Has the community decided on a "standard" Ruby GUI toolkit? I know the 
Windows installer comes with Tk and Fox. I have also read that work is 
being done on a WX version (which would be my preference).

as far as I am informed, there's no souch thing.
If you dont' like Tk's visual, you may considder FOX-tk
or if you want to be platform dependent you may have a try at GTK.

So you are free to use whatever you like

Robert schrieb:

> Has the community decided on a "standard" Ruby GUI toolkit? I know the 
> Windows installer comes with Tk and Fox. I have also read that work is 
> being done on a WX version (which would be my preference).

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 15:13:47 -0500, Robert wrote:

> Has the community decided on a "standard" Ruby GUI toolkit? I know the 
> Windows installer comes with Tk and Fox. I have also read that work is 
> being done on a WX version (which would be my preference).

You can find some info on the wxWindows support for Ruby here:
http://wxruby.rubyforge.org
-- 
Barnaby Mannerings (www.r1g.org | www.lancs.org)

As soon as WX is out it will have *my* vote as the official GUI toolkit.

:-)

On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 05:14:52AM +0900, Robert wrote:
> Has the community decided on a "standard" Ruby GUI toolkit? I know the 
> Windows installer comes with Tk and Fox. I have also read that work is 
> being done on a WX version (which would be my preference).

-- 
Daniel Carrera | No trees were harmed in the generation of this  e-mail.
PhD student.   | A significant number of electrons were, however, severely 
Math Dept. UMD | inconvenienced.

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 23:22:46 +0900, Daniel Carrera wrote:

> As soon as WX is out it will have *my* vote as the official GUI toolkit.

While not officially a release, I got hold of a binary build of wxRuby for
Windows (with installer) from a friend a few days ago - I think he got it
from the wxRuby mailing list.

I've been playing around with it for a couple of days and it seems quite
nice, the sample apps generally work pretty well although they show that
there is still a little work to be done to make it perfect.

I'll definitely be keeping my eye on this project in the next few months.

If anyone is interested in trying the version I have, which appears to be
v0.2 (wxruby-mswin-0.2_debug.exe) then I am willing to put it up on some
webspace.

Regards

-- 
Barnaby Mannerings (www.r1g.org | www.lancs.org)

On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:10:42 +0000, Barnaby Mannerings
<org.r1g_AT_barny> wrote:

>If anyone is interested in trying the version I have, which appears to be
>v0.2 (wxruby-mswin-0.2_debug.exe) then I am willing to put it up on some
>webspace.

I'd be interested in a copy of the file. :)

Thanks!
M.

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 at 11:10 GMT, Barnaby Mannerings <> wrote:

> If anyone is interested in trying the version I have, which appears to be
> v0.2 (wxruby-mswin-0.2_debug.exe) then I am willing to put it up on some
> webspace.

i'm interested in the installer version. i use wx with three other languages
and for the few things i've tried with ruby it seems to 'fit' just nicely.


-- 
http://home.cogeco.ca/~tsummerfelt1

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:19:53 GMT, tony summerfelt
<snowzone5@hotmail.com> wrote:

>i'm interested in the installer version. i use wx with three other languages
>and for the few things i've tried with ruby it seems to 'fit' just nicely.

I found it here:
http://curthibbs.us/wxruby-mswin-0.2_release.zip

M.

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 at 04:53 GMT, Michael Vondung <mvondung@gmx.net> wrote:

> I found it here:
> http://curthibbs.us/wxruby-mswin-0.2_release.zip

got it. thanks...

-- 
http://home.cogeco.ca/~tsummerfelt1