Can someone give me a brief rundown of using tabs in FM 8 and why they
seem not to be able to be scripted.
Is it not possible to write a script that automatically selects the
layout and a specifc number tab, or a tab with a specific name?
Anyone know if this is a simple thing FM might add in an update?
Is there a plug-in that can deal with this shortcoming?
Thanks.
David Averbach
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
averbach (17)
|
3/29/2006 6:08:37 AM |
|
On 28 Mar 2006 22:08:37 -0800, "davey" <averbach@mac.com> wrote:
>Can someone give me a brief rundown of using tabs in FM 8 and why they
>seem not to be able to be scripted.
Don't know
>Is it not possible to write a script that automatically selects the
>layout...
Using tabs, you are on the same layout throughout all tabs. Tabs
should not take the place of different layouts if they are needed -
they just help organize the layout you are on, a space thing.
If you want the tab control to act as if it were scripted, you can
draw a rectangle with transparent line and fill on top of it and treat
it like any other button you can script.
>...and a specifc number tab, or a tab with a specific name?
The way I do this is to add a Go To Field script step at the end of my
script and make the target field a field that is on the tab you want
the user to be on when the script is finished.
>Anyone know if this is a simple thing FM might add in an update?
We can onbly hope!
>Is there a plug-in that can deal with this shortcoming?
I have never looked for one - I have only done the above. There are
some other tab examples at:
http://www.24usoftware.com/TabControl
Good Luck!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
VoicesInMyHead
a.k.a. The Voices
No, we're not... Yes, we are...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
VoicesInMyHead
|
3/29/2006 1:34:05 PM
|
|
Also, check out the thread from March 22nd titled "FMPro8 Tabs"...
that has some useful info in it too!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
VoicesInMyHead
a.k.a. The Voices
No, we're not... Yes, we are...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
VoicesInMyHead
|
3/29/2006 1:43:06 PM
|
|