linux pbuffer __GL_FSAA_MODE

  • Follow


Hi,

it seems that __GL_FSAA_MODE has no effect on offscreen
rendering buffers under linux. Using an on-screen buffer
works great with all the various FSAA modes. I am wondering
why that is, and if windows users have the same problem
or if it's yet another linux-disadvantage. I'm using
the latest nvidia drivers....

Regards,

	Toni


-- 
for mail, mirror: ed.lausivksa@elielb
0
Reply Antonio 9/17/2004 6:52:17 PM

Antonio Bleile wrote:
> it seems that __GL_FSAA_MODE has no effect on offscreen
> rendering buffers under linux. Using an on-screen buffer
> works great with all the various FSAA modes. I am wondering
> why that is, and if windows users have the same problem
> or if it's yet another linux-disadvantage. I'm using
> the latest nvidia drivers....

Have you tried asking for multisampling when you create the pbuffer? Maybe
the environment variable is only meant to affect on-screen buffers.

Cheers,
Jon.

0
Reply Jon 9/19/2004 12:25:09 AM


Jon Harrop wrote:
> Antonio Bleile wrote:
> 
>>it seems that __GL_FSAA_MODE has no effect on offscreen
>>rendering buffers under linux. Using an on-screen buffer
>>works great with all the various FSAA modes. I am wondering
>>why that is, and if windows users have the same problem
>>or if it's yet another linux-disadvantage. I'm using
>>the latest nvidia drivers....
> 
> 
> Have you tried asking for multisampling when you create the pbuffer? Maybe
> the environment variable is only meant to affect on-screen buffers.

Hi Jon,

adding

GLX_SAMPLE_BUFFERS_ARB, 1,
GLX_SAMPLES_ARB, 4,

to the attribute list worked out fine. Thank you for the hint!

But I still dont't know which settings match the ones I
can setup throught the __GL_FSAA_MODE variable. There
doesn't seem to be any documentation on GLX_SAMPLE_BUFFERS_ARB
or GLX_SAMPLES_ARB.

Cheers and thanks again,

	Toni


-- 
for mail, mirror: ed.lausivksa@elielb
0
Reply Antonio 9/19/2004 3:46:44 PM

2 Replies
236 Views

(page loaded in 0.126 seconds)

Similiar Articles:






7/20/2012 5:48:53 AM


Reply: