|
|
Ruby Logo #2
I changed the color a bit on the Ruby logo, and I think it looks better
(and if I may say so, fits with Why's (Poignant) Guide to Ruby better as
well).
Attachments:
http://www.ruby-forum.com/attachment/2955/attractive_ruby.png
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
fredrikhcs (6)
|
11/23/2008 11:30:51 AM |
|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|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
radek.bulat (87)
|
11/23/2008 12:17:22 PM
|
|
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Fredrik Stagling <fredrikhcs@gmail.com> wrote:
> I changed the color a bit on the Ruby logo, and I think it looks better
> (and if I may say so, fits with Why's (Poignant) Guide to Ruby better as
> well).
>
> Attachments:
> http://www.ruby-forum.com/attachment/2955/attractive_ruby.png
>
The trick is to stay the same.
--
http://www.home.no/reddvinylene
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
reddvinylene (40)
|
11/23/2008 4:09:22 PM
|
|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|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
botp (987)
|
11/24/2008 1:43:06 AM
|
|
Peña, Botp wrote:
> From: Fredrik Stagling [mailto:fredrikhcs@gmail.com]
> # I changed the color a bit on the Ruby logo, and I think it
> # looks better
>
> that's not red :)
True. It should be a ruby coloring. On the other hand, though the GEM
should be colored as a ruby, perhaps a tweak of the [b]background[/b]
might help a bit.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Lloyd
|
11/24/2008 2:06:25 PM
|
|
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]
I prefer the original color for the gem, but maybe the background color
should be changed.
This pink is flashing to much in my eyes I think ;)
I just like the original :)
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
eregontp (60)
|
11/24/2008 7:29:44 PM
|
|
On Nov 23, 9:30=A0am, Fredrik Stagling <fredrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I changed the color a bit on the Ruby logo, and I think it looks better
> (and if I may say so, fits with Why's (Poignant) Guide to Ruby better as
> well).
>
> Attachments:http://www.ruby-forum.com/attachment/2955/attractive_ruby.png
>
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
I think the "Atractive Version" lacks some of the elegance of the
original. It is nice, but I think elegance is a important factor for
the Ruby logo, since elegance is important for Ruby itself. :)
However, a change in the background only could be nice, although it's
hard to say without actually seeing one.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
fernandohsanches (5)
|
11/25/2008 6:31:05 AM
|
|
Peña, Botp wrote:
> that's not red :)
Yes, but rubies aren't only red. They vary in color
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby).
From Wikipedia: "The finest ruby is best described as being a vivid
medium-dark toned red. Secondary hues add an additional complication.
Pink, orange, and purple are the normal secondary hues in ruby. Of the
three, purple is preferred because, firstly, the purple reinforces the
red making it appear richer[3]. Secondly, purple occupies a position on
the color wheel halfway between red and blue."
The color of the ruby in the logo doesn't look very "vivid".
attractive_version.png was just a mockup. But I still think it could use
an edge. So I think some purple/pink to spice it up would look very good
if not overused (like it was in attractive_version.png, I just changed
the hue of the whole image). Would be interesting to see some attempts
at this.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
fredrikhcs (6)
|
11/30/2008 10:42:22 PM
|
|
|
7 Replies
17 Views
(page loaded in 0.187 seconds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|