[OT] How to argue on the internet

  • Follow


http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/steven-baxter/2011/01/straight-middle-
discussion
http://goo.gl/otGBq

The foolproof guide to avoiding intelligent discussion online.

<quote>
Fancy derailing a discussion but aren't sure how to go about it? Can't be 
bothered discussing things properly and would much rather chuck a spanner in 
the works? No worries. Simply use the Derailing for Dummies guide and you 
need never think too hard about complicated things again!
</quote>

-- 
Big Brother is watching ... so are we
0
Reply Robin 1/28/2011 6:14:17 PM

In message <XJydnRdEOMLnmt7QnZ2dnUVZ8hIAAAAA@bt.com>, Robin T Cox wrote:

> http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/steven-baxter/2011/01/straight-middle-discussion

Exercise for the reader (to bring this back on-topic): find examples of
those principles being applied in this noisegroup.
0
Reply Lawrence 1/28/2011 10:16:46 PM


Verily I say unto thee, that Robin T Cox spake thusly:
> 
> http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/steven-baxter/2011/01/straight-middle-discussion
> http://goo.gl/otGBq
>
> The foolproof guide to avoiding intelligent discussion online.
>
> <quote>
> Fancy derailing a discussion but aren't sure how to go about it? Can't
> be bothered discussing things properly and would much rather chuck a
> spanner in the works? No worries. Simply use the Derailing for Dummies
> guide and you need never think too hard about complicated things
> again!
> </quote>

Steven Baxter needs nearly 500 words to explain "non sequitur"?

Weird.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 35 days  | about GNU/Linux."
0
Reply Homer 1/29/2011 5:18:36 AM

2 Replies
73 Views

(page loaded in 0.056 seconds)

Similiar Articles:













7/23/2012 7:40:15 AM


Reply: