Found some ebook about C++ Parogramming from one free ebook site.
Here are some title to share among us.

# Addison Welsey - The C++ Prog Language Special 3rd Ed
# Addison Wesley -- Essential C++
# Addison Wesley -- The C++ Programming Language Special 3rd Edition
# Addison Wesley C++ Network Programming,Volume 1
# Addison Wesley C++ Network Programming,Volume 2
# C & C++ Programming Style Guidlines - Fred Richards
# C++ 2005 for Dummies
# C++ for Dummies 5th Edition
# C++ Programming HOWTO
# C++ Timesaving Techniques for Dummies

http://ebook.mazudi.com/?w=c%2B%2B+programming

Laurynn wrote:
> 
> Found some ebook about C++ Parogramming from one free ebook site.
> Here are some title to share among us.
> 
> # Addison Welsey - The C++ Prog Language Special 3rd Ed
.... snip more ...

If you closely examine the name of this news group, you may notice
the lack of a '++' in the name.  If you closely examing the name of
comp.lang.c++ newsgroup, you might find that missing '++'.  You
will also find that your post is topical there.  Here it is not.

C++ is not C.

-- 
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) 
 [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
            Try the download section.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

CBFalconer wrote:

> Laurynn wrote:
>> 
>> Found some ebook about C++ Parogramming from one free ebook site.
>> Here are some title to share among us.
>> 
>> # Addison Welsey - The C++ Prog Language Special 3rd Ed
> ... snip more ...
> 
> If you closely examine the name of this news group, you may notice
> the lack of a '++' in the name.  If you closely examing the name of
> comp.lang.c++ newsgroup, you might find that missing '++'.  You
> will also find that your post is topical there.  Here it is not.
> 
> C++ is not C.

� � � � � +-------------------+ � � � � � � .:\:\:/:/:.
� � � � � | � PLEASE DO NOT � | � � � � � �:.:\:\:/:/:.:
� � � � � | � FEED SPAMMERS � | � � � � � :=.' - � - '.=:
� � � � � | � � � � � � � � � | � � � � � '=(\ 9 � 9 /)='
� � � � � | � Thank you, � � �| � � � � � � �( �(_) �)
� � � � � | � � � Management �| � � � � � � �/`-vvv-'\
� � � � � +-------------------+ � � � � � � / � � � � \
� � � � � � � � � | �| � � � �@@@ � � � � �/ /|,,,,,|\ \
� � � � � � � � � | �| � � � �@@@ � � � � /_// �/^\ �\\_\
� � @x@@x@ � � � �| �| � � � � |/ � � � � WW( �( � ) �)WW
� � \||||/ � � � �| �| � � � �\| � � � � � __\,,\ /,,/__
� � �\||/ � � � � | �| � � � � | � � �jgs (______Y______)
�/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
�==============================================================

On 13 May 2008 at  4:10, CBFalconer wrote:
> Laurynn wrote:
>> 
>> Found some ebook about C++ Parogramming from one free ebook site.
>> Here are some title to share among us.
>> 
>> # Addison Welsey - The C++ Prog Language Special 3rd Ed
> ... snip more ...
>
> If you closely examine the name of this news group, you may notice
> the lack of a '++' in the name.  If you closely examing the name of
> comp.lang.c++ newsgroup, you might find that missing '++'.  You
> will also find that your post is topical there.  Here it is not.

Marvelous. Firstly, we find that the king of net nannies can't resist
responding to spam himself. Secondly, in his warped morality, making an
"off topic" post is a great crime, whereas illegally sharing copyrighted
books doesn't provoke the slightest condemnation.

Antoninus Twink wrote:

> On 13 May 2008 at  4:10, CBFalconer wrote:
>> Laurynn wrote:
>>> 
>>> Found some ebook about C++ Parogramming from one free ebook site.
>>> Here are some title to share among us.
>>> 
>>> # Addison Welsey - The C++ Prog Language Special 3rd Ed
>> ... snip more ...
>>
>> If you closely examine the name of this news group, you may notice
>> the lack of a '++' in the name.  If you closely examing the name of
>> comp.lang.c++ newsgroup, you might find that missing '++'.  You
>> will also find that your post is topical there.  Here it is not.
> 
> Marvelous. Firstly, we find that the king of net nannies can't resist
> responding to spam himself. Secondly, in his warped morality, making
> an "off topic" post is a great crime, whereas illegally sharing
> copyrighted books doesn't provoke the slightest condemnation.

Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here. It's
better done through a private mail to the OP.

santosh <santosh.k83@gmail.com> writes:

> Antoninus Twink wrote:
>
>> On 13 May 2008 at  4:10, CBFalconer wrote:
>>> Laurynn wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Found some ebook about C++ Parogramming from one free ebook site.
>>>> Here are some title to share among us.
>>>> 
>>>> # Addison Welsey - The C++ Prog Language Special 3rd Ed
>>> ... snip more ...
>>>
>>> If you closely examine the name of this news group, you may notice
>>> the lack of a '++' in the name.  If you closely examing the name of
>>> comp.lang.c++ newsgroup, you might find that missing '++'.  You
>>> will also find that your post is topical there.  Here it is not.
>> 
>> Marvelous. Firstly, we find that the king of net nannies can't resist
>> responding to spam himself. Secondly, in his warped morality, making
>> an "off topic" post is a great crime, whereas illegally sharing
>> copyrighted books doesn't provoke the slightest condemnation.
>
> Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here. It's
> better done through a private mail to the OP.

Are you sure you are not he moderator here? More tellings off than I can
count. Why is it ok for you to reply OT but not for the other people?

Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
> santosh <santosh.k83@gmail.com> writes:
> 
.... snip ...
>
>> Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here.
>> It's better done through a private mail to the OP.
> 
> Are you sure you are not he moderator here? More tellings off
> than I can count. Why is it ok for you to reply OT but not for
> the other people?

FYI, discussion of topicality is always topical.

-- 
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) 
 [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
            Try the download section.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

CBFalconer wrote:
> Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
>> santosh <santosh.k83@gmail.com> writes:
>>
> ... snip ...
>>
>>> Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here.
>>> It's better done through a private mail to the OP.
>>
>> Are you sure you are not he moderator here? More tellings off
>> than I can count. Why is it ok for you to reply OT but not for
>> the other people?
>
> FYI, discussion of topicality is always topical.
Replys to spam never are. 

Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:

> santosh <santosh.k83@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Antoninus Twink wrote:
>>
>>> On 13 May 2008 at  4:10, CBFalconer wrote:
>>>> Laurynn wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Found some ebook about C++ Parogramming from one free ebook site.
>>>>> Here are some title to share among us.
>>>>> 
>>>>> # Addison Welsey - The C++ Prog Language Special 3rd Ed
>>>> ... snip more ...
>>>>
>>>> If you closely examine the name of this news group, you may notice
>>>> the lack of a '++' in the name.  If you closely examing the name of
>>>> comp.lang.c++ newsgroup, you might find that missing '++'.  You
>>>> will also find that your post is topical there.  Here it is not.
>>> 
>>> Marvelous. Firstly, we find that the king of net nannies can't
>>> resist responding to spam himself. Secondly, in his warped morality,
>>> making an "off topic" post is a great crime, whereas illegally
>>> sharing copyrighted books doesn't provoke the slightest
>>> condemnation.
>>
>> Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here. It's
>> better done through a private mail to the OP.
> 
> Are you sure you are not he moderator here? More tellings off than I
> can count. Why is it ok for you to reply OT but not for the other
> people?

Guess I should've added a smiley.

"Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@schmitz-digital.de> writes:

> CBFalconer wrote:
>> Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
>>> santosh <santosh.k83@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>> ... snip ...
>>>
>>>> Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here.
>>>> It's better done through a private mail to the OP.
>>>
>>> Are you sure you are not he moderator here? More tellings off
>>> than I can count. Why is it ok for you to reply OT but not for
>>> the other people?
>>
>> FYI, discussion of topicality is always topical.
> Replys to spam never are. 

I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same person I
think? All they seem to do is to telling people off for what they are
seeing as topic issues.

Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
> "Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@schmitz-digital.de> writes:
<snip>
> I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same
> person I think?
I don't believe that.

Bye, Jojo 

Joachim Schmitz wrote:
> Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same
>> person I think?
>
> I don't believe that.

Nor do I :-)

-- 
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) 
 [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
            Try the download section.


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Joachim Schmitz said:

> Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:
>> "Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@schmitz-digital.de> writes:
> <snip>
>> I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same
>> person I think?
> I don't believe that.

Neither do I - but I'm not surprised that Mr Narutowicz believes it. Some 
people have seriously difficulty in accepting that more than one person 
might disagree with them, which is why these ludicrous allegations of 
sockpuppetry crop up from time to time.

The difference in writing style between Santosh (or rather, "santosh", for 
he invariably eschews the capital) and CBFalconer is significant, and each 
is internally very consistent. If this is one person posting under both 
nicks, he's either extremely clever, patient, and careful or very, very 
unwell indeed. The simplest explanation consistent with the facts is that 
the two identities genuinely belong to different people.

-- 
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999