Gadget Errors in Firefox

  • Follow


On my mac, I am running

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/
20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7

and

Safari  Version 3.0.3 (522.12.1)

My gadget:

http://www.powderdrop.com/powderdroptest.xml

runs very well on Safari, but not on Firefox.   I get a bad URL
report.   Is there anyway to run the gadgets in some type of debug
mode?  Any ideas on why this runs on one and not the other?

Thank you!!!

0
Reply scifluent (10) 9/21/2007 3:41:48 PM

Penn <scifluent@gmail.com> wrote in news:1190389308.894634.71860
@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

> 
> On my mac, I am running
> 
> Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/
> 20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7
> 
> and
> 
> Safari  Version 3.0.3 (522.12.1)
> 
> My gadget:
> 
> http://www.powderdrop.com/powderdroptest.xml
> 
> runs very well on Safari, but not on Firefox.   I get a bad URL
> report.   Is there anyway to run the gadgets in some type of debug
> mode?  Any ideas on why this runs on one and not the other?
> 
> Thank you!!!
> 
> 

Whats a gadget?

You should wrap your "Content" node in CDATA at the very least, unless you 
mean for its contents ('<TABLE>' et al) to be parsed along with the XML
0
Reply Good 9/21/2007 3:49:39 PM


On Sep 21, 8:49 am, Good Man <he...@letsgo.com> wrote:
> Penn <sciflu...@gmail.com> wrote in news:1190389308.894634.71860
> @q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On my mac, I am running
>
> > Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/
> > 20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7
>
> > and
>
> > Safari  Version 3.0.3 (522.12.1)
>
> > My gadget:
>
> >http://www.powderdrop.com/powderdroptest.xml
>
> > runs very well on Safari, but not on Firefox.   I get a bad URL
> > report.   Is there anyway to run the gadgets in some type of debug
> > mode?  Any ideas on why this runs on one and not the other?
>
> > Thank you!!!
>
> Whats a gadget?
>
> You should wrap your "Content" node in CDATA at the very least, unless you
> mean for its contents ('<TABLE>' et al) to be parsed along with the XML

Sorry for the multiple posts on this...  I guess my browser wasn't
refreshing and I didn't see my posts coming through.

A Google gadget is a 'widget' for the Google Homepage.

I tried including the Content node in the CDATA, but I got an error
saying that that shouldn't be included.

The error I am getting is

<h1>Not Found</h1>
The requested URL
<code>/ig/California</code>
was not found on this server.
<p/>

California is one of my preferences...and it seems to want to look
this up as a URL.

0
Reply Penn 9/21/2007 4:27:26 PM

Penn <scifluent@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1190392046.693128.310710@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com: 


> Sorry for the multiple posts on this...  I guess my browser wasn't
> refreshing and I didn't see my posts coming through.
> 
> A Google gadget is a 'widget' for the Google Homepage.

You should probably troubleshoot your problem at 

http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API

or

http://groups.google.com/group/macwidgets


The XML file is not nearly enough info to debug; one would need to know 
what the "widget" is *doing* with the XML.  And since Google is supplying 
the code behind it, you should troubleshoot in their specified faux 
newsgroups.

0
Reply Good 9/21/2007 4:35:21 PM

On Sep 21, 9:35 am, Good Man <he...@letsgo.com> wrote:
> Penn <sciflu...@gmail.com> wrote innews:1190392046.693128.310710@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>
> > Sorry for the multiple posts on this...  I guess my browser wasn't
> > refreshing and I didn't see my posts coming through.
>
> > A Google gadget is a 'widget' for the Google Homepage.
>
> You should probably troubleshoot your problem at
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API
>
> or
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/macwidgets
>
> The XML file is not nearly enough info to debug; one would need to know
> what the "widget" is *doing* with the XML.  And since Google is supplying
> the code behind it, you should troubleshoot in their specified faux
> newsgroups.

Thanks!

0
Reply Penn 9/21/2007 4:47:50 PM

4 Replies
78 Views

(page loaded in 0.053 seconds)


Reply: