Confused about Android

  • Permalink
  • submit to reddit
  • Email
  • Follow


The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my 
wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so confusing.

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
Reply RonB 1/22/2011 8:08:41 PM

See related articles to this posting


RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> writes:

> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my 
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
> confusing.

Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.

Why are you so clueless about everything?

0
Reply Hadron 1/22/2011 8:23:45 PM

RonB stated in post ihfdg9$5jk$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11 1:08
PM:

> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so confusing.

The context is, I am guessing, that it is not standard desktop Linux.

Hope that helps!


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Reply Snit 1/22/2011 8:30:11 PM

Hadron stated in post ihfech$ah7$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11
1:23 PM:

> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>> confusing.
> 
> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
> 
> Why are you so clueless about everything?
> 
The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.  Where
to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to others.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Reply Snit 1/22/2011 8:31:21 PM

"RonB" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:ihfdg9$5jk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

morons like you get confused easily about a lot of things.

> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so 
> confusing.

because the phone is a defective piece of shit.



0
Reply One 1/22/2011 8:35:39 PM

Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:
> 
> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
> confusing.

I must admit that is confusing. It's even more confusing for me, because
I have GNU software running on mine as well, like Bash.

If I didn't know better, I'd swear this was GNU/Linux running a
Java-like virtual machine called Dalvik, a Dalvik based UI, and some
Dalvik applications, but with the ability to run native GNU/Linux
applications like Bash and OpenVPN too.

Sort of like, erm, any other GNU/Linux distribution.

I'm shocked and amazed.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 29 days  | about GNU/Linux."
0
Reply Homer 1/22/2011 10:11:51 PM

Homer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:
>> 
>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>> confusing.
>
> I must admit that is confusing. It's even more confusing for me, because
> I have GNU software running on mine as well, like Bash.
>
> If I didn't know better, I'd swear this was GNU/Linux running a
> Java-like virtual machine called Dalvik, a Dalvik based UI, and some
> Dalvik applications, but with the ability to run native GNU/Linux
> applications like Bash and OpenVPN too.
>
> Sort of like, erm, any other GNU/Linux distribution.

Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?

> I'm shocked and amazed.

Actually, according to "Hadron", a Linux kernel engineer disagrees with you:

   Message-ID: <ihfech$ah7$1@news.eternal-september.org>

And here it is:

   http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/News/How-Much-Linux-Is-in-Android

   Matthew Porter's talk at the Grenoble conference titled "Mythbusters:
   Android" tackled the question of how much Android is actually Linux, how
   functional it is, and what is the nature of the Android community. .  . .

   Porter works as chief software architect at the open source firm Embedded
   Alley, which Mentor Graphics acquired the end of July 2009. He is a
   PowerPC specialist, thus viewing Android from a hardware perspective.

How do we handle this confusion?

   http://lwn.net/Articles/320437/

   Android is the first widely-deployed platform that uses the Linux kernel
   but does not provide a Unixish userland. Finally, after all these years,
   rms's insistence on calling the system GNU/Linux starts to make sense.
   There is GNU/Linux providing the GNU C library, utilities and other
   userland on top of the Linux kernel, and now Android/Linux using the same
   kernel but different userspace.

Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?  :-D

-- 
The most happy marriage I can imagine to myself would be the union
of a deaf man to a blind woman.
		-- Samuel Taylor Coleridge
0
Reply Chris 1/22/2011 10:36:08 PM

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Homer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:
>>> 
>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>> confusing.
>>
>> I must admit that is confusing. It's even more confusing for me, because
>> I have GNU software running on mine as well, like Bash.
>>
>> If I didn't know better, I'd swear this was GNU/Linux running a
>> Java-like virtual machine called Dalvik, a Dalvik based UI, and some
>> Dalvik applications, but with the ability to run native GNU/Linux
>> applications like Bash and OpenVPN too.
>>
>> Sort of like, erm, any other GNU/Linux distribution.
> 
> Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?

If he keeps adding GNU stuff then both would be the right answer. It is 
possible to compile and install all the usual GNU libs and tools on top of 
Android's Linux kernel. I may even be possible to run Xorg using the Linux 
framebuffer driver. The most difficult part may be to create a GNU cross-
build environment for Android. After that is done, configure and make take 
care of the rest.

Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU libs and 
tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.

Regards.

0
Reply Lusotec 1/23/2011 2:50:18 AM

Snit wrote:
> Hadron wrote:
>> RonB writes:
>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>> confusing.
>> 
>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>> 
>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
> 
> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand. 
> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
> others.

Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel looks 
and behaves the same.

Regards.

0
Reply Lusotec 1/23/2011 2:53:53 AM

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:

> Snit wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>> RonB writes:
>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
>>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>> confusing.
>>> 
>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>> 
>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>> 
>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
>> others.
> 
> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
> looks and behaves the same.
> 
> Regards.

If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux -- Snit can't twist his way out of 
that simple fact. The line has already been drawn and the WinTroll and 
MacTroll rants claiming that Android "isn't Linux" is shown to be as 
baseless as most of their other claims. Linux is becoming very popular. 
Live with it.

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
Reply RonB 1/23/2011 2:58:15 AM

Lusotec stated in post ihg580$p8m$2@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11
7:53 PM:

> Snit wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>> RonB writes:
>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>>>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>> confusing.
>>> 
>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>> 
>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>> 
>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
>> others.
> 
> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel looks
> and behaves the same.
> 
> Regards.
> 
Fair enough... I know very little about the changes.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Reply Snit 1/23/2011 3:06:55 AM

RonB stated in post ihg5g7$rnh$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11 7:58
PM:

> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:
> 
>> Snit wrote:
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>> RonB writes:
>>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
>>>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>>> confusing.
>>>> 
>>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>>> 
>>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>>> 
>>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
>>> others.
>> 
>> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
>> looks and behaves the same.
>> 
>> Regards.
> 
> If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux -- Snit can't twist his way out of
> that simple fact.

Nor am I trying!  Wow... what a strange concept.

> The line has already been drawn and the WinTroll and MacTroll rants claiming
> that Android "isn't Linux" is shown to be as baseless as most of their other
> claims. Linux is becoming very popular. Live with it.

I hope you feel better soon.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Reply Snit 1/23/2011 3:08:37 AM

Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:

> Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?

In volumetric terms, I'm running Android/Linux/GNU, in that order.
In quantum terms, I'm running GNU relative to Linux, with Android acting
as a coupling constant.

>    Android is the first widely-deployed platform that uses the Linux
>    kernel but does not provide a Unixish userland. Finally, after all
>    these years, rms's insistence on calling the system GNU/Linux
>    starts to make sense.  There is GNU/Linux providing the GNU C
>    library, utilities and other userland on top of the Linux kernel,
>    and now Android/Linux using the same kernel but different
>    userspace.
>
> Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?  :-D

I have Linux and GNU software on my Android smartphone, so yes, I'm
running GNU/Linux ... and Android.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 29 days  | about GNU/Linux."
0
Reply Homer 1/23/2011 3:26:16 AM

Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:

> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU libs
> and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.

First thing I did when I bought my phone.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 29 days  | about GNU/Linux."
0
Reply Homer 1/23/2011 3:36:37 AM

Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:

> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
> 
>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU libs
>> and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
> 
> First thing I did when I bought my phone.

A phone is used for calling people.  You are thinking in terms of other
features, not the phone.

LOL!


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Reply Snit 1/23/2011 4:06:03 AM

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:

> RonB stated in post ihg5g7$rnh$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11 7:58
> PM:
>
>> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:
>> 
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>> RonB writes:
>>>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
>>>>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>>>> confusing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>>>> 
>>>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>>>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
>>>> others.
>>> 
>>> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
>>> looks and behaves the same.
>>> 
>>> Regards.
>> 
>> If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux -- Snit can't twist his way out of
>> that simple fact.
>
> Nor am I trying!  Wow... what a strange concept.
>
>> The line has already been drawn and the WinTroll and MacTroll rants claiming
>> that Android "isn't Linux" is shown to be as baseless as most of their other
>> claims. Linux is becoming very popular. Live with it.
>
> I hope you feel better soon.


The Q is why is WronG telling lies? I dont recall anyone here saying
it's not based on Linux.
0
Reply Hadron 1/23/2011 4:58:46 AM

Hadron stated in post ihgci6$bvo$2@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11
9:58 PM:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
> 
>> RonB stated in post ihg5g7$rnh$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11 7:58
>> PM:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>>> RonB writes:
>>>>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
>>>>>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>>>>> confusing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>>>>> 
>>>>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>>>>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
>>>>> others.
>>>> 
>>>> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
>>>> looks and behaves the same.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards.
>>> 
>>> If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux -- Snit can't twist his way out of
>>> that simple fact.
>> 
>> Nor am I trying!  Wow... what a strange concept.
>> 
>>> The line has already been drawn and the WinTroll and MacTroll rants claiming
>>> that Android "isn't Linux" is shown to be as baseless as most of their other
>>> claims. Linux is becoming very popular. Live with it.
>> 
>> I hope you feel better soon.
> 
> 
> The Q is why is WronG telling lies?

Might as well as why fleas bite and clouds drop rain.  It is just what they
do.

> I dont recall anyone here saying it's not based on Linux.

Certainly not me.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Reply Snit 1/23/2011 5:59:15 AM

"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> schreef in bericht 
news:C96111C3.8B6AC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com...
> Hadron stated in post ihgci6$bvo$2@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11
> 9:58 PM:
>
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
>>
>>> RonB stated in post ihg5g7$rnh$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11 
>>> 7:58
>>> PM:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>>>> RonB writes:
>>>>>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
>>>>>>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>>>>>> confusing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>>>>>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
>>>>> looks and behaves the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>> If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux -- Snit can't twist his way out 
>>>> of
>>>> that simple fact.
>>>
>>> Nor am I trying!  Wow... what a strange concept.
>>>
>>>> The line has already been drawn and the WinTroll and MacTroll rants 
>>>> claiming
>>>> that Android "isn't Linux" is shown to be as baseless as most of their 
>>>> other
>>>> claims. Linux is becoming very popular. Live with it.
>>>
>>> I hope you feel better soon.
>>
>>
>> The Q is why is WronG telling lies?
>
> Might as well as why fleas bite and clouds drop rain.  It is just what 
> they
> do.
>
>> I dont recall anyone here saying it's not based on Linux.
>
> Certainly not me.
>

Software Expert Matthew Porter claimed it.
"Android Is Not Linux"
http://www.ismashphone.com/2009/11/android-is-not-linux-says-software-expert.html
Like iOS is not the same as Mac OS.
"iOS is derived from Mac OS X, with which it shares the Darwin foundation, 
and is therefore a Unix-like operating system by nature."

Derived from Linux, yes, like Chromium OS, but it's not even a Linux distro.
*Other* operating systems:
http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=links#otheros
.. Android
^^^^^^^^^^^^
.. AROS
.. AtheOS (discontinued?)
.. BeOS
.. BlueEyedOS
.. Chromium OS
.. DexOS
.. eyeOS
.. eComStation
.. FreeDOS
.. Haiku OS
.. Mac OS
.. MenuetOS
.. Microsoft Windows
.. NewOS
.. PETROS
.. QNX
.. ReactOS
.. RISC OS
.. SkyOS
.. Syllable
.. THEOS
.. Unununium Operating Engine
.. ZETA-OS 

0
Reply Clogwog 1/23/2011 10:17:32 AM

"RonB" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> schreef in bericht 
news:ihfdg9$5jk$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so 
> confusing.
>


Yes we all lnow that you are a "confused" individual WRonG.
You don't have to underline this fact so many times.
It makes you look like an idiot!
HTH & GFIA

0
Reply utf 1/23/2011 10:22:37 AM

On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:08:41 +0000, RonB wrote:

> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
> confusing.

My phone is running 2.6.32. Must be that damn fragmentation thing hadron
goes on and on about. :-)
0
Reply Hardon 1/23/2011 11:20:57 AM


"Homer" <usenet@slated.org> wrote in message 
news:onjs08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix...
> Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>
>> Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?
>
> In volumetric terms, I'm running Android/Linux/GNU, in that order.
> In quantum terms, I'm running GNU relative to Linux, with Android acting
> as a coupling constant.
>
>>    Android is the first widely-deployed platform that uses the Linux
>>    kernel but does not provide a Unixish userland. Finally, after all
>>    these years, rms's insistence on calling the system GNU/Linux
>>    starts to make sense.  There is GNU/Linux providing the GNU C
>>    library, utilities and other userland on top of the Linux kernel,
>>    and now Android/Linux using the same kernel but different
>>    userspace.
>>
>> Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?  :-D
>
> I have Linux and GNU software on my Android smartphone, so yes, I'm
> running GNU/Linux ... and Android.
>
I bet that, if you were to shout that out at your next Dweebs Anonymous 
meeting, all the girls would be thrilled!  LOL! 

0
Reply amicus_curious 1/23/2011 2:57:15 PM

On 2011-01-23, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
> Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:
>
>> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
>> 
>>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU
>>> libs and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
>> 
>> First thing I did when I bought my phone.
>
> A phone is used for calling people.

A router is used for routing traffic.

> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the phone.

You are thinking in terms of other features, not the router.

> LOL!

LOL!

-- 
I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us.
Pigs treat us as equals.
	~ Winston Churchill
0
Reply TomB 1/23/2011 11:24:06 PM

TomB stated in post 20110124002153.953@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/23/11 4:24
PM:

> On 2011-01-23, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
>> Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:
>> 
>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
>>> 
>>>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU
>>>> libs and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
>>> 
>>> First thing I did when I bought my phone.
>> 
>> A phone is used for calling people.
> 
> A router is used for routing traffic.
> 
>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the phone.
> 
> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the router.
> 
>> LOL!
> 
> LOL!


  TomB 1:
    -----
    Jezus, is Snit still maintaining the idea that I don't realize
    that routers often have a lot of additional functionality on top
    of their routing task?
    -----

  TomB 2:
    -----
    Routers route. Nothing else.
    -----

Your get-it/forget-it game is silly.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Reply Snit 1/24/2011 12:17:23 AM

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:

> TomB stated in post 20110124002153.953@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/23/11 4:24
> PM:
>
>> On 2011-01-23, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
>>> Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:
>>> 
>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
>>>> 
>>>>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU
>>>>> libs and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
>>>> 
>>>> First thing I did when I bought my phone.
>>> 
>>> A phone is used for calling people.
>> 
>> A router is used for routing traffic.
>> 
>>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the phone.
>> 
>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the router.
>> 
>>> LOL!
>> 
>> LOL!
>
>   TomB 1:
>     -----
>     Jezus, is Snit still maintaining the idea that I don't realize
>     that routers often have a lot of additional functionality on top
>     of their routing task?
>     -----
>
>   TomB 2:
>     -----
>     Routers route. Nothing else.
>     -----
>
> Your get-it/forget-it game is silly.

It's what he does.

Once more you have rope-a-doped him. His thread memory is nil. He MUST
be related to Chris who suffers from the same ailment.
0
Reply Hadron 1/24/2011 12:19:07 AM

Hadron stated in post ihighr$q3o$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/23/11
5:19 PM:

>>   TomB 1:
>>     -----
>>     Jezus, is Snit still maintaining the idea that I don't realize
>>     that routers often have a lot of additional functionality on top
>>     of their routing task?
>>     -----
>> 
>>   TomB 2:
>>     -----
>>     Routers route. Nothing else.
>>     -----
>> 
>> Your get-it/forget-it game is silly.
> 
> It's what he does.
> 
> Once more you have rope-a-doped him. His thread memory is nil. He MUST
> be related to Chris who suffers from the same ailment.

The sad past is how many times he denied his going back and forth on this.
I am sure I could pull up even more quotes showing him doing this, but this
is quite representative.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Reply Snit 1/24/2011 12:21:03 AM

On 2011-01-24, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
> TomB stated in post 20110124002153.953@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/23/11 4:24
> PM:
>
>> On 2011-01-23, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
>>> Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:
>>> 
>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
>>>> 
>>>>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU
>>>>> libs and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
>>>> 
>>>> First thing I did when I bought my phone.
>>> 
>>> A phone is used for calling people.
>> 
>> A router is used for routing traffic.
>> 
>>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the phone.
>> 
>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the router.
>> 
>>> LOL!
>> 
>> LOL!

<snip>

Jezus dude, it was a /joke/. Please lighten up.

In any case, to say that a modern phone is 'used for calling people'
is bizarre at the least.

-- 
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man
to laugh at that man. 
0
Reply TomB 1/24/2011 12:45:43 AM

TomB stated in post 20110124014155.661@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/23/11 5:45
PM:

> On 2011-01-24, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
>> TomB stated in post 20110124002153.953@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/23/11 4:24
>> PM:
>> 
>>> On 2011-01-23, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
>>>> Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:
>>>> 
>>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU
>>>>>> libs and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
>>>>> 
>>>>> First thing I did when I bought my phone.
>>>> 
>>>> A phone is used for calling people.
>>> 
>>> A router is used for routing traffic.
>>> 
>>>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the phone.
>>> 
>>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the router.
>>> 
>>>> LOL!
>>> 
>>> LOL!
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Jezus dude, it was a /joke/. Please lighten up.
> 
> In any case, to say that a modern phone is 'used for calling people'
> is bizarre at the least.

That was my point... it is bizarre to say that a modern end user router only
routes.  You sometimes show you get this... and sometimes show you do not:

  TomB 1:
    -----
    Jezus, is Snit still maintaining the idea that I don't realize
    that routers often have a lot of additional functionality on top
    of their routing task?
    -----

  TomB 2:
    -----
    Routers route. Nothing else.
    -----


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Reply Snit 1/24/2011 12:51:02 AM

On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:20:57 +0000, Hardon wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:08:41 +0000, RonB wrote:
> 
>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>> confusing.
> 
> My phone is running 2.6.32. Must be that damn fragmentation thing hadron
> goes on and on about. :-)

Obviously Google could sell a few hundred Android phones in a year or so 
if it wasn't for all that darned "fragmentation." 

2.6.32 huh? Now I'm jealous. :)

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
Reply RonB 1/24/2011 1:49:35 AM

In article <ihg5g7$rnh$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:
> 
> > Snit wrote:
> >> Hadron wrote:
> >>> RonB writes:
> >>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
> >>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
> >>>> confusing.
> >>> 
> >>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
> >>> 
> >>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
> >> 
> >> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
> >> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
> >> others.
> > 
> > Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
> > looks and behaves the same.
> > 
> > Regards.
> 
> If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux

Android is Linux.

It just isn't meaningfully part of the same platform as desktop Linux 
distros.

COLA advocates want to gloss over this point to make Linux seem more 
competitive in the market share race, but the only reason market share 
matters to end users at all is because of its influence over application 
availability, which is a function of how many users share a common 
application platform, not how many users are running systems based on 
the same kernel.

By the exact standard you guys use to lump Android in with desktop 
Linux, iOS market share should be counted as Mac market share.

[snip]

-- 
"The game of professional investment is intolerably boring and over-exacting to
anyone who is entirely exempt from the gambling instinct; whilst he who has it
must pay to this propensity the appropriate toll." -- John Maynard Keynes
0
Reply ZnU 1/24/2011 8:32:07 AM

On Monday 24 January 2011 08:32 ZnU wrote:

> By the exact standard you guys use to lump Android in with desktop 
> Linux, iOS market share should be counted as Mac market share.

Actually, I'd agree with that!

Currently, the cry is that Android is for phones.
The reality is that we have (or are starting to have)...

 - Android on phones, tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.

 - iOS on phones and ipads

 - MS phone 7 on phones, but W7 on tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.

Consequently, the way things are going with the "new devices", a MS system 
is being counted as a Windows desktop, and iOS and Android etc. are being 
dismissed as "only phones"  This is to say nothing of new Linus OSs like 
MeeGo, of course.

To me, and as you suggest, the only way that the figures we get (web 
statistics) make any sense is to talk about Microsoft, Apple, Linux.
This is imo going to become more obvious as time goes on and these "new 
devices" become increasingly prevalent.

0
Reply bbgruff 1/25/2011 11:51:27 AM

On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:51:27 +0000, bbgruff wrote:

> On Monday 24 January 2011 08:32 ZnU wrote:
> 
>> By the exact standard you guys use to lump Android in with desktop
>> Linux, iOS market share should be counted as Mac market share.
> 
> Actually, I'd agree with that!
> 
> Currently, the cry is that Android is for phones. The reality is that we
> have (or are starting to have)...
> 
>  - Android on phones, tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.
> 
>  - iOS on phones and ipads
> 
>  - MS phone 7 on phones, but W7 on tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops
>  etc.
> 
> Consequently, the way things are going with the "new devices", a MS
> system is being counted as a Windows desktop, and iOS and Android etc.
> are being dismissed as "only phones"  This is to say nothing of new
> Linus OSs like MeeGo, of course.
> 
> To me, and as you suggest, the only way that the figures we get (web
> statistics) make any sense is to talk about Microsoft, Apple, Linux.
> This is imo going to become more obvious as time goes on and these "new
> devices" become increasingly prevalent.

Sounds fine -- but I (for one) don't categorize Android as "Desktop 
Linux." I just call Android "Linux." Some of the WinTrolls and MacTrolls 
were trying to deny that simple fact... probably because Android is 
successful with a large market share.

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
Reply RonB 1/25/2011 12:09:53 PM

Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:51:27 +0000, bbgruff wrote:
>> On Monday 24 January 2011 08:32 ZnU wrote:
>> 
>>> By the exact standard you guys use to lump Android in with desktop
>>> Linux, iOS market share should be counted as Mac market share.
>> 
>> Actually, I'd agree with that!
>> 
>> Currently, the cry is that Android is for phones. The reality is that
>> we have (or are starting to have)...
>> 
>>  - Android on phones, tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.
>> 
>>  - iOS on phones and ipads
>> 
>>  - MS phone 7 on phones, but W7 on tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops
>>  etc.
>> 
>> Consequently, the way things are going with the "new devices", a MS
>> system is being counted as a Windows desktop, and iOS and Android
>> etc.  are being dismissed as "only phones"  This is to say nothing of
>> new Linus OSs like MeeGo, of course.
>> 
>> To me, and as you suggest, the only way that the figures we get (web
>> statistics) make any sense is to talk about Microsoft, Apple, Linux.
>> This is imo going to become more obvious as time goes on and these
>> "new devices" become increasingly prevalent.
>
> Sounds fine -- but I (for one) don't categorize Android as "Desktop
> Linux." I just call Android "Linux." Some of the WinTrolls and
> MacTrolls were trying to deny that simple fact... probably because
> Android is successful with a large market share.

I'm more interested in the fact that the proportion of Free Software in
use is growing exponentially, regardless of the hardware's form factor.

Why exactly should desktop systems be the only consideration? ZnU seems
to forget this is comp.os.linux.advocacy, not comp.hw.desktop.advocacy.

Personally I'm happy using any computer hardware, provided it's running
Free Software - at a reasonable speed, and 1GHz seems plenty reasonable
to me. Heck, I used to run games, productivity and development software
on a 3.5MHz PC, called a Sinclair Spectrum. I'm damned sure a dual-core
1GHz PC with Nvidia graphics can provide me with at least that level of
functionality.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 31 days  | about GNU/Linux."
0
Reply Homer 1/25/2011 2:01:32 PM

On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:01:32 +0000, Homer wrote:

> I'm more interested in the fact that the proportion of Free Software in
> use is growing exponentially, regardless of the hardware's form factor.

Yep.
 
> Why exactly should desktop systems be the only consideration? ZnU seems
> to forget this is comp.os.linux.advocacy, not comp.hw.desktop.advocacy.

The WinTrolls, MacTrolls and other assorted FUDdites like to control the 
debate by attempting to define the parameters. Too bad for them that it 
doesn't work that way. 

> Personally I'm happy using any computer hardware, provided it's running
> Free Software - at a reasonable speed, and 1GHz seems plenty reasonable
> to me. Heck, I used to run games, productivity and development software
> on a 3.5MHz PC, called a Sinclair Spectrum. I'm damned sure a dual-core
> 1GHz PC with Nvidia graphics can provide me with at least that level of
> functionality.

Yep. My computing started on a Timex-Sinclair 1000 (the American 
equivalent of the ZX-81. For about seven years my main computer was a 
Sinclair QL, but during that time I bought a Timex-Sinclair 2048, with a 
Spectrum emulation ROM -- so it was both. This was well after they were 
new. I used to be kind of a collector (long past that stage now).

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
Reply RonB 1/25/2011 9:35:33 PM

Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:

> Yep. My computing started on a Timex-Sinclair 1000 (the American
> equivalent of the ZX-81. For about seven years my main computer was a
> Sinclair QL, but during that time I bought a Timex-Sinclair 2048, with
> a Spectrum emulation ROM -- so it was both. This was well after they
> were new. I used to be kind of a collector (long past that stage now).

I've still got my MkIV Speccy (blue rubber keys) in mint condition, plus
all the bits ... somewhere. I might take it out for a spin, just to have
a go at running the new Twitter client (yes, really):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ECnN7jdgA4

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 32 days  | about GNU/Linux."
0
Reply Homer 1/26/2011 7:09:31 AM

On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:09:31 +0000, Homer wrote:

> Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:
> 
>> Yep. My computing started on a Timex-Sinclair 1000 (the American
>> equivalent of the ZX-81. For about seven years my main computer was a
>> Sinclair QL, but during that time I bought a Timex-Sinclair 2048, with
>> a Spectrum emulation ROM -- so it was both. This was well after they
>> were new. I used to be kind of a collector (long past that stage now).
> 
> I've still got my MkIV Speccy (blue rubber keys) in mint condition, plus
> all the bits ... somewhere. I might take it out for a spin, just to have
> a go at running the new Twitter client (yes, really):
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ECnN7jdgA4

Pretty amazing (though I never twit) and he's got some kind of network 
adapter hooked up to it also -- which impressed me even more. I parted 
with my 2068 (not 2048 as I said earlier) a few years ago, but I've still 
got the complete QL setup -- not sure for how much longer -- and a couple 
T-S 1000s. But I'm at the age where I just want to get rid of stuff I 
don't use.

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
Reply RonB 1/26/2011 7:25:32 AM

In article <8q7rpvF55oU1@mid.individual.net>,
 bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> On Monday 24 January 2011 08:32 ZnU wrote:
> 
> > By the exact standard you guys use to lump Android in with desktop 
> > Linux, iOS market share should be counted as Mac market share.
> 
> Actually, I'd agree with that!
> 
> Currently, the cry is that Android is for phones.
> The reality is that we have (or are starting to have)...
> 
>  - Android on phones, tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.
> 
>  - iOS on phones and ipads
> 
>  - MS phone 7 on phones, but W7 on tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.
> 
> Consequently, the way things are going with the "new devices", a MS system 
> is being counted as a Windows desktop, and iOS and Android etc. are being 
> dismissed as "only phones"  This is to say nothing of new Linus OSs like 
> MeeGo, of course.
> 
> To me, and as you suggest, the only way that the figures we get (web 
> statistics) make any sense is to talk about Microsoft, Apple, Linux.

The problem with that is that two of those things are companies and the 
third is a kernel. Gains for Apple and Microsoft platforms benefit Apple 
and Microsoft, so at least from a market analysis perspective it might 
make sense to group each company's platforms together. But gains for 
"Linux" aren't all aggregated by any single entity.

IMO the only meaningful way to make like-for-like comparisons is to 
segment the market at the "platform" level, with each "platform" being 
defined as encompassing a set of devices that are both technically 
capable of running a common set of apps _and_ that provide compatibility 
useful enough that's it's actually widely used.

> This is imo going to become more obvious as time goes on and these "new 
> devices" become increasingly prevalent.

-- 
"The game of professional investment is intolerably boring and over-exacting to
anyone who is entirely exempt from the gambling instinct; whilst he who has it
must pay to this propensity the appropriate toll." -- John Maynard Keynes
0
Reply ZnU 1/26/2011 6:20:13 PM
comp.os.linux.advocacy 117899 articles. 12 followers. Post

35 Replies
115 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 36


  • Permalink
  • submit to reddit
  • Email
  • Follow


Reply:

Similar Artilces:

US-MO: University City-Android Developer - Android Programmer
************************************************************** JobCircle.com is the largest regional job board in the Mid-Atlantic region, with tens of thousands of job offerings in PA, NJ, DE, MD, NY, and Washington D.C. To learn more, visit http://www.jobcircle.com?source=ng ************************************************************** Job Title: Android Developer - Android Programmer - Android Engineer Job Location: MO: University City Pay Rate: competitive Job Length: full time Start Date: 2011-05-06 Company Name: Cybercoders Contact: Shea Stone Phone: ...

Best Android Online Training | Online Android Training | Training Android Online
SUN IT Labs provides the best Software's training for various Computer IT c= ourses through Webex, Gotomeeting. We are providing Android Online Training= based on specific needs of the learners especially we will give innovative= one to one Classes which have great opportunities in the present IT market= .. We also providing complete set of material for our students so that you c= an go through that material and can understand in a proper manner. We provi= de interactive and effective classes for each and every student. After comp= letion of your course we will help you to clear y...

Android is not Linux; Android is insular.
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/reviews/2009/02/an-introduction-to-google-android-for-developers.ars > February 23, 2009 > Design philosophy > > Although Android is built on top of the Linux kernel, the platform has very little in common with the conventional desktop Linux stack. In fact, during a presentation at the Google IO conference, Google engineer Patrick Brady stated unambiguously that Android is not Linux. > Much of the Android userspace operates within the constraints of Dalvik, Google's own custom Java virtual machine. Dalvik uses its own bytecode format ca...

Memory confusion or confused about memory.
Hi, I'm looking at memory for the opteron, and ran across this at one vendors web site. ECC+registered memory Registered memory only What is the difference? I thought that all Registered memory was ECC. Could be the vendors web site is wrong or I don't really understand what is registered memory. Did some searching on google but nothing came up to clear the matter. Thanks for any info. Alan Well some more searching and found the answer. Really adding some good key words. I was getting tons of memory for sale at first. What is meant by Registered memory? ...

Android
I see HTC are advertising on TV, with the "Hero" centre stage, what I find interesting is that it uses Android a Linux based OS, HTC also sell Microsoft based mobiles, but they decided to focus on a Linux based phone, this I think is a shift away from Microsoft on mobile devices, in the news today Sony announced they will also be adopting Android for their newest phone. Digging a little deeper it looks like we could see Android on the desktop. So you have a mobile device that runs on Linux, has thousands of applications, then you find it also runs on your desktop, it would se...

android
http://www.wildopensource.com/activities/larry-projects/doc-android.php Ignore previous post. "Patrick" <chppxf1@No_SPAMozemail.com.au> wrote in message news:al0pd.426$km5.7657@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au... > http://www.wildopensource.com/activities/larry-projects/doc-android.php > "Patrick" <chppxf1@No_SPAMozemail.com.au> writes: > Ignore previous post. > > "Patrick" <chppxf1@No_SPAMozemail.com.au> wrote in message > news:al0pd.426$km5.7657@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au... > > http://www.wildopensource.com/activities/larry-...

Android
Can anyone point me to a group for supernoob android developers? I'm using eclipse SDK plugin, and having real problems even getting past layout. -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/ - My new book - Magick and Technology On 16-01-2011 22:24, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: > Can anyone point me to a group for supernoob android developers? > I'm using eclipse SDK plugin, and having real problems even getting past > layout. See: http://developer.android.com/resources/community-groups.html But an Android programming question (assuming SDK not NDK) woul...

Android-x86
https://sites.google.com/a/android-x86.org/web/ Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> writes: > https://sites.google.com/a/android-x86.org/web/ > A hive of activity! -- A certain COLA "advocate" faking his user-agent in order to pretend to be a Linux user: User-Agent: Outlook 5.5 (WinNT 5.0), User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux), Message-ID: <wPGdnd3NnOM0ACfdRVn-hw@comcast.com> On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:01:37 +0100, Hadron wrote: > Nobody <invalid@invalid.com> writes: > >> https://sites.google.com/a/android-x86.org/web/ >> >...

As Android gets popular, so does Android malware
http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/mobile/08/04/lookout.threat.report.gahran/ (CNN) -- As Android devices get more popular, they're becoming a more attractive target for cybercriminals. Consequently, if you use an Android smartphone you are now 2.5 times more likely to encounter malware (malicious software) than you were six months ago. On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 19:17:28 +0200, Alexandrovitch Kudiroyaravtsevgovoi wrote: > http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/mobile/08/04/lookout.threat.report.gahran/ > > (CNN) -- As Android devices get more popular, they're becoming a more > attractiv...

Android move not helpful to Microsoft Android
'Google may be working on an arrangement to put its Android handset operating system into PCs. The move would not be helpful to Microsoft. According to Bloomberg, "Asustek Computer Inc., which pioneered the market for sub-$500 laptops, may install Google Inc.'s free Android operating system on its low-cost notebooks, challenging the dominance of Microsoft Corp.'s Windows software."' "It is hard to see it as a challenge. Netbooks run OSs from other software development sources like Linux. Most buyers of the small machines have to upgrade to the more useful...

lognormal confusion (worse than normal confusion!)
I have some data that is probably distributed as a log normal process and now I want to make a final figure for a paper. But I cannot get the scaling (I think is the problem) correct. Consider the example below were I generate random deviates, plot the resulting histogram and then try to plot the theoretical PDF. I seems that some scaling is in error but where? % generate random deviates n = 10000; mu = 2.3; % arbitrary sig = 0.5; %arbitrary r = lognrnd(mu,sig,n,1); % estimate mu and sig from data parmhat = lognfit(r); muhat = parmhat(1); sighat = parmhat(2); % histogram of data [nh x] ...

confused..again
It is very easy to see what I am trying to do with this code: #include <stdio.h> main(){ char name[200]; printf ("Enter -> "); fflush (stdout); fgets (name,200,stdin); printf("is? ",name);} I have also tried this with the last line with printf printf("is? %c",name); Either way same results. Printf will not print the value of name. Bill Bill Cunningham wrote: > It is very easy to see what I am trying to do with this code: I'm not finding it easy. Please don't assume everyone else is as perceptive as you are. > #...

Confused
Hi: I have been programming with OOP and C++ for over 10 years but I am new to javascript. I am very confused about one aspect and would appreciate it if someone could explain the differences between the following 2 groups of "statements": function myFunc (x) { a = 1; var a = 1; a: 1; this.a = 1; b = x; var b = x; b: x; this.b = x; } TIA Marvin "Marvin" <marvin.avery@sdc-dsc.gc.ca> wrote in message news:1142954241.588066.220920@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com... > Hi: > > I have been programming with OOP and C++ f...

confuse =[
confuse about this quetion =.=" On Jul 5, 1:55=A0pm, JetQi Tan <jetqi1...@gmail.com> wrote: > confuse about this quetion =3D.=3D" I'm confused about your confusion. Confusion about what =3D[ or =3D.=3D? Please explain your problem in more details. Please send your code. -- Saeed Amrollahi #include<stdio.h> #include<conio.h> main() { int row, column; //print the first 3 rows for (row = 1; row <= 3; row++){ for(column = 1; column <= row; column++) { printf("*"...

Or And Confusion
Why do so many people get Or and And mixed up - is it something to do with English usage? On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:46:02 +0100, "peetm" <usenetmeister@gmail.com> wrote: >Why do so many people get Or and And mixed up - is it something to do with >English usage? > Since Or and And are English words, it must have something to do with English usage, if true ;-) Did you mean '|' and '&', or '||' and '&&'? -- Al Balmer Balmer Consulting removebalmerconsultingthis@att.net ;-) Yup && and ||, i.e., esp. the logical o...

confused...
how do I install and view the following files types on my HP 49g+ ..TGV ..XV ..HP49 FILE ..lib ..prog You have to understand something. Extensions don't really matter. On any PC you can open any type of file with any program. Extensions just make it easier to see what kind of program should run the file. The calculator doesn't use extensions at all. If the program is a library, it must be installed into port 0 1 or 2. I recommend using port 2. Move the item into port 2 using the filer, reboot the calculator using ON-C and then access it with the LIB button on 2. TGV will prob...

Confused
Can someone explain why the file output produces all zeros? It seems to work fine in memory (e.g. passing char pointers to printf) but when I output the file, it comes out as zeros. Bookkeeping seems correct (counts, sizes, etc.) and the output file is the correct size, just all zeros. cd_entry *src = (cd_entry*)(tpd + tpd->cd_offset); cd_entry *dest = (cd_entry*)(cur + cur->cd_offset); for(int i = 0; i < tpd->num_columns; i++) { *dest = *src; dest += sizeof(cd_entry); src += sizeof(cd_entry); } newlist->num_tables++; free(g_tpd_list); // deallocate old memory g...

=== confusion
Hello, After a couple of years of Ruby programming, I find that the === operator still has the ability to occasionally confound me. Today, I had some code that looked like this: foo = case bar.class when Foo::Bar 'abc' when Foo::Bar::Baz 'def' when Foo::Qux 'ghi' else 'jkl' end The problem is that most comparisons of bar.class fell through to the else clause. A quick debugging session on a particular instance of 'bar' revealed that 'bar.class == Foo::Bar' was true, but 'bar.cla...

Why am I confused on this?
I have an ArrayList of questions (as Strings). I simply want to step through the arraylist, posit the question to the user (in a Swing interface), and after he answers, move on to the next question.Why am I so confused with this? Can someone share with me how they might do this? Would you use one of the SwingUtilities methods (invokeAndWait(someRunnable) or invokeLater(someRunnable)) ?I'm just struggling with the flow of control on this (seemingly) simple problem. Thanks, R.Vince R. Vince wrote:> I have an ArrayList of questions (as Strings). I simply want to step through > the arra...

Confused
Hi all, yes, i have to admit, I'm quite confused by the OS400 filesystem. Workin with V5R3 and after logged in doing DSPLIB I see a bunch of libraries like QSYS, QYYS2, QUSRSYS, etc., but *not* my library MYLIB. Q: Why not? Nevertheless, doing a CHGCURLIB MYLIB is successful and I see MYLIB added in the DSPLIB-output, marked 'CUR' as current library. Q: Why is it successful *without* changing to QSYS.LIB first? But when starting an ftp, i have to do cd /qsys.lib/mylib.lib to ftp a file into MYLIB. I also have to specify /QSYS.LIB/MYLIB.LIB/MYPRG.PGM if I'm spawning a pro...

some of you are very confused!
Apparently some here think that we can solve problems by defining a self consistent mathematical system, and simply defining a system of equations that permit compression to work. Oh! would that we could. And indeed such an approach will work, but only in that world. Not in the real world. --jg On Nov 29, 10:16=A0am, jules Gilbert <jules.sto...@gmail.com> wrote: > Apparently some here think that we can solve problems by defining a > self consistent mathematical system, and simply defining a system of > equations that permit compression to work. > > Oh! would that w...

a confusion....
can anyone tell me what type of control "intrinsic control like commandbutton,textbox,listbox etc" are? are they some kind of activex control? where are they located in the registry?(i am using win2000 sp3) what is their corresponding dll file? regards, Yogesh Joshi yogesh wrote: > can anyone tell me what type of control "intrinsic control like > commandbutton,textbox,listbox etc" are? > > are they some kind of activex control? > > where are they located in the registry?(i am using win2000 sp3) > > what is their corresponding dll file? Intrinsi...

So confused
When I was in 9.2 I knew how to use my AW . What I want to know now is what is like this in OSX. I saw text edit, BUT it does not seem to be what I need. I need something that will let me make ads up. SO after looking forever for something that can do this I went back to my trusty AW. Please help me Thanks Hannah Hannah wrote: > When I was in 9.2 I knew how to use my AW. Now I am confused - what on earth is an AW? -- Ian Gregory http://www.zenatode.org.uk/ian/ Ian Gregory <foo@bar.invalid> wrote: > Hannah wrote: > > When I was in 9.2 I knew how to use my AW. > &g...

confused....
I deploy few uicontrols at the runtime and change the variables/properties of these uicontrols in the run time.to do this i identify each uicontrol using their handles..which i successfully retrieve but my actual problem is that when i use fhandle=findall(figure handle); uihandle=findobj(fhandle,'Style','Uistyle'); get(uihandle)...this should spit out all the properties values of the uicontrol but i get an error ...something like invalid handle so now if i replace this get statement with get(uihandle(1)) or get(uihandle(2)) ...this gives the desired results.... i am confused...