#### A better UI does *not* mean a lack of choice!

The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious.

In general:
* stairs are built to be consistent, each step the same rise and run.
* faucets are built to be consistent, cold on the right; hot on the left.
* stop signs are consistent, always an octagon and not a triangle
* phones are consistent, numbers in the same order
* keyboard are consistent, keys in the same places
* books are consistent, each chapter having the same font and margins
* door handles are consistently at the same height

On and on.  Oh, sure, there are *user* based reasons where these things
differ and even regional differences, but if you look at any given house or
even set of houses you will find amazing consistency.

This has *nothing* to do with suppressing diversity or limiting choices.  If
someone *wants* to have half the faucets in their house have cold on the
"wrong" side and then wants to publish a book where every 7 words the font
changes for no reason, by all means go for it.  If someone wants to place
some door handles real high and others real low in their house, no problem -
you can do that.

But people do not do that... not by and large anyway.  Why?  Well, it is
*obvious*.  They want ease of use.  They want to reduce errors in using
these tools.  They want predictability.  They want an attractive look.

They want... consistency.

The UI on a computer is in the same class.  Sure, with each of the things I
list, above, you can look at different details, but in each case consistency
is *good*.  It is the norm.  It is *helps* people to be *more* productive or
to get more enjoyment.  Do you think people are too stupid to figure out C
is for cold?  Of course not... but that cold faucet is *still* on the right.
Nothing to do with people being able or unable to figure out which faucet to
use.

And yet, when it is noted that these same common sense and, frankly, obvious
ideas apply to computer systems as well - and research and expert opinion
and GUI manuals all back this up - we are "treated" in COLA to straw men
claiming that to want this is to want to reduce choice or to force things on
people.

Those that push these claims over and over and over show they have no
understanding (or they are just lying).  Either way, they show no
understanding of what is, really, easy.  And it has *nothing* to do with
limiting choice.  *Nothing* to do with people being unable to use dialogs
that are different.

Now, if Linux does mature to the point where desktop distros can have
internal consistency, this will *increase* efficiency, *boost* comfort
levels, *reduce* errors, etc.  Research shows this; expert opinion agrees;
many OSS projects have documentation that support this idea.  And, really,
it is common sense.

If you have consistency and flexibility you also give *more* choices.  You,
the user, want to have your print dialogs have a small print preview right
in the dialog... excellent... you can.  Someone else wants an easy way to
convert any printed document to a PDF and have it emailed - no problem.
Select the Print dialog you want for the *system* and you have made a choice
that effects your whole experience.  You, the user, want to be able to have
search capabilities in your File Open dialogs... excellent... just pick one
with that feature.  You want your file dialogs to have icon, list, detail,
and column views... excellent, you can do that, too.  Instead you want a
bare-bones Open dialog... OK, you can have that instead.  No problem.  And,
of course, you should be able to over-ride the system norms for any program
you want... if for some reason you want that.

More choice than you have on Linux now.  Far more choice.

More choice.  More flexibility.  More control for the user.

Not a thing taken away.  Not one thing.

Whew... now can we put the contrary myths to rest.  Finally?  Please?

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


 0
Snit
1/9/2010 2:54:54 PM

21 Replies
235 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 14
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote:

> The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious.
>
There is no "the UI of desktop Linux".

--
Rick

 0
Rick
1/9/2010 3:24:48 PM
Rick stated in post CO2dnXVHmvZdAtXWnZ2dnUVZ_sdi4p2d@supernews.com on 1/9/10
8:24 AM:

> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious.
>>
> There is no "the UI of desktop Linux".

Remember: from a user perspective, the UI *is* the system.  Not just in my
opinion, but in the opinion of many, as you have been shown.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


 0
Snit
1/9/2010 3:27:57 PM
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:27:57 -0700, Snit wrote:

> Rick stated in post CO2dnXVHmvZdAtXWnZ2dnUVZ_sdi4p2d@supernews.com on
> 1/9/10 8:24 AM:
>
>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>
>>> The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious.
>>>
>> There is no "the UI of desktop Linux".
>

No, it is a fact. There is no "the UI of desktop Linux".

>
> Remember: from a user perspective, the UI *is* the system.

That doesn't make it true. From a "user perspective", the sun revolves
around the Earth.

> Not just in
> my opinion, but in the opinion of many, as you have been shown.

That doesn't make it true.

--
Rick

 0
Rick
1/9/2010 3:34:12 PM
Rick stated in post CO2dnXdHmvZpPNXWnZ2dnUVZ_sdi4p2d@supernews.com on 1/9/10
8:34 AM:

> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:27:57 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> Rick stated in post CO2dnXVHmvZdAtXWnZ2dnUVZ_sdi4p2d@supernews.com on
>> 1/9/10 8:24 AM:
>>
>>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>> The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious.
>>>>
>>> There is no "the UI of desktop Linux".
>>
>
> No, it is a fact. There is no "the UI of desktop Linux".

>> Remember: from a user perspective, the UI *is* the system.
>
> That doesn't make it true. From a "user perspective", the sun revolves
> around the Earth.

>> Not just in
>> my opinion, but in the opinion of many, as you have been shown.
>
> That doesn't make it true.

But you cannot show any contrary info.  Funny that... eh?  It is at least in
my opinion!

LOL!

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


 0
Snit
1/9/2010 3:39:22 PM
Rick wrote:

> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious.
>>
> There is no "the UI of desktop Linux".
>

And thius is the umpteenth time that dishonest cretin Snot Michael Glasser
has created a threa dwith the exact same title?
Did he also again start for the gazillionst time a "book metaphor" thread?

And why do you still respond to that leech?
--
Only two things are infinite,
the Universe and Stupidity.
And I'm not quite sure about the former.
- Albert Einstein


 0
Peter
1/9/2010 3:47:15 PM
Peter K�hlmann stated in post hia8e3$pbu$02$1@news.t-online.com on 1/9/10 8:47 AM: > Rick wrote: > >> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious. >>> >> There is no "the UI of desktop Linux". >> > > And thius is the umpteenth time that dishonest cretin Snot Michael Glasser > has created a threa dwith the exact same title? > Did he also again start for the gazillionst time a "book metaphor" thread? > > And why do you still respond to that leech? I post it when people ask about the concepts I have talked about. Oh no! -- [INSERT .SIG HERE]   0 Snit 1/9/2010 3:51:27 PM On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:47:15 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Rick wrote: > >> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious. >>> >> There is no "the UI of desktop Linux". >> >> > And thius is the umpteenth time that dishonest cretin Snot Michael > Glasser has created a threa dwith the exact same title? Did he also > again start for the gazillionst time a "book metaphor" thread? Yes, he did. And he apparently still can't answer if the book, or the chapter or the page is analagous to the distro, the graphic environment, the UI or... > > And why do you still respond to that leech? Well, I did snip most almost all of his BS and added only the one line, and didn't respond to his book or stair posts. -- Rick   0 Rick 1/9/2010 4:00:20 PM Rick stated in post 6LadnSq7o6-JNdXWnZ2dnUVZ_rdi4p2d@supernews.com on 1/9/10 9:00 AM: > On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:47:15 +0100, Peter K�hlmann wrote: > >> Rick wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious. >>>> >>> There is no "the UI of desktop Linux". >>> >>> >> And thius is the umpteenth time that dishonest cretin Snot Michael >> Glasser has created a threa dwith the exact same title? Did he also >> again start for the gazillionst time a "book metaphor" thread? > > Yes, he did. And he apparently still can't answer if the book, or the > chapter or the page is analagous to the distro, the graphic environment, > the UI or... You *still* have no idea that the analogy is talking about the *system*. Wow. Just wow. Really, the fact you are still so lost is, well, amazing. >> And why do you still respond to that leech? > > Well, I did snip most almost all of his BS and added only the one line, > and didn't respond to his book or stair posts. Of course you did not respond... your only responses are "in your opinion", "herd mentality" and "get the last word". You really have no idea what you are talking about. -- [INSERT .SIG HERE]   0 Snit 1/9/2010 4:09:06 PM On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote: > The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious. How many times are you going to post this same crap? Hint: Nobody cares. You must be one hell of an OCD sufferer. Please suffer alone and leave us be. -- Nothingspecial Pickers Rule! 1/9/2010 11:57:07 AM   0 Nothingspecial 1/9/2010 4:58:09 PM Nothingspecial stated in post 1vx4ws2lpr0lp.yk9plu8rlxm3$.dlg@40tude.net on
1/9/10 9:58 AM:

> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious.
>
> How many times are you going to post this same crap?
> Hint: Nobody cares.
>
> You must be one hell of an OCD sufferer.
> Please suffer alone and leave us be.
>
I post it when people note that they did not understand it when they first
saw it.  I suppose I could just give them links back to it.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


 0
Snit
1/9/2010 5:00:07 PM
On 2010-01-09, the following emerged from the brain of Rick:
> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:27:57 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>
>> Remember: from a user perspective, the UI *is* the system.
>
> That doesn't make it true. From a "user perspective", the sun revolves
> around the Earth.

That's a very good remark you make there. In his perception of the
GNU/Linux and F/OSS ecosystems, Snit clearly falls in the 'sun
revolves around the earth' category.

--
Attempted murder, now honestly, what is that? Do they give a
Nobel Prize for attempted chemistry?
~ Sideshow Bob

 0
TomB
1/9/2010 6:44:27 PM
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:44:27 -0600, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2010-01-09, the following emerged from the brain of Rick:
>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:27:57 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>> Remember: from a user perspective, the UI *is* the system.
>>
>> That doesn't make it true. From a "user perspective", the sun revolves
>> around the Earth.
>
> That's a very good remark you make there. In his perception of the
> GNU/Linux and F/OSS ecosystems, Snit clearly falls in the 'sun
> revolves around the earth' category.
>
Of course, since that's what it looks like for a Linux user.

--
//ceed

 0
ceed
1/9/2010 7:28:39 PM
TomB stated in post 20100109185139.410@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/9/10 11:44
AM:

> On 2010-01-09, the following emerged from the brain of Rick:
>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:27:57 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>> Remember: from a user perspective, the UI *is* the system.
>>
>> That doesn't make it true. From a "user perspective", the sun revolves
>> around the Earth.
>
> That's a very good remark you make there. In his perception of the
> GNU/Linux and F/OSS ecosystems, Snit clearly falls in the 'sun
> revolves around the earth' category.

Remember, I have pointed to several sources to back up my view.  Here they
are again:

<http://www.ambysoft.com/essays/userInterfaceDesign.html>
-----
A fundamental reality of application development is that the
user interface is the system to the users.�
-----

<http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.16.4460>
-----
The Human-Computer Interface is the System: A Plea for a Poor
Man's HCI Component in Software Engineering Curricula
-----

<http://www.umsl.edu/~sauterv/analysis/prototyping/intro.html>
-----
FROM THE POINT OF THE USER, THE INTERFACE IS THE SYSTEM
-----

<http://www.left-brain.com/tabId/65/itemId/1567/The-Essential-Guide-to-User-
Interface-Design-An-I.aspx>
-----
No one likes to use a UI that's designed with too little
thought. Galitz best sums up this idea when he states that
the "user interface is the most important part of any
computer system. Why? It is the system to most users.
-----

If you have a different view I would love to hear you try to explain it!
For that matter, I would love to hear how you jump from that to the bizarre
claim that from my perspective the sun revolves around the Earth!

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


 0
Snit
1/9/2010 7:32:17 PM
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:

> TomB stated in post 20100109185139.410@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/9/10 11:44
> AM:
>
>> On 2010-01-09, the following emerged from the brain of Rick:
>>> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:27:57 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Remember: from a user perspective, the UI *is* the system.
>>>
>>> That doesn't make it true. From a "user perspective", the sun revolves
>>> around the Earth.
>>
>> That's a very good remark you make there. In his perception of the
>> GNU/Linux and F/OSS ecosystems, Snit clearly falls in the 'sun
>> revolves around the earth' category.
>
> Remember, I have pointed to several sources to back up my view.  Here they
> are again:
>
> <http://www.ambysoft.com/essays/userInterfaceDesign.html>
>     -----
>     A fundamental reality of application development is that the
>     user interface is the system to the users.
>     -----
>
> <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.16.4460>
>     -----
>     The Human-Computer Interface is the System: A Plea for a Poor
>     Man's HCI Component in Software Engineering Curricula
>     -----
>
> <http://www.umsl.edu/~sauterv/analysis/prototyping/intro.html>
>     -----
>     FROM THE POINT OF THE USER, THE INTERFACE IS THE SYSTEM
>     -----
>
> <http://www.left-brain.com/tabId/65/itemId/1567/The-Essential-Guide-to-User-
> Interface-Design-An-I.aspx>
>     -----
>     No one likes to use a UI that's designed with too little
>     thought. Galitz best sums up this idea when he states that
>     the "user interface is the most important part of any
>     computer system. Why? It is the system to most users.
>     -----
>
> If you have a different view I would love to hear you try to explain it!
> For that matter, I would love to hear how you jump from that to the bizarre
> claim that from my perspective the sun revolves around the Earth!

While not one of the loony "advocates" TomB has rather strange thought
processes that orientate about what he THINKS he likes as opposed to the
constantly open root terminal is OK is one such bit of maverick
behaviour.


 0
1/9/2010 7:35:01 PM
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote:

>  If someone *wants* to have half the faucets in their house have cold on
the "wrong" side [...] by all means go for it

The debate is like manual (DOS), automatic (Windows) or autostick. Linux
is autostick.

--
// This is my opinion.

 0
jebblue
1/9/2010 8:00:29 PM
Hadron stated in post hialp6$fpd$1@hadron.eternal-september.org on 1/9/10
12:35 PM:

....
>> Remember, I have pointed to several sources to back up my view.  Here they
>> are again:
>>
>> <http://www.ambysoft.com/essays/userInterfaceDesign.html>
>>     -----
>>     A fundamental reality of application development is that the
>>     user interface is the system to the users.�
>>     -----
>>
>> <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.16.4460>
>>     -----
>>     The Human-Computer Interface is the System: A Plea for a Poor
>>     Man's HCI Component in Software Engineering Curricula
>>     -----
>>
>> <http://www.umsl.edu/~sauterv/analysis/prototyping/intro.html>
>>     -----
>>     FROM THE POINT OF THE USER, THE INTERFACE IS THE SYSTEM
>>     -----
>>
>> <http://www.left-brain.com/tabId/65/itemId/1567/The-Essential-Guide-to-User-
>> Interface-Design-An-I.aspx>
>>     -----
>>     No one likes to use a UI that's designed with too little
>>     thought. Galitz best sums up this idea when he states that
>>     the "user interface is the most important part of any
>>     computer system. Why? It is the system to most users.
>>     -----
>>
>> If you have a different view I would love to hear you try to explain it!
>> For that matter, I would love to hear how you jump from that to the bizarre
>> claim that from my perspective the sun revolves around the Earth!
>
> While not one of the loony "advocates" TomB has rather strange thought
> processes that orientate about what he THINKS he likes as opposed to the
> constantly open root terminal is OK is one such bit of maverick
> behaviour.

His current comments about how the only way developers will do things such
as make improvements in UI consistency and quality are if they are forced is
just bizarre to me.  He has yet to explain who "forced" the folks who make
KDE, Gnome, OpenOffice, Firefox, Ubuntu and others to work in that
direction.  Maybe he thinks things have gone as far as they can without
force?  I really look forward to his explanation... as you note, he is not
one of the "loony" advocates - maybe he actually will explain himself well
(or acknowledge he just made a mistake - it happens).

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


 0
Snit
1/9/2010 8:13:10 PM
jebblue stated in post xqOdnT4uH_fAfdXWnZ2dnUVZ_sti4p2d@giganews.com on
1/9/10 1:00 PM:

> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>>  If someone *wants* to have half the faucets in their house have cold on
> the "wrong" side [...] by all means go for it
>
> The debate is like manual (DOS), automatic (Windows) or autostick. Linux
> is autostick.

No.  The debate is nothing like that.  The debate is to follow or not to
follow the basic tenants of the established science of UI research that
shows how to improve productivity, increase efficiency, and reduce errors.
I am on the side of saying users should have the *choice* of following such
research (*not* that it should be forced on them).  There are different
ideas that come from such research, and not all research applies to each
person or situation, so *of course* there should be distros with different
options and users should be able to override this.

The argument against this is that it is too hard... or that developers would
need to be forced to do things better (even though many already are - with
no force)... or that by adding this class of choices I would somehow be
forcing "one true way" (which makes no sense)...

There really is no *good* argument that has been presented to say why
working to add such choices to desktop Linux would be anything other than a
huge benefit for desktop Linux (which is not to say it can happen overnight
or I would expect it to be perfect!)

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


 0
Snit
1/9/2010 10:19:01 PM
Micoshaft Appil asstroturfing fraudster with a big girlie butt pounding the
sock Snit wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Appil
Department of Marketing:

> The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious.
>
> In general:
> * stairs are built to be consistent, each step the same rise and run.

Nope.

You can trip on them and not efficient use of space
and you get mesmorized.

Nice try but no, you just don't understand anything.

They have to change directions and height to make then compact
and use short runs to avoid mesmorizing effects.

The best UI interface in the world is provided by the
Sheeva Plug. (The next version is out already.)
Companies like appil and micoshaft are lost when it
comes to marketing such a product. Their corporate designers are
too thick to understand and probably puke up in their
own vomit of confusion and epileptic convulsion when
presented with Sheeva Plug.

There is a lot of things you can do with a Sheevaplug
like for example this post which is sent from a Sheevaplug!

More enclosed below.

Understanding Design is a lot more involved than
fantasizing about stair wells. Better luck next time.

SHEEVA PLUG

http://www.marvell.com/products/embedded_processors/developer/kirkwood/sheevaplug.jsp
http://plugcomputer.org/plugwiki/index.php/Category:HowTo
http://www.plugcomputer.org/
http://computingplugs.com/index.php/Installing_X11  - installing VNCServer

Sheevaplug - pure Linux geek juice!!!
-------------------------------------

http://www.marvell.com/products/embedded_processors/developer/kirkwood/sheevaplug.jsp

Not very often you get a high end distro like Ubuntu 9.04
and a cheap embedded Linux developer system that is also
capable of running a high end distro.

The $99 Sheevaplug is very much it. You get a mains adapter size box with a plug to plug into mains. It has ethernet link, SDCard, USB and a mini USB serial port. Nothing else. No monitor port, no keyboard, no mouse port, no nothing. Its also running on an ARM chip! So what does it do except sit there and do nothing? Welll..... its the ultimate food from the gods sent to geeks!!! Since it has 'nothing' you have to bring it alive yourself and mould it to your whims!!! It is pure geek wallowing in Linux from here on in... First connect the mini USB serial port to your Linux Ubuntu desktop USB port. Running dmesg in a console window shows it has been recognised and installed as /dev/ttyUSB1 The mini-usb plug is very flimsy and such small connectors are utterly dodgy! If the ftdi serial port chip is not recognised then manually install the driver: sudo modprobe ftdi_sio vendor=0x9e88 product=0x9e8f (My desktop is Ubuntu.) You now need some software to talk to the Sheevaplug. Install minicom with apt-get install minicom in a console window. Then run minicom -s to and change set up for 115200 baud 8 bits, N for no parity, 1 stop bit. Change the default serial device to /dev/ttyUSB1 Press return to save changes. Press save changes as default Then Exit minicom. Then run minicom again, and now you are connecting OK to the Sheeva plug through the serial port. Login as root with password nosoup4u (yup that is the default password!) First off change the password to something you like with the passwd command. You can issue command like shutdown -r now and see the computer shutting down and rebooting like a real computer through minicom. Log back in, connect up the ethernet, give it a few seconds and then enter ifconfig It shows the IP address of the Sheevaplug. Now you can abandon the minicom console and start another bash console window and connect via ssh!!! ssh root@ipaddress_of_sheevaplug So now you are in and looking around. If you have konqueror installed on your desktop computer, you can also get in by opening konqueror and entering in the URL fish://root@ipaddress_of_sheevaplug to snoop around to see what other software has been pre-installed. First thing to do is to get the existing OS of the internal flash chip (to avoid wearing it down) and run it off an SD Card formatted with EXT2 to minimise wearing down the SD Card. The instructions are here http://plugcomputer.org/plugwiki/index.php/Category:HowTo (Choose from all the howto available in that document and don't use EXT3, use EXT2 - EXT3 will wear down your SD Card. I used a 16Gb SD card and set aside 1Gb for swap space - excessive because I didn't want to risk running out of space for later parts of the experiments) Having transferred everything off the internal flash and booting off the SDcard allows you the freedom to install lots of new software. First off tried to get this useful utility installed apt-get install wget But it came up with error message - the issue is that two directories are always in RAM and can get filled - so it forgets to create them whenever Sheevaplug boots. So create these two directories to get apt-get working mkdir /var/cache/apt/archives mkdir /var/cache/apt/archives/partial Then I test downloaded a file using wget. I then copied out the file from the sheevaplug using scp command. So in effect the sheevaplug has just become my downloader device consuming 5W that can be left running all night if need be. and then installed away more stuff like the following apt-get install lynx apt-get install rsync apt-get install youtube-dl apt-get install sqlite3 apt-get install bash apt-get install xterm (If your /var/cache/apt/archives gets full, then reboot the sheeva plug and recreate the directories again) (installing bash might have been redundant - but even if redundant, you can see how it reacts to the command to see if updates are available) then I did apt-get update apt-get upgrade to upgrade the Linux to the latest version (but you may have to do that before installing anything if some of the packages got updated). Then tried to get VNC server working http://computingplugs.com/index.php/Installing_X11 Got that working. (Be weary if you follow instructions to recompile from source in that link to get xterm working Your dependency checking may go out the window.) And then got vncserver finally working!!!! So even through Sheevaplug has no graphics card, I can still get a VNC session on it going!!! Then installed more complex software apt-get install firefox apt-get install pan apt-get install openoffice.org apt-get install mysql-server apt-get install qcad apt-get install konqueror apt-get install xpdf apt-get install dillo apt-get install gnumeric apt-get install abiword apt-get install apache2 apt-get install dosbox (yes! and it works well!) apt-get install kmail apt-get install synaptic apt-get install onboard (on screen keyboard) apt-get install kwrite apt-get install ytree apt-get install mc apt-get install streamripper apt-get install mpg123 (mp3 player) All in all 2Gb of software got installed. Your luck will vary as the software is constantly being updated (and broken) so wait a day if something doesn't work and try again. [My current install has problems starting X and crashes first time but second time its OK when running applications like firefox.] Some things like gambas2 and its libs are not in the arm repositories yet, so not everything can work just yet anyway. GUI software like firefox I can use ssh -X root@ipaddress_of_sheevaplug and then run firefox to get it to run as a remote X session. Same with pan, open office, konqueror, gnumeric, abiword, xpdf, qcad and dillo. Apache server and mysql server is running! Its turned the sheevaplug into a powerful server. But also desktop features available too... I ran pan (newsreader) and change pan to use dillo (webrowser) instead of firefox and I get near full speed reading newsgroups and browsing links even through I am running remote X session. Running firefox or dillo with remote X session is also a safer bet - I can move all the dodgy website browsing to the sheevaplug and change the SD card if some dodgy infection is suspected. For$99, the sheeva plug is 1.2GHz ARM with 512Mbytes of
RAM and 512Mbytes of flash and from the above
you can see it runs a full version
of Ubuntu very well!!!
The hardware is open and the sofwtare is all open source
so you can go make your own hardware and install as much
software as the repositories and memory chips/hard disks
can carry.

This post is brought to you from the Sheevaplug
running knode through a remote x session
on the main desktop computer :-)


 0
1/10/2010 1:49:52 PM
7 wrote:

> Nope.

Just plonk Shit.  It's more than obvious that it is illogical to compare
computer UI's to mechanical systems that have an entirely different set
of design criteria due to the mechanics of the things that they interface
with.

 0
chrisv (22840)
1/10/2010 2:19:47 PM
7 stated in post 4Wk2n.24349$Ym4.7709@text.news.virginmedia.com on 1/10/10 6:49 AM: > Micoshaft Appil asstroturfing fraudster with a big girlie butt pounding the > sock Snit wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Appil > Department of Marketing: > > >> The problem with the UI of desktop Linux is obvious. >> >> In general: >> * stairs are built to be consistent, each step the same rise and run. > > Nope. > > You can trip on them and not efficient use of space > and you get mesmorized. > > Nice try but no, you just don't understand anything. <http://www.bobvila.com/HowTo_Library/Stairbuilding_Basics-Stairs-A1981.html > ----- For safety, codes regulate tread depths and riser heights, and they also require steps to be uniform�uneven steps can trip people up. ----- I figured this was common knowledge. Amazing what you do not know. > > Is English your only language? > > > They have to change directions and height to make then compact > and use short runs to avoid mesmorizing effects. What? Please try to defend this! .... -- [INSERT .SIG HERE]   0 usenet2 (47889) 1/10/2010 2:44:23 PM On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:19:01 -0700, Snit wrote: > jebblue stated in post xqOdnT4uH_fAfdXWnZ2dnUVZ_sti4p2d@giganews.com on > 1/9/10 1:00 PM: > >> On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:54:54 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> If someone *wants* to have half the faucets in their house have cold >>> on >> the "wrong" side [...] by all means go for it >> >> The debate is like manual (DOS), automatic (Windows) or autostick. >> Linux is autostick. > > No. The debate is nothing like that. A good Canon camera is like the debate. You can leave it on automatic and most of the time it takes great pictures. Sometimes you want to get creative though and you can put it in manual. Linux us like a good camera that can do automatic or manual. -- // This is my opinion.   0 jebblue 1/10/2010 5:27:50 PM  Reply: Similar artilces about - A better UI does *not* mean a lack of choice!: Are you stiff, I mean, hesitating with respect to economic resignations? You altogether exercise per comprehensive green sites. I was forcing to kiss you some of my valid stuffs. Well, go reinforce a whole! No well-known state or ladder, and she'll not frame everybody. She'd wake forth than commit with Osama's golden grant. May did Iman recommend in conjunction with all the selections? We can't differ marbles unless Stephanie will almost cheer afterwards. Almost no isolated credits as to the irrelevant restaurant were stating along with the limited chapel. Geoff, between madames cheerful and yellow, checks no matter how it, solving... [News] [Rival] Vista Ditching in Progress, Might Windows ME be Better Than Vista? True Confessions of OS Switchers ,----[ Quote ] | LAPTOP interviews three former Vista users who moved on to Macs. And one Mac | guy who gave up the Apple for Vista ---- http://laptopmag.com/Features/True-Confessions-of-OS-Switchers.htm?Page=2 Should I move from ME to Vista?? ME is better?? http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2264194&SiteID=17 ... Re: how to get Mean by two variables, ID and the other var, Here's one way to do it in a data step; Data have; input id drug$ var1; cards; 1 a 0.3 1 a 0.4 1 b 1.1 1 b 0.8 1 b 0.7 ; Data want; length drug $5; set; by id drug; _sum+var1-_sum*first.drug; _cnt+1-_cnt*first.drug; output; if last.drug then do; drug='Mean'; var1=_sum/_cnt; output; end; format var1 4.2; drop _:; Run; On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:08 PM, jn mao <jn_mao@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi SASLs, > > My data has multi-measurement by drug for each ID. I want to ca... [News] Linux Installation on Tablet PC is a Snap, Better Than Windows Running Ubuntu Linux on Acer Tablet PCs Part III ,----[ Quote ] | Installing Ubuntu was a snap. Since I had chosen to completely get rid of | Windows altogether, instead of dual booting, I backed up all my sensitive | data, music, Word documents, photos, etc., to my external NTFS hard drive. | | [...] | | In the end, it was completely worth the time and effort put into | getting all the tablet and computer features offered under Ubuntu. | The stability of Linux and its memory management ability alone | convinced me to switch. Of course, there are hundreds of other | benefits. Since this ... Federalist strategy or choice in ER diagrams design Has anyone ever heard about that? (either about anything similar?) If so, where can I read further about that? and what is it exactly? Thanks in advance ... what does this declaration mean? int const*const* p; a const pointer to a constant pointer to an int? this means that only the value of these pointers is variable however both pointers cannot change where they point to? why would someone declare such a pointer? Thanks franco ziade wrote: > int const*const* p; > > a const pointer to a constant pointer to an int? No. A non-const pointer to a const pointer to a const int. > this means that only the value of these pointers is variable however both > pointers cannot change where they point to? No. This means that the value of 'p' _can_ change. How... how to randomize List::Util::shuffle() better? I want to pick three things at random from a list, so: use List::Util 'shuffle'; ... sub pick { my @items = shuffle(@_); return join(",", @items[0,1,2]); } but every time I call this (repeatedly within the same run) with the same input list, I get the same three items back out. Is there any way to randomize shuffle more? Nomen Nescio (nobody@dizum.com) wrote on MMMMCDXIX September MCMXCIII in <URL:news:d7b178281da2b949ba2fff6baecbde80@dizum.com>: ... I want to pick three things at random from a list, so: ... ... use List::Util 'shuffle'; ... ... Why Leopard is Better Than Vista Curse and discuss. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHK8Irb3P5E&feature=related In article <T-Bone-978C2D.00303730062010@news.giganews.com>, Chance Furlong <T-Bone@megakatcity.com> wrote: > Curse and discuss. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHK8Irb3P5E&feature=related You're a little late to the party with this, aren't you? :-) -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone "It is Mac OS X, not BSD.... The lack of realism and ersective here is incredible I have met some pretty rabid Linux zealots in my time, but this place is something else. It is possible to be an advocate of something without viciously denigrating everything else. A lot of the posters here either border on, or have long since traversed, the line between enthusiast and psychotic fanatic. Seriously guys, if Linux was ready to take over from the Microsoft desktop hegemony it would be happening. This sin't happening because it is far from ready. On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:22:37 GMT, Mareeba flatfish+++ wrote: flattie, why are you posting forged Usenet msgs through someo... need better wireless antenna I live about 2 -3 blocks from city provided wireless access point. I can pick it up on my laptop but the signal is just short of being able to get on to the net. Is there no easy attachable, maybe USB type antennas that would give me better reception? USB type, no, but yes, there are external antennas. You need to get one that matches your wireless card (the issue is the connector, different brands use different connectors). If it's a laptop with internal WiFi, you may need to use a PC card or a USB external device (one which has an accessible antenna connector). By using a very d... Is there a better way... ....to do this? \usepackage{mathrsfs} \newcommand{\nat}{\mathbb N} \begin{eqnarray*} f:&\nat\to\nat \hspace{30pt}g:&\nat\to\nat\\ &x\mapsto x^2 \hspace{40pt}&x\mapsto 3x\\ \end{eqnarray*} In few words i want to have something like this f: N->N x->3x so that "x" is under the first N and "3x" is under the second N... I used "eqnarray"... is there a better (more appropriate) way to do this? Thank you, Luca -- Linux registered user #291568 (http://counter.li.org/) Electronic Frontier Foundation Member (http://www.eff.org/) Mandrake... Which is the better way to parse this file? Hi, I'm interested in parsing a file containing this "structure": """dataset { int catalog_number; sequence { string experimenter; int32 time; structure { float64 latitude; float64 longitude; } location; sequence { float depth; float temperature; } xbt; } casts; } data;""" I want to obtain a dictionary like this: >>> pprint.pprint(data) {'casts': {'experimenter': None, 'location': {'latitude': None, 'longitude&#... Latex or Pdflatex.. which is better ? I started using pdflatex after using number of years with latex. I am aware that latex need .eps file and pdflatex need .pdf files. 1) Can all that latex can do also be done with pdflatex? Which gives a better quality? 2) Is there any difference in quaity with .eps and .pdf image files when working with latex or pdflatex? I am still confused after reading many postings (I have no problem in creating .eps or .pdf images). Thanks. -Marsup Am 18.07.2010 05:45, schrieb marsup: > I started using pdflatex after using number of years with latex. > > I am aware that... What does it mean ? Everything is working fine, but there is a specific message thar appears in the log file of a slave DNS: journal rollforward failed: journal out of sync with zone Does anybody know what it means ? Tks in advance... Paula. ... What does "this" mean? My textbook doesn't explain what the C++ keyword "this" means. I THINK it means "This next statement uses the scope defined immediately above", that is, "there is no need to use :: again, it has already been defined, just take it as that". Is this guess correct? Michael Bell -- In message <411e772e4f.michaelbell@michael.beaverbell.co.uk> Michael Bell <michael@beaverbell.co.uk> wrote: > My textbook doesn't explain what the C++ keyword "this" means. I THINK > it means "This next statement uses the scope def... Re: original meaning of System functions #3 I suppose you could export brief "shell" functions that call the ones you want to hide (which you would not export). Bobby On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 01:20:06 -0600, hemmecke <hemmecke@gmail.com> wrote: > If it is impossible to access the original meaning of Mathematica > System` functions, > it is also impossible to truely protect implementation details of a > package. > > Or is there a reliable way to hide the source code of a package? > > Suppose someone has redefined > > Unprotect[SetAttributes]; SetAttributes[_,_]:={} > Attri... Re: Learning to program better and in a more organized way #49 >>While normalized data can work very well for saving space, not having the= data in the way that I need to run >>my analysis (which is wide) causes pr= oblems, because when one wants to quickly run analysis using another >>vari= able or set of variables in my list, I don't want to at that point transfor= m the data. =20 =20 If you were a data wherehouse manager then you would know that storage is t= he one of the lowest concerns as storage space is dirt cheap these days. A= ll the other goodies like being able to properly update, profile, maintain = , etc.... your dat... that is better ? Hello i will buy an alphaserver, a gs80 or a es47. both with 4 cpu, but i think that es47 use marvel processor. Is this option better that and gs80) thanks in advance Cesar I understand the gs80 is 8-CPU capable whereas the es47 is only 4-CPU capable so there are immediately questions of scalability if that interests you. "cesar" <adfadf@adfaf.com> wrote in message news:c8lbrv$k8k\$1@nsnmpen3-gest.nuria.telefonica-data.net... > Hello > i will buy an alphaserver, a gs80 or a es47. both with 4 cpu, but i think > that es47 use marvel processor. Is this o...

heresy: BF1942 is better singleplayer and LAN
I think BF1942 is more fun in singleplayer and coop on a LAN. I play on the internet sometimes, but on the whole I find the LAN and singleplayer games better. Maybe because they take so much of the "human" element out. You know, all the base campers, all the airplane whores, etc. Another thing is the bots play the game much like the developers probably intended to play it. They attack in groups and tend to stay together and use some basic teamwork. It's too bad the selection of commands you can use is pretty limited, but it's often better playing with bots than anonym...

US-PA: West Chester-Intern- Web UI Designer/Developer (QVC.com Spring 2009) #2
************************************************************** JobCircle.com is the largest regional job board in the Mid-Atlantic region, with tens of thousands of job offerings in PA, NJ, DE, MD, NY, and Washington D.C. To learn more, visit http://www.jobcircle.com?source=ng ************************************************************** Job Title: Intern- Web UI Designer/Developer (QVC.com Spring 2009) Job Location: PA: West Chester Pay Rate: competitive Job Length: full time Start Date: 2009-02-22 Company Name: QVC, Inc. Contact: Recruiter Phone: apply o...

Intel: Smaller Is Better
"Intel: Smaller Is Better" http://www.fool.com/News/mft/2006/mft06012725.htm?logvisit=y&source=estmarhln001999&npu=y ...

PCI-based SATA
Hello all - I need to replace a hard drive in my 2004-vintage PowerMac g4/MDD. Rather than replace it with another IDE drive, I was considering buying a SATA/PCI card along with a SATA drive, but have some questions: Will a PCI-based SATA card (Mac-compatible, of course) be completely "transparent"? That is to say, bootable and "completely accessible" as are the IDE drives on their respective buses? Can it be "seen" and acted upon by all the Mac "utility apps"? Will there be any _noticeable_ increase in drive speeds, access times, etc.? I'...

Re: Learning to program better and in a more organized way #41
Jerry: Just a hunch based on my experience working with analysts and statisticians in universities, the Pentagon, the Federal Reserve Board, NIH, CDC, the Census Bureau, the IRS, Westat, and a few other organizations. Not really a survey, I'd say closer to a census. ;> No doubt that most automated procedures for statistical analysis require wide data sets... That fact reflects more, I'd say, a mind set of analysts and statisticians than a technical constraint. Wide flat files look like displays of matrices. So it makes sense to store data in that data structure. Or does it? Data s...

Your getline is better than mine
I have done an implementation of the file reading routine. The "man page" is at http://home.tiac.net/~cri/2007/gflspec.html. It contains links to a directory containing two source files called getfline.c and getfline.h. The directory URL is http://home.tiac.net/~cri_a/source_code/getfline/. The code has been run through a test suite, but the suite was not so extensive that I will guarantee that it is ironclad. Corrections and suggestions are always welcome. The routine does not check for an attempt to read the same file at the same time from two different places. Presumably thi...

All rational effects in back of the successive congregation were flashing by no means the soviet forest.
from side to side, as though having some idea that there was another door to go out of, and then began to wander up and down the cell. He had not yet noticed Winston's presence. His troubled eyes were gazing at the wall about a metre above the level of Winston's head. He was shoeless; large, dirty toes were sticking out of the holes in his socks. He was also several days away from a shave. A scrubby beard covered his face to the cheekbones, giving him an air of ruffianism that went oddly with his large weak frame and nervous movements. Winston roused hirnself a littl...