LW 9 multi-platform use

  • Follow


Hi everyone,

I have a PC and an Intel Mac.  I'm finding that it is easier to do 
graphic/video work on the Mac.  My question is: can I use LW9 on both 
machines with just one license/dongle.

What I'd like to happen is I'll install LW on the both Mac & PC but will 
leave the dongle on the Mac where LW is running.  The PC will not be running 
LW concurrently.

Should I want to keep just the PC running (or when travelling), I'll just 
grab the dongle and attach it to the PC.

Will that work?  i.e. do I need to get 2 registration numbers/keys (for 
PC/Mac)?  On the verge of getting the upgrade but I need to be sure I'd be 
able to use it for both machines - I may switch to the Mac completely once 
all my work software becomes available on the Mac.

Thanks



0
Reply Chris 8/2/2006 2:45:52 PM

Hi Chris
Far as I know, you get a number for both Mac and PC per dongle and what
you want to do is possible & legal.

The Biggest issue you're likely to come up against is plugins.....there
are more available for PC than Mac. As long as you avoid using PC only
plugins, you should be fine.

Cheers

Nicko


Chris wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a PC and an Intel Mac.  I'm finding that it is easier to do
> graphic/video work on the Mac.  My question is: can I use LW9 on both
> machines with just one license/dongle.
>
> What I'd like to happen is I'll install LW on the both Mac & PC but will
> leave the dongle on the Mac where LW is running.  The PC will not be running
> LW concurrently.
>
> Should I want to keep just the PC running (or when travelling), I'll just
> grab the dongle and attach it to the PC.
>
> Will that work?  i.e. do I need to get 2 registration numbers/keys (for
> PC/Mac)?  On the verge of getting the upgrade but I need to be sure I'd be
> able to use it for both machines - I may switch to the Mac completely once
> all my work software becomes available on the Mac.
> 
> Thanks

0
Reply Nicko 8/2/2006 3:16:05 PM


1 Replies
61 Views

(page loaded in 0.041 seconds)

5/22/2013 11:39:19 AM


Reply: