Help needed with a Cisco Pix 520

  • Follow


Hi all!

I am testing my home lab and I can ping my switch/router ports from the 
PIX-outside and inside. However, when I try to ping across the PIX 520 
from one of my switches, I am not able to. I did create the access-list 
and access-group to allow icmp but still no go. Any ideas?

James
0
Reply j.krych469 (2) 5/31/2008 5:45:24 AM

On May 31, 1:45=A0am, jwkrych <j.krych...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I am testing my home lab and I can ping my switch/router ports from the
> PIX-outside and inside. However, when I try to ping across the PIX 520
> from one of my switches, I am not able to. I did create the access-list
> and access-group to allow icmp but still no go. Any ideas?
>
> James

just so I understand this correctly. You have a switch on the inside
network which you are trying to ping from the switch through the
inside interface to the outside interface?

If that is the case then you need to set up a nat/pat.

Good Luck,
0
Reply Newbie72 6/1/2008 9:46:33 PM


In article <3430c5ca-298a-42ff-a21c-a486f2cecd8a@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Newbie72  <sdj30@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On May 31, 1:45�am, jwkrych <j.krych...@comcast.net> wrote:

>> I am testing my home lab and I can ping my switch/router ports from the
>> PIX-outside and inside. However, when I try to ping across the PIX 520
>> from one of my switches, I am not able to. I did create the access-list
>> and access-group to allow icmp but still no go. Any ideas?

>just so I understand this correctly. You have a switch on the inside
>network which you are trying to ping from the switch through the
>inside interface to the outside interface?

>If that is the case then you need to set up a nat/pat.

I wasn't able to figure out -what- James is trying to do, but if
your analysis of his goal is correct, then setting up nat/pat would
*not* work on the 520. The 520 is limited to PIX 6.x, and in PIX 6.x
is not allowed to start a packet from inside, have it go out and
be routed back to the PIX for termination on the inside.
0
Reply roberson 6/2/2008 2:30:20 AM

On Jun 1, 10:30=A0pm, rober...@hushmail.com (Walter Roberson) wrote:
> In article <3430c5ca-298a-42ff-a21c-a486f2cec...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.=
com>,
>
> Newbie72 =A0<sd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 31, 1:45=A0am, jwkrych <j.krych...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> I am testing my home lab and I can ping my switch/router ports from the=

> >> PIX-outside and inside. However, when I try to ping across the PIX 520
> >> from one of my switches, I am not able to. I did create the access-list=

> >> and access-group to allow icmp but still no go. Any ideas?
> >just so I understand this correctly. You have a switch on the inside
> >network which you are trying to ping from the switch through the
> >inside interface to the outside interface?
> >If that is the case then you need to set up a nat/pat.
>
> I wasn't able to figure out -what- James is trying to do, but if
> your analysis of his goal is correct, then setting up nat/pat would
> *not* work on the 520. The 520 is limited to PIX 6.x, and in PIX 6.x
> is not allowed to start a packet from inside, have it go out and
> be routed back to the PIX for termination on the inside.

You are absolutely right.... my bad for over looking that. I had
simular issues with trying to figure out what he needed. I took a stab
n the dark.
0
Reply Newbie72 6/2/2008 9:55:24 PM

Newbie72 wrote:
> On Jun 1, 10:30 pm, rober...@hushmail.com (Walter Roberson) wrote:
>> In article <3430c5ca-298a-42ff-a21c-a486f2cec...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
>>
>> Newbie72  <sd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On May 31, 1:45 am, jwkrych <j.krych...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> I am testing my home lab and I can ping my switch/router ports from the
>>>> PIX-outside and inside. However, when I try to ping across the PIX 520
>>>> from one of my switches, I am not able to. I did create the access-list
>>>> and access-group to allow icmp but still no go. Any ideas?
>>> just so I understand this correctly. You have a switch on the inside
>>> network which you are trying to ping from the switch through the
>>> inside interface to the outside interface?
>>> If that is the case then you need to set up a nat/pat.
>> I wasn't able to figure out -what- James is trying to do, but if
>> your analysis of his goal is correct, then setting up nat/pat would
>> *not* work on the 520. The 520 is limited to PIX 6.x, and in PIX 6.x
>> is not allowed to start a packet from inside, have it go out and
>> be routed back to the PIX for termination on the inside.
> 
> You are absolutely right.... my bad for over looking that. I had
> simular issues with trying to figure out what he needed. I took a stab
> n the dark.

Hi guys,

Here is my setup:

I have a 2620, with a NM-4E, as my VLAN trunking router-with two 
switches; a directly connected 2924 and a trunked 2912 to the '24.
Then, one of the 10Mb ports of the NM-4E connects to the INSIDE of the 
Pix 520. The Outside port of the Pix 520 connects to one of the Ethernet 
ports on the 2611. (The 2924 connects to the 100/10 FastEthernet Port of 
the 2620)

As said before, I can ping all loopbacks on my network routers and the 
VLAN 1 IP's for the two switches-from the PIX command line itself. I can 
ping to the INSIDE port of the Pix from my 2620, the two switches, and 
the 2610 which hangs off of the 2620's WIC-2T card. The 2611 can ping 
the OUTSIDE port of thee PIX.

But, if I try to ping the LO of the 2611 from say the 2620, or the 2912 
switch, I cannot.

I hope this cleared things up.

0
Reply jwkrych 6/3/2008 12:04:05 AM

    access-list ping_acl permit icmp any any

    access-group ping_acl in interface outside

Hope this will clear if you try once..
0
Reply CK 6/3/2008 6:46:07 AM

jwkrych wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> I am testing my home lab and I can ping my switch/router ports from the 
> PIX-outside and inside. However, when I try to ping across the PIX 520 
> from one of my switches, I am not able to. I did create the access-list 
> and access-group to allow icmp but still no go. Any ideas?
> 
> James

Situation resolved with conduit and NAT/PAT.

James
0
Reply jwkrych 6/15/2008 3:00:52 AM

6 Replies
64 Views

(page loaded in 0.136 seconds)

Similiar Articles:













7/17/2012 5:41:31 AM


Reply: