COMPGROUPS.NET | Browse | Post | Groups | Users | Stream | About | |

### sf2 vs expander?

• Email
• Follow

Hello and a Happy New Year!

Searching for good orchestral sounds to intregrate in my rock songs, I
came across hammersound.net were I found a couple of useful instruments
after I had filtered them out of the 1000s of free soundfonts offered
there. However, as I found that method - searching millions of sounds
for some dozens of good ones - satisfying, I wondered if there was a
better way out.

So, I visited a nearby music-store where I tried some hardware expanders
that costet up to $1000 but also had quite impressive sounds! Then, by chance I realized the names of the machines tested on soundfont CDs offered in some ebay auctions for about 1% of the hardware price. So: What's the difference e.g. between a Proteus 2000 machine and a soundfont CD labeled "Proteus 2000"? BTW, I'm gonna replace my Soundblaster by maybe a Terratec 24/96 and will have to use a special (hopefully free) tool in order to get my sf2's running. Will there be any change in the fact that I can only use half of my physical RAM for soundfonts? (At the moment I'm using 768 MB on a win98 system, but please not another discussion on win98 managing 512+ MB...) Thomas   0 Reply Thomas 1/1/2004 7:36:41 PM See related articles to this posting "Thomas Blankenstein" <Thomas_Blankenstein@gmx.de> wrote in message news:bt1sil$2gg1g$1@ID-42748.news.uni-berlin.de... > Hello and a Happy New Year! > > Searching for good orchestral sounds to intregrate in my rock songs, I > came across hammersound.net were I found a couple of useful instruments > after I had filtered them out of the 1000s of free soundfonts offered > there. However, as I found that method - searching millions of sounds > for some dozens of good ones - satisfying, I wondered if there was a > better way out. > > So, I visited a nearby music-store where I tried some hardware expanders > that costet up to$1000 but also had quite impressive sounds! Then, by
> chance I realized the names of the machines tested on soundfont CDs
> offered in some ebay auctions for about 1% of the hardware price.
>
> So: What's the difference e.g. between a Proteus 2000 machine and a
> soundfont CD labeled "Proteus 2000"?
>
> BTW, I'm gonna replace my Soundblaster by maybe a Terratec 24/96 and
> will have to use a special (hopefully free) tool in order to get my
> sf2's running. Will there be any change in the fact that I can only use
> half of my physical RAM for soundfonts? (At the moment I'm using 768 MB
> on a win98 system, but please not another discussion on win98 managing
> 512+ MB...)
>
> Thomas

Thomas

Hi I use quite a few soundfonts myself and I suppose the value of any font
is critically realted to how well it will do the job at hand both sonically
and dynamically.

My own experience is that soundfonts of musical instruments rarely capture
the full expression available with the origional hardware. e.g. some of the
Proteus 200 pianos.

However I for one dont often use all the expression on tap so in some cases
a soundfont will sound perfect.

I have listened in particular to sound fonts derived from the Proteus 2000
piano range and my opinion is they sound less impressive and after less
flexible artistically than the origional but only just. If I didnt have a
Proteus already I would use them.

BEst N10

Hope this helps


 0

On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 20:36:41 +0100, Thomas Blankenstein
<Thomas_Blankenstein@gmx.de> wrote:

>Hello and a Happy New Year!
>
>Searching for good orchestral sounds to intregrate in my rock songs, I
>came across hammersound.net were I found a couple of useful instruments
>after I had filtered them out of the 1000s of free soundfonts offered
>there. However, as I found that method - searching millions of sounds
>for some dozens of good ones - satisfying, I wondered if there was a
>better way out.
>
>So, I visited a nearby music-store where I tried some hardware expanders
>that costet up to $1000 but also had quite impressive sounds! Then, by >chance I realized the names of the machines tested on soundfont CDs >offered in some ebay auctions for about 1% of the hardware price. > >So: What's the difference e.g. between a Proteus 2000 machine and a >soundfont CD labeled "Proteus 2000"? The machine is the hardware which plays the samples on the sample CD. Often, soundfonts are sampled from great hardware synths. But samples alone aren't the entire story -- the sampler used to play them makes a difference in how they sound, and what effects/controls/changes you can apply to them. The other part of hardware expanders is that they are external boxes, easier to use in many ways on stage and even in the studio. They do their things well, without tying up the PC. If you need to play many sounds at once, a single PC is going to hit limitations. Hardware is always a nice option for expansion, cheaper than adding several PCs to run many software synths. Plus the engines are often superior to those in common softsynths, barring a lot of CPU power used to drive them. A very fast PC with the right sound card can do a *lot* well, but you can easily tie up the entire system generating one sound. A hardware synth, OTOH, does its stuff without using the PC at all. >BTW, I'm gonna replace my Soundblaster by maybe a Terratec 24/96 and >will have to use a special (hopefully free) tool in order to get my >sf2's running. Will there be any change in the fact that I can only use >half of my physical RAM for soundfonts? (At the moment I'm using 768 MB >on a win98 system, but please not another discussion on win98 managing >512+ MB...) Any of the software soundfont using synths can use much more memory. Oh, and Win98 isn't going to work easily, no good WDM support so no good use of live DXi synths, but you probably already know that. ASIO (VSTi) should work OK. -- *-__Jeffery Jones__________| *Starfire* |____________________-* ** Muskego WI Access Channel 14/25 <http://www.execpc.com/~jeffsj/mach7/> *Starfire Design Studio* <http://www.starfiredesign.com/>   0 Reply Jeffery 1/2/2004 4:05:26 PM On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 20:36:41 +0100, Thomas Blankenstein <Thomas_Blankenstein@gmx.de> wrote: >So: What's the difference e.g. between a Proteus 2000 machine and a >soundfont CD labeled "Proteus 2000"? It is quite likely that the soundfont CD just uses the raw sample data from the Proteus, or perhaps has just sampled and looped the output of the standard presets of the Proteus. The real difference is that the hardware has additonal sonic shaping circuits that your soundfont player is unlikely to have, such as the excellent array of filters available on the Proteus. It is these that give real character and depth to a sound. Additionally, if the CD has sampled the output of a Proteus, it is impossible that it could come close to replicating it, unless the maker of the CD multi-sampled the instrument (more than one sample covering the entire keyboard range pitch-wise and velocity-wise). In short, the soundfont CD is likely to be a pale imitation of the real thing, just as it would be for any instrument.   0 Reply Noel 1/5/2004 7:27:02 AM 3 Replies 220 Views Similar Articles [PageSpeed] 6 • Permalink • Email • Follow  Reply: Similar Artilces: select VS inherit expanded Hi To be short, I don't understand in what way the "inherit expanded" feature solves the classical diamond inheritance scheme : ==> class A ... end class B inherit A ... end class C inherit A ... end class D inherit B, inherit C ... end <== as it may be sometimes *useful* for D to conforms to A, B and C altogether (consider for example STREAM, INPUT_STREAM, OUTPUT_STREAM and INPUT_OUTPUT_STREAM). The "inherit expanded" syntax forces D not to conform to B or C, whereas the problem for D in when it has to conform to A (what path should we use ?). It see... g@addto@macro vs. expanding after \def Hello, Last time I checked, \g@addto@macro used token registers to do its job, which seems a little complicated. I don't live and breathe TeX enough to know why you'd want to do that instead of: \def\my@addto@macro#1#2{\expandafter\gdef \expandafter#1\expandafter{#1#2}} One of the changes made to this macro was "Use toks register to avoid `hash' problem" but I don't understand this. Any hints? Thanks, Will Will Robertson <wspr81@gmail.com> writes: > Last time I checked, \g@addto@macro used token registers to do its > job, which seems a little comp... importing module (i.e. expand time vs run time, again) The mega-thread on phase separations made me think about the issue of expand time versus run time, again. Since that thread is gigantic and since now I have a very specific question I thought I will post it here. I performed the following experiment in Ikarus Scheme: I have defined a library:$ cat mylib.sls (library (mylib) (export a) (import (rnrs)) (define a 42) (display "hello!\n")) Then, I have imported it a the REPL: \$ ikarus Ikarus Scheme version 0.0.3+ (revision 1654, build 2008-10-30) Copyright (c) 2006-2008 Abdulaziz Ghuloum > (import (mylib)) > At this moment no...

Expanding and collapsing information in a dialog, wxMSW vs. wxLIN, wxMAC
Hi! [wxW 2.6.2] I want to expand and collapse a dialog according to information that is added/removed when the user presses a button - via wxSizer::Detach(), deleting the panel that was added to it and wxDialog::Fit(). This should serve as some kind of help/description about what can be done in that dialog (Yes, I'm aware of tooltips and F1-help...). The source-code is attached below. When I run ModalDialog TheDialog(this, ID_MODALDLG); TheDialog.ShowModal(); from a simple wxMSW application, everything is fine and the dialog resizes happily as text appears and va...

[Info-Ingres] not in vs outer join syntax as a table expands
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA144B.58D06C01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, =20 We have many programs which use the old style 'not in' queries:. Eg. select count(*) from progres where attended_fup1 is not null and participant_id not in ( select participant_id from fup where fup_num=3D1); =20 In some cases some of these queries have been re-written using the more modern outer join syntax. ie. select count(*) from progres p ...