COMPGROUPS.NET | Search | Post Question | Groups | Stream | About | Register

### complexity of CALIC and JPEG-LS

• Email
• Follow

```These 2 are good in lossless compression.

what are thir computational complexity especially in the context modelling
part.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 2003/11/25

```
 0

See related articles to this posting

0 Replies
254 Views

Similar Articles

12/8/2013 5:30:41 AM
page loaded in 56592 ms. (0)

Similar Artilces:

Complexity of medfilt2
We've got some computing time issues while invoking medfilt2. I spent successfully some time on finding several approaches for optimizing exactly this operation. Unfortunately, this information is kind of useless as I cannot find the complexity (or the implementation's basic approach) for the Matlab medfilt2 function. Has anybody got any idea what the Matlab implementation's performance might be or alternatively, what algorithm it is based on?! (The documentation does not contain any of these information, nor can I find alternative implementations on File Exchange).

FFT complexity
hi, If the number of input data for my FFT block is N=m+k, m data are non zero and k data are zero, how much is the order of computational complexity of my FFT block? As you know if all inputs were non zero it will be O(N/2*logN) but how about if I know that k of these N inputs are zero? Regards On Aug 16, 10:37=A0am, "ahmadagha23" <ahmadagha23@n_o_s_p_a_m.yahoo.com> wrote: > hi, > If the number of input data for my FFT block is N=3Dm+k, m data are non z= ero > and k data are zero, how much is the order of computational complexity of > my FFT block... data are zero, how much is the order of computational complexity of >> my FFT block? As you know if all inputs were non zero it will be >> O(N/2*logN) but how about if I know that k of these N inputs are zero? >> Regards > i don't have my O&S handy at the moment. i can't remember if there > are radix-2 forms (Decimation-in-Time or Frequency) that begin with > "little" butterflys (that use their neighboring bins) and do not bit- > reverse the data going in, but if there are such forms, you would be > able to write code that does

Complexity of Appromixate String Matching
Dear All, Does someone know what is the best theoretical complexity in the literature, as O(f(N)), where N is the number of rows in a table t and where approximate string matching on some field in t is to be done. I am not asking about the complexity of a single approximate match between 2 strings with lengths n and m, but on the cost of the lookup over the entire table. In other words, what is the cost of the following, in terms of N, the number of rows in t: SELECT * FROM t WHERE APPROXIMATELY_EQUAL(t.a, threshold) I thank you in advance for any feedback. Best Regards, Walid Saba On 2011-01-18, PRAGMATECH <walid.saba@gmail.com> wrote: [ Selecting all rows having some approximately matching string field ] > Does someone know what is the best theoretical complexity in the > literature, as O(f(N)), where N is the number of rows in a table t > and where approximate string matching on some field in t is to be > done. Surely the complexity will also depend upon string length and threshold? Are these assumed to be bounded above by some constant, or does your computational model make them irrelevant? It can't be less than O(N), since (in the absence

Reinforcement Learning Algorithms Complexity
What is the complexity of RL learning algorithms (for example: Q-learning, Q(lambda)-learning) etc.? Thanks, Uri. http://www.compactech.com/kartoun/ "kartoun" <kartoun@gmail.com> wrote in news:1162473685.806493.194310 @b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com: > What is the complexity of RL learning algorithms (for example: > Q-learning, Q(lambda)-learning) etc.? > > Thanks, > > Uri. > > http://www.compactech.com/kartoun/ > > Since most RL algorithms are based on a set of linear equations for updating cost/gain state variables, the complexity is roughly O(KM), were M is the max number of terms in any of the linear equations, and K is the total number of (linear) equations, usually the same as the number of distinct actions. Note, however, that this is the computational complexity for each update cycle, not the whole convergence process. Since most RL systems closely resemble an ARMA(a,b) linear system, any "AR" term (i.e. feedback) makes the system -asymptotically- stable. This means that, if the environment remains stationary for a long time, the RL system converges to its optimal performance asymptotically, i.e.

Search 1D Array complexity
Hi, all,Can someone please tell me the order-of-magnitude complexity of the "Search 1D Array" VI in the number of elements of the array?I'd expect O(log n) but wanted to confirm that for a fact.Thanks,- Steve.Message Edited by SPM on 06-23-2008 09:30 AM I think the LabVIEW Help has the answer for you:Search 1D ArraySearches for an element in a 1D array starting at start index. Because the search is linear, you need not sort the array before calling this function. LabVIEW stops searching as soon as the element is found.Note that the search is linear.Message Edited... where the "seven searches" comes from, but binary search on a sorted array is O(log n). I'm just used to the OO standard libraries and would prefer not to implement it myself if LV already does it for me somewhere. (Most OO language standard libraries have some sort of an O(log n) lookup via a height-balanced tree or hash table, with O(log n) complexity for insertion and deletion.)Thanks,- Steve.EDIT: Thanks, Altenbach! Since I only have to sort the array once in its lifetime, this will do it. -S.Message Edited by SPM on 06-23-2008 10:21 AM Of course if you sort the array first

Essay on Complexity in Programming Languages?
Hello, I'm looking for general reading material, related to this http://biharmonic.org/czero/archives/000203.html, specifically, something on how markup and general programming languages tend to become more and more general/complex over time. Or on the design of domain specific markup languages. I'm not a comp. sci. major, just an amateur programmer, so adjust recommendations accordingly :) Thanks, Alex

Q: Proving time complexity
How would one go about proving the following: For any two numbers a and b, a > b > 1, it is not the case that a^n is O(b^n). What's the procedure for proving that something is _not_ ordo of something else. Just reversing the case and proving that b^n is O(a^n) for instance wouldn't prove the claim since it still would be possible that a^n is O(b^n)...?! Best regards, Smalmatskungen In article <2qs10mF1333e5U1@uni-berlin.de>, reply.to@group.please says... > How would one go about proving the following: > > For any two numbers a and b, a > b > 1, >

time complexity of positive definiteness
Hello, For a non-symmetric square matrix of size n x n. What is the time complexity of finding out whether the matrix is positive definite or not. Also, which would be the fastest, in terms of time complexity, to compute the same in matlab I want to know the answer for finding singularity of a matrix too. Which would be the fastest in terms of the time complexity of n and how fast will it be? Thanks, Dilip

Question on complexity classes
I have a relatively brief/simple questions about complexity classes. Any answers would be greatly appreciated. Are there any languages that are outside of NP that are not NP-hard? On Jan 7, 7:41=A0pm, cplxp...@gmail.com wrote: > I have a relatively brief/simple questions about complexity classes. > Any answers would be greatly appreciated. > > Are there any languages that are outside of NP that are not NP-hard? Oops, I forgot to write my second question (I had two). Are there any languages outside of PSPACE that are not PSPACE-hard? Maybe a good general question is: Given a complexity class X, does there exist a language outside of X that is not X-hard? Thanks again. -Phil

Heapsort Complexity Analysis
Heapsort worst case complexity is obviously nLogN. However, what's the best case complexity? Can we consider that the siftup(fixup) & siftdown(fixdown) operations will be done in constant time, so the complexity of heapsort would be n? Is this correct - if not what's the best case scenario for heapsort? In comp.lang.c++ Gr <g@g.com> wrote: > Heapsort worst case complexity is obviously nLogN. > However, what's the best case complexity? Every time the smallest (iow. first) element of the heap is removed, the heap needs to be re-heapified, which is always a log(n) operation. You need to do this n times. On Sep 27, 1:22=A0am, Gr <g...@g.com> wrote: > Heapsort worst case complexity is obviously nLogN. > However, what's the best case complexity? > Can we consider that the siftup(fixup) & siftdown(fixdown) operations > will be done in constant time, so the complexity of heapsort would be n? > Is this correct - if not what's the best case scenario for heapsort? There are n! ways of ordering the input. Discovering the order of the input is equivalent to sorting. (That is, if you know the order of the input, it's