bridging between 2 ATM subinterfaces/PVC's

  • Follow


Hi,

On a Cisco 7204VXR i want to configure 2 ATM PVC's, bridged together so they can communicate transparently.
On the 7204 i configured the interfaces as follows :

int atm1/0.162055 point-to-point
  pvc 16/2055
   encap aal5snap
  bridge-group 1

int atm1/0.162056 point-to-point
  pvc 16/2056
   encap aal5snap
  bridge-group 1

The bridge group is configured easily like this :

bridge 1 protocol ieee


According to my theory, the two PVC's should be in bridging mode now. The PVC's are terminated (through a 3rd party network) on DSL routers, where i 
configured RFC1483, LLC based. On router 1 i configured IP address 10.0.0.1/24 and on the second router 10.0.0.2/24. They don't seem to 'see' 
eachother in any way and i cannot ping from router 1 to router 2.

Can anyone put me in the right direction?

Thanks in advance,

Remco Bressers
0
Reply Remco 8/11/2005 3:39:47 PM

Remco Bressers <remco@remcobressers.nl> wrote in
news:42fb7143$0$11062$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl: 

> Hi,
> 
> On a Cisco 7204VXR i want to configure 2 ATM PVC's, bridged together
> so they can communicate transparently. On the 7204 i configured the
> interfaces as follows : 
> 
> int atm1/0.162055 point-to-point
>   pvc 16/2055
>    encap aal5snap
>   bridge-group 1
> 
> int atm1/0.162056 point-to-point
>   pvc 16/2056
>    encap aal5snap
>   bridge-group 1
> 
> The bridge group is configured easily like this :
> 
> bridge 1 protocol ieee
> 
> 
> According to my theory, the two PVC's should be in bridging mode now.
> The PVC's are terminated (through a 3rd party network) on DSL routers,
> where i configured RFC1483, LLC based. On router 1 i configured IP
> address 10.0.0.1/24 and on the second router 10.0.0.2/24. They don't
> seem to 'see' eachother in any way and i cannot ping from router 1 to
> router 2. 
> 
> Can anyone put me in the right direction?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Remco Bressers
> 


You might need to bridge your IP protocol as well. try add "atm route-
bridge ip" to the interfaces or "bridge 1 route ip" to your global 
config.

Cheers,

Lars Christensen
0
Reply Lars 8/11/2005 6:13:07 PM


Lars L. Christensen wrote:
> Remco Bressers <remco@remcobressers.nl> wrote in
> news:42fb7143$0$11062$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl: 
> 
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>On a Cisco 7204VXR i want to configure 2 ATM PVC's, bridged together
>>so they can communicate transparently. On the 7204 i configured the
>>interfaces as follows : 
>>
>>int atm1/0.162055 point-to-point
>>  pvc 16/2055
>>   encap aal5snap
>>  bridge-group 1
>>
>>int atm1/0.162056 point-to-point
>>  pvc 16/2056
>>   encap aal5snap
>>  bridge-group 1
>>
>>The bridge group is configured easily like this :
>>
>>bridge 1 protocol ieee
>>
>>
>>According to my theory, the two PVC's should be in bridging mode now.
>>The PVC's are terminated (through a 3rd party network) on DSL routers,
>>where i configured RFC1483, LLC based. On router 1 i configured IP
>>address 10.0.0.1/24 and on the second router 10.0.0.2/24. They don't
>>seem to 'see' eachother in any way and i cannot ping from router 1 to
>>router 2. 
>>
>>Can anyone put me in the right direction?
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>
>>Remco Bressers
>>
> 
> You might need to bridge your IP protocol as well. try add "atm route-
> bridge ip" to the interfaces or "bridge 1 route ip" to your global 
> config.

Isn't it the case that i'm using IRB, and 'atm route-bridge ip' is used for RBE or am i totally wrong?
Second.. The term bridge 1 route ip is also not working :(

Remco
0
Reply Remco 8/12/2005 7:21:14 AM

    Have you turned off ip routing?

no ip routing

no ip routing
 !
 interface Ethernet0/0
  no ip address
  bridge-group 1
  !
 interface ATM1/0
  no ip address
 !
  interface ATM1/0.116 point-to-point
  pvc 1/116
   encapsulation aal5snap
   !
   bridge-group 1
  !
  bridge 1 protocol ieee

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk48/technologies_configuration_example09186a008009455f.shtml

-as




Remco Bressers wrote:
> Lars L. Christensen wrote:
> > Remco Bressers <remco@remcobressers.nl> wrote in
> > news:42fb7143$0$11062$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl:
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On a Cisco 7204VXR i want to configure 2 ATM PVC's, bridged together
> >>so they can communicate transparently. On the 7204 i configured the
> >>interfaces as follows :
> >>
> >>int atm1/0.162055 point-to-point
> >>  pvc 16/2055
> >>   encap aal5snap
> >>  bridge-group 1
> >>
> >>int atm1/0.162056 point-to-point
> >>  pvc 16/2056
> >>   encap aal5snap
> >>  bridge-group 1
> >>
> >>The bridge group is configured easily like this :
> >>
> >>bridge 1 protocol ieee
> >>
> >>
> >>According to my theory, the two PVC's should be in bridging mode now.
> >>The PVC's are terminated (through a 3rd party network) on DSL routers,
> >>where i configured RFC1483, LLC based. On router 1 i configured IP
> >>address 10.0.0.1/24 and on the second router 10.0.0.2/24. They don't
> >>seem to 'see' eachother in any way and i cannot ping from router 1 to
> >>router 2.
> >>
> >>Can anyone put me in the right direction?
> >>
> >>Thanks in advance,
> >>
> >>Remco Bressers
> >>
> >
> > You might need to bridge your IP protocol as well. try add "atm route-
> > bridge ip" to the interfaces or "bridge 1 route ip" to your global
> > config.
>
> Isn't it the case that i'm using IRB, and 'atm route-bridge ip' is used for RBE or am i totally wrong?
> Second.. The term bridge 1 route ip is also not working :(
> 
> Remco

0
Reply aservin 8/12/2005 3:39:54 PM

No i havent, because the router should do routing, except for these two subinterfaces.



aservin wrote:
>     Have you turned off ip routing?
> 
> no ip routing
> 
> no ip routing
>  !
>  interface Ethernet0/0
>   no ip address
>   bridge-group 1
>   !
>  interface ATM1/0
>   no ip address
>  !
>   interface ATM1/0.116 point-to-point
>   pvc 1/116
>    encapsulation aal5snap
>    !
>    bridge-group 1
>   !
>   bridge 1 protocol ieee
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk48/technologies_configuration_example09186a008009455f.shtml
> 
> -as
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Remco Bressers wrote:
> 
>>Lars L. Christensen wrote:
>>
>>>Remco Bressers <remco@remcobressers.nl> wrote in
>>>news:42fb7143$0$11062$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>On a Cisco 7204VXR i want to configure 2 ATM PVC's, bridged together
>>>>so they can communicate transparently. On the 7204 i configured the
>>>>interfaces as follows :
>>>>
>>>>int atm1/0.162055 point-to-point
>>>> pvc 16/2055
>>>>  encap aal5snap
>>>> bridge-group 1
>>>>
>>>>int atm1/0.162056 point-to-point
>>>> pvc 16/2056
>>>>  encap aal5snap
>>>> bridge-group 1
>>>>
>>>>The bridge group is configured easily like this :
>>>>
>>>>bridge 1 protocol ieee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>According to my theory, the two PVC's should be in bridging mode now.
>>>>The PVC's are terminated (through a 3rd party network) on DSL routers,
>>>>where i configured RFC1483, LLC based. On router 1 i configured IP
>>>>address 10.0.0.1/24 and on the second router 10.0.0.2/24. They don't
>>>>seem to 'see' eachother in any way and i cannot ping from router 1 to
>>>>router 2.
>>>>
>>>>Can anyone put me in the right direction?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks in advance,
>>>>
>>>>Remco Bressers
>>>>
>>>
>>>You might need to bridge your IP protocol as well. try add "atm route-
>>>bridge ip" to the interfaces or "bridge 1 route ip" to your global
>>>config.
>>
>>Isn't it the case that i'm using IRB, and 'atm route-bridge ip' is used for RBE or am i totally wrong?
>>Second.. The term bridge 1 route ip is also not working :(
>>
>>Remco
> 
> 
0
Reply Remco 8/17/2005 12:56:16 PM

4 Replies
90 Views

(page loaded in 0.144 seconds)

Similiar Articles:




7/9/2012 11:45:56 PM


Reply: