Hello!
I have a problem. I have an image sequence that I want to convert to a high
quality movie with a high compression. The problem is that the movie is
supposed to be 752x525 in resolution. This is not pal and not ntsc either,
its just som arbitrary resolution.
Now, whatever I try, DF, Premiere 6, Lightwave or other, I cannot make this
into a DivX. I have tried DivX 3.11, 5.1 and XviD to no avail. They all give
an error message and fail to render this movie.
Does anyone know a method of doing this besides putting in bars on the top?
Greetings, Tom
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
except
|
1/20/2004 4:29:53 PM |
|
That's weird... It should let you produce videos in that resolution.
AFAIK, the only restriction to resolutions in DivX is that the horizontal
pixel count must be evenly divisible by 16, which 752 is. What is the error
message? Does it work with other resolutions that are similar in size and
aspect ratio?
What version of DivX are you using and is it DivX Pro or one of the lesser
packages? It could be that they have restricted DivX to only use standard
resolution settings....
I just stretched a clip to 752x525 in Vegas4 and rendered out as a DivX and
it worked. This system has DivX Pro 5.03 (looks like I need to upgrade).
Jeff
"except" <info@Nospam-except.nl> wrote in message
news:ca6e933bfbd4ae3da46e46625a389310@news.teranews.com...
> Hello!
>
> I have a problem. I have an image sequence that I want to convert to a
high
> quality movie with a high compression. The problem is that the movie is
> supposed to be 752x525 in resolution. This is not pal and not ntsc either,
> its just som arbitrary resolution.
>
> Now, whatever I try, DF, Premiere 6, Lightwave or other, I cannot make
this
> into a DivX. I have tried DivX 3.11, 5.1 and XviD to no avail. They all
give
> an error message and fail to render this movie.
>
> Does anyone know a method of doing this besides putting in bars on the
top?
>
> Greetings, Tom
>
>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
DarkScience
|
1/20/2004 5:45:14 PM
|
|
Hi!
Its DivX 5.1 Pro, and the error messages are the standard ones:
DF: Render did not Complete (now thats helpfull)
Lightwave: "Cannot Set Stream Format"
Premiere 6.5: "An error occured. Codec Compression Error. This codec may be
unable to support the requested frame size, or there may be a hardwarwe or
memory problem"
But hardware and memory are a-ok... : (
"DarkScience" <Jeff at Applied Visual dot Com> wrote in message
news:qIidnZQBfL239JDdRVn-jw@speakeasy.net...
> That's weird... It should let you produce videos in that resolution.
> AFAIK, the only restriction to resolutions in DivX is that the horizontal
> pixel count must be evenly divisible by 16, which 752 is. What is the
error
> message? Does it work with other resolutions that are similar in size and
> aspect ratio?
>
> What version of DivX are you using and is it DivX Pro or one of the lesser
> packages? It could be that they have restricted DivX to only use standard
> resolution settings....
>
> I just stretched a clip to 752x525 in Vegas4 and rendered out as a DivX
and
> it worked. This system has DivX Pro 5.03 (looks like I need to upgrade).
>
> Jeff
>
> "except" <info@Nospam-except.nl> wrote in message
> news:ca6e933bfbd4ae3da46e46625a389310@news.teranews.com...
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have a problem. I have an image sequence that I want to convert to a
> high
> > quality movie with a high compression. The problem is that the movie is
> > supposed to be 752x525 in resolution. This is not pal and not ntsc
either,
> > its just som arbitrary resolution.
> >
> > Now, whatever I try, DF, Premiere 6, Lightwave or other, I cannot make
> this
> > into a DivX. I have tried DivX 3.11, 5.1 and XviD to no avail. They all
> give
> > an error message and fail to render this movie.
> >
> > Does anyone know a method of doing this besides putting in bars on the
> top?
> >
> > Greetings, Tom
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
except
|
1/20/2004 10:40:46 PM
|
|
Sorry it's 720x 525. But it still doesnt work : (
"DarkScience" <Jeff at Applied Visual dot Com> wrote in message
news:qIidnZQBfL239JDdRVn-jw@speakeasy.net...
> That's weird... It should let you produce videos in that resolution.
> AFAIK, the only restriction to resolutions in DivX is that the horizontal
> pixel count must be evenly divisible by 16, which 752 is. What is the
error
> message? Does it work with other resolutions that are similar in size and
> aspect ratio?
>
> What version of DivX are you using and is it DivX Pro or one of the lesser
> packages? It could be that they have restricted DivX to only use standard
> resolution settings....
>
> I just stretched a clip to 752x525 in Vegas4 and rendered out as a DivX
and
> it worked. This system has DivX Pro 5.03 (looks like I need to upgrade).
>
> Jeff
>
> "except" <info@Nospam-except.nl> wrote in message
> news:ca6e933bfbd4ae3da46e46625a389310@news.teranews.com...
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have a problem. I have an image sequence that I want to convert to a
> high
> > quality movie with a high compression. The problem is that the movie is
> > supposed to be 752x525 in resolution. This is not pal and not ntsc
either,
> > its just som arbitrary resolution.
> >
> > Now, whatever I try, DF, Premiere 6, Lightwave or other, I cannot make
> this
> > into a DivX. I have tried DivX 3.11, 5.1 and XviD to no avail. They all
> give
> > an error message and fail to render this movie.
> >
> > Does anyone know a method of doing this besides putting in bars on the
> top?
> >
> > Greetings, Tom
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
except
|
1/20/2004 10:45:15 PM
|
|
except wrote:
> Sorry it's 720x 525. But it still doesnt work : (
Mmmm... that sounds a lot like they want to do square pixel version of
D1 PAL video file for computer screen viewing (the mathematically
correct 4:3 size would be 720*540, which is close to what you're doing).
Have you tried rendering to some other resolution?
Try rendering in an image size where BOTH horizontal and vertical
resolution can be divided by 16 (i.e. 720*528, which is just 3 pixels
off from what they asked, or 720*544, which is the closest to the real
thing). Does it work?
If not, try with some other source material. Maybe your original file is
the problem. Does that work?
CU
--
- Eki
http://www.akmp-program.fi
http://www.kolumbus.fi/erkki.halkka/
*************************************
******** warp9.to/soapwish **********
*************************************
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Erkki
|
1/22/2004 11:28:00 PM
|
|
Hi Eki,
Thanks for the good advice.
Actually, I succeeded in making one go with 720x525. I did it in Digital
Fusion by setting the 'Make Legal' option in the saver.
Problem is, its an OOOLD digital fusion and I dont seem to be able to
control the codec in any way. the movie becomes 20 mb's at whatever setting
I put either the avi saving defaults or the slider in the saver unit. So I
will have to do it in another program like premiere or LW, but so far these
have refused to do it at all.
I will try your solutions... Ill get back : )
"Erkki Halkka" <erkki.halkka@kolumbus.fi> wrote in message
news:buplpa$2ia$1@phys-news1.kolumbus.fi...
> except wrote:
>
> > Sorry it's 720x 525. But it still doesnt work : (
>
> Mmmm... that sounds a lot like they want to do square pixel version of
> D1 PAL video file for computer screen viewing (the mathematically
> correct 4:3 size would be 720*540, which is close to what you're doing).
>
> Have you tried rendering to some other resolution?
>
> Try rendering in an image size where BOTH horizontal and vertical
> resolution can be divided by 16 (i.e. 720*528, which is just 3 pixels
> off from what they asked, or 720*544, which is the closest to the real
> thing). Does it work?
>
> If not, try with some other source material. Maybe your original file is
> the problem. Does that work?
>
> CU
> --
> - Eki
>
> http://www.akmp-program.fi
> http://www.kolumbus.fi/erkki.halkka/
>
> *************************************
> ******** warp9.to/soapwish **********
> *************************************
>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
except
|
1/23/2004 9:09:10 AM
|
|
|
5 Replies
80 Views
(page loaded in 0.105 seconds)
Similiar Articles: OT: Calculators - comp.dspAdd to that a non-standard keypad layout (I keep hitting "+" when I ... to normalize the image .for this first i have to find ot the mean an variance of the image..Size my ... Negative dimensions: why not? - comp.cad.solidworksFrustrated Non-SW user at work (because of the ... -- -- -- Personally, and this is probably entirely OT ... bar size, i.e., a value of 1.0 would make the gap the same size ... strndup: RFC - comp.compilers.lcc< off topic> Since lcc-win32 supports optional ... stdlib.h defines > > > > calloc(size_t,size_t ... It's also pretty standard when working with <OT>sockets</OT>; because ... standard pragma's? - comp.lang.cThe > "#pragma pack" directive is simply non-standard. ... is fast, I see little point in optimizing for size ... Re: OT: Question: is Google not working in the US ... varargs in C (AMD64 architecture) - comp.lang.asm.x86(warning: getting further OT and rather ... bit pattern for null pointer is non-zero ... The compiler is REQUIRED to make these work. See > <stddef.h>. The C standard actually ... segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) - comp.lang.fortranAnother possible reason: Too small memory sizes, like ... functions specifically designed to convert non ... of effort considering that the text of the '03 standard ... Yet another binary search tree library - comp.lang.cBasically I tried to make the API as simple as I can and the node structure sizes as ... obvious example is a bit off-topic ... behaviors >> that the Standard considers non ... IOSTAT for input from sequential formatted files with "incomplete ...Set up a .rc file or something with an option to make ... In the standard emacs version in MacOSX (22.1.1), that ... used emacs much, but it might be that it can edit non ... "C" calling convention on x86 - comp.lang.asm.x86... subsequently get flamed for being "off-topic ... worth noting -- as an MS defacto standard, and not to be depended upon in non ... how to make calls to C library functions on ... code speed moving from fortran 77 compiler to f2003 compiler ...... Sincerely, > Lynn McGuire A code of the size that you ... ii) FOR_C may choke on many of the non-standard F77 extensions ... > > Thanks, > Lynn Sort of OT, but if you do use ... How to Make a Pillow Case | eHow.comHow to Make a Pillow Case. A sewing project that ... the road by carrying your own travel-size pillow. Creating a pillow case for your pillow is easy... How to Make a Standard ... Updated: The New Crib Standard: Questions and Answers | OnSafetyA non-full-size crib is a crib that is either larger or smaller (or otherwise shaped differently) from a full-size crib. The standard for non-full-size cribs covers ... 6/29/2012 5:12:19 PM
|