Re: Line breaks #2

  • Follow


On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 8:08:46 PM UTC-5, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 6:16:09 PM UTC-5, Rod Pemberton wrote:
> > "Nathan Baker" <nath...@nospicedham.gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:VeOdndaxuqbbfBrQnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
> > > "Rick C. Hodgin" <foxm...@nospicedham.gmail.com> wrote in message
> > >
> > news:969e1ec9-ef8f-4d3f-b514-09c25aedb8a3@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com...
> > > > On Monday, March 21, 2011 2:20:50 PM UTC-5, Rod Pemberton wrote:
> > > >> "Nathan" <nat...@nospicedham.gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > >>
> > news:ac517951-906b-47bf-9c46-4cb60dcd62b4@t19g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Nor do I know why
> > > >> > Rick Hodgin's posts are not being threaded properly.
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> No NNTP "References" line, I suspect:
> > > >> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.os.development/msg/5556032c112998c4
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > I'm using the web-interface for groups.google.com.  It's nothing I'm
> > > > doing.  Talk to Google. :-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, apparently, Google sometimes uses "In-reply-to:" in place of the
> > > "References:" field.  Our moderation software does not currently preserve
> > > "In-reply-to:" as it, perhaps, should.
> > >
> > 
> > If the "In-reply-to:" field is set and the "References:" field isn't, rename
> > the field...  It won't fix his posts to non-moderated groups, like
> > alt.os.development, where his posts are doing the same thing.  FYI, I've not
> > noticed this issue with other posts to Usenet via Google Groups users.
> > 
> > "He," or the web interface, also trims the replied to headers in the message
> > body.  Maybe they're the problem...
> > 
> > 
> > Rod Pemberton
> 
> test

On both of these (the "test" and this reply), I just hit reply and added stuff at the end.  I didn't delete anything or alter anything in the quoted content above.

- Rick C. Hodgin
0
Reply foxmuldrster (53) 3/23/2011 4:00:35 AM


0 Replies
207 Views

(page loaded in 0.028 seconds)

Similiar Articles:













7/2/2012 3:49:21 PM


Reply: