MicroSoft SQL Server 2000, Service Pack 2, AppDev SQL Server 2000 Accelerated Training [3 CDs], TransTrainer for Designing Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Databases v1.1, SQL Server 2000 Reporting Ser
MicroSoft SQL Server 2000, Service Pack 2, AppDev SQL Server 2000
Accelerated Training [3 CDs], TransTrainer for Designing Microsoft SQL
Server 2000 Databases v1.1, SQL Server 2000 Reporting Services,
(Enterprise), Developer Edition 64 Bit, other 16,000 more CDs, [ no
dongles, no activations, etc ... needed ! ] (free donge)! No time
CD NR 4203 MicroSoft SQL Server 2000 4in1
CD NR 9452 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Service Pack 2
CD NR 11 298 AppDev SQL Server 2000 Accelerated Training [3 CDs]
CD NR 12 000 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Developer Edition 64 Bit
CD NR 13 424 TransTrainer for Designing Microsoft SQL Server 2000
CD NR 14 688 SQL Server 2000 Reporting Services (c) Microsoft
CD NR 15 412 SQL Server 2000 Reporting Services Enterprise (c)
please send e-mail, to firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
...Using MS SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Manager with MS SQL Server 2000
Most of our MS SQL Servers are still running on SQL 2000, but being I
will soon be upgrading my workstation to Vista Business I'd like to
install MS SQL 2005 Enterprise Manager to manage them all. When I
tried to install MS SQL 2000 Enterprise Manager on Vista, it gave me a
message saying it's not compatible, so I'll have to use 2005 I guess.
We have LOTS of DTS scripts on our SQL 2000 server, and will 2005 EM
work with these okay? Also I want to make sure SQL 2005 Enterprise
Manager won't be adding to, changing, or 'upgrading' the DTS scripts or
anythi...MS SQL Server 2000 and MS JDBC SQL Server driver problems. (Connection timed out, followed by Error establishing socket)
I have downloaded the MS SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Evaluation edition, and
the MS SQL 2000 Server JDBC driver.
I have installed and configured the MS SQL Server 2000 onto two computers,
which reside on the same network. (In fact, these two computers comprise
the entire network).
The network server (computer name=SUNCDS1), and the lone node (SUNCDS2),
each have their own SQL Server 2000 instance.
The SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Manager console on SUNCDS1 shows both SQL
Server instances, the (local) instance, which is SUNCDS1, and also SUNCDS2.
It may be worthwhile to mention that the SUNCDS2 instance on the Enterprise
console does not show the SQL Server Agent as being started, but I can
navigate to the SUNCDS2 databases, and display the table information. If I
try to start the SQL Server Agent for SUNCDS2, I receive the message "Access
is Denied". The enterprise console on the SUNCDS2 machine indeed shows the
SQL Server Agent as being started.
I have written a sample Java application that uses both the MS SQL Server
ODBC driver and a JDBC type 4 driver (MS SQL Server 2000 JDBC) to establish
a connection to the SUNCDS2 instance. This application resides on the
SUNCDS1 network server. The ODBC driver will connect to SUNCDS2 instance
wihout a problem.
The JDBC driver does not connect to SUNCDS2. The JDBC driver will, however,
connect to the local SQL Server instance that resides on SUNCDS1.
Following are the code snippet to est...Can SQL Server 2005 Express and SQL Server 2005 be installed on same machine?
I am interested in installing both SQL Server 2005 Express and SQL Server
2005 b2 on the same machine. Can they both be installed on the same machine
without conflicts? As in two different instances?
John Dalberg <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:<email@example.com>...
> I am interested in installing both SQL Server 2005 Express and SQL Server
> 2005 b2 on the same machine. Can they both be installed on the same machine
> without conflicts? As in two different instances?
> John Dalberg
From what I understand of the...Upgrade SQL Server 2000 Failover Cluster from SP3 to SP4
I have a production failover cluster running SQL Server 2000 at SP3
that I want to upgrade to SP4. I do not have a test failover cluster
to test with so I need the install on the primary server to work the
first time. Per the information I have I just install the patch on the
primary server and it will install both on the primary and on the
However, I remember when I did the initial install and it failed. The
first problem traced to the fact that the install uses temporary files
under the profile of the installing administrator and the id had never
logged into the second server ...Multiples Instance of SQL server 2000/SQL server 7.0 on Windows server 2003
Is it possible to install on a Windows server 2003,
SQL SERVER 2000 in the folowing configuration :
SQL server 7.0 as a default Instance
SQL server 2000 as a named instance.
Thanks for your answer.
riless (firstname.lastname@example.org) writes:
> Is it possible to install on a Windows server 2003,
> SQL SERVER 2000 in the folowing configuration :
> SQL server 7.0 as a default Instance
> SQL server 2000 as a named instance.
If SQL 7 can be installed on Win2003, yes. But I would not really
expect SQL 7 to be welcome on Windows 2003, although I don't...Why upgrade to MS SQL Server (be it 2000 or 2005) from Access (say, 97)?
Probably this question has been asked hundreds of times and yet net
search has not generated satisfactory enough answer, at least, to me.
And OK, let's assume your organization has more than 200 employees,
just one measure to indicate that it's not small and data processing
needs are quite extensive (for both OLTP and OLAP).
We've heard so much about concurrency support, stability and
performance. Are there any real persuasive paper out there to talk
about it? Now, let me also put it in another perspective, say, you're
a Microsoft sql server sales guy or gal for that matte...Explicitly fail a SQL Server Job in SQL Server 2000
I have a SQL Server job, which runs mutiple steps. One of the steps
(step 3) looks for a record in the database. How can I explicitly fail
the SQL server job if the database record does not exist?
You can use RAISERROR with a severity level of 11 or higher to indicate
Thanks Simon. That worked.
...Problem with casting value under 64-bit sql server 2005 vs under 32-bit sql server 2005
I have a strange problem when casting value under 64-bit sql server
2005 vs under 32-bit sql server 2005.
I got two servers. One has 32-bit SQL server 2005 standard edition
(version 9.00.3073.00) on Windows NT 5.2 (3790) with NT INTEL x86.
The second server has 64-bit SQL server Enterprise edition (version
9.00.4035.00) on Windows NT 5.2 (3790) with NT AMD64.
The problem came when I tried to cast value under 32-bit SQL server
2005, the result gets queried out. But when the same sql got run, it
prompted conversion error - "Error converting data type varchar to
numeric." under the 64-bit server.
I tried cleaned up the data and it still gives the same error.
Thanks in advance.
> Hello -
> I have a strange problem when casting value under 64-bit sql server
> 2005 vs under 32-bit sql server 2005.
> I got two servers. One has 32-bit SQL server 2005 standard edition
> (version 9.00.3073.00) on Windows NT 5.2 (3790) with NT INTEL x86.
> The second server has 64-bit SQL server Enterprise edition (version
> 9.00.4035.00) on Windows NT 5.2 (3790) with NT AMD64.
> The problem came when I tried to cast value under 32-bit SQL server
> 2005, the result gets queried out. But when the same sql got run, it
> prompted conversion error - "Error converting data type varchar to
> numeric." under the 64-bit server.
> I tried cleaned up the data and it still gives the same error.
&g...Access database(Jet Engine) and SQL Server or SQL Server express
I am trying to find out what are the big differences between access
database Jet engine and SQL Server? If I have serveral web
applications (same content different copies) running as different
sites(on IIS), each site using an access as a back-end database, all
sites will be running simultaneously, all the access databases are on
the same machine, on this approach, does each copy of access has its
own Jet engine to handle database transaction or only has one Jet
engine with multiple threads handles multiple copies of access
database. Also, I'd like to know what kind database, and database
engines are used by big sites such as Yahoo, Hotmail, MSN, etc, and
what are the good database structures for the hosting applications
that deal with huge,complex information and large number of users.
Thanks a lot, your time and help are highly appreciated.
On 13 Sep 2004 18:37:35 -0700, email@example.com (Leon) wrote:
I think there is only one instance of Jet running. You can check this
using Task Manager.
More than likely you don't have to worry about Yahoo et al. They take
many orders of magnitude more traffic then yours. One thing for sure:
they are not using an Access back-end :-)
> I am trying to find out what are the big differences between access
>database Jet engine and SQL Server? If I have serveral web
>applications (same content different copies) running as different
>sites(on IIS), each site using an access as a back-end database...Setting a SQL Server-wide Block timeout for SQL Server 2005
I'm new at SQL Server 2005, and am having quite a number of problems
with blocked deadlocks at the moment.
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/tips/blocking_p1.aspx says that
"By default, blocking locks do not time out. The waiting connection
waits until the lock is released, and the block is over. If you like,
you can set a lock time-out so that a connection does not wait
indefinitely for the blocking lock to be released. This is
accomplished using the LOCK_TIMEOUT setting."
I'm wondering if there is an easy setting on the SQL Server Management
Studio Express, or anywhere on SQL Server where I can set a server-
wide/database-wide/table-wide LOCK_TIMEOUT setting, without having the
change the existing applications accessing the server.
cwho80 (firstname.lastname@example.org) writes:
> I'm new at SQL Server 2005, and am having quite a number of problems
> with blocked deadlocks at the moment.
> http://www.sql-server-performance.com/tips/blocking_p1.aspx says that
> "By default, blocking locks do not time out. The waiting connection
> waits until the lock is released, and the block is over. If you like,
> you can set a lock time-out so that a connection does not wait
> indefinitely for the blocking lock to be released. This is
> accomplished using the LOCK_TIMEOUT setting."
> I'm wondering if there is an easy setting on the SQL Server Management
> Studio Express, or anywhere on SQL Server wher...SQL server replication from non-clustered database servers
Being a bit of a SQL Server novice, need some advice with the following
Server A and Server B have SQLServer 2000 based databases. The vendor
of the application/system has implemented their own replication process
to ensure the 2 databases are in sync. However, there is no clustering
with virtual IP addresses implemented. So to an external client/db, it
is 2 identical databases with the same name on 2 distinct servers.
We need to develop an application that will reside on a networked
server C and with SQLServer 2000 as well. While most of the tables in
this database are self contained, around 10 tables will have to be
mirror copies of the same tables from either Server A or Server B.
Question, how do we implement subscription based replication on top of
a redundant database, when no clustering is implemented? So, in
essence, when Server A is alive, the database on Server C will
periodically (or on change) replicate the 10 tables from Server A. When
Server A is not alive, it needs to do same from server B. (When both
server A and B are alive, it is acceptable to get data from either,
since they are synchronized internally).
Any alternate suggestions on achieving this functionality are welcome
too. If SQL Server 2005 has some capabilities that may address this
problem, that is a consideration as well.
Pls take a look at Alternate Synchronization Partners in merge replication.
On SQL Server 2005 you might consider peer-to-peer transactional
repl...Copy databases from SQL 2005 server to SQL Express
Two Windows 2003 server,
one with SQL 2005 server,
another with SQL Express.
Is it possible to copy databases from SQL 2005 to SQL Express?
Thanks (Thanks@work.com) writes:
> Two Windows 2003 server,
> one with SQL 2005 server,
> another with SQL Express.
> Is it possible to copy databases from SQL 2005 to SQL Express?
Yes, but I don't think you can use the Copy Database Wizard, but you will
have to do it by hand. Which is not very difficult anyway.
On source machine backup database, and make note of the logical
filenames. (You see these with sp_helpdb).
...MS SQL Server 2005
I am currently running SQL Server 2005 on a stand alone (not a domain
member) Windows Server 2003, this server was installed during setup
using local user accounts as service accounts.
As far as I recall at the time everything, including the SQL agent
functioned normally. At this time, the server itself still seems to
be running fine, however the SQL Agent service will not start.
I can not be sure as up until recently we haven't really been using
the SQL Agent, however I believe the problem would have started around
the time that service pack 1 was installed.
The following is the event...move/copy database objects from SQL Server Express to SQL Server Standard??
Can anyone refer me to good 'recipes' or sources of information on this
I have Visual Studio Tools for Office, which installs SS 2005 Express
locally to my XP box, and I want to develop in SS 2005, then copy the
tables or queries or reports etc. to a SS 2005 Standard server.
Thank you, Tom
If the objects are on source code control you may just want to check out the
scripts and run them through SQLCMD.
If you want the whole database then you can either use backup/restore or
sp_detach_db/sp_attach_db, failing that you could use the import/export
wizard, If SQLExpr...Installing MS sql server 2000 on win 2003 server
How do I do this when my instalation cd is an old veriosn with no SP�s? Win
2003 requires MS SQL 2000 SP3 sp what do I do???
> When you get the prompt saying that it must be SP3 you can continue to the
> end of the installation as per normal. You should then install SP3
> immediately before you do anything else. SP3a can be download from the
> microsoft web site.
Actually not. It says:
Ms SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Ediditon server componenet is not supportet on
this operating system. Only client componentes will be avaible for
I juts read that bef...can not connect to linked sql server 2000 from sql 2005
I have sql2005 db (main) on one network and sql2000 (bogus) on the
other, both are under W'2003, both servers see each other over tcp/ip.
I need to link bogus sql2000 to main sql2005, so I would execute query
on main and read bogus data.
This is my script to add linked server:
@server = N'BOGUS',
EXEC master.dbo.sp_addlinkedsrvlogin N'BOGUS', N'false', NULL,
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'BOGUS', @optname=N'collation
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'BOGUS', @optname=N'data
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'BOGUS', @optname=N'rpc',
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'BOGUS', @optname=N'rpc out',
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'BOGUS', @optname=N'sub',
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'BOGUS', @optname=N'connect
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'BOGUS', @optname=N'collation
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'BOGUS', @optname=N...Access2003
This is the vba code
Set db =3D CurrentDb
On error goto fErr
strSql =3D "UPDATE tblInvAnalysisWhse" & _
" SET ltDeviation =3D " & Sqr(dblError /
intPeriods) & _
" WHERE item =3D '" & Trim(strItem) & "'" & _
" AND location =3D " & intLocation
dblCount =3D dblCount + 1
db.Execute strSql, dbFailOnError
db.execute always fails after 1246 iterations, with
- [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Timeout
expired ,ODBC.Database ,0
- ODBC--update on a linked table 'tblInvAnalysisWhse'
failed. ,DAO.Database ,3157
'tblInvAnalysisWhse=92 has 107,000+ records, and is a linked sql server
Columns item & location are indexed
Strsql on failure is
SET ltDeviation =3D 9
WHERE item =3D 'P103 L25348' AND location =3D 21
If I try to execute the UPDATE statement in sql server, it never
completes (> 8 mins and running)
There=92s nothing in the sql server logs
And my process only has 20 object locks
Until I 'stop' running the ms-access function, and then the sql server
statement completes immediately
Of course, all the locks are gone
so the problem has to do with locks
So what do I need to do, in a vba loop, to free up my sql server locks
after each update statement ?
create a tran...Help! Sql Server 2005 kicked my Sql Server 7's You-Know-What
Life is not good.
So I've got a machine that I do some development work on, nothing
major, but I'd like to keep some things intact. I'm running SQL Server
7, it's an old installation, but it works and I've got a number of
databases on it.
So I see the new 2005 Express downloads and I download the Web
Developer edition, install it, it installs 2005, but my SQL Server 7
installation now seems to be hosed.
The SQL Server Service Manager still shows SQL Server 7 starting and
running, but the Enterprise Manager can no longer connect, it gives a
vague "General Error"...Database link to a MS SQL Server 2000
we have to replikate some data between an oracle DB and an application with MS SQL Server.
There is no possibility to load and push the data on the client mashine. We have to replicate the data on the server mashines
Is there a possibility to create a DB link from oracle to MS SQL Server or otherwise?
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 00:13:02 +0200, "Abbas" <email@example.com>
>we have to replikate some data between an oracle DB and an application with MS SQL Server.
>There is no possibility to load and push the data on the client mashine. We have to replicate the data on the server mashines
>Is there a possibility to create a DB link from oracle to MS SQL Server or otherwise?
Look into using Heterogeneous Services in your Net administrators
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
Are you willing to install a bridge program to create this "link"? If
so, then try www.examinstudio.com
Do as Sybrand told you, look at the Heterogenous services of Oracle.
Oracle even supports natively DRDA towards a DB2 z/OS mainframe,
and they also support SQL Server. They all end-up like a database link
with a totally quallified names in the "from" clause.
Be aware of that distributed joins between different DBMS systems
might cause huge performance problems, keep the functionality
when dealing with multiple DBMS systems simple, no dist...Using SQL Server IP for non-sql uses on a failover cluster
At my organization, users have started to use the virtual address
created when SQL Server is installed on a failover cluster for non-SQL
I have always created an cluster IP resource in addition to the SQL
cluster IP resource for non-SQL access to the server (like for mapping
What is the impact on SQL Server if people use the SQL virtual IP for
non-SQL related access to the cluster?
Is there a best practice that dictates that a separate IP should be
provided for non-SQL access?
Mark (firstname.lastname@example.org) writes:
> At my organization, users have started to use the virtual address
> created when SQL Server is installed on a failover cluster for non-SQL
> I have always created an cluster IP resource in addition to the SQL
> cluster IP resource for non-SQL access to the server (like for mapping
> What is the impact on SQL Server if people use the SQL virtual IP for
> non-SQL related access to the cluster?
> Is there a best practice that dictates that a separate IP should be
> provided for non-SQL access?
Since I'm into clustering myself, I relayed the question to my MVP mates.
Here are two responses I recevied:
There is no different impact to SQL Between using the SQL name/ip or a
different name/ip in the same resource group. All it is in either
case is a socket connection to the server on one ip or another.
And response to this comment was:
The impact is this: if th...SQL Server "Linked Server" to MS Access Database
I have a very frustrating problem. I have a situation that works fine
on some computers, but not on others. I have SQL Server Express 2005
and Access 2003 loaded on 4 computers. I have set up a "Linked
Server" in SQL Server linked to my Access database. I am running
queries on t-SQL against the Access tables through the linked server.
On all of the computers, I can do select queries and they all work
great but what I need to do is run Update, Insert, Delete queries as
well. On a couple of the computers, it works fine, locally and across
the LAN, and a VPN as far as that goes. But on other computers I can
do Select queries (also across the network) but no update queries. I
get the error message "OLE DB provider "Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0" for
linked server "securedjetls" returned message "Operation must use an
updateable query." where securedjetls is the name of the linked
server. The Access database on the computer that is not working is a
copy of the database from the computer that is working and any of the
tables that I'm trying to update have primary keys, so that's not the
...Oracle DB to MS Sql Server DB Replication question...via Sql Server Views??
I'm not sure if this is even possible, but I've been asked to look
into replication from Oracle to Sql Server. He's the situation:
We have access to a remote Oracle database, but only read access (not
allowed to configure or change the db).
We own a Sql Server database with Views that use a link server to
query the Oracle database.
With this setup, is it possible to replicate the Oracle database? Can
we do a replication from the Sql Server with the Views into another
Sql Server database, and if we can, will it be able to only pull the
delta for subsequent replications?
Any tips and hints would be helpful. Pleeease!
> I'm not sure if this is even possible, but I've been asked to look
> into replication from Oracle to Sql Server. He's the situation:
> We have access to a remote Oracle database, but only read access (not
> allowed to configure or change the db).
> We own a Sql Server database with Views that use a link server to
> query the Oracle database.
> With this setup, is it possible to replicate the Oracle database? Can
> we do a replication from the Sql Server with the Views into another
> Sql Server database, and if we can, will it be able to only pull the
> delta for subsequent replications?
> Any tips and hints would be helpful. Pleeease!
I don't know the answer to the second question, nor your versions, but
the first sh...Transfer Database from one Pervasive SQL 2000i server to Another Pervasive SQL 2000i Server
Any tips on how to transfer the data files from one Pervasive SQL
2000i database to another Pervasive SQL 2000i database.
Please advice ASAP
Simply copy the files from one server to the other.
Sajid Saeed wrote:
> Any tips on how to transfer the data files from one Pervasive SQL
> 2000i database to another Pervasive SQL 2000i database.
> Please advice ASAP
> Sajid Saeed
If you are just wanting the whole database from one server on another
copy the files over. May need to set up an engine DSN on the new
server for SQL/ODBC acce...