Email Script

I'm using the following script on my web site.  I have done this in
order to keep web spider programs from harvesting my email address.

I want to have the "Subject" line filled in also.

Does anyone know how I can do that?

Thanks

---------------------------------------------

<script language="javascript">

  <!--

  var contact = " Contact MySiteName"

  var email = "myname"

  var emailHost = "MySiteName.com"

  document.write("<a href=" + "mail" + "to:" + email + "@" +
emailHost+ ">" + contact + "</a>")

  //-->

</script>

0
TomatoeMan
10/4/2004 8:59:56 PM
comp.lang.javascript 38159 articles. 0 followers. javascript4 (1315) is leader. Post Follow

20 Replies
308 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 31
In article <tde3m010ivbsatsvcb1gr5rofbqjtuteaf@4ax.com>, TomatoeMan 
says...
> I'm using the following script on my web site.  I have done this in
> order to keep web spider programs from harvesting my email address.
> 
> I want to have the "Subject" line filled in also.
> 
> Does anyone know how I can do that?

Use a server-side form handler.  Trying it with mailto won't work.

-- 
Hywel

http://sponsorhywel.org.uk/
0
Hywel
10/4/2004 9:07:46 PM
On 4/10/04 9:59 pm, TomatoeMan wrote:

> I'm using the following script on my web site.  I have done this in
> order to keep web spider programs from harvesting my email address.
> 
> I want to have the "Subject" line filled in also.
> 
> Does anyone know how I can do that?

Basically you need to form a link with an href that looks like this:

mailto:me@my.domain.com?subject=This%20is%20the%20subject
(Note: you have to use "%20" instead of spaces in the subject line)

But beware. There appear to be robots out there that can extract email
addresses from simple Javascripts like this. You would be better off using a
stronger form of scrambling. Here's one you could try:

<http://freespace.virgin.net/phil.ronan/scramble.html>

Hope that helps.

Phil

-- 
Philip Ronan
phil.ronanzzz@virgin.net
(Please remove the "z"s if replying by email)


0
Philip
10/4/2004 9:09:40 PM
JRS:  In article <BD877AA4.22E6F%phil.ronanzzz@virgin.net>, dated Mon, 4
Oct 2004 22:09:40, seen in news:comp.lang.javascript, Philip Ronan
<phil.ronanzzz@virgin.net> posted :
>On 4/10/04 9:59 pm, TomatoeMan wrote:
>
>> I'm using the following script on my web site.  I have done this in
>> order to keep web spider programs from harvesting my email address.
>> 
>> I want to have the "Subject" line filled in also.
>> 
>> Does anyone know how I can do that?
>
>Basically you need to form a link with an href that looks like this:
>
>mailto:me@my.domain.com?subject=This%20is%20the%20subject
>(Note: you have to use "%20" instead of spaces in the subject line)

This question, too, should be a <FAQENTRY>, to point out that mailto:...
can only work on systems with an appropriately-configured browser-mailer
interface (and that not all of those can do Subject).

Moreover, the person who wants to send mail is not necessarily the
person who "owns" the browser.

Therefore, there should always be a means of giving the E-mail address
independently of mailto:.


One should never say that mailto: does not work; for many users, it
demonstrably does work.

 
-- 
 � John Stockton, Surrey, UK.  ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk   Turnpike v4.00   MIME � 
 Web <URL:http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/tsfaq.html> -> Timo Salmi: Usenet Q&A.
 Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/news-use.htm> :  about usage of News.
No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News.
0
Dr
10/5/2004 2:01:35 PM
Dr John Stockton wrote:

<--snip-->

> One should never say that mailto: does not work; for many users, it
> demonstrably does work.

I don't recall reading very many posts where it was said that mailto: 
does not work, but I have read many many posts where it was said that it 
was unreliable, since it is unreliable in a web environment.

-- 
Randy
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq
0
Randy
10/5/2004 10:14:04 PM
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000701060601080408010807
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dr John Stockton wrote:

> JRS: In article <BD877AA4.22E6F%phil.ronanzzz@virgin.net>, dated Mon, 4
> Oct 2004 22:09:40, seen in news:comp.lang.javascript, Philip Ronan
> <phil.ronanzzz@virgin.net> posted :
>
>> On 4/10/04 9:59 pm, TomatoeMan wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using the following script on my web site. I have done this in 
>>> order to keep web spider programs from harvesting my email address.
>>>
>>> I want to have the "Subject" line filled in also.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know how I can do that?
>>
>> Basically you need to form a link with an href that looks like this:
>>
>> mailto:me@my.domain.com?subject=This%20is%20the%20subject
>> (Note: you have to use "%20" instead of spaces in the subject line)
>
> This question, too, should be a <FAQENTRY>, to point out that 
> mailto:... can only work on systems with an appropriately-configured 
> browser-mailer interface (and that not all of those can do Subject).

Really? Again I implore, which lame brain browser-mailer interfaces fail 
at this task?

> Moreover, the person who wants to send mail is not necessarily the 
> person who "owns" the browser.

What does that mean? Is not the person who wants to send mail the person 
who just clicked the mailto link? If not then who is that person?!?

> Therefore, there should always be a means of giving the E-mail address 
> independently of mailto:.

I disagree.

> One should never say that mailto: does not work; for many users, it 
> demonstrably does work.

For all users it should work as it is part of the standard, no? For any 
user which it doesn't work then they are using non-standard compliant 
software, no?
-- 
There cannot be a crisis today; my schedule is already full.

--------------000701060601080408010807
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Dr John Stockton wrote:
<blockquote cite="midehtrEpI$kqYBFweg@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">JRS:
In article <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:BD877AA4.22E6F%phil.ronanzzz@virgin.net">&lt;BD877AA4.22E6F%phil.ronanzzz@virgin.net&gt;</a>, dated Mon, 4<br>
Oct 2004 22:09:40, seen in <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:comp.lang.javascript">news:comp.lang.javascript</a>, Philip Ronan<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:phil.ronanzzz@virgin.net">&lt;phil.ronanzzz@virgin.net&gt;</a> posted :<br>
  <blockquote type="cite">On 4/10/04 9:59 pm, TomatoeMan wrote:<br>
    <blockquote type="cite">I'm using the following script on my web
site. I have done this in order to keep web spider programs from
harvesting my email address.<br>
      <br>
I want to have the "Subject" line filled in also.<br>
      <br>
Does anyone know how I can do that?<br>
    </blockquote>
Basically you need to form a link with an href that looks like this:<br>
    <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:me@my.domain.com?subject=This%20is%20the%20subject">mailto:me@my.domain.com?subject=This%20is%20the%20subject</a><br>
(Note: you have to use "%20" instead of spaces in the subject line)<br>
  </blockquote>
<!---->This question, too, should be a &lt;FAQENTRY&gt;, to point out
that mailto:... can only work on systems with an
appropriately-configured browser-mailer interface (and that not all of
those can do Subject).<br>
</blockquote>
Really? Again I implore, which lame brain browser-mailer interfaces
fail at this task? <br>
<blockquote cite="midehtrEpI$kqYBFweg@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">Moreover,
the person who wants to send mail is not necessarily the person who
"owns" the browser.<br>
</blockquote>
What does that mean? Is not the person who wants to send mail the
person who just clicked the mailto link? If not then who is that
person?!?<br>
<blockquote cite="midehtrEpI$kqYBFweg@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">Therefore,
there should always be a means of giving the E-mail address
independently of mailto:.<br>
</blockquote>
I disagree.<br>
<blockquote cite="midehtrEpI$kqYBFweg@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">One
should never say that mailto: does not work; for many users, it
demonstrably does work.<br>
</blockquote>
For all users it should work as it is part of the standard, no? For any
user which it doesn't work then they are using non-standard compliant
software, no?<br>
-- <br>
There cannot be a crisis today; my schedule is already full.<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------000701060601080408010807--
0
Andrew
10/6/2004 12:37:19 AM
JRS:  In article <ycOdndSwb-Q-gf7cRVn-pQ@comcast.com>, dated Tue, 5 Oct
2004 18:14:04, seen in news:comp.lang.javascript, Randy Webb
<HikksNotAtHome@aol.com> posted :
>Dr John Stockton wrote:
>
><--snip-->
>
>> One should never say that mailto: does not work; for many users, it
>> demonstrably does work.
>
>I don't recall reading very many posts where it was said that mailto: 
>does not work,

I recall seeing enough to justify the warning.

> but I have read many many posts where it was said that it 
>was unreliable, since it is unreliable in a web environment.

Agreed.
 
-- 
 � John Stockton, Surrey, UK.  ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk   Turnpike v4.00   MIME. �
 Web  <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - FAQqish topics, acronyms & links;
 some Astro stuff via astro.htm, gravity0.htm; quotes.htm; pascal.htm; &c, &c.
 No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News.
0
Dr
10/6/2004 1:40:05 PM
JRS:  In article <22251$41633db1$c09cfcf$19738@msgid.meganewsservers.com
>, dated Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:37:19, seen in news:comp.lang.javascript,
Andrew DeFaria <Andrew@DeFaria.com> posted :

Don't post HTML or multipart - see FAQ 2.3.

>    Dr John Stockton wrote: 

>>       This question, too, should be a <FAQENTRY>, to point out that 
>>       mailto:... can only work on systems with an 
>>       appropriately-configured browser-mailer interface (and that not 
>>       all of those can do Subject).
>    Really? Again I implore, which lame brain browser-mailer interfaces 
>    fail at this task? 

Any where the browser and mailer have not been configured to interact,
or whose interaction has been de-configured.  I do not want my browser
to interact with my mail system, except by a trusted mechanism, which
means one independent of MS.  My browser does not know my E-mail
address; my mail/news system is from a different, trusted supplier who
is reliably security-conscious; therefore I allow mailto: to start, but
of course not send, E-mail.

>>       Moreover, the person who wants to send mail is not necessarily 
>>       the person who "owns" the browser.
>    What does that mean? Is not the person who wants to send mail the 
>    person who just clicked the mailto link? If not then who is that 
>    person?!?

Who knows? it is the person holding the mouse.  The computer may belong
to someone else entirely; a family member, a friend, the Public Library,
the school.  It does not necessarily know the E-mail address of the
putative sender; its owner is not necessarily willing to provide mail-
sending to the current user.  And the current user may want to send mail
to the web page owner, but not from his current location.

>>       Therefore, there should always be a means of giving the E-mail 
>>       address independently of mailto:.
>    I disagree.

You have not successfully applied adequate thought and understanding to
the matter.

>>       One should never say that mailto: does not work; for many users, 
>>       it demonstrably does work.
>    For all users it should work as it is part of the standard, no? For 
>    any user which it doesn't work then they are using non-standard 
>    compliant software, no?

Yhnsaatauttm.
 
-- 
 � John Stockton, Surrey, UK.  ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk   Turnpike v4.00   IE 4 �
 <URL:http://www.jibbering.com/faq/>  JL/RC: FAQ of news:comp.lang.javascript 
 <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-index.htm> jscr maths, dates, sources.
 <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> TP/BP/Delphi/jscr/&c, FAQ items, links.
0
Dr
10/6/2004 1:52:03 PM
Andrew DeFaria wrote:

> Dr John Stockton wrote:

<--snip-->

>> This question, too, should be a <FAQENTRY>, to point out that 
>> mailto:... can only work on systems with an appropriately-configured 
>> browser-mailer interface (and that not all of those can do Subject).
> 
> 
> Really? Again I implore, which lame brain browser-mailer interfaces fail 
> at this task?

See my other reply to you.

>> Moreover, the person who wants to send mail is not necessarily the 
>> person who "owns" the browser.
> 
> What does that mean? Is not the person who wants to send mail the person 
> who just clicked the mailto link? If not then who is that person?!?

You are confusing the user with the "owner" of the browser. Go in an 
Internet Cafe, click a mailto:, who owns the computer/browser?

>> Therefore, there should always be a means of giving the E-mail address 
>> independently of mailto:.
> 
> 
> I disagree.
> 
>> One should never say that mailto: does not work; for many users, it 
>> demonstrably does work.
> 
> For all users it should work as it is part of the standard, no? For any 
> user which it doesn't work then they are using non-standard compliant 
> software, no?

Can you quote that "standard"?

And, can you give a list of "standard compliant software"? I have 7 
browsers, mailto: does not work in a single one. Which one isnt 
standards compliant?

-- 
Randy
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq
0
Randy
10/6/2004 5:14:23 PM
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040803090309050005020101
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dr John Stockton wrote:

> JRS: In article <22251$41633db1$c09cfcf$19738@msgid.meganewsservers.com
>
>> , dated Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:37:19, seen in news:comp.lang.javascript,
>
> Andrew DeFaria <Andrew@DeFaria.com> posted :
>
> Don't post HTML or multipart - see FAQ 2.3.

Ah, no. End of discussion.

>> Dr John Stockton wrote:
>
>
>>> This question, too, should be a <FAQENTRY>, to point out that
>>> mailto:... can only work on systems with an
>>> appropriately-configured browser-mailer interface (and that not
>>> all of those can do Subject).
>>
>> Really? Again I implore, which lame brain browser-mailer interfaces
>> fail at this task?
>
> Any where the browser and mailer have not been configured to interact, 
> or whose interaction has been de-configured. 

Every email client I've seen comes configured to handle mailto links.

> I do not want my browser to interact with my mail system, except by a 
> trusted mechanism, which means one independent of MS. 

Then get one that is independent of MS. Try Thunderbird. Switch to 
Linux. Otherwise you are explicitly saying you don't want mailto links 
to work. Fine. Then they won't for you.

> My browser does not know my E-mail address; 

So?

> my mail/news system is from a different, trusted supplier who is 
> reliably security-conscious; therefore I allow mailto: to start, but 
> of course not send, E-mail.

That's all a mailto link does anyway!

>>> Moreover, the person who wants to send mail is not necessarily the 
>>> person who "owns" the browser.
>>
>> What does that mean? Is not the person who wants to send mail the 
>> person who just clicked the mailto link? If not then who is that 
>> person?!?
>
> Who knows? it is the person holding the mouse. The computer may belong 
> to someone else entirely; a family member, a friend, the Public 
> Library, the school. It does not necessarily know the E-mail address 
> of the putative sender; its owner is not necessarily willing to 
> provide mail-sending to the current user. And the current user may 
> want to send mail to the web page owner, but not from his current 
> location.

Then mailto functionality is not for you I guess. But it's better than 
form based email by far IMHO.

>>> Therefore, there should always be a means of giving the E-mail 
>>> address independently of mailto:.
>>
>> I disagree.
>
> You have not successfully applied adequate thought and understanding 
> to the matter.

Funny I was gonna say the same thing about you!

>>> One should never say that mailto: does not work; for many users,
>>> it demonstrably does work.
>>
>> For all users it should work as it is part of the standard, no? For
>> any user which it doesn't work then they are using non-standard
>> compliant software, no?
>
> Yhnsaatauttm.

Whatever dude...
-- 
If one synchronized swimmer drowns, do the rest have to drown too?

--------------040803090309050005020101
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Dr John Stockton wrote:
<blockquote cite="midI0C+xqJDi$YBFwMM@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">JRS:
In article &lt;<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:22251$41633db1$c09cfcf$19738@msgid.meganewsservers.com">22251$41633db1$c09cfcf$19738@msgid.meganewsservers.com</a><br>
  <blockquote type="cite">, dated Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:37:19, seen in
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:comp.lang.javascript">news:comp.lang.javascript</a>,<br>
  </blockquote>
<!---->Andrew DeFaria <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Andrew@DeFaria.com">&lt;Andrew@DeFaria.com&gt;</a> posted :<br>
  <br>
Don't post HTML or multipart - see FAQ 2.3.<br>
</blockquote>
Ah, no. End of discussion.<br>
<blockquote cite="midI0C+xqJDi$YBFwMM@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">
  <blockquote type="cite"> Dr John Stockton wrote: <br>
  </blockquote>
<!----><br>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <blockquote type="cite"> This question, too, should be a
&lt;FAQENTRY&gt;, to point out that <br>
mailto:... can only work on systems with an <br>
appropriately-configured browser-mailer interface (and that not <br>
all of those can do Subject).<br>
    </blockquote>
Really? Again I implore, which lame brain browser-mailer interfaces <br>
fail at this task? <br>
  </blockquote>
Any where the browser and mailer have not been configured to interact,
or whose interaction has been de-configured. </blockquote>
Every email client I've seen comes configured to handle mailto links.<br>
<blockquote cite="midI0C+xqJDi$YBFwMM@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">I
do not want my browser to interact with my mail system, except by a
trusted mechanism, which means one independent of MS. </blockquote>
Then get one that is independent of MS. Try Thunderbird. Switch to
Linux. Otherwise you are explicitly saying you don't want mailto links
to work. Fine. Then they won't for you.<br>
<blockquote cite="midI0C+xqJDi$YBFwMM@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">My
browser does not know my E-mail address; </blockquote>
So?<br>
<blockquote cite="midI0C+xqJDi$YBFwMM@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">my
mail/news system is from a different, trusted supplier who is reliably
security-conscious; therefore I allow mailto: to start, but of course
not send, E-mail.<br>
</blockquote>
That's all a mailto link does anyway!<br>
<blockquote cite="midI0C+xqJDi$YBFwMM@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <blockquote type="cite"> Moreover, the person who wants to send
mail is not necessarily the person who "owns" the browser.<br>
    </blockquote>
What does that mean? Is not the person who wants to send mail the
person who just clicked the mailto link? If not then who is that
person?!?<br>
  </blockquote>
<!---->Who knows? it is the person holding the mouse. The computer may
belong to someone else entirely; a family member, a friend, the Public
Library, the school. It does not necessarily know the E-mail address of
the putative sender; its owner is not necessarily willing to provide
mail-sending to the current user. And the current user may want to send
mail to the web page owner, but not from his current location.<br>
</blockquote>
Then mailto functionality is not for you I guess. But it's better than
form based email by far IMHO.<br>
<blockquote cite="midI0C+xqJDi$YBFwMM@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <blockquote type="cite"> Therefore, there should always be a means
of giving the E-mail address independently of mailto:.<br>
    </blockquote>
I disagree.<br>
  </blockquote>
<!---->You have not successfully applied adequate thought and
understanding to the matter.<br>
</blockquote>
Funny I was gonna say the same thing about you!<br>
<blockquote cite="midI0C+xqJDi$YBFwMM@merlyn.demon.co.uk" type="cite">
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <blockquote type="cite"> One should never say that mailto: does not
work; for many users, <br>
it demonstrably does work.<br>
    </blockquote>
For all users it should work as it is part of the standard, no? For <br>
any user which it doesn't work then they are using non-standard <br>
compliant software, no?<br>
  </blockquote>
Yhnsaatauttm.<br>
</blockquote>
Whatever dude...<br>
-- <br>
If one synchronized swimmer drowns, do the rest have to drown too?<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------040803090309050005020101--
0
Andrew
10/6/2004 9:45:55 PM
Randy Webb wrote:

>> Really? Again I implore, which lame brain browser-mailer interfaces 
>> fail at this task?
>
> See my other reply to you.

Yeah and see my reply to you. Works great for me.

>>> Moreover, the person who wants to send mail is not necessarily the 
>>> person who "owns" the browser.
>>
>> What does that mean? Is not the person who wants to send mail the 
>> person who just clicked the mailto link? If not then who is that 
>> person?!?
>
> You are confusing the user with the "owner" of the browser. Go in an 
> Internet Cafe, click a mailto:, who owns the computer/browser?

I'd believe the owner would be the Internet Cafe owner, no? I would 
suspect that the email client would pop up, probably incorrectly 
configured. Configure it!

>>> One should never say that mailto: does not work; for many users, it 
>>> demonstrably does work.
>>
>> For all users it should work as it is part of the standard, no? For 
>> any user which it doesn't work then they are using non-standard 
>> compliant software, no?
>
> Can you quote that "standard"?

Sure: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2368.html

> And, can you give a list of "standard compliant software"?

The list would include all software that comply with the standard in 
question.

> I have 7 browsers, mailto: does not work in a single one. Which one 
> isnt standards compliant?

Again, sorry it doesn't work in any of your browsers. I use some of the 
same browsers and they all work just fine for me. I guess the real 
question is why isn't it working for you? I guess I'll ask the standard 
question that I do of all people who fail to give details about their 
problem: What was the first indication that you had that it failed? ;-)
-- 
A mainframe: The biggest PC peripheral available.
0
Andrew
10/6/2004 9:55:29 PM
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:55:29 -0700, Andrew DeFaria <Andrew@DeFaria.com>  
wrote:

> Randy Webb wrote:

[snip]

>> You are confusing the user with the "owner" of the browser. Go in an  
>> Internet Cafe, click a mailto:, who owns the computer/browser?
>
> I'd believe the owner would be the Internet Cafe owner, no? I would  
> suspect that the email client would pop up, probably incorrectly  
> configured. Configure it!

And how do you propose that that is done? Create an account for every  
single person that uses the service? Not likely.

Either you are unable to understand the intrinsic unreliability of the  
mailto: protocol, or you are simply unwilling. Either way, stop wasting  
our time. Do you have nothing better to do than troll this group?

[snip]

>> Can you quote that "standard"?
>
> Sure: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2368.html

That's an RFC, not a standard. If you actually did as instructed and read  
STD 1 (currently RFC 3700, I believe), you would see that RFC 2368 is  
nothing more than a proposed standard; the first stage of standardisation.  
The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) do not recommend that  
proposed standards are implemented as they may change before reaching  
maturity.

To me, it suggests something quite significant when a Standards Track RFC  
has remained at the proposal stage for over six years.

[snip]

Mike

-- 
Michael Winter
Replace ".invalid" with ".uk" to reply by e-mail.
0
Michael
10/7/2004 9:22:26 AM
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:45:55 -0700, Andrew DeFaria <Andrew@DeFaria.com>  
wrote:

> Dr John Stockton wrote:

[snip]

>> Don't post HTML or multipart - see FAQ 2.3.
>
> Ah, no. End of discussion.

Umm, yes. This is a text-only newsgroup.

[snip]

Mike

-- 
Michael Winter
Replace ".invalid" with ".uk" to reply by e-mail.
0
Michael
10/7/2004 9:26:42 AM
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:26:42 GMT, Michael Winter wrote:

> Umm, yes. This is a text-only newsgroup.

Heck yes.  My ISP's news server does it for me 
(strips attachments), automatically and for free.   :-)

-- 
Andrew Thompson
http://www.PhySci.org/codes/  Web & IT Help
http://www.PhySci.org/  Open-source software suite
http://www.1point1C.org/  Science & Technology
http://www.lensescapes.com/  Images that escape the mundane
0
Andrew
10/7/2004 10:03:45 AM
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:03:45 GMT, Andrew Thompson <SeeMySites@www.invalid>  
wrote:

> On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:26:42 GMT, Michael Winter wrote:
>
>> Umm, yes. This is a text-only newsgroup.
>
> Heck yes.  My ISP's news server does it for me
> (strips attachments), automatically and for free.   :-)

My ISP provides two News servers - one is for binaries, the other is for  
text. Guess which one I use.

Mike

-- 
Michael Winter
Replace ".invalid" with ".uk" to reply by e-mail.
0
Michael
10/7/2004 10:28:39 AM
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:28:39 GMT, Michael Winter wrote:

> My ISP provides two News servers - one is for binaries, the other is for  
> text. Guess which one I use.

Do I get a  ( attach \ \ ments )  T-shirt if I get it right?

...that above is intended to be one of those 'red circle
with a diagonal line crossing out word' thingy symbols, 
...what is it?  Oh, yeah ..NOT.

Or mebe that should be a plain ol' ( detachments )         ;-)
0
Andrew
10/7/2004 12:30:27 PM
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:30:27 GMT, Andrew Thompson <SeeMySites@www.invalid>  
wrote:

> On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:28:39 GMT, Michael Winter wrote:
>
>> My ISP provides two News servers - one is for binaries, the other is  
>> for text. Guess which one I use.
>
> Do I get a  ( attach \ \ ments )  T-shirt if I get it right?

Hehe  :P

[snip]

Mike

-- 
Michael Winter
Replace ".invalid" with ".uk" to reply by e-mail.
0
Michael
10/7/2004 1:47:00 PM
Michael Winter wrote:

> On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:55:29 -0700, Andrew DeFaria 
> <Andrew@DeFaria.com>  wrote:
>
>> Randy Webb wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> You are confusing the user with the "owner" of the browser. Go in 
>>> an  Internet Cafe, click a mailto:, who owns the computer/browser?
>>
>>
>> I'd believe the owner would be the Internet Cafe owner, no? I would  
>> suspect that the email client would pop up, probably incorrectly  
>> configured. Configure it!
>
> And how do you propose that that is done? Create an account for every  
> single person that uses the service? Not likely.

Did I suggest that the internet cafe owner configure it? No. I was at an 
internet cafe once in a foreign land. You're right, it came up not 
configured for me (I didn't necessarily click a mailto link though). 
What did I do? (Horrors). I configured it for myself and sent my email. 
No big deal!

> Either you are unable to understand the intrinsic unreliability of 
> the  mailto: protocol, or you are simply unwilling. Either way, stop 
> wasting  our time. Do you have nothing better to do than troll this 
> group?

I'm not trolling - I'm simply expressing my opinion on this - just like 
you. Sorry you seem to have so much of a problem with that!

>>> Can you quote that "standard"?
>>
>> Sure: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2368.html
>
> That's an RFC, not a standard. If you actually did as instructed and 
> read  STD 1 (currently RFC 3700, I believe), you would see that RFC 
> 2368 is  nothing more than a proposed standard; the first stage of 
> standardisation.  The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) do 
> not recommend that  proposed standards are implemented as they may 
> change before reaching  maturity.

There are many RFC's that do not reach maturity and yet are referred to 
as standards. The good thing about standards are that there are so many 
to choose from!
-- 
Some people say "life is short". What?? Life is the longest damn thing 
anyone ever does!! What can you do that's longer?
0
Andrew
10/7/2004 4:13:59 PM
Michael Winter wrote:

> On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:45:55 -0700, Andrew DeFaria 
> <Andrew@DeFaria.com>  wrote:
>
>> Dr John Stockton wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> Don't post HTML or multipart - see FAQ 2.3.
>>
>> Ah, no. End of discussion.
>
> Umm, yes. This is a text-only newsgroup.

Ah, no. Like I said - end of discussion. If you wish to discuss this 
issue then you can discuss it amongst yourselves. I have no interest in 
debating this with you
-- 
I went to a general store, but they wouldn't let me buy anything specific.
0
Andrew
10/7/2004 4:15:57 PM
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:13:59 -0700, Andrew DeFaria <Andrew@DeFaria.com>  
wrote:

[snip]

> Did I suggest that the internet cafe owner configure it? No. I was at an  
> internet cafe once in a foreign land. You're right, it came up not  
> configured for me (I didn't necessarily click a mailto link though).  
> What did I do? (Horrors). I configured it for myself and sent my email.  
> No big deal!

And if customers in other places aren't given permission to do that? This  
isn't about what you can do. This is about the reliability of a protocol  
that obviously fails in some situations where it is beyond the user's  
ability to correct.

[MW:]
>> Either you are unable to understand the intrinsic unreliability of the  
>> mailto: protocol, or you are simply unwilling. Either way, stop wasting  
>> our time. Do you have nothing better to do than troll this group?
>
> I'm not trolling - I'm simply expressing my opinion on this - just like  
> you. Sorry you seem to have so much of a problem with that!

The problem that I have is that you're missing the point, seemingly on  
purpose. The argument as presented is that mailto: is not reliable on all  
configurations. Therefore, as the only form of feedback on websites, or  
other similar uses, it is not appropriate.

I don't think that anyone is suggesting that form mail should only ever be  
used in such situations, that is a mailto: link can be provided, but as  
form mail is more reliable it should be the first choice. As free public  
services are provided, there is no reason why this cannot be the case.

At one point in a different thread, you seemed to be under the impression  
that we're talking about an e-mail conversation, in which form mail is  
obviously unsuitable. However, no-one else is approaching it from that  
position. It is this deviation from what seems a straight-forward subject  
that I object to.

[snip]

Mike

-- 
Michael Winter
Replace ".invalid" with ".uk" to reply by e-mail.
0
Michael
10/7/2004 5:18:03 PM
Michael Winter wrote:

>> Did I suggest that the internet cafe owner configure it? No. I was at 
>> an  internet cafe once in a foreign land. You're right, it came up 
>> not  configured for me (I didn't necessarily click a mailto link 
>> though).  What did I do? (Horrors). I configured it for myself and 
>> sent my email.  No big deal!
>
> And if customers in other places aren't given permission to do that? 

Find a better Internet Cafe! ;-)

> The problem that I have is that you're missing the point, seemingly 
> on  purpose. The argument as presented is that mailto: is not reliable 
> on all  configurations. Therefore, as the only form of feedback on 
> websites, or  other similar uses, it is not appropriate.
>
> I don't think that anyone is suggesting that form mail should only 
> ever be  used in such situations, that is a mailto: link can be 
> provided, but as  form mail is more reliable it should be the first 
> choice. As free public  services are provided, there is no reason why 
> this cannot be the case.

I'd be happy if there were always an mailto link as an alternative. 
Companies hide behind email forms, force fitting you into little 
categories and additional hassles when the purpose of your communication 
quite simply just does not fit the form. Often they never respond to 
your email anyway (and regardless if mailto is more or less reliable 
than web form based email, communication is a two way street and if they 
don't respond then even web based form email is as "reliable" as a mis 
configured client and a mailto tag!) Additionally form mail is extremely 
limited and often cumbersome to use. And it's not like I have not had 
many times when form mail simple does not work - anything from server 
errors to browser errors to whatever.

> At one point in a different thread, you seemed to be under the 
> impression  that we're talking about an e-mail conversation, in which 
> form mail is  obviously unsuitable. However, no-one else is 
> approaching it from that  position. It is this deviation from what 
> seems a straight-forward subject  that I object to.

I've only ever said that mailto links were good for email conversations! 
Obviously mailto links are not designed to be used in web form data 
gathering application.

-- 
5 days a week my body is a temple. The other two, it's an amusement park.
0
Andrew
10/7/2004 10:15:35 PM
Reply:
Similar artilces about - Email Script:

Emailing a list of users when a record is entered in the database.
Hi, I need to develop my database so when a record is entered through a browser, it will automatically email a list of interested parties. I am ok at designing the tables so the relevant personid's have the email address and their interested subjects. But can anybody help on how to email the parties when the data is passed. The only knowledge i have on this is the command "cat {filename} | mail {emailadd} -s {subject} Thanks in advance for any help I installed a great function called pgmail. Then I wrote a trigger that sends email when certain conditions are met. ...

Script, Save, Export SQL 2005 Database Diagrams
I've used the code from the post [Script, Save, Export SQL Database Diagrams] for a while now... but recently upgraded to SQL Server 2005. I've written a new script for SQL Server 2005, which can be found at http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/ScriptDiagram2005.asp if anyone is looking to script out database diagrams... Thanks to the original poster - Clay Beatty - for his effort. URL: [Script, Save, Export SQL Database Diagrams] http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.databases.ms-sqlserver/browse_frm/thread/ca9a9229d06a56f9/37802441d6466ca2?tvc=1&q=Script%2C+Save%2C+Export+SQL...

tracking pixel in a processing script, instead of HTML page
Hello, I have a Web form that is filled out on my company's web site. When the submit button is pressed, the form data is posted to a PHP page that (in the background) inserts their information into a database, sends them a confirmation e-mail, etc. Once the form processing is done, the user is redirected to a Thank You Page. The thank you page has the following code in it: <IMG SRC='http://www.emailoptinlistwebsite.blah/scripts/blah.asp?userid=123&ListID=456&FirstName=".$fFirstName."&AffID=".$affiliateID."&Email=".$fEmail."&LastN...

people please heeelpppp meeeee.....pleaseee urgent help needed..any one willing to send me his/her email id so that i email him the fortran question.
it wont take more than 20 minutes to design the fortran program involving only logical variables and do loops .....and 1 pseudocode.. i have not much time left.....help meeeee....... On Apr 5, 7:42 am, fahad_...@yahoo.com wrote: > it wont take more than 20 minutes to design the fortran program > involving only logical variables and do loops .....and 1 pseudocode.. > i have not much time left.....help meeeee....... because you are caught in a spider web and see above you a man bearing a large rock? sir i just sent u my question .plzzzzz have a look at it.... epc8@juno.com sen...

Scripting to repeat Healing Brush operation
Hei All, I have a problem. There was some dust on my lens when I took some hundred photos on an expedition to the East Coast of Spitsbergen last week and now I wish to remove it. It is extremely easy to do so with the healing brush in Photoshop CS but that would mean doing the work for each invdividual photo. I figured that, since the dust is always int he same space, it should be possible to make a script to do this work for me. However, I don't have much experience with this (just with Java itself, not JavaScript) and I wonder whether it is possible to tell the script where the dust occu...

Earn money with your email
EARN 5000 EURO WITH YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS! READ THIS MESSAGE GOOD! "Some time ago, I was surfing and I came on a Message same like you are now reading, which told me that you can earn thousands of euros within a few weeks with an investment Of Only 6 euro! So I thought it was a scam or a bad joke, but Curious as I am,i read the whole massage. The only thing you have to do is send via Paypal 1 euro to each of The Six e-mail addresses later in this message. Then place your own E-mail address in last place in the mail message to your friends, Acquaintances and publish it in so many newsgroup...

scripting or command capability
Hi, I have a large assembly that changes frequently and I need to export the parts into STL. Doing a "Save a copy" on each individual part is painful.... Is there a way to script this? I need to provide input (triangulation tolerances, and pick 1 or more parts to combine into one stl file), so hopefully there is a way to provide inputs. Is this possible? -dave This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C622A5.A0269870 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <dpugmi...

Email from access and change the from-property
Dear All, How can i email from access and change the from-property of the email. Quotations for a house are made by several salers with an Access-interface on the firms server ( Remote Desktop) . When sending the report by email to the client the firm wants the salers email in the from-property and not the firms email. THANKS Filip ...

email hacking
Hi there, I really need some help, everything I've tried, all I've found, doesn't seem to work. I have lost an email address which is very important to me. I really need to contact that person asap. I'm sure to remember that it begin with "leslie". Is any of you out there able to run a powerful email extractor, script or anything else that will provide me a complete list of such addresses? Doesn't matter how big it will be, it's really important for me. Above all, I'm not going to spam anyone, I have no commercial purpose in mind. I can also reward people ...

Emailing the reports of nessus
Can Nessus Output be sent by email If so , HOW??? BYe jZZ ...

Re: Telus Prevents Residential Clients From Sending Email #4
In article <telecom23.298.2@telecom-digest.org>, Brian <a8b04191REMOVE@REMOVETHIStelus.net> wrote: > The following is a letter I sent Telus because they cut off my email > in hope of forcing me to upgrade to a Business high speed ADSL > account. [........] > In the name of fighting SPAM and beginning May 14, 2004, Telus > modified its routers to disable customers' ability to use non-Telus > SMTP servers to send mail. This was explained to me today by a Telus > technical support worker, but only during my second call as the first > techn...

FAQ 8.34 I {changed directory, modified my environment} in a perl script. How come the change disappeared when I exited the script? How do I get my changes to be visible? #14
This is an excerpt from the latest version perlfaq8.pod, which comes with the standard Perl distribution. These postings aim to reduce the number of repeated questions as well as allow the community to review and update the answers. The latest version of the complete perlfaq is at http://faq.perl.org . -------------------------------------------------------------------- 8.34: I {changed directory, modified my environment} in a perl script. How come the change disappeared when I exited the script? How do I get my changes to be visible? Unix In the strictest sense, it can't...

Launching a Vi in background, from a script
Hi, I have a Python script that (apart from a bunch of other stuff) opens and starts a Labview Vi in WIn XP, filling in its fields via COM interface (win32com.client library).When the scripts launches the Vi, execution control is passed to that one, and the script pauses, until the Vi stops.What I would like to obtain is the following:1) The script runs the Vi2) Vi starts, goes in background, and execution resumes on the script3) I do other stuff on the script, like acting on the running Vi buttons.I tried setting the "Wait until done" method on the Vi, but I guess I am not doing it ...

reject email from own domain
I have added the following line to our access.db: From:owndomain.com REJECT but occasionally still get spam emails that pretend to come from our own domain. None of our employees send email to this machine. How can i block all incoming emails that appear to be from our own domain? thanks dave. ...

One-click email in FMP
I'm experimenting with the Send Mail script step. In a dedicated layout I want to type the subject and message then click a button to start the script. The email addresses are in a field in a different file. I've set the Send Mail script to look to that field in the other file via a relationship and to include "all records in the found set". I'm suspicious that there isn't a "all related records" button, however. Anyway, with this setup, an odd set of individuals not related to the record from where the email message is sent, ends up being sent the mess...

emails
isle4@hanaro.com ekdydehtlf@bluebottle.com ekdydehtlf@cashette.com ekdydehtlf@gawab.com ekdydehtlf@korea.com support10@bluebottle.com altec10@cashette.com support10@gawab.com ting1972@korea.com whitemixer@bluebottle.com whitemixer@cashette.com whitemixer@gawab.com whitehz@korea.com mrson92@bluebottle.com mrson92@cashette.com jjul19@korea.com jjul19@bluebottle.com jjul19@cashette.com ekdydehtlfa@snu.ac.kr ekdydehtlff@snu.ac.kr tera1234@sogang.ac.kr tera9833@sogang.ac.kr thswjdcjf@gmsh.co.kr rhrudxo@gmsh.co.kr thswjdcjf@icgas.co.kr qkrdudgml@icgas.co.kr dladudwo@catholi...

Recent spam/email viruses (MailScout)
Image Software 24th September 2003 =================== In light of recent email viruses with large attachments we would like to remind everyone that MailScout provides an ideal method of controlling the contents of your mailbox and avoiding junk email and viruses. MailScout allows you to interactively review the emails in your mailbox on the mail server and delete unwanted spam/junk mail without the need to download it. MailScout is an invaluable tool in the fight against spam and ideally suited to those who want a simple to setup and use solution, without the need to setup complicated r...

Download attachment from email
Hi! I wanna know how to download my email from pop3 account and take the attachment and save it in a folder. I have been seeing NET::Pop3 to do that but I dont know if it has this method for attachment. Is there something way to take the attachment from email.? Quoth Macaruchi <jqmicro@gmail.com>: > I wanna know how to download my email from pop3 account and take the > attachment and save it in a folder. > I have been seeing NET::Pop3 to do that but I dont know if it has this Net::POP3. Case is important. > method for attachment. > > Is there something way to take...

script works fine now
http://mroldies.net/showtable.php ...

(Reliably) calling a function from a dynamically loaded script
Hi, Is there a way to know when a function is available for me to call it from a dynamically loaded a javascript? I use this code to load the include.js file and then I call testIncludeFn() from it: <code> var html_doc = document.getElementsByTagName('head').item(0); var file = document.createElement('script'); file.setAttribute('language','javascript'); file.setAttribute('type','text/javascript'); file.setAttribute('src','/include.js'); html_doc.appendChild(file); // here I would like to be able to wait ...

Template generator for structured shell scripts
Hi, I'm looking for an application or script that generates structured shell scripts, something like [1]. Does anyone know alternatives to this "template generator"? Thorsten [1] http://www.linuxcommand.org/html_text/new_script.README.html new_script is a program that creates shell script templates. It was developed to facilitate rapid creation of well-formed shell scripts containing the features expected in a production quality script. These features include: traps for signal handling, command line option and argument processing, help messages invoked with the "-h" ...

Simple script does not work
Can anyone see why this simple script doesnt make the element visible? It starts of as hidden but will not show when the button is clicked. This has worked for me before but I cannot see what is different. Thanks <script language="Javascript"> <!-- function addnewsub(){ var newsubject = document.getElementById('newsub'); newsubject.style.display=''; } //--> </script> <input name="Submit2" type="button" class="BodyText" onClick="addnewsub()" value="New"> here is the relevent code from tabl...

What scripting language is most widely available on *nix systems?
I know AWK is widely available being part of the POSIX standard. What else? On 2005-11-03, casioculture@gmail.com wrote: > > I know AWK is widely available being part of the POSIX standard. What > else? POSIX shell. There are several varieties, some with their own extensions. If you stick to POSIX syntax, your code should run on any modern *nix system. The GNU C compiler is available for all systems, and is installed on most. Most systems have Perl and Python installed. -- Chris F.A. Johnson | Author: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org> ...

Scripting engine
Hi -I am a newbie wrt scripting in Java 6. I have 2 questions on thistopic :a) With the current version of Java 6 distribution, the version ofRhino that comes bundled is 1.6 Release 2. If I want to use adifferent version of the Rhino engine (e.g. 1.6 Release 5), how do Ido that ?b) In cases when I return a Javascript array from my script code, whatI get back in Java is sun.org.mozilla.javascript.internal.NativeArray,which is probably a wrapper for org.mozilla.javascript.NativeArray. Isit the common practice to handle these sun.org datatypes within myJava program ? Or is there a way I can get b...

Looking for free email that also lets me download selected emails
I currently use Yahoo for free email. However, there's a limit of 5Mb for the mailbox size, and if I subscribe to a discussion listserv and don't keep up, the mailbox will soon fill up and block/bounce subsequent email. What I need is a free email account that lets me select and download all (or part) of my list of emails to my hard-drive so that they can be deleted off the email-provider's computer, and give me more time to sort through my emails. Any recommendations? .... Do you have a paid-for web site? If so, I know a VERY cheap host that offers web-based eMail. I host m...