f



Universal VHDL Verification Methodology (Free & Open source), Free webinar Thursday Nov. 17.

How can we do FPGA VHDL Verification faster and with better quality =E2=80=
=93 at no extra cost?

This is actually possible =E2=80=93 and with an average efficiency improvem=
ent of 20 to 50% for medium to high complexity FPGAs. Less for data path or=
iented designs and more for control or protocol oriented designs. At no ext=
ra cost.

All that is required is that you do your testbench development the same way=
 you do your design. Every single FPGA designer knows that a good top level=
 design architecture is critical. Most FPGA designers also know that a good=
 microarchitecture is at least as important for module design. It should th=
us be obvious that a good architecture is also equally important for your t=
estbench, but for some strange reason most testbenches do not have the same=
 good architecture as the design being verified.

Most designers agree that the following are critical for an efficient devel=
opment of a high quality design module:
- Overview, Readability, Simplicity
- Modifiability, Maintainability, Extendibility
- Debuggability
- Reusability

So why should testbenches be any different, with on average the same time u=
sage as the actual design?

It should be obvious that these aspects are equally critical for testbench =
development, but there has been no standard solution to build a good testbe=
nch architecture =E2=80=93 until now =E2=80=93 when UVVM has been introduce=
d as a free and open source solution to this challenge.

See blog at EDACaf=C3=A9:
http://www10.edacafe.com/blogs/aldec/2016/11/14/fpga-vhdl-verification-can-=
we-do-this-faster-with-better-quality-at-no-extra-cost/

And please join the webinar tomorrow by registering at either of
https://www.aldec.com/en/events/770  for presentation at 3pm CET
https://www.aldec.com/en/events/771  for presentation at 11am PST

0
espen
11/16/2016 9:22:45 AM
comp.lang.vhdl 6430 articles. 2 followers. Post Follow

0 Replies
484 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 39

Reply: