Just FYI - I think your posts (in this NG) are being filtered out by my
news provider.  I don't want to go into a full exposition and proof of
why this is so, but suffice to say that it is my considered believe that
something about the way you are posting is setting off spam flags.  Have
you changed anything recently?

P.S.  I suppose if you reply to this post, I won't see your response.
Maybe you can send me an email...

-- 
One of the best lines I've heard lately:

    Obama could cure cancer tomorrow, and the Republicans would be
    complaining that he had ruined the pharmaceutical business.

(Heard on Stephanie Miller = but the sad thing is that there is an awful lot
of direct truth in it.  We've constructed an economy in which eliminating
cancer would be a horrible disaster.  There are many other such examples.)

On 10/28/2010 1:55 PM, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> Just FYI - I think your posts (in this NG) are being filtered out by my
> news provider.  I don't want to go into a full exposition and proof of
> why this is so, but suffice to say that it is my considered believe that
> something about the way you are posting is setting off spam flags.  Have
> you changed anything recently?
>
> P.S.  I suppose if you reply to this post, I won't see your response.
> Maybe you can send me an email...
>

I post 2 ways:

1) from eternal-september.org, and
2) from google groups.

This one is from eternal-september, and I'm about to post an almost identical 
response from google.

Let me know which you do/don't see. I haven't changed anything about the way I 
post. If I don't see a response in a day or so, I'll email you.

Thanks,

	Ed.

On Oct 28, 1:55=A0pm, gaze...@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
wrote:
> Just FYI - I think your posts (in this NG) are being filtered out by my
> news provider. =A0I don't want to go into a full exposition and proof of
> why this is so, but suffice to say that it is my considered believe that
> something about the way you are posting is setting off spam flags. =A0Hav=
e
> you changed anything recently?
>
> P.S. =A0I suppose if you reply to this post, I won't see your response.
> Maybe you can send me an email...
>
> --
> One of the best lines I've heard lately:
>
> =A0 =A0 Obama could cure cancer tomorrow, and the Republicans would be
> =A0 =A0 complaining that he had ruined the pharmaceutical business.
>
> (Heard on Stephanie Miller =3D but the sad thing is that there is an awfu=
l lot
> of direct truth in it. =A0We've constructed an economy in which eliminati=
ng
> cancer would be a horrible disaster. =A0There are many other such example=
s.)

I post 2 ways:

1) from eternal-september.org, and
2) from google groups.

I posted one a few minutes ago from eternal-september, and this almost
identical one is from google.

Let me know which you do/don't see. I haven't changed anything about
the way I post. If I don't see a response in a day or so, I'll email
you.

Thanks,

	Ed.

In article <52e750d8-1862-4199-a2d3-aa2add46d0fa@g25g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
Ed Morton  <mortonspam@gmail.com> wrote:

Hmmm.  Got 'em both.  So, maybe the problem was transient and has gone
away.  Thanks for your effort.

-- 
Just for a change of pace, this sig is *not* an obscure reference to
comp.lang.c...

On 10/28/2010 11:51 PM, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> In article<52e750d8-1862-4199-a2d3-aa2add46d0fa@g25g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
> Ed Morton<mortonspam@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> Hmmm.  Got 'em both.  So, maybe the problem was transient and has gone
> away.  Thanks for your effort.
>

Beats me. I did try to send you an email and that got rejected though (see below).

	Ed.

> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
> Date: Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:32 PM
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> To: mortonspam@gmail.com
>
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>     gazelle@shell.xmission.com
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550-XM-RJCT06: Sending mail to <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> from
> 550-[209.85.160.177] is not allowed from your host. If you are an XMission
> 550 customer please use SMTP authentication before sending. (Relaying Denied) (state 14).
>
> ----- Original message -----
>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Received: by 10.90.24.8 with SMTP id 8mr3505439agx.184.1288308751625; Thu, 28
>  Oct 2010 16:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.90.231.12 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:32:31 -0500
> Message-ID: <AANLkTi=RUk08aQQLRDL5ZM0uJaomPU1xYpB-5AAfXc17@mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: comp.lang.awk messages
> From: Ed Morton <mortonspam@gmail.com>
> To: gazelle@shell.xmission.com
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016361e7a70806e560493b5c123
>
> Kenny - thanks for the heads up on some news servers possibly screening out
> my comp.lang.awk messages. I just posted 2 responses to you, let's see what
> happens.
>
>        Ed.