Problems with the Ruby MySQL Interface 2.4.4a and Ruby 1.8.0 on OS X
The Ruby MySQL Interface 2.4.4a package compiles fine with Ruby 1.8.0
on the OS X 10.2.6 I'm running, but as soon as I try to run the test
script (or require 'mysql' in IRB), it cramps with this:
% ruby -I. ./test.rb localhost root
dyld: ruby Undefined symbols:
> The Ruby MySQL Interface 2.4.4a package compiles fine with Ruby 1.8.0
> on the OS X 10.2.6 I'm running, but as soon as I try to run the test
> script (or require 'mysql' in IRB), it cramps with this:
It appears that this problem only...Ruby 1.8.4 and Ruby 1.8.6
I was wondering, if we could use previous version if we installed
i know this is stupid. :) any suggestions?
On Feb 28, 2008, at 01:14 AM, Bala wrote:
> Hi Experts,
> I was wondering, if we could use previous version if we installed
> i know this is stupid. :) any suggestions?
[unpack a ruby 1.8.6 tarball and cd into it]
make && make install
On Feb 28, 2:20 pm, Eric Hodel <drbr...@segment7.net> wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2008, at 01:14 AM, Bala wr...Ruby extension (C++) on OS X [ruby 1.8.2] and Google-Sketchup [ruby 1.8.5]
I have written a ruby extension in C++ and it works fine on OS X
Tiger which ships ruby-1.8.2.
With the succesful test of the extension (bundle), I then proceed to
try to use it within Google-Sketchup [which I think embeds ruby-1.8.5].
Sketchup crashes the application just loading the extension.
cRCL = rb_define_class("rcl", rb_cObject); <=== /CRASH
8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8...Ruby 1.8.x in Mac OS X.4 (Tiger)?
Anyone know if Ruby will be updated from 1.6 to 1.8 in the next major
release of OS X?
Randy Lawrence <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Anyone know if Ruby will be updated from 1.6 to 1.8 in the next major
> release of OS X?
I don't know, but there's at least to packages for Panther :
% fink list ruby
Information about 3553 packages read in 4 seconds.
ruby 1.8.0-11 Symlinks to ruby1.8
ruby16 1.6.8-10 Interpreted, object-oriented scripting la...
ruby16-dev 1.6.8-10 Ruby 1.6 development lib...Ruby 1.8.0 and Mac OS X and Tcl/Tk 8.4 Aqua (not!)
My trials with Ruby and Tcl/Tk on Mac OS X
Ruby is 1.8.0 preview 7
Tcl/Tk 8.4 is the recent TclTk-Aqua build for that native OSX Aqua look
Mac OS X is 10.2.3
(1) 'configure' wasn't finding Tcl/Tk, so I hacked up an OSX-only version
of ext/tcltklib/extconf.rb with hard-coded parameters
(which might be OK because of the frameworks)
# extconf.rb for tcltklib
# HACKED for Mac OS X !!!
if RUBY_PLATFORM !~ /mswin32|mingw|cygwin|bccwin32/
have_library("socket&q...XCode (2.4.1) Linking issue, wx 2.8.6, OS X 10.4.10, GCC4.0
Platform: Mac mini - intel dual core.
I'm working through the examples in the "Cross-Platform GUI Programming
with wxWidgets" books and I'm stuck on an XCode linking issue.
The demos on the base wxMac code base build and work fine. So I know
it's the XCode setup. I can't find the entry where the libraries are
I've setup XCode using the wx-config --cxxflags and wx-config --libs
When building the minimal code example in chapter two, the build
completes and goes to the link stage where:
"Linking /Volumes//u01/work/wx - example...ruby 1.8.4 gives warnings where ruby 1.8.2 doesn't
How do I disable warning output in Ruby? The servers at work use ruby 1.8.2,
which gives no warning when running some rake / rails scripts. If I rsync /
copy those scripts to my ruby 1.8.4 machine and run them there, I get loads of
I don't want to downgrade my beloved Ruby, can anyone tell me how I can simply
disable those warnings at run-time?
To reply, take of all ZIGs !!
Alternative email address: emailZIG@asfandyarZIG.cjbZIG.netZIG
Asfand Yar Qazi wrote:
> I don't want to downgrade my beloved Ruby, can anyone tell me how I can
> simply d...GNU gcc 4.8.4 for OS X Yosemite (10.10)
A freely redistributable installation script that ports the GNU gcc
compiler (4.8.4) to OS X Yosemite (10.10) is accessible from:
This script applies about 40 patches (backports) mainly to gfortran and
enables the maintainer mode in each installed language. Therefore it can
fully compile gcc from source.
In addition, this gcc might be suitable when you want to port certain
packages as various OS X specific issues are handled. On the other hand
you will not find some new features supported in gfortran 4.9 or 5.1
Yesterday, I...[wx 2.6.3, Mac OS X 10.4.8, gcc 4.0.1] extremely slow wxStyledTextCtrl::Colourise()
I'm developing a multi-platform source code editor with
syntax-highlighting based on wxWidgets.
I have a problem with the wxStyledTextCtrl::Colourise() function on the
This function is extremely slow on Mac, e.g. it takes about 40 seconds
to do the lexing of a file of 500 lines of c++ code, while the same
within 1 second on the Windows and Linux platforms using the same
wxWidgets. (I'm using the wxSTC_LEX_CPP lexer).
The problem appears when the user wants to scroll down the
the slider blocks and th...Compiling 8.13.4 with GCC 3.3--error, stdarg.h v. varargs.h on Mac OS X 10.4.1?
I'm trying to compile Sendmail 8.13.4 on Mac OS X 10.4.1, using GCC 3.3.
I'm getting the message that GCC no longer supports varargs.h and code
should be updated to use stdarg.h. I know this is a long-standing
problem, and I used to be able to solve it (with Sendmail 8.12.x on Mac
OS X 10.2.x and 10.3.x) by reverting to GCC 3.1.
Unfortunately, GCC 3.1 is not installed on Mac OS X 10.4. The weird
thing is that the last machine I build this way was Sendmail 8.13.3 on
Mac OS X 10.3.7 and it compiled just fine with GCC 3.3. Possibly this
had something to do with the fact that GCC 3...Will Ruby 1.8.2 include tcl/tk 8.4.x instead of 8.3?
Will Ruby 1.8.2 release come with tcl/tk 8.4.7 libraries?
From: "H. Simpson" <email@example.com>
Subject: Will Ruby 1.8.2 include tcl/tk 8.4.x instead of 8.3?
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:01:40 +0900
> Will Ruby 1.8.2 release come with tcl/tk 8.4.7 libraries?
Is that a binary package of Ruby 1.8.2 ?
If you say about source files, Ruby/Tk can work with Tcl/Tk8.4.7.
I already tested that Ruby/Tk works with Tcl/Tk8.4.7 and 8.5a1
(and ActiveTcl-18.104.22.168 binary package).
U...verifiing 22.214.171.124.1 upgrade to 126.96.36.199.x
I have upgraded our test 188.8.131.52.1 database to 184.108.40.206.13. I would
like to verify this fact.
In the readme it does state that all the products will not display the
version number 220.127.116.11.13, because it's a cummulative patch.
I would like to see at least one file with the version number greater
querying the database, v$instance still yields 18.104.22.168.1
Try (might need as SYS)
column comp_name format a35
column status format a20
column version format a11
select comp_name, status, substr(version,1,10) as version
order by comp_name;
...upgrading OS 10.4.1 to OS 10.4.9
Is there a charge to upgrade from upgrading OS 10.4.1 to OS 10.4.9
Where can I find the upgrade online
researcher <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Is there a charge to upgrade from upgrading OS 10.4.1 to OS 10.4.9
> Where can I find the upgrade online
no. apple never charges for updates.
just google for 10.4.9 combo update
fyi 10.4.11 should be out by the end of the month.
In article <email@example.com>,
researcher <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Is there a charge to upgrade from upgrading OS 10.4.1 to OS 1...ruby-1.8.6-p111 build on osx 10.5.0 fails; ok on 10.4.10. bug or config?
not sure if this is a bug or a config issue ... since ruby _ships_ on
osx, i thought i'd check here first ...
any hints ? thanks!
i'm building ruby-1.8.6-p111 w/
is _OK_ on OSX 10.4.10/Tiger, but, reproducibly fails at,
./mkconfig.rb:191: [BUG] Bus Error
ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-24) [powerpc-darwin9.0.0]
make: *** [.rbconfig.time] Abort trap
on OSX 10.5....