=?iso-8859-1?q?Druckvorschau_ist_nur_Schwarz_wei=DF_!!?=

Hallo, ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann ihn so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke. pDC->SetTextColor(RGB ( 0,0,0) ); pDC->SetBkColor( RGB (0,95,160) ); pDC->TextOut(x*600,y*360,m_rSet->m_Vorname + " " + m_rSet->m_Name); So wenn ich nun einen Farbdrucker ausgew=E4hlt habe dann hat der Texhintergrund auch die richtige farbe. Wenn ich nun aber einen Schwar wei=DF druckertreiber ausgew=E4hlt habe dann ist der Hintergrund wei=DF. Kann ich den farbigen Hintergrund nicht erzwingen egal ob Schwarz wei=DF drucker oder nicht ? ( nat=FCrlich nur in der Seitenansicht ) In MS Word geht das doch auch=20 Danke Jens

> ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann > ihn > so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke. .... 3 problems here. - newsgroup is english - off topic, see microsoft.public.ms-windows.programmer.win32 or .mfc - MS Word has a self-written print preview. If you use the MFC thingy it emulates the printer cheers, -Gernot

Gernot Frisch wrote: > > ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann > > ihn > > so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke. > > ... > > 3 problems here. > - newsgroup is english Really? I know the majority of the members (if not all) speak English and that it helps to have a common language. I do not believe, though, that there is any mandate that posters must use English. I would hope that a non-English speaker could still attempt to get help here, even though such help may be limited. I would also hope that the use of German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT. just my halfpence, REH

REH wrote: > Gernot Frisch wrote: > >>>ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann >>>ihn >>>so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke. >> >>... >> >>3 problems here. >>- newsgroup is english > > > Really? I know the majority of the members (if not all) speak English > and that it helps to have a common language. I do not believe, though, > that there is any mandate that posters must use English. There is no mandate to post in any particular way, period. 'c.l.c++' is after all an unmoderated newsgroup. However, there is Netiquette, following which makes everything simpler. While Netiquette does not require English to be used on posts to international newsgroups, a charter of that newsgroup might. No, I couldn't locate the original charter for 'comp.lang.c++' which leads me to believe that it had outlived its usefulness at some point in the past. However, there is the "Welcome" message posted here regularly that _is_ in English (which should serve as a hint), it also mentions the FAQ Lite (that does contain a section on 'comp.lang.c++', BTW), and that list is also in English and contains some recommendations how to find _where_ to post (the use of local, humanlanguage-specific newsgroups should be apparent here as well). There is RFC 1855, which for NetNews recommends _reading_ the newsgroup where you intend to post for one or two _months_ prior to posting. Had _anyone_ who recently asked questions here for the first time done that? I somehow strongly doubt that. Had the OP of this thread cared to _read_ he might post differently and cause less commotion. The last thing I'd like to mention goes to respect and less to common sense in Usenet postings. If one posts in a language that is not usually spoken (written/read) in a newsgroup, he/she effectively *forcefully* excludes those who don't understand that language from the discussion, thus discriminating without a good reason. The same goes to posts with OS-specific or compiler-specific subjects, and that's why they are met with criticism. We are all interested in discussing C++. Very few of us are interested in any particular OS or compiler, especially since there are newsgroups for those specifically. Just like the 'de.comp.*' forums. > I would hope > that a non-English speaker could still attempt to get help here, even > though such help may be limited. I would also hope that the use of > German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT. Flamed, not. Corrected, absolutely. > just my halfpence, Yep... V -- Please remove capital As from my address when replying by mail

REH wrote: > Really? I know the majority of the members (if not all) speak English > and that it helps to have a common language. I do not believe, though, > that there is any mandate that posters must use English. I'm pretty sure that the common charter of the Big Eight hierarchies actually sets out English as the common language. I don't know how to locate a corresponding document but I remember reading several charter related documents when I became a moderator. ... and there was definitely a discussion of the [human] language policies in those hierarchies as well as UseNet wide policies (e.g. that asking others to do a homework assignment is inappropriate, as are many other things, of course). > I would also hope that the use of > German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT. Well, if we let it pass unchallenged, others might get the impression that German is an appropriate language in this forum. Thus, we shall not let it pass without pointing out that it is inappropriate. The exact form of such a reply shall, of course, be appropriate. Of course, we could happily flame the original article because it talks about environment specific issues which are off-topic anyway :-) -- <mailto:dietmar_kuehl@yahoo.com> <http://www.dietmar-kuehl.de/> <http://www.eai-systems.com> - Efficient Artificial Intelligence

Victor Bazarov wrote: > REH wrote: > There is no mandate to post in any particular way, period. 'c.l.c++' is > after all an unmoderated newsgroup. However, there is Netiquette, > following which makes everything simpler. While Netiquette does not > require English to be used on posts to international newsgroups, > a charter of that newsgroup might. > > No, I couldn't locate the original charter for 'comp.lang.c++' which leads > me to believe that it had outlived its usefulness at some point in the > past. However, there is the "Welcome" message posted here regularly that > _is_ in English (which should serve as a hint), it also mentions the FAQ > Lite (that does contain a section on 'comp.lang.c++', BTW), and that list > is also in English and contains some recommendations how to find _where_ > to post (the use of local, humanlanguage-specific newsgroups should be > apparent here as well). > > There is RFC 1855, which for NetNews recommends _reading_ the newsgroup > where you intend to post for one or two _months_ prior to posting. Had > _anyone_ who recently asked questions here for the first time done that? > I somehow strongly doubt that. > > Had the OP of this thread cared to _read_ he might post differently and > cause less commotion. > > The last thing I'd like to mention goes to respect and less to common > sense in Usenet postings. If one posts in a language that is not usually > spoken (written/read) in a newsgroup, he/she effectively *forcefully* > excludes those who don't understand that language from the discussion, > thus discriminating without a good reason. The same goes to posts with > OS-specific or compiler-specific subjects, and that's why they are met > with criticism. We are all interested in discussing C++. Very few of > us are interested in any particular OS or compiler, especially since there > are newsgroups for those specifically. Just like the 'de.comp.*' forums. > > > I would hope > > that a non-English speaker could still attempt to get help here, even > > though such help may be limited. I would also hope that the use of > > German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT. > > Flamed, not. Corrected, absolutely. > > > just my halfpence, > > Yep... > > V > -- Well, I will submit to the will of the majority. I do find it a little sad, though. REH

REH wrote: > Victor Bazarov wrote: > [...blah blah blah-dee-blah...] > > Well, I will submit to the will of the majority. I do find it a little > sad, though. Democracy's a bitch. The alternatives are worse, however.

In article <47qis2Fh4tl8U1@individual.net>, Gernot Frisch <Me@Privacy.net> writes > >> ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann >> ihn >> so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke. > >... > >3 problems here. >- newsgroup is english No its not. You can use any language here. Might get better relies if you use the right non-English language. :-) >- off topic, see microsoft.public.ms-windows.programmer.win32 or .mfc >- MS Word has a self-written print preview. If you use the MFC thingy >it emulates the printer Agreed. though as you posted in English you have no idea if the OP understands that.... -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ /\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

In article <47qsa9Fgp0t6U1@individual.net>, Dietmar Kuehl <dietmar_kuehl@yahoo.com> writes > >> I would also hope that the use of >> German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT. > >Well, if we let it pass unchallenged, others might get the impression >that German is an appropriate language in this forum. and why not if they want to use it. It will restrict the replies they let. Let democracy prevail. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ /\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

In article <DyWRf.6222$a97.3444@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net>, Victor Bazarov <v.Abazarov@comAcast.net> writes >REH wrote: >> Gernot Frisch wrote: >> >>>>ich gebe mit folgendem Code den text auf dem Dokument aus und kann >>>>ihn >>>>so in der Druckvorschau ansehen befor ich ihn drucke. >>> >>>... >>> >>>3 problems here. >>>- newsgroup is english >> >> >> Really? I know the majority of the members (if not all) speak English >> and that it helps to have a common language. I do not believe, though, >> that there is any mandate that posters must use English. > >No, I couldn't locate the original charter for 'comp.lang.c++' which leads >me to believe that it had outlived its usefulness at some point in the >past. However, there is the "Welcome" message posted here regularly that >_is_ in English I bet it's in American :-) >The last thing I'd like to mention goes to respect and less to common >sense in Usenet postings. If one posts in a language that is not usually >spoken (written/read) in a newsgroup, he/she effectively *forcefully* >excludes those who don't understand that language from the discussion, >thus discriminating without a good reason. You don't know that. Also by insisting on English you are also excluding a large part of the world that don't use English. I don't know what is going to happen when the Chinese eventually get open access to the Internet NG's what does Chines look like in ASCII? :-) BTW I note The IEEE recently excluded large parts of it's membership recently whilst the US engaged in a war for Democracy :-) People can use any language they like. It just restricts the number of people who can reply to them. Either more people will start using German (or what ever) or they won't. Natural selection. >The same goes to posts with >OS-specific or compiler-specific subjects, and that's why they are met >with criticism. Agreed. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ /\/\/ chris@phaedsys.org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

Chris Hills wrote: > I don't know what is going to happen when the Chinese eventually get > open access to the Internet NG's what does Chines look like in ASCII? > :-) Just look at the porn and warez spam in this newsgroup. :-)

Chris Hills wrote: > In article <DyWRf.6222$a97.3444@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net>, > Victor Bazarov <v.Abazarov@comAcast.net> writes > [...] >>The last thing I'd like to mention goes to respect and less to common >>sense in Usenet postings. If one posts in a language that is not usually >>spoken (written/read) in a newsgroup, he/she effectively *forcefully* >>excludes those who don't understand that language from the discussion, >>thus discriminating without a good reason. > > > You don't know that. Oh, yes, I do. That's why I said it. > Also by insisting on English you are also excluding a large part of the > world that don't use English. Yes, but for their benefit there are local newsgroups, like 'de.comp' or 'cz.comp' or 'japan.comp' hierarchies. > [...] > > People can use any language they like. It just restricts the number of > people who can reply to them. Either more people will start using > German (or what ever) or they won't. Natural selection. So, my reply to him/her is part of that natural selection. You have a problem with that? V -- Please remove capital As from my address when replying by mail

Chris Hills wrote: > In article <47qsa9Fgp0t6U1@individual.net>, Dietmar Kuehl > <dietmar_kuehl@yahoo.com> writes > >>>I would also hope that the use of >>>German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT. >> >>Well, if we let it pass unchallenged, others might get the impression >>that German is an appropriate language in this forum. > > > and why not if they want to use it. It will restrict the replies they > let. Let democracy prevail. I think you confuse anarchy with democracy.

> Democracy's a bitch. The alternatives are worse, however. If you want 90% stupids to choose for your future, democracy's the way to go. BTW. There's no democracy in Germany, otherwise we would not have the Euro, nor would we be part of the EU. We have not been asked and we had no alternatives to choose from. *Sigh*

REH wrote in message > I would also hope that the use of >German alone is not enough to get someone flamed as OT. >REH OOOhh, German!! I thought it was some freaked out Ozark moonshiner, who sampled too much of his squeezins, and was typing to Dvorak on a Qwerty keyboard! No wonder ROT13 didn't work on it. -- Bob <G> R POVrookie

Gernot Frisch <Me@Privacy.net> schrieb > >> Democracy's a bitch. The alternatives are worse, however. > > If you want 90% stupids to choose for your future, democracy's the way > to go. BTW. There's no democracy in Germany, otherwise we would not > have the Euro, nor would we be part of the EU. We have not been asked > and we had no alternatives to choose from. Well, at least you can choose your official leader. Its not so, that this would have any influence, but it's still much more than you can do in other countries.