how nice and consistent flubuntu must be. one release they're using gnome 
and the next release it is something completely different.



Canonical Ubuntu Splits From GNOME Over Design Issues

Canonical made the switch for the next release of its Ubuntu desktop Linux 
distribution, because of increasingly divergent views of how a desktop 
interface should look and operate, according to Canonical founder Mark 
Shuttleworth.

"We were part of the GNOME shell design discussion, we put forward our views 
and they were not embraced by designers," Shuttleworth said during a press 
briefing. "We took a divergent view from the GNOME shell folks on key design 
issues, for example how application menus should appear on the system, how 
one should search to find applications, [and] how one's favorite 
applications should be presented."

The next release of Natty Narwhal (11.04), due to be released in April 2011, 
will install a Unity shell, for those systems that meet the hardware 
requirements to run the interface, in either two-dimensional or 
three-dimensional modes,


http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/208708/canonical_ubuntu_splits_from_gnome_over_design_issues.html

On 10/25/2010 02:29 PM, One Shot - One Kill wrote:
> http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/208708/canonical_ubuntu_splits_from_gnome_over_design_issues.html

I still am waiting for you to answer to me why is it that MS is using 
Linux servers.

Why haven’t you answered yet?

"Magno" <marbarand@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:nrsgp7-jo6.ln1@news.newsgroup.cl...
> On 10/25/2010 02:29 PM, One Shot - One Kill wrote:
>> http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/208708/canonical_ubuntu_splits_from_gnome_over_design_issues.html
>
> I still am waiting for you to answer to me why is it that MS is using 
> Linux servers.
>
> Why haven't you answered yet?

I realize that your a brain dead fscking linux luser but if you want to know 
why MS is using linux servers - how the fsck would I know?

if you want to know then ask MS and not me you stupid fool.

but if you are simply out for a (s)troll then keep repeating your nonsense.

On 10/25/2010 04:07 PM, One Shot - One Kill wrote:
> "Magno"<marbarand@gmail.com>  wrote in message
> news:nrsgp7-jo6.ln1@news.newsgroup.cl...
>> On 10/25/2010 02:29 PM, One Shot - One Kill wrote:
>>> http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/208708/canonical_ubuntu_splits_from_gnome_over_design_issues.html
>>
>> I still am waiting for you to answer to me why is it that MS is using
>> Linux servers.
>>
>> Why haven't you answered yet?
>
> I realize that your a brain dead fscking linux luser but if you want to know
> why MS is using linux servers - how the fsck would I know?
>
> if you want to know then ask MS and not me you stupid fool.

I knew you had no idea.

> but if you are simply out for a (s)troll then keep repeating your nonsense.

Just like when you copied and pasted the previous message when you had 
no idea what to answer to me?

lol, no worries... thanks for being honest now, anyway, and admitting 
you have no idea.

"Magno" <marbarand@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:tl1hp7-pj7.ln1@news.newsgroup.cl...
> On 10/25/2010 04:07 PM, One Shot - One Kill wrote:
>> "Magno"<marbarand@gmail.com>  wrote in message
>> news:nrsgp7-jo6.ln1@news.newsgroup.cl...
>>> On 10/25/2010 02:29 PM, One Shot - One Kill wrote:
>>>> http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/208708/canonical_ubuntu_splits_from_gnome_over_design_issues.html
>>>
>>> I still am waiting for you to answer to me why is it that MS is using
>>> Linux servers.
>>>
>>> Why haven't you answered yet?
>>
>> I realize that your a brain dead fscking linux luser but if you want to 
>> know
>> why MS is using linux servers - how the fsck would I know?
>>
>> if you want to know then ask MS and not me you stupid fool.
>
> I knew you had no idea.

no shit. so you just now figured out that I am not the person running 
microsoft and that is why I do not know the reason.


>> but if you are simply out for a (s)troll then keep repeating your 
>> nonsense.
>
> Just like when you copied and pasted the previous message when you had no 
> idea what to answer to me?
>
> lol, no worries... thanks for being honest now, anyway, and admitting you 
> have no idea.

correct. it is too bad for you that I had to explain to you that I am not 
the person who runs microsoft.