|
|
Intel Fortran 8.0 resource usage during compilation
Hello all,
this not about reporting a bug, but did anybody notice that in rare
cases the current Intel Fortran compiler (Linux version) uses
exceptional amounts of resources (CPU & memory) as compared to version
7.1? At the same time the produced object files are significantly
larger.
To be specific: while recompiling LAPACK95 from netlib.org, the
following files all required much more that 10 times the CPU time and
had more than tenfold larger memory footprint while compiling (-O1),
whereas the objects were more than five times larger that with ifc-7.1:
la_cggesx.f90
la_dggesx.f90
la_sggesx.f90
la_zggesx.f90
Does anybody see a reason why this should be so?
--
Ciao,
-ha
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
anlauf (32)
|
12/17/2003 2:45:56 PM |
|
Yes, and the situations aren't rare. I can't build my program on my old
Linux box because 750 MBytes of memory, physical and virtual, just
aren't enough. When I complained, Intel said get more memory, so I'll
just continue to rely on Lahey.
Norm Clerman
Opcon Associates, Inc.
www.opconassociates.com
norm.opcon@fuse.net
Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> this not about reporting a bug, but did anybody notice that in rare
> cases the current Intel Fortran compiler (Linux version) uses
> exceptional amounts of resources (CPU & memory) as compared to version
> 7.1? At the same time the produced object files are significantly
> larger.
>
> To be specific: while recompiling LAPACK95 from netlib.org, the
> following files all required much more that 10 times the CPU time and
> had more than tenfold larger memory footprint while compiling (-O1),
> whereas the objects were more than five times larger that with ifc-7.1:
>
> la_cggesx.f90
> la_dggesx.f90
> la_sggesx.f90
> la_zggesx.f90
>
> Does anybody see a reason why this should be so?
>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
norm.opcon (19)
|
12/17/2003 8:25:05 PM
|
|
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:25:05 -0500, Norman Clerman wrote:
> Yes, and the situations aren't rare. I can't build my program on my old
> Linux box because 750 MBytes of memory, physical and virtual, just
> aren't enough. When I complained, Intel said get more memory, so I'll
> just continue to rely on Lahey.
Which options are you using, and how large is your application?
...Scott
--
Scott Robert Ladd
Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com)
Software Invention for High-Performance Computing
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
scott8 (19)
|
12/17/2003 8:36:26 PM
|
|
|
2 Replies
43 Views
(page loaded in 0.065 seconds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|