From what I have been reading it is possible to copy data from one
field into another by doing something similar to this:
UPDATE table
SET field2 = field1;
what I am looking to do is take the the information from several
fields and create one new field
ie: all of the info from field1 + first character of field2 + first
character of field3 + first charcter of field4 is used to create the
information in field5 for this I could do something like:
UPDATE table
SET field5 = CONCAT(field1, ',' ,field2, ',' ,field3, ',' ,field4);
but how do i get it to only use the first character of fields 2,3 and
4?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
canajien
|
8/5/2010 5:18:06 PM |
|
canajien wrote:
> From what I have been reading it is possible to copy data from one
> field into another by doing something similar to this:
>
> UPDATE table
> SET field2 = field1;
>
> what I am looking to do is take the the information from several
> fields and create one new field
>
> ie: all of the info from field1 + first character of field2 + first
> character of field3 + first charcter of field4 is used to create the
> information in field5 for this I could do something like:
>
> UPDATE table
> SET field5 = CONCAT(field1, ',' ,field2, ',' ,field3, ',' ,field4);
>
> but how do i get it to only use the first character of fields 2,3 and
> 4?
You could use substr:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/string-functions.html#function_substr
--
//Aho
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
J
|
8/5/2010 5:24:09 PM
|
|
On 2010-08-05 19:18, canajien wrote:
> From what I have been reading it is possible to copy data from one
> field into another by doing something similar to this:
>
> UPDATE table
> SET field2 = field1;
>
> what I am looking to do is take the the information from several
> fields and create one new field
>
> ie: all of the info from field1 + first character of field2 + first
> character of field3 + first charcter of field4 is used to create the
> information in field5 for this I could do something like:
>
> UPDATE table
> SET field5 = CONCAT(field1, ',' ,field2, ',' ,field3, ',' ,field4);
>
> but how do i get it to only use the first character of fields 2,3 and
> 4?
Why would you like to do such thing?
/Lennart
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Lennart
|
8/5/2010 5:44:35 PM
|
|
On Aug 5, 1:24=A0pm, "J.O. Aho" <u...@example.net> wrote:
> canajien wrote:
> > From what I have been reading it is possible to copy data from one
> > field into another by doing something similar to this:
>
> > UPDATE table
> > SET field2 =3D field1;
>
> > what I am looking to do is take the the information from several
> > fields and create one new field
>
> > ie: all of the info from field1 + first character of field2 + first
> > character of field3 + first charcter of field4 is used to create the
> > information in field5 for this I could do something like:
>
> > UPDATE table
> > SET field5 =3D CONCAT(field1, ',' ,field2, ',' ,field3, ',' ,field4);
>
> > but how do i get it to only use the first character of fields 2,3 and
> > 4?
>
> You could use substr:http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/string-functi=
ons.html#function...
>
> --
>
> =A0 //Aho
thanks, I used:
UPDATE table SET field5 =3D CONCAT(field1, substring( field2, 1, 1 ) ,
substring( field3, 1, 1 ) , substring( field4, 1, 1 ) ) ;
and got what I needed
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
canajien
|
8/5/2010 5:54:24 PM
|
|
canajien wrote:
> From what I have been reading it is possible to copy data from one
> field into another by doing something similar to this:
>
> UPDATE table
> SET field2 = field1;
>
> what I am looking to do is take the the information from several
> fields and create one new field
>
> ie: all of the info from field1 + first character of field2 + first
> character of field3 + first charcter of field4 is used to create the
> information in field5 for this I could do something like:
>
> UPDATE table
> SET field5 = CONCAT(field1, ',' ,field2, ',' ,field3, ',' ,field4);
>
> but how do i get it to only use the first character of fields 2,3 and
> 4?
You really don't want to do it that way because you would be duplicating
data, thus introducing the possibility of anomalies. What if the
underlying data in fields 1-4 changed? You'd have to take extra
precautions to update the other field any time that happened.
It is much better to leave the fields "as is" and generate the format
you want in a view. That way, the underlying data can change, and the
correlated data remains consistent.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Robert
|
8/5/2010 6:07:03 PM
|
|
|
4 Replies
422 Views
(page loaded in 0.044 seconds)
|