Sendmail 8.12.10 queue file permissions 600

On a sendmail 8.12.10 list server, I'm seeing intermittent problems along the
lines of:


I don't see a final answer to that thread.

Basically, "sometimes," some qf files are created sympa.smmsp, mode 600, hence
the smmsp queue runner can't read them. My guess is that it happens more often
when messages are split into queue groups, but I haven't done exhaustive tests.

I do have some unusual options to split queue groups:

QUEUE_GROUP(`unet', `P=/var/spool/mqueue/unet, F=f, R=4, r=200, I=30s')dnl
QUEUE_GROUP(`brandeis', `P=/var/spool/mqueue/brandeis, F=f, r=50, R=5, I=1m')dnl
QUEUE_GROUP(`hotmail', `P=/var/spool/mqueue/hotmail, F=f, r=30, R=4, I=2m')dnl
QUEUE_GROUP(`yahoo', `P=/var/spool/mqueue/yahoo, F=f, r=30, R=4, I=2m')dnl
QUEUE_GROUP(`aol', `P=/var/spool/mqueue/aol, F=f, r=1, R=4, I=2m')dnl
QUEUE_GROUP(`other', `P=/var/spool/mqueue/other, F=f, r=10, R=8, I=30s')dnl
define(`ESMTP_MAILER_QGRP', `other')dnl
define(`confDELIVERY_MODE', `interactive')dnl
define(`LOCAL_SHELL_FLAGS', `u9')dnl
R$* @ imap.$*.brandeis.edu      $# unet
R$* @ brandeis.edu              $# unet
R$* @ $*.brandeis.edu           $# brandeis
R$* @ hotmail.com               $# hotmail
R$* @ msn.com                   $# hotmail
R$* @ aol.com                   $# aol
R$* @ yahoo.com                 $# yahoo
R$* @ $*                        $# other
R$*                             $# mqueue

I notice that the 8.10.11 ReadMe starts with:

	Use QueueFileMode when opening qf files.  This error was a
		regression in 8.12.10.  Problem detected and diagnosed
		Lech Szychowski of the Polish Power Grid Company.

Is that it, or is it something else?

Permissions are as in sendmail/SECURITY, and sendmail -d47.10 says:

main: e/ruid = 0/0 e/rgid = 51/0
main: RunAsUser = 0:0
readcf: RunAsUser = 51:51
drop_privileges(0): Real[UG]id=0:0, get[ug]id=0:0, gete[ug]id=0:51, RunAs[UG]id=51:51
drop_privileges: e/ruid = 51/51 e/rgid = 51/51
drop_privileges: RunAsUser = 51:51
drop_privileges: rval = 0

I expect that this will go away when I upgrade this box to 8.13.1+long strings patch,
which I should do anyway, but I'm curious to know for posterity if this relates to a
known/known fixed bug.
Rich Graves <rcgraves@brandeis.edu>
UNet Systems Administrator
rcgraves1 (2)
11/23/2004 7:39:07 PM
comp.mail.sendmail 13518 articles. 1 followers. jfretby (35) is leader. Post Follow

0 Replies

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 19


Similar Artilces:

Sendmail 8.12.8/8.12.10 and aliases file
Hi, I've tested the aliases issue on Fedora/Sendmail 8.12.8 and 8.12.10 on few boxes (four) and I'm getting the same result - when sending email by using 'mail' it doesn't references to aliases file. When debugging I can see that aliases file is read. Any inputs or thoughts are greatly appreciated. Thanks, Magda All I've done is: 1. /etc/mail/sendmail.cf set smart relay #DS DSrelay:mailhost set domain name to AAA: #Dj$w.Foo.COM Dj$w.AAA.com 2 /etc/mail/submit.cf set smart relay #DS DSrelay:mailhost set MTA #D{MTAHost}[] D{MTAHost} mailhost set domain name #Dj$w.Foo.COM Dj$w.AAA.com 3. /etc/hosts set mailhost to notes server 10.xxx.xx.xx mailhost xxx.AAA.com 4. trun off sendmail: # chkconfig --list | grep on #chckonfig sendamil off #service sendmail stop 5. DNS verify /etc/resolv.conf file 6. test MTA functionality: # mail -v name@AAA.com test 7. set cron entry to run 5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 * * * * /usr/lib/sendmail -q For some reason when I try to send email using MTA it doesn't read aliases file. For instance /etc/aliases file has entry: magda mhewryk@xxx.com 1). debug looks good, an alias is found # sendmail -bv -d27.2 magda magda (, magda) aliased to mhewryk@AAA.com self_reference(mhewryk@AAA.com) ... no self ref mhewryk@AAA.com... deliverable: mailer esmtp, host AAA.com., user mhewryk@AAA.com 2.) When I add a double entry to aliases file is sees it # newaliases /etc/aliases: line 88: magda... ...

too many sendmail 8.12.11 sendmail and mail.local processes
I noticed over 7000 sendmail and mail.local processes that eventually exhausted the system's swap space. The system is a Solaris 8 box running sendmail 8.12.11. Also, sendmail.cf has MaxDaemonChildren=500 set. The problem occurred after the system received over 60,000 large email due to a misbehaved application. 1. Why would there be more than 500 sendmail processes? I noticed the parent process for most of the sendmail processes is 1 and mail.local were spawned by sendmail, of course. I have the default MaxQueueChildren value which is unlimited. I noted over 7,000 of these messages in syslog during the time of the incident; Jun 12 09:02:04 peace sendmail-mta[22621]: j5CD04jr022619: timeout waiting for i nput from local during Draining Input Jun 12 09:03:03 peace sendmail-mta[23982]: j5CD13Ef023979: timeout waiting for i nput from local during Draining Input Jun 12 09:04:36 peace sendmail-mta[26086]: j5CD2aaO026076: timeout waiting for i nput from local during Draining Input Jun 12 09:05:38 peace sendmail-mta[27455]: j5CD3bKd027452: timeout waiting for i nput from local during Draining Input Jun 12 09:06:01 peace sendmail-mta[27939]: j5CD411x027931: timeout waiting for i nput from local during Draining Input Jun 12 09:06:16 peace sendmail-mta[28248]: j5CD4GmD028243: timeout waiting for i nput from local during Draining Input F S UID PID PPID C PRI NI ADDR SZ WCHAN STIME TTY TIME CMD 8 S root 8888 1 0 49 20 69174...

Sendmail-8.12.10: Repeating Queue IDs?
I've noticed this odd condition on one of my mail servers (and it may also have ocurred on others which are similarly configured, but I haven't yet found any evidence), where it appears that a queue id sometimes gets re-used. The system is Linux-2.4.25 (Slackware-9.1), with a local installation of Sendmail-8.12.10 (I can post configuration details if required, of course). This system is strictly a mail relay host. No mail is expected to be received on the host itself. A sample of the logs of one such re-used queue id follows, with only the sender and recipient hostnames and email addresses sanitized for their protection (long lines reformatted for legibility): Apr 4 01:32:14 bonnie sm-mta[13896]: i2TGhAtS013896: from=<>, size=2107, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200404040632.i346WDUM027220@mail.remote.net>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=mail.remote.net [XXX.XXX.208.18] Apr 4 01:32:15 bonnie sm-mta[13896]: i2TGhAtS013896: Milter add: header: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35 Apr 4 01:32:16 bonnie sm-mta[13910]: i2TGhAtS013896: SMTP outgoing connect on bonnie.concordia.ca Apr 4 01:32:16 bonnie sm-mta[13910]: i2TGhAtS013896: to=<recip1@host1.concordia.ca>, delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=32107, relay=host1.concordia.ca. [132.205.NNN.NNN], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (97ECDC5F Message accepted, transient identifier was 11206) Apr 4 01:32:16 b...

Sendmail 8.14.3 not sendmail hugely attached e-mail files in a timely manner
What could be the problem. They seem stuck and I have to run sendmail -v -q manually just to get them to propogate. Any reason why? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Never Satan President Republic! If you cannot lead a family how can you pastor a church? The Doctor unleashed the infinite monkeys on 21/05/2009 00:07 producing: > What could be the problem. > > They seem stuck and I have to run sendmail -v -q manually just > to get them to propogate. > > Any reason why? With so little information, it's impossible to help you. How do you define "huge"? How long do you wait? What's in your mail logs? -- Rob MacGregor (BOFH) Rule 37: "There is no 'overkill'. There is only 'open fire' and 'I need to reload.'" ...

web scripts and local mail problem with sendmail 8.12.10 ... REWARD OFFERED!
I have just recently upgraded to sendmail 8.12.10 on a Red Hat Enterprise system. I have Apache 2.0.46 with PHP 4.3.2 The problem I'm having is that all of my scripts (PHP and Perl) which use mail functions result in maillog entries with SYSERR(apache): savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere among other things. I have found other posts in the sendmail group which describe the same problem, but I haven't found the end solution as of yet. If there is a post that I've missed that explains this, I apologize for the duplication here. On the advice of previous posts, I did t...

Relaying in Sendmail 8.12.10
Hi All, I am having problems with relaying mail from remote machines and wondered whether anyone here could point me in the right direction. I have found plenty of documentation about relaying but none of it works for me! I am running sendmail 8.12.10 on Redhat Fedora 1. Here is what I have done... 1. Added all the domains I want to allow relaying for to /etc/mail/access and then run 'makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access' Example: domain1.com RELAY domain2.com RELAY 2. Added all the domains I want to relay to /etc/mail/relay-domains 3. Made advised changes to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc as follows and then run 'make -C /etc/mail' FEATURE(`access_db',`hash -T<TMPF> -o /etc/mail/access.db')dnl dnl FEATURE(`blacklist_recipients')dnl dnl # The following causes sendmail to only listen on the IPv4 loopback address dnl # and not on any other network devices. Remove the loopback dnl # address restriction to accept email from the internet or intranet. dnl # dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Address=, Name=MTA')dnl 4. Restarted sendmail What am I doing wrong, I am sure I have missed something simple but this is driving me mad? TIA Phil Ewington. you probably forgot to recompile sendmail.cf m4 sendmail.mc > sendmail.cf ________________________________________ Martin Leblanc Administrateur de Systeme / System Administrator Peerless Clothing Inc. Courriel/E-mail: martin...

Sendmail 8.12.10 on Solaris
Hi list, I upgraded sendmail to 8.12.10, now can't send emails outside of our Network. After upgrading I changed relay host in sendmail.cf. I can send emails within our Network, before it used to work fine but it stopped working after upgrade. I have the following errors in /var/log/syslog file Oct 15 14:26:39 portal_1 sendmail[20142]: h9FIQdr4020140: to=rgoud@yahoo.com, ctladdr=robert (107/1), delay=00r Oct 15 14:26:39 portal_1 sendmail[20142]: h9FIQdr4020140: h9FIQdr3020142: DSN: Data format error Oct 15 14:26:39 portal_1 sendmail[20142]: h9FIQdr3020142: to=robert, delay=00:00:00, xde...

Sendmail 8.12.10 on Unixware
With a little tweak to devtools/OS/UnixWare.5.i386 > define(`confMAPDEF', `-DNDBM -DMAP_REGEX') > define(`confLIBS', `-lsocket -lnsl -lelf -Kpthread') Sendmail 8.12.10 compiles and installs. Needs BerkeleyDB.4.1 for makemap (not sure if vanilla unixware includes it) ...

Sendmail 8.12.10 has a bug ?!
On same mailserver, where sendmail 8.12.10 runs, "x.factor" user sends message to "utente" user (both have mailboxes on serverB) but often I can see two or more instances of sendmail in maillog file, so message is received from client 2 or more times. Sendmail has bug ?! Here my sendmail logs: Jun 12 08:09:57 serverB sendmail[9000]: n5C69vbQ009000: from=<x.fac...@mydomain.it>, size=1992, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<000501c9eb24$cdfb0560$0105a8c0@xfactorpc>, proto=SMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=xfactor [A.B.C.D] Jun 12 08:09:58 serverB sendmail[9007]: n5C69vbQ009000: forward /dev/ null/.forward.serverB: World writable directory Jun 12 08:09:58 serverB sendmail[9007]: n5C69vbQ009000: forward /dev/ null/.forward: World writable directory Jun 12 08:09:58 serverB sendmail[9007]: n5C69vbQ009000: to=utente, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=local, pri=62195, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent Jun 12 08:09:58 serverB sendmail[9007]: n5C69vbQ009000: to=spamca...@mydomain2.it, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=smtp, pri=62195, relay=[serverSpam] [serverSpam], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (n5C69waT019706 Message accepted for delivery) Jun 12 08:10:05 serverB sendmail[9013]: n5C6A5bQ009013: from=<x.fac...@mydomain.it>, size=1992, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<000601c9eb24$d2fdacc0$0105a8c0@xfactorpc>, proto=SMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=xfactor [A.B.C.D] Jun 12 08:10:06 serverB sendmail[9020]: n5C6A5bQ009013: forward /dev/ null/.forward.serverB: World writable directory...

Sendmail 8.12 masquerade with mail hub
I am having a problem attempting to masquerade a domain while using a mail hub. I did not have a problem with this prior to upgrading to 8.12. The following config file works with 8.11.6, but does not work with 8.12.x. Is it still possible to masquerade the domain of the mail hub? I am using the standard submit.cf file and the following is what I am using to generate my cf file: divert(0)dnl VERSIONID(`$Id: host.mc,v 8.11 2001/02/21 07:26:03 craig Exp $') OSTYPE(solaris2)dnl DOMAIN(generic)dnl FEATURE(allmasquerade)dnl FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl FEATURE(virtusertable, `btree -o /...

sendmail 8.12.10
I think I must not be understanding something here, no suprises there then :-) I'm trying to configure sendmail to use one / several of the dns blacklists out there. I am not having any luck. I'm sure it's down to my lack of understanding of how sendmail works. Is it true to say that when you difine 'dnsbl' as a feature that it only checks the relay from which I recieve emails ?. If this is the case then it would probably explain the behavior i'm seeing. I expected that once I configured dnsbl I would see hits for the each mail recieved. However, mails that have been s...

Sendmail 8.12.10+Sun and genericstable
I have a problem with sendmail 8.12.10 on Solaris 9. I generate my sendmail.cf file using m4 from a sendmail.mc file which adds the genericstable and masquerading features etc. Below is an extract from my sendmail.mc file: MASQUERADE_AS(`domain.com')dnl MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(`domain.com intranet.domain.com')dnl FEATURE(`always_add_domain')dnl FEATURE(`relay_entire_domain')dnl FEATURE(`masquerade_envelope')dnl FEATURE(`masquerade_entire_domain')dnl FEATURE(`mailertable', DATABASE_MAP_TYPE `-o MAIL_SETTINGS_DIR`'mailertable')dnl FEATURE(`genericstable', DATABASE_MAP_TYPE `-o MAIL_SETTINGS_DIR`'genericstable')dnl GENERICS_DOMAIN(`domain.com intranet.domain.com')dnl I use the genericstable to rewrite emails from certain senders on the Solaris server to another address; line from /etc/mail/genericstable below: root UnixTeam@domain.com This way system emails sent by the root account will appear to the receipient as coming from UnixTeam@domain.com and replies to these emails (including mail bounces) will go the local Sys Admins (UnixTeam is a distribution list). With Solaris 9's sendmail (8.12.10) the genericstable sender address rewriting no longer works. Sendmail (8.11.3) on Solaris 8 using a sendmail.cf file generated from the same sendmail.mc source works fine! The strange things is that in sendmail rule test mode (sendmail -bt -d21.4 -d21.12 -d31.2 -d0.4) entering the ruleset > 3,1,EnvFromSM...

sendmail 8.12.10 leaks children
We've had a couple of incidents recently where sendmail was logging messages like: Oct 4 08:20:13 electra sm-mta[20080]: [ID 702911 mail.info] rejecting connections on daemon MTA: 600 children, max 600 When I checked, there were only 55 sendmail processes running. Why is sendmail losing track of children? Should I just remove the limit on children? This with sendmail 8.12.10 on Solaris 8, running on a 4-CPU E450. -- -Gary Mills- -Unix Support- -U of M Academic Computing and Networking- ...

Sendmail 8.12.10 Issues on Solaris 9
I've been struggling with this issue for several days now and am not making any progress, so any help would be greatly appreciated!! Here's the issue in a nutshell: running a sun server with solaris 9 and sendmail version 8.12.10+sun. No matter what cf file I use, sendmail does not appear to be using the one in /etc/mail. It only appears to use the one specified when I use the -C command. Even after starting the sendmail daemon (/etc/init.d/sendmail start), sendmail appears to not be using the newly compiled sendmail.cf file in /etc/mail. Frustrating!! Basically this server is just a management console for another application and I would like to only run sendmail so that scripts can call mail or mailx to send out email notifications, etc, when issues come up. It should not accept connections from anyone for mail delivery. We have some aliases defined in /etc/aliases that should be able to be used by the mail programs, but this does not seem to be working either unless I forcefully tell sendmail which sendmail.cf file to use using the -C command: /usr/lib/sendmail -C /etc/mail/sendmail.cf -v root </dev/null Any help would be greatly appreciated!! PS. If you need to see copies of the cf files I'm using, I will post those. Thanks in advance!! David DFIELDS wrote: > Here's the issue in a nutshell: running a sun server with solaris 9 > and sendmail version 8.12.10+sun. No matter what cf file I use, > sendmail does not appear to be usi...

allmasquerade help in sendmail-8.12.10-1
On a Red Hat 3.2.3-20 machine running sendmail-8.12.10-1 I want to send everything to a smart host. No one reads mail on this machine. I started with the sendmail.mc file that came with the machine and defined a smart host in the beginning of the sendmail.mc file. Near the sendmail.mc file I added: MASQUERADE_AS(`mydomain.com')dnl dnl # dnl # masquerade not just the headers, but the envelope as well dnl # FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl dnl # dnl # masquerade not just @mydomainalias.com, but @*.mydomainalias.com as well dnl # FEATURE(masquerade_entire_domain)dnl FEATURE(allmasquerade)dnl MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(mydomain.com)dnl MAILER(smtp)dnl MAILER(procmail)dnl The problem I have is that mail addressed to just "username" is only delivered locally, it doesn't go to the smart host at all. How do I send all mail to the smart host? I thought allmasquerade would fix this. Here's the log file when a user named luser sends email to luser. email to luser@mydomain.com gets delivered fine. Aug 3 10:39:05 uxlnxbld1 sendmail[4251]: i73Ed5vX004251: from=luser, size=32, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200408031439.i73Ed5vX004251@uxlnxbld1.mydomain.com>, relay=luser@localhost Aug 3 10:39:05 uxlnxbld1 sendmail[4253]: i73Ed5uL004253: from=<luser@uxlnxbld1.mydomain.com>, size=400, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200408031439.i73Ed5vX004251@uxlnxbld1.mydomain.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [] Aug 3 10:39:05 uxlnxbld1 sendmail[4251]:...

Sendmail 8.12.10 on SLES9
Hi, We are trying out a third party mail solution (Scalix) which uses Sendmail in local mode for routing outgoing mail. I have an issue however with domain masquerading, whereby the line: From: "Andrew Hodgson" <andrew@domain.com> Gets changed to: From: "Andrew Hodgson" <andrew@machine.domain.com>. As this machine is not known externally, it won't work. As the vender have changed sendmail.cf (I assume this is the case as there is a backup sendmail.cf.1 file without vender specific binary paths in it), I can't use the macros. I have changed the DM line so it just says: DM Taking out all domain masquerading (or so I thought). However, rcsendmail restart works fine but messages coming through still have this issue. Are there any other lines I can change? Thanks. Andrew. -- Andrew Hodgson in Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK. My Email: use <andrew at hodgsonfamily dot org>. On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:11:30 +0000, Andrew Hodgson <me3@privacy.net> wrote: > Hi, > >We are trying out a third party mail solution (Scalix) which uses >Sendmail in local mode for routing outgoing mail. > >I have an issue however with domain masquerading, whereby the line: > >From: "Andrew Hodgson" <andrew@domain.com> > >Gets changed to: > >From: "Andrew Hodgson" <andrew@machine.domain.com>. Sorted, was due to an entry in /etc/hosts which was changed and all is fine now :). Andr...

latest libc6 breaks sendmail 8.12.10
Hi. I am running on a Debian system, but I have compiled sendmail 8.12.10 muyself and in the latest libc6 it complains about incorrectly built binaries accessing errno or h_errno directly -- now this creates all kinds of messages all over the place of anyone using sendmail and some applications under emacs won't send the amil -- so is there a way to get sendmail to obey the libc6 or get libc6 to shut up? Thanks. -- John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com John Covici wrote: > Hi. I am running on a Debian system, but I have compiled sendmail > 8.12.10 muyself and in t...

mail file keeps growing Sendmail 8.11
I have a problem that keeps reoccuring. Something happens to the /usr/spool/mail/user file that causes it to keep growing in size. When this happens the mail can not be pickup by MS Outlook and the only solution I have found is to delete the file and loose all the mail in the file. If I examine the file I see the exact same messages repeated various times and generally this is several thousand duplicates. It does seem that the reason that Outlook fails is that it does not wait long enough for the system to respond while it tries to process such a huge mail box. What causes it to grow I have not been able to determine but I suspect it is due to a large volume of spam and that once the file gets to certain size Outlook starts to time out and cause the problem. I have seen this happen on multiple machines and multiple mail accounts. Most are running SCO 5.0.5 or 5.0.6 and are using Outlook as the mail reader. For some reason this week has resulted with several differnet systems having this problem and some more then once. It is starting to be a real problem and since the only solution I have is to delete the mailbox I am concerned about what "real" mail is being lost. Darmbrust wrote: > I have a problem that keeps reoccuring. That is never good. Good for troubleshooting, but nothing else. > Something happens to the /usr/spool/mail/user file that causes it to > keep growing in size. When this happens the mail can not be pickup by > MS Outlook ...

Sendmail-8.12.10 servers are basically overwhelmed ... :-(
I hope someone can provide suggestions and/or point me to suitable documentation. I manage three mail servers, which handle mail for the whole of the Concordia University community. One is a machine on which many users read their mail (via POP/IMAP/local shell) while the other two are strictly mail gateways (MX for all systems at the university, including many others where users receive and read mail). These all have similar Sendmail configurations, in that they use MimeDefang/SpamAssassin for spam detection and MimeDefang/Sophie/Sophos for virus detection. They have slightly different con...

sending e-mail to oneself (w/ sendmail 8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8)
Hello everyone, I hate to ask a basic question. But I already spent two weeks. I think I have suffered enough to post a question. I have been using Solaris 9 (SPARC) for years. My sendmail.mc with older sendmail worked okay for years. Now I updated my machine to Solaris 10, which comes with a newer version of sendmail (8.13.8). I tried my old sendmail.mc (with some tweaks) but it didn't work. So, I reverted the changes I made, one by one. Finally, I used the original sendmail.mc that comes with Solaris 10. It still didn't work. The problem I'm having is that I cannot send e-mails to myself. (Mail client == Mail host) I tried: # /usr/lib/sendmail -v myself </dev/null It hangs. The mail is stored in a spool because sendmail failed to deliver. I can see it by using 'mailq' command. Eventually the e-mail is forwarded to 'root' as an undeliverable e- mail (from MAIL-DAEMON). 553 5.3.5 mailhost.my_domain.com config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?)554 5.3.5 Local configuration error As you my suspect, I can send an e-mail to somebody else (local). // My question is: What is the correct sequence should occur when sending e-mail to oneself? How can I debug this problem? (After e-amil is submitted to a mail spool) // The newer version of sendmail now uses 'submit.cf'. I'm suspecting that sendmail puts e-mails into a spool even the e-mail doesn't need any relaying. As my understanding of sendmail is very shallow, I'...

Unable to enable milter interface in sendmail 8.12.10
I'm currently attempting to setup a virus scanner on incoming e-mail using sendmail 8.12.10 on a box running Red Hat 7.3. I have downloaded the original 8.12.10 sources from sendmail.org and configured, compiled & installed everything the way I think things should be. However, for some reason it seems my sendmail is being compiled without Milter support, even though I believe to have enabled it through devtools/Site/site.config.m4 by adding the lines: dnl Milter APPENDDEF(`conf_sendmail_ENVDEF', `-DMILTER') Every time I startup sendmail I will see this message come by in my ...

Sendmail 8.14.4 or Sendmail 8.15.0
Are either coming down the pipe? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Never Satan President Republic! Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength. -Eric Hoffer ...

Solaris 9 + sendmail 8.12.10 + qpopper + drac
Hello - Installed sendmail ok, drac installed ok as well, but the qpopper install returns the following message when running make: checking for clock_gettime in -lposix4... no checking for set_auth_parameters in -lsecurity... no checking for crypt in -lcrypt... no checking for dracauth in -ldrac... no Can't use DRAC: dracauth not found in -ldrac Saturn# sh # env HOME=/ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.1/lib LOGNAME=root PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/ucb:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/etc:. PWD=/opt/qpopper4.0.5 SHELL=/sbin/sh...

problem sendmail sendmail-8.13.8 , aliases and LDAP
Hi guys , Im trying to connect my sendmail to my LDAP. In fact in my ldap i the following field mailLocalAddress with the e- mail of the employee ( john.dupont@mycompanie.com ) le in an other field i have rfc822MailMember which is jdupont@server1.mycompanie.com (where jdupont is the account of my employee for the server1). Now I d like to set up a sendmail server that can translate the e-mail to the rfc822MailMember address. Here is my following configuration : site.config.m4 dnl #compilation de sendmail avec support ldapdnl APPENDDEF(`confMAPDEF', `-DLDAPMAP') APPENDDEF(`confINCDIRS', `-I/apps/openldap-2.1.30/include') APPENDDEF(`confLIBSDIRS', `-L/apps/openldap-2.1.30/lib') APPENDDEF(`confLIBS', `-lldap -llber') sendmail.mc define(`confLDAP_DEFAULT_SPEC',`-h myldap.mycompanie.com ')dnl define(`ALIAS_FILE', `/etc/mail/aliases, ldap:-k "(&(objectClass=inetLocalMailRecipient)(mailLocalAddress=%0))" -d "cn=bindcn,ou=sec,dc=mycompanie,dc=fr" -P "/etc/mail/ldapconnect" -M LDAP_AUTH_SIMPLE -b "dc=mycompanie,dc=fr" -v "rfc822MailMember" ')dnl so when i try to send and e mail to john.dupont with my e-amil client i have the following error "Error 5.1.1 john.dupont@mycompanie.com User unknow. I ve the following log john.dupont@mycompanie.com ... User unknown And i my ldap server i ve the following log Feb 5 13:57:59 ldapserver slapd[7702]: conn=30283 fd=27 ACC...

Web resources about - Sendmail 8.12.10 queue file permissions 600 - comp.mail.sendmail

Permission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ;additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the ...

Facebook Fixing Vulnerability That Would Prohibit Users From Revoking App Permissions
Facebook is working to remedy a vulnerability discovered by application security provider MyPermissions , which blocks users of the social network ...

Dwight Murphy - Ok, I now have permission to share the... - Facebook
Ok, I now have permission to share the news about Bowe Bergdahl..This in 2 emails... Here it is in Bob Bergdahls words to me! (1) You guys rock! ...

How-To: Handle Revoked Auth Permissions
This how-to document will help developers check a user's permissions and prompt that user for any missing permissions.

Facebook gives users more options for login, app permissions
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s new mantra of “Move fast with stable infra,” might not be as sexy as “ Move fast and break things ,” but it reflects ...

Arafat's widow grants permission for Swiss lab to test poisoning theory
The Palestinian Authority also approved the probe, which was requested by Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas after a media investigation found ...

'Give me the tooth': Pensioner fights for teeth 'taken without permission'
Perth pensioner Doreen Wilkes is fighting to get her front teeth back after they were allegedly removed by a student dentist without permission. ...

CSIRO moves toward industrial action: seeks Fair Work permission for protected action ballot
CSIRO's new chief executive Larry Marshall could soon be faced with disruptive staff.

Resources last updated: 3/25/2016 7:21:59 AM