How Does Haas Make This Claim And Get Away With It?

  • Follow


See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
0
Reply jon_banquer 12/12/2008 12:56:32 AM

Barnard Rubble... kicked me to the curb where I belong yet again.

Barnard Rubble  joins the likes of James Meyette, Tom Brewer, Joe 788,
John Carroll, Pete Logghe, and recently Bottlebob who prove on a
constant basis how superior they are to me.

Only a complete genius like Barnard Rubble would try to belittle me
with his superior knowledge over me and succeed time and time again.

Barnard Rubble has tried to post comments to my blog and I can't
"publish" them because it would show how superior he is compared to
me.

Barnard Rubble has gotten others to see what an idiot I am and now
they won't post comments on my blogs.

Barnard Rubble got my blog removed and I don't know how he did it.

Barnard Rubble has contributed more to alt.machines.cnc and
comp.cad.solidworks than me because his skills are far superior to
mine.

Barnard Rubble has been quoted by fellow geniuses like James Meyette
and Matt Lombard and I'm jealous.

For over ten years I=92ve shown that Barnard Rubble is superior to me
everytime I post.

When they come as stupid as me, its not really hard work to show how
dumb and stupid I am on a constant basis.


Jon Banquer...aka...Larry Loser

BridgeHermit, Ca
0
Reply barn_rubble 12/12/2008 4:26:24 AM


See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/12/2008 4:44:02 AM

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:56:32 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

  http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/does-haas-lie-and-get-away-with-it/

>Jon Banquer
>San Diego, CA
>http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

  This problem is caused because you are an idiot.

  http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/does-haas-lie-and-get-away-with-it/

  You don't know what torque is nor HP & I suspect
even RPM confuses you.
  You don't begin to grasp machining or machines either,
much less simple shop math.
  From:
http://haasportal.net/Portals/57ad7180-c5e7-49f5-b282-c6475cdb7ee7/DS_MMseries_US_7_2008.pdf
  "33 ft-lb @ 1,200 rpm"
  33*1,200/5252 = 7.5399847677075399847677075399848 HP

  IF you are not at 1,200 RPM you need to look at the torque curve
to find the available HP at specific RPM.
  You probably get the max product of torque & RPM at 1,200 RPM
on that machine (which is max HP too)

  YOU are at 6,000 RPM, idiot. That's max RPM on that
machine & thus probably MINIMUM torque/torque-RPM product. 
  Manual probably has the torque curve (or power curve)  (but with 
your reading comprehension problems PLUS all the shop math ones ....)

  Idiot.

  PS - Thanks again for drooling all over your blob.
-- 
Cliff
0
Reply Cliff 12/12/2008 12:48:48 PM

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:56:32 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

  http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/does-haas-lie-and-get-away-with-it/

>Jon Banquer
>San Diego, CA
>http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

  This problem is caused because you are an idiot.

  http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/does-haas-lie-and-get-away-with-it/

  You don't know what torque is nor HP & I suspect
even RPM confuses you.
  You don't begin to grasp machining or machines either,
much less simple shop math.
  From:
http://haasportal.net/Portals/57ad7180-c5e7-49f5-b282-c6475cdb7ee7/DS_MMseries_US_7_2008.pdf
  "33 ft-lb @ 1,200 rpm"
  33*1,200/5252 = 7.5399847677075399847677075399848 HP

  IF you are not at 1,200 RPM you need to look at the torque curve
to find the available HP at specific RPM.
  You probably get the max product of torque & RPM at 1,200 RPM
on that machine (which is max HP too)

  YOU are at 6,000 RPM, idiot. That's max RPM on that
machine & thus probably MINIMUM torque/torque-RPM product. 
  Manual probably has the torque curve (or power curve)  (but with 
your reading comprehension problems PLUS all the shop math ones ....)

  Idiot.

  PS - Thanks again for drooling all over your blob.
-- 
Cliff
0
Reply Cliff 12/12/2008 2:13:15 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/12/2008 2:15:59 PM

On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:15:59 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

  Or look here: http://tinyurl.com/yjm842
  Or here: http://tinyurl.com/5zhej6
-- 
Cliff
0
Reply Cliff 12/12/2008 6:37:58 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for comment and response.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
0
Reply jon_banquer 12/13/2008 5:20:44 AM

On Dec 12, 4:48=A0am, Cliff <Clhupr...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:56:32 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banq...@yahoo.=
com>
> wrote:
>
> >See the Jon Banquer blog for details:
>
> =A0http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/does-haas-lie-and-get-away-with-it/
>
> >Jon Banquer
> >San Diego, CA
> >http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
>
> =A0 This problem is caused because you are an idiot.
>
> =A0http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/does-haas-lie-and-get-away-with-it/
>
> =A0 You don't know what torque is nor HP & I suspect
> even RPM confuses you.
> =A0 You don't begin to grasp machining or machines either,
> much less simple shop math.
> =A0 From:http://haasportal.net/Portals/57ad7180-c5e7-49f5-b282-c6475cdb7e=
e7/DS...
> =A0 "33 ft-lb @ 1,200 rpm"
> =A0 33*1,200/5252 =3D 7.5399847677075399847677075399848 HP
>
> =A0 IF you are not at 1,200 RPM you need to look at the torque curve
> to find the available HP at specific RPM.
> =A0 You probably get the max product of torque & RPM at 1,200 RPM
> on that machine (which is max HP too)
>
> =A0 YOU are at 6,000 RPM, idiot. That's max RPM on that
> machine & thus probably MINIMUM torque/torque-RPM product.
> =A0 Manual probably has the torque curve (or power curve) =A0(but with
> your reading comprehension problems PLUS all the shop math ones ....)
>
> =A0 Idiot.
>
> =A0 PS - Thanks again for drooling all over your blob.
> --
> Cliff

I explained this to him last time he blabbered about it. I told him
exactly where the HP is.

For how much he brags about his employer, you'd think they'd perhaps
have some better equipment. Ya know, maybe something that doesn't
stall on a 2hp cut, or drop tools out of the carousel. Then again,
things do get kind of skewed working in a not-for-profit shop.

0
Reply Joe788 12/13/2008 5:50:48 AM

Barnard Rubble... kicked me to the curb where I belong yet again.

Barnard Rubble  joins the likes of James Meyette, Tom Brewer, Joe 788,
John Carroll, Pete Logghe, and recently Bottlebob who prove on a
constant basis how superior they are to me.

Only a complete genius like Barnard Rubble would try to belittle me
with his superior knowledge over me and succeed time and time again.

Barnard Rubble has tried to post comments to my blog and I can't
"publish" them because it would show how superior he is compared to
me.

Barnard Rubble has gotten others to see what an idiot I am and now
they won't post comments on my blogs.

Barnard Rubble got my blog removed and I don't know how he did it.

Barnard Rubble has contributed more to alt.machines.cnc and
comp.cad.solidworks than me because his skills are far superior to
mine.

Barnard Rubble has been quoted by fellow geniuses like James Meyette
and Matt Lombard and I'm jealous.

For over ten years I=92ve shown that Barnard Rubble is superior to me
everytime I post.

When they come as stupid as me, its not really hard work toshow how
dumb and stupid I am on a constant basis.


Jon Banquer...aka...Larry Loser

BridgeHermit, Ca
0
Reply barn_rubble 12/13/2008 5:56:37 AM

See the Jon Banquer blog for comment and response.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/13/2008 6:09:13 AM

See the Jon Banquer blog for comment and response.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/13/2008 7:06:32 AM

On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:20:44 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>See the Jon Banquer blog for comment and response.

  "You should do some research into how machine tools deliver power, and the
relationship between hp, torque and rpm, before claiming a published spec for a
machine is incorrect"

  <Snicker>
-- 
Cliff
0
Reply Cliff 12/13/2008 11:10:46 AM

On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:50:48 -0800 (PST), Joe788 <joemama788@aol.com> wrote:

>On Dec 12, 4:48�am, Cliff <Clhupr...@aol.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:56:32 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banq...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >See the Jon Banquer blog for details:
>>
>> �http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/does-haas-lie-and-get-away-with-it/
>>
>> >Jon Banquer
>> >San Diego, CA
>> >http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
>>
>> � This problem is caused because you are an idiot.
>>
>> �http://jonbanquer.wordpress.com/does-haas-lie-and-get-away-with-it/
>>
>> � You don't know what torque is nor HP & I suspect
>> even RPM confuses you.
>> � You don't begin to grasp machining or machines either,
>> much less simple shop math.
>> � From:http://haasportal.net/Portals/57ad7180-c5e7-49f5-b282-c6475cdb7ee7/DS...
>> � "33 ft-lb @ 1,200 rpm"
>> � 33*1,200/5252 = 7.5399847677075399847677075399848 HP
>>
>> � IF you are not at 1,200 RPM you need to look at the torque curve
>> to find the available HP at specific RPM.
>> � You probably get the max product of torque & RPM at 1,200 RPM
>> on that machine (which is max HP too)
>>
>> � YOU are at 6,000 RPM, idiot. That's max RPM on that
>> machine & thus probably MINIMUM torque/torque-RPM product.
>> � Manual probably has the torque curve (or power curve) �(but with
>> your reading comprehension problems PLUS all the shop math ones ....)
>>
>> � Idiot.
>>
>> � PS - Thanks again for drooling all over your blob.
>> --
>> Cliff
>
>I explained this to him last time he blabbered about it. I told him
>exactly where the HP is.

  In this case I found out that the max is actually at ~ 1500 RPM with
~ 8.5 HP.

  He's been told about HP & torque several times by several 
people but it never sinks in.

>For how much he brags about his employer, you'd think they'd perhaps
>have some better equipment. Ya know, maybe something that doesn't
>stall on a 2hp cut, or drop tools out of the carousel. Then again,
>things do get kind of skewed working in a not-for-profit shop.

  But he had the lube off, right?

  It's his broom. He's not even an operator as far as I 
can see.
-- 
Cliff
0
Reply Cliff 12/13/2008 11:16:25 AM

jon_banquer wrote:
> See the Jon Banquer blog for details:
> 
> Jon Banquer
> San Diego, CA
> http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
0
Reply TOP 12/13/2008 3:28:39 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for comment and response.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/13/2008 3:50:28 PM

On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:28:39 -0500, TOP <kellnerp@cbd.net> wrote:

>jon_banquer wrote:

  Did jb have to move again?
-- 
Cliff
0
Reply Cliff 12/13/2008 5:44:57 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for comment and response.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/14/2008 7:20:04 AM

On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:20:04 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>See the Jon Banquer blog 

  "You should do some research into how machine tools deliver power, and the
relationship between hp, torque and rpm, before claiming a published spec for a
machine is incorrect"
0
Reply Cliff 12/14/2008 10:10:32 AM

See the Jon Banquer blog for comment and response.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/14/2008 3:50:16 PM

The Jon Banquer Blog is the most read CAM-centric blog on the web and
I'm just getting started!

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/


0
Reply P 12/16/2008 1:48:46 AM

See the Jon Banquer blog for comment and response.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/16/2008 6:53:05 AM

On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:48:46 -0500, "P Sevin - SBC" <psevin2@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

>The Jon Banquer Blog 

  "You should do some research into how machine tools deliver power, and the
relationship between hp, torque and rpm, before claiming a published spec for a
machine is incorrect"
0
Reply Cliff 12/16/2008 11:38:36 AM

See the Jon Banquer blog for comment and response.

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/16/2008 2:49:35 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/17/2008 3:15:52 PM

On Dec 17, 7:15 am, jon_banquer <jon_banq...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> See the Jon Banquer blog for details:
>
> Jon Banquer
> San Diego, CAhttp://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

Jon, how did Barn's wordpress blog get 7500 hits in 8 hours? I thought
you said it couldn't be done? How much you want to bet that he has
more views than you by the end of today?

So the question is, were you lying, or were you just that clueless? I
guess it really doesn't matter....
0
Reply Joe788 12/17/2008 3:39:55 PM

On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:15:52 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>See the Jon Banquer

  "You should do some research into how machine tools deliver power, and the
relationship between hp, torque and rpm, before claiming a published spec for a
machine is incorrect"
0
Reply Cliff 12/17/2008 4:13:41 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/19/2008 2:54:33 PM

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:54:33 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

  "You should do some research into how machine tools deliver power, and the
relationship between hp, torque and rpm, before claiming a published spec for a
machine is incorrect"
0
Reply Cliff 12/19/2008 6:17:41 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/20/2008 4:13:22 PM

On Dec 20, 8:13 am, jon_banquer <jon_banq...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> See the Jon Banquer blog for details:
>
> Jon Banquer
> San Diego, CAhttp://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

Spambot.
0
Reply Joe788 12/20/2008 4:36:53 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
0
Reply jon_banquer 12/20/2008 4:53:39 PM

On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:53:39 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

  Does it not have the quoted Max Torque of
33 ft-lb at 1,200 RPM?

  Yes or no.

  Is that or is that not 7.5 HP?

  Yes or no.

  You don't have a clue what any of it is about.
  That's clear to everybody but you.
-- 
Cliff
0
Reply Cliff 12/20/2008 6:10:02 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/29/2008 6:33:34 AM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
0
Reply jon_banquer 12/29/2008 5:23:57 PM

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:23:57 -0800 (PST), jon_banquer <jon_banquer@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

  "You should do some research into how machine tools deliver power, and the
relationship between hp, torque and rpm, before claiming a published spec for a
machine is incorrect"
0
Reply Cliff 12/29/2008 7:11:45 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/30/2008 12:41:45 AM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/30/2008 1:32:27 AM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 12/30/2008 7:42:36 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 1/2/2009 4:37:43 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
0
Reply jon_banquer 1/3/2009 2:39:34 PM

See the Jon Banquer blog for details:

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/

0
Reply jon_banquer 1/5/2009 5:20:04 AM

41 Replies
314 Views

(page loaded in 0.452 seconds)

Similiar Articles:


















7/23/2012 7:37:26 PM


Reply: