Any information please on using Oracle 9i (9.2.0.3.0) in conjunction with Application Server 10g? Both on Windows Server 2003 platform. Experts, is this a workable (certified?) combination? Any reason to consider earlier (some say buggier) version of AS? Is there anything in AS 10g that will not be happy talking to Database 9i (9.2.0.3.0) on Win2K3. Appreciate any advice on this configuration, including "you must be crazy!" Have just heard good things about AS 10g versus its previous incarnations. Thanks, Mike
Mike <bishopsbitter@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1034fkqonpus1ef@corp.supernews.com: > Any information please on using Oracle 9i (9.2.0.3.0) in conjunction > with Application Server 10g? > Both on Windows Server 2003 platform. - Use 9.2.0.4 instead of 9.2.0.3. - Wait until OracleAS 10g (9.0.4) comes available for Windows. Combination should be certified. If you want the infrastructure database to be of version 9.2.0.4, you must create the repository with the Repository Creation Assistant (RepCA). > Any reason to consider earlier (some say buggier) version > of AS? Is there anything in AS 10g that will not be happy talking to > Database 9i (9.2.0.3.0) on Win2K3. Avoid 9iAS 9.0.2.x if you can wait until you have 10g. The 10g (9.0.4) version is much more stable and easier to configure/install/use. Sander
Mike <bishopsbitter@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<1034fkqonpus1ef@corp.supernews.com>... > Any information please on using Oracle 9i (9.2.0.3.0) in conjunction with > Application Server 10g? > > Both on Windows Server 2003 platform. > > Experts, is this a workable (certified?) combination? > > Any reason to consider earlier (some say buggier) version > of AS? Is there anything in AS 10g that will not be happy talking to > Database 9i (9.2.0.3.0) on Win2K3. > > Appreciate any advice on this configuration, including "you must be > crazy!" Have just heard good things about AS 10g versus its previous > incarnations. > > Thanks, > Mike That is one of those "amazing and stupendous" products that is projected to be certified but not available for download. As opposed to the W2K version, which is certified but not available for download. I take it to mean there is some problem, although whether the problem is with the product is difficult to determine. jg -- @home.com is bogus. Hopefully this will all be wrong by the time usenet propagates it.
joel-garry@home.com (Joel Garry) wrote in news:91884734.0402181446.7fd8f934@posting.google.com: > That is one of those "amazing and stupendous" products that is > projected to be certified but not available for download. As opposed > to the W2K version, which is certified but not available for download. > > I take it to mean there is some problem, although whether the problem > is with the product is difficult to determine. Not at all. After the build has completed on Unix, the NT porting group starts porting it to NT. Instead of holding the Unix product until the NT product is ready, it is made available. Indeed you will have to wait longer for the NT product - if you don't want that, you could for example use Linux. The Win2k version that _is_ certified _and_ available is 9.0.2, maybe you should search harder ;-) http://otn.oracle.com/software/products/ias/devuse_9ias_r2.html I would however wait for 9.0.4 if you can. Sander