Confused about Android

The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my 
wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so confusing.

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
RonB
1/22/2011 8:08:41 PM
comp.os.linux.advocacy 122149 articles. 0 followers. Post Follow

35 Replies
213 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 13

RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> writes:

> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my 
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
> confusing.

Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.

Why are you so clueless about everything?

0
Hadron
1/22/2011 8:23:45 PM
RonB stated in post ihfdg9$5jk$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11 1:08
PM:

> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so confusing.

The context is, I am guessing, that it is not standard desktop Linux.

Hope that helps!


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Snit
1/22/2011 8:30:11 PM
Hadron stated in post ihfech$ah7$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11
1:23 PM:

> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>> confusing.
> 
> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
> 
> Why are you so clueless about everything?
> 
The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.  Where
to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to others.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Snit
1/22/2011 8:31:21 PM
"RonB" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:ihfdg9$5jk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

morons like you get confused easily about a lot of things.

> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so 
> confusing.

because the phone is a defective piece of shit.



0
One
1/22/2011 8:35:39 PM
Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:
> 
> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
> confusing.

I must admit that is confusing. It's even more confusing for me, because
I have GNU software running on mine as well, like Bash.

If I didn't know better, I'd swear this was GNU/Linux running a
Java-like virtual machine called Dalvik, a Dalvik based UI, and some
Dalvik applications, but with the ability to run native GNU/Linux
applications like Bash and OpenVPN too.

Sort of like, erm, any other GNU/Linux distribution.

I'm shocked and amazed.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 29 days  | about GNU/Linux."
0
Homer
1/22/2011 10:11:51 PM
Homer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:
>> 
>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>> confusing.
>
> I must admit that is confusing. It's even more confusing for me, because
> I have GNU software running on mine as well, like Bash.
>
> If I didn't know better, I'd swear this was GNU/Linux running a
> Java-like virtual machine called Dalvik, a Dalvik based UI, and some
> Dalvik applications, but with the ability to run native GNU/Linux
> applications like Bash and OpenVPN too.
>
> Sort of like, erm, any other GNU/Linux distribution.

Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?

> I'm shocked and amazed.

Actually, according to "Hadron", a Linux kernel engineer disagrees with you:

   Message-ID: <ihfech$ah7$1@news.eternal-september.org>

And here it is:

   http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/News/How-Much-Linux-Is-in-Android

   Matthew Porter's talk at the Grenoble conference titled "Mythbusters:
   Android" tackled the question of how much Android is actually Linux, how
   functional it is, and what is the nature of the Android community. .  . .

   Porter works as chief software architect at the open source firm Embedded
   Alley, which Mentor Graphics acquired the end of July 2009. He is a
   PowerPC specialist, thus viewing Android from a hardware perspective.

How do we handle this confusion?

   http://lwn.net/Articles/320437/

   Android is the first widely-deployed platform that uses the Linux kernel
   but does not provide a Unixish userland. Finally, after all these years,
   rms's insistence on calling the system GNU/Linux starts to make sense.
   There is GNU/Linux providing the GNU C library, utilities and other
   userland on top of the Linux kernel, and now Android/Linux using the same
   kernel but different userspace.

Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?  :-D

-- 
The most happy marriage I can imagine to myself would be the union
of a deaf man to a blind woman.
		-- Samuel Taylor Coleridge
0
Chris
1/22/2011 10:36:08 PM
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Homer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:
>>> 
>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>> confusing.
>>
>> I must admit that is confusing. It's even more confusing for me, because
>> I have GNU software running on mine as well, like Bash.
>>
>> If I didn't know better, I'd swear this was GNU/Linux running a
>> Java-like virtual machine called Dalvik, a Dalvik based UI, and some
>> Dalvik applications, but with the ability to run native GNU/Linux
>> applications like Bash and OpenVPN too.
>>
>> Sort of like, erm, any other GNU/Linux distribution.
> 
> Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?

If he keeps adding GNU stuff then both would be the right answer. It is 
possible to compile and install all the usual GNU libs and tools on top of 
Android's Linux kernel. I may even be possible to run Xorg using the Linux 
framebuffer driver. The most difficult part may be to create a GNU cross-
build environment for Android. After that is done, configure and make take 
care of the rest.

Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU libs and 
tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.

Regards.

0
Lusotec
1/23/2011 2:50:18 AM
Snit wrote:
> Hadron wrote:
>> RonB writes:
>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>> confusing.
>> 
>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>> 
>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
> 
> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand. 
> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
> others.

Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel looks 
and behaves the same.

Regards.

0
Lusotec
1/23/2011 2:53:53 AM
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:

> Snit wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>> RonB writes:
>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
>>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>> confusing.
>>> 
>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>> 
>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>> 
>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
>> others.
> 
> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
> looks and behaves the same.
> 
> Regards.

If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux -- Snit can't twist his way out of 
that simple fact. The line has already been drawn and the WinTroll and 
MacTroll rants claiming that Android "isn't Linux" is shown to be as 
baseless as most of their other claims. Linux is becoming very popular. 
Live with it.

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
RonB
1/23/2011 2:58:15 AM
Lusotec stated in post ihg580$p8m$2@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11
7:53 PM:

> Snit wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>> RonB writes:
>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>>>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>> confusing.
>>> 
>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>> 
>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>> 
>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
>> others.
> 
> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel looks
> and behaves the same.
> 
> Regards.
> 
Fair enough... I know very little about the changes.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Snit
1/23/2011 3:06:55 AM
RonB stated in post ihg5g7$rnh$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11 7:58
PM:

> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:
> 
>> Snit wrote:
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>> RonB writes:
>>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
>>>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>>> confusing.
>>>> 
>>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>>> 
>>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>>> 
>>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
>>> others.
>> 
>> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
>> looks and behaves the same.
>> 
>> Regards.
> 
> If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux -- Snit can't twist his way out of
> that simple fact.

Nor am I trying!  Wow... what a strange concept.

> The line has already been drawn and the WinTroll and MacTroll rants claiming
> that Android "isn't Linux" is shown to be as baseless as most of their other
> claims. Linux is becoming very popular. Live with it.

I hope you feel better soon.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Snit
1/23/2011 3:08:37 AM
Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:

> Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?

In volumetric terms, I'm running Android/Linux/GNU, in that order.
In quantum terms, I'm running GNU relative to Linux, with Android acting
as a coupling constant.

>    Android is the first widely-deployed platform that uses the Linux
>    kernel but does not provide a Unixish userland. Finally, after all
>    these years, rms's insistence on calling the system GNU/Linux
>    starts to make sense.  There is GNU/Linux providing the GNU C
>    library, utilities and other userland on top of the Linux kernel,
>    and now Android/Linux using the same kernel but different
>    userspace.
>
> Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?  :-D

I have Linux and GNU software on my Android smartphone, so yes, I'm
running GNU/Linux ... and Android.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 29 days  | about GNU/Linux."
0
Homer
1/23/2011 3:26:16 AM
Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:

> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU libs
> and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.

First thing I did when I bought my phone.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 29 days  | about GNU/Linux."
0
Homer
1/23/2011 3:36:37 AM
Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:

> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
> 
>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU libs
>> and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
> 
> First thing I did when I bought my phone.

A phone is used for calling people.  You are thinking in terms of other
features, not the phone.

LOL!


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Snit
1/23/2011 4:06:03 AM
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:

> RonB stated in post ihg5g7$rnh$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11 7:58
> PM:
>
>> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:
>> 
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>> RonB writes:
>>>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
>>>>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>>>> confusing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>>>> 
>>>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>>>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
>>>> others.
>>> 
>>> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
>>> looks and behaves the same.
>>> 
>>> Regards.
>> 
>> If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux -- Snit can't twist his way out of
>> that simple fact.
>
> Nor am I trying!  Wow... what a strange concept.
>
>> The line has already been drawn and the WinTroll and MacTroll rants claiming
>> that Android "isn't Linux" is shown to be as baseless as most of their other
>> claims. Linux is becoming very popular. Live with it.
>
> I hope you feel better soon.


The Q is why is WronG telling lies? I dont recall anyone here saying
it's not based on Linux.
0
Hadron
1/23/2011 4:58:46 AM
Hadron stated in post ihgci6$bvo$2@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11
9:58 PM:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
> 
>> RonB stated in post ihg5g7$rnh$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11 7:58
>> PM:
>> 
>>> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>>> RonB writes:
>>>>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
>>>>>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>>>>> confusing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>>>>> 
>>>>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>>>>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
>>>>> others.
>>>> 
>>>> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
>>>> looks and behaves the same.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards.
>>> 
>>> If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux -- Snit can't twist his way out of
>>> that simple fact.
>> 
>> Nor am I trying!  Wow... what a strange concept.
>> 
>>> The line has already been drawn and the WinTroll and MacTroll rants claiming
>>> that Android "isn't Linux" is shown to be as baseless as most of their other
>>> claims. Linux is becoming very popular. Live with it.
>> 
>> I hope you feel better soon.
> 
> 
> The Q is why is WronG telling lies?

Might as well as why fleas bite and clouds drop rain.  It is just what they
do.

> I dont recall anyone here saying it's not based on Linux.

Certainly not me.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Snit
1/23/2011 5:59:15 AM
"Snit" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> schreef in bericht 
news:C96111C3.8B6AC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com...
> Hadron stated in post ihgci6$bvo$2@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11
> 9:58 PM:
>
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
>>
>>> RonB stated in post ihg5g7$rnh$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/22/11 
>>> 7:58
>>> PM:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>>>> RonB writes:
>>>>>>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
>>>>>>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>>>>>>>> confusing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
>>>>>> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
>>>>> looks and behaves the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>> If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux -- Snit can't twist his way out 
>>>> of
>>>> that simple fact.
>>>
>>> Nor am I trying!  Wow... what a strange concept.
>>>
>>>> The line has already been drawn and the WinTroll and MacTroll rants 
>>>> claiming
>>>> that Android "isn't Linux" is shown to be as baseless as most of their 
>>>> other
>>>> claims. Linux is becoming very popular. Live with it.
>>>
>>> I hope you feel better soon.
>>
>>
>> The Q is why is WronG telling lies?
>
> Might as well as why fleas bite and clouds drop rain.  It is just what 
> they
> do.
>
>> I dont recall anyone here saying it's not based on Linux.
>
> Certainly not me.
>

Software Expert Matthew Porter claimed it.
"Android Is Not Linux"
http://www.ismashphone.com/2009/11/android-is-not-linux-says-software-expert.html
Like iOS is not the same as Mac OS.
"iOS is derived from Mac OS X, with which it shares the Darwin foundation, 
and is therefore a Unix-like operating system by nature."

Derived from Linux, yes, like Chromium OS, but it's not even a Linux distro.
*Other* operating systems:
http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=links#otheros
.. Android
^^^^^^^^^^^^
.. AROS
.. AtheOS (discontinued?)
.. BeOS
.. BlueEyedOS
.. Chromium OS
.. DexOS
.. eyeOS
.. eComStation
.. FreeDOS
.. Haiku OS
.. Mac OS
.. MenuetOS
.. Microsoft Windows
.. NewOS
.. PETROS
.. QNX
.. ReactOS
.. RISC OS
.. SkyOS
.. Syllable
.. THEOS
.. Unununium Operating Engine
.. ZETA-OS 

0
Clogwog
1/23/2011 10:17:32 AM
"RonB" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> schreef in bericht 
news:ihfdg9$5jk$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so 
> confusing.
>


Yes we all lnow that you are a "confused" individual WRonG.
You don't have to underline this fact so many times.
It makes you look like an idiot!
HTH & GFIA

0
utf
1/23/2011 10:22:37 AM
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:08:41 +0000, RonB wrote:

> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
> confusing.

My phone is running 2.6.32. Must be that damn fragmentation thing hadron
goes on and on about. :-)
0
Hardon
1/23/2011 11:20:57 AM

"Homer" <usenet@slated.org> wrote in message 
news:onjs08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix...
> Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>
>> Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?
>
> In volumetric terms, I'm running Android/Linux/GNU, in that order.
> In quantum terms, I'm running GNU relative to Linux, with Android acting
> as a coupling constant.
>
>>    Android is the first widely-deployed platform that uses the Linux
>>    kernel but does not provide a Unixish userland. Finally, after all
>>    these years, rms's insistence on calling the system GNU/Linux
>>    starts to make sense.  There is GNU/Linux providing the GNU C
>>    library, utilities and other userland on top of the Linux kernel,
>>    and now Android/Linux using the same kernel but different
>>    userspace.
>>
>> Are you running Android/Linux or GNU/Linux?  :-D
>
> I have Linux and GNU software on my Android smartphone, so yes, I'm
> running GNU/Linux ... and Android.
>
I bet that, if you were to shout that out at your next Dweebs Anonymous 
meeting, all the girls would be thrilled!  LOL! 

0
amicus_curious
1/23/2011 2:57:15 PM
On 2011-01-23, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
> Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:
>
>> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
>> 
>>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU
>>> libs and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
>> 
>> First thing I did when I bought my phone.
>
> A phone is used for calling people.

A router is used for routing traffic.

> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the phone.

You are thinking in terms of other features, not the router.

> LOL!

LOL!

-- 
I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us.
Pigs treat us as equals.
	~ Winston Churchill
0
TomB
1/23/2011 11:24:06 PM
TomB stated in post 20110124002153.953@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/23/11 4:24
PM:

> On 2011-01-23, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
>> Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:
>> 
>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
>>> 
>>>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU
>>>> libs and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
>>> 
>>> First thing I did when I bought my phone.
>> 
>> A phone is used for calling people.
> 
> A router is used for routing traffic.
> 
>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the phone.
> 
> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the router.
> 
>> LOL!
> 
> LOL!


  TomB 1:
    -----
    Jezus, is Snit still maintaining the idea that I don't realize
    that routers often have a lot of additional functionality on top
    of their routing task?
    -----

  TomB 2:
    -----
    Routers route. Nothing else.
    -----

Your get-it/forget-it game is silly.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Snit
1/24/2011 12:17:23 AM
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:

> TomB stated in post 20110124002153.953@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/23/11 4:24
> PM:
>
>> On 2011-01-23, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
>>> Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:
>>> 
>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
>>>> 
>>>>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU
>>>>> libs and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
>>>> 
>>>> First thing I did when I bought my phone.
>>> 
>>> A phone is used for calling people.
>> 
>> A router is used for routing traffic.
>> 
>>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the phone.
>> 
>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the router.
>> 
>>> LOL!
>> 
>> LOL!
>
>   TomB 1:
>     -----
>     Jezus, is Snit still maintaining the idea that I don't realize
>     that routers often have a lot of additional functionality on top
>     of their routing task?
>     -----
>
>   TomB 2:
>     -----
>     Routers route. Nothing else.
>     -----
>
> Your get-it/forget-it game is silly.

It's what he does.

Once more you have rope-a-doped him. His thread memory is nil. He MUST
be related to Chris who suffers from the same ailment.
0
Hadron
1/24/2011 12:19:07 AM
Hadron stated in post ihighr$q3o$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/23/11
5:19 PM:

>>   TomB 1:
>>     -----
>>     Jezus, is Snit still maintaining the idea that I don't realize
>>     that routers often have a lot of additional functionality on top
>>     of their routing task?
>>     -----
>> 
>>   TomB 2:
>>     -----
>>     Routers route. Nothing else.
>>     -----
>> 
>> Your get-it/forget-it game is silly.
> 
> It's what he does.
> 
> Once more you have rope-a-doped him. His thread memory is nil. He MUST
> be related to Chris who suffers from the same ailment.

The sad past is how many times he denied his going back and forth on this.
I am sure I could pull up even more quotes showing him doing this, but this
is quite representative.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Snit
1/24/2011 12:21:03 AM
On 2011-01-24, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
> TomB stated in post 20110124002153.953@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/23/11 4:24
> PM:
>
>> On 2011-01-23, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
>>> Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:
>>> 
>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
>>>> 
>>>>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU
>>>>> libs and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
>>>> 
>>>> First thing I did when I bought my phone.
>>> 
>>> A phone is used for calling people.
>> 
>> A router is used for routing traffic.
>> 
>>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the phone.
>> 
>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the router.
>> 
>>> LOL!
>> 
>> LOL!

<snip>

Jezus dude, it was a /joke/. Please lighten up.

In any case, to say that a modern phone is 'used for calling people'
is bizarre at the least.

-- 
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man
to laugh at that man. 
0
TomB
1/24/2011 12:45:43 AM
TomB stated in post 20110124014155.661@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/23/11 5:45
PM:

> On 2011-01-24, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
>> TomB stated in post 20110124002153.953@usenet.drumscum.be on 1/23/11 4:24
>> PM:
>> 
>>> On 2011-01-23, the following emerged from the brain of Snit:
>>>> Homer stated in post 5bks08-nrf.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/22/11 8:36 PM:
>>>> 
>>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Lusotec spake thusly:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Don't forget that root permissions are required to install GNU
>>>>>> libs and tools, so this may not be possible on some phones.
>>>>> 
>>>>> First thing I did when I bought my phone.
>>>> 
>>>> A phone is used for calling people.
>>> 
>>> A router is used for routing traffic.
>>> 
>>>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the phone.
>>> 
>>> You are thinking in terms of other features, not the router.
>>> 
>>>> LOL!
>>> 
>>> LOL!
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Jezus dude, it was a /joke/. Please lighten up.
> 
> In any case, to say that a modern phone is 'used for calling people'
> is bizarre at the least.

That was my point... it is bizarre to say that a modern end user router only
routes.  You sometimes show you get this... and sometimes show you do not:

  TomB 1:
    -----
    Jezus, is Snit still maintaining the idea that I don't realize
    that routers often have a lot of additional functionality on top
    of their routing task?
    -----

  TomB 2:
    -----
    Routers route. Nothing else.
    -----


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


0
Snit
1/24/2011 12:51:02 AM
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:20:57 +0000, Hardon wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:08:41 +0000, RonB wrote:
> 
>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does my
>> wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
>> confusing.
> 
> My phone is running 2.6.32. Must be that damn fragmentation thing hadron
> goes on and on about. :-)

Obviously Google could sell a few hundred Android phones in a year or so 
if it wasn't for all that darned "fragmentation." 

2.6.32 huh? Now I'm jealous. :)

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
RonB
1/24/2011 1:49:35 AM
In article <ihg5g7$rnh$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 02:53:53 +0000, Lusotec wrote:
> 
> > Snit wrote:
> >> Hadron wrote:
> >>> RonB writes:
> >>>> The WinTrolls have told us that Android is not Linux... so why does
> >>>> my wife's Android phone show it's running on kernel 2.6.29? It's so
> >>>> confusing.
> >>> 
> >>> Actually a Linux Kernel engineer has made that claim.
> >>> 
> >>> Why are you so clueless about everything?
> >> 
> >> The kernel is fairly heavily modified Linux, from what I understand.
> >> Where to draw the line as to what is and is not Linux can be left up to
> >> others.
> > 
> > Actually, the modifications are minor, and from user space the kernel
> > looks and behaves the same.
> > 
> > Regards.
> 
> If it uses the Linux kernel, it's Linux

Android is Linux.

It just isn't meaningfully part of the same platform as desktop Linux 
distros.

COLA advocates want to gloss over this point to make Linux seem more 
competitive in the market share race, but the only reason market share 
matters to end users at all is because of its influence over application 
availability, which is a function of how many users share a common 
application platform, not how many users are running systems based on 
the same kernel.

By the exact standard you guys use to lump Android in with desktop 
Linux, iOS market share should be counted as Mac market share.

[snip]

-- 
"The game of professional investment is intolerably boring and over-exacting to
anyone who is entirely exempt from the gambling instinct; whilst he who has it
must pay to this propensity the appropriate toll." -- John Maynard Keynes
0
ZnU
1/24/2011 8:32:07 AM
On Monday 24 January 2011 08:32 ZnU wrote:

> By the exact standard you guys use to lump Android in with desktop 
> Linux, iOS market share should be counted as Mac market share.

Actually, I'd agree with that!

Currently, the cry is that Android is for phones.
The reality is that we have (or are starting to have)...

 - Android on phones, tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.

 - iOS on phones and ipads

 - MS phone 7 on phones, but W7 on tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.

Consequently, the way things are going with the "new devices", a MS system 
is being counted as a Windows desktop, and iOS and Android etc. are being 
dismissed as "only phones"  This is to say nothing of new Linus OSs like 
MeeGo, of course.

To me, and as you suggest, the only way that the figures we get (web 
statistics) make any sense is to talk about Microsoft, Apple, Linux.
This is imo going to become more obvious as time goes on and these "new 
devices" become increasingly prevalent.

0
bbgruff
1/25/2011 11:51:27 AM
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:51:27 +0000, bbgruff wrote:

> On Monday 24 January 2011 08:32 ZnU wrote:
> 
>> By the exact standard you guys use to lump Android in with desktop
>> Linux, iOS market share should be counted as Mac market share.
> 
> Actually, I'd agree with that!
> 
> Currently, the cry is that Android is for phones. The reality is that we
> have (or are starting to have)...
> 
>  - Android on phones, tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.
> 
>  - iOS on phones and ipads
> 
>  - MS phone 7 on phones, but W7 on tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops
>  etc.
> 
> Consequently, the way things are going with the "new devices", a MS
> system is being counted as a Windows desktop, and iOS and Android etc.
> are being dismissed as "only phones"  This is to say nothing of new
> Linus OSs like MeeGo, of course.
> 
> To me, and as you suggest, the only way that the figures we get (web
> statistics) make any sense is to talk about Microsoft, Apple, Linux.
> This is imo going to become more obvious as time goes on and these "new
> devices" become increasingly prevalent.

Sounds fine -- but I (for one) don't categorize Android as "Desktop 
Linux." I just call Android "Linux." Some of the WinTrolls and MacTrolls 
were trying to deny that simple fact... probably because Android is 
successful with a large market share.

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
RonB
1/25/2011 12:09:53 PM
Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:51:27 +0000, bbgruff wrote:
>> On Monday 24 January 2011 08:32 ZnU wrote:
>> 
>>> By the exact standard you guys use to lump Android in with desktop
>>> Linux, iOS market share should be counted as Mac market share.
>> 
>> Actually, I'd agree with that!
>> 
>> Currently, the cry is that Android is for phones. The reality is that
>> we have (or are starting to have)...
>> 
>>  - Android on phones, tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.
>> 
>>  - iOS on phones and ipads
>> 
>>  - MS phone 7 on phones, but W7 on tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops
>>  etc.
>> 
>> Consequently, the way things are going with the "new devices", a MS
>> system is being counted as a Windows desktop, and iOS and Android
>> etc.  are being dismissed as "only phones"  This is to say nothing of
>> new Linus OSs like MeeGo, of course.
>> 
>> To me, and as you suggest, the only way that the figures we get (web
>> statistics) make any sense is to talk about Microsoft, Apple, Linux.
>> This is imo going to become more obvious as time goes on and these
>> "new devices" become increasingly prevalent.
>
> Sounds fine -- but I (for one) don't categorize Android as "Desktop
> Linux." I just call Android "Linux." Some of the WinTrolls and
> MacTrolls were trying to deny that simple fact... probably because
> Android is successful with a large market share.

I'm more interested in the fact that the proportion of Free Software in
use is growing exponentially, regardless of the hardware's form factor.

Why exactly should desktop systems be the only consideration? ZnU seems
to forget this is comp.os.linux.advocacy, not comp.hw.desktop.advocacy.

Personally I'm happy using any computer hardware, provided it's running
Free Software - at a reasonable speed, and 1GHz seems plenty reasonable
to me. Heck, I used to run games, productivity and development software
on a 3.5MHz PC, called a Sinclair Spectrum. I'm damned sure a dual-core
1GHz PC with Nvidia graphics can provide me with at least that level of
functionality.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 31 days  | about GNU/Linux."
0
Homer
1/25/2011 2:01:32 PM
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:01:32 +0000, Homer wrote:

> I'm more interested in the fact that the proportion of Free Software in
> use is growing exponentially, regardless of the hardware's form factor.

Yep.
 
> Why exactly should desktop systems be the only consideration? ZnU seems
> to forget this is comp.os.linux.advocacy, not comp.hw.desktop.advocacy.

The WinTrolls, MacTrolls and other assorted FUDdites like to control the 
debate by attempting to define the parameters. Too bad for them that it 
doesn't work that way. 

> Personally I'm happy using any computer hardware, provided it's running
> Free Software - at a reasonable speed, and 1GHz seems plenty reasonable
> to me. Heck, I used to run games, productivity and development software
> on a 3.5MHz PC, called a Sinclair Spectrum. I'm damned sure a dual-core
> 1GHz PC with Nvidia graphics can provide me with at least that level of
> functionality.

Yep. My computing started on a Timex-Sinclair 1000 (the American 
equivalent of the ZX-81. For about seven years my main computer was a 
Sinclair QL, but during that time I bought a Timex-Sinclair 2048, with a 
Spectrum emulation ROM -- so it was both. This was well after they were 
new. I used to be kind of a collector (long past that stage now).

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
RonB
1/25/2011 9:35:33 PM
Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:

> Yep. My computing started on a Timex-Sinclair 1000 (the American
> equivalent of the ZX-81. For about seven years my main computer was a
> Sinclair QL, but during that time I bought a Timex-Sinclair 2048, with
> a Spectrum emulation ROM -- so it was both. This was well after they
> were new. I used to be kind of a collector (long past that stage now).

I've still got my MkIV Speccy (blue rubber keys) in mint condition, plus
all the bits ... somewhere. I might take it out for a spin, just to have
a go at running the new Twitter client (yes, really):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ECnN7jdgA4

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 32 days  | about GNU/Linux."
0
Homer
1/26/2011 7:09:31 AM
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:09:31 +0000, Homer wrote:

> Verily I say unto thee, that RonB spake thusly:
> 
>> Yep. My computing started on a Timex-Sinclair 1000 (the American
>> equivalent of the ZX-81. For about seven years my main computer was a
>> Sinclair QL, but during that time I bought a Timex-Sinclair 2048, with
>> a Spectrum emulation ROM -- so it was both. This was well after they
>> were new. I used to be kind of a collector (long past that stage now).
> 
> I've still got my MkIV Speccy (blue rubber keys) in mint condition, plus
> all the bits ... somewhere. I might take it out for a spin, just to have
> a go at running the new Twitter client (yes, really):
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ECnN7jdgA4

Pretty amazing (though I never twit) and he's got some kind of network 
adapter hooked up to it also -- which impressed me even more. I parted 
with my 2068 (not 2048 as I said earlier) a few years ago, but I've still 
got the complete QL setup -- not sure for how much longer -- and a couple 
T-S 1000s. But I'm at the age where I just want to get rid of stuff I 
don't use.

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0
0
RonB
1/26/2011 7:25:32 AM
In article <8q7rpvF55oU1@mid.individual.net>,
 bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> On Monday 24 January 2011 08:32 ZnU wrote:
> 
> > By the exact standard you guys use to lump Android in with desktop 
> > Linux, iOS market share should be counted as Mac market share.
> 
> Actually, I'd agree with that!
> 
> Currently, the cry is that Android is for phones.
> The reality is that we have (or are starting to have)...
> 
>  - Android on phones, tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.
> 
>  - iOS on phones and ipads
> 
>  - MS phone 7 on phones, but W7 on tablets/slates, netbooks, net-tops etc.
> 
> Consequently, the way things are going with the "new devices", a MS system 
> is being counted as a Windows desktop, and iOS and Android etc. are being 
> dismissed as "only phones"  This is to say nothing of new Linus OSs like 
> MeeGo, of course.
> 
> To me, and as you suggest, the only way that the figures we get (web 
> statistics) make any sense is to talk about Microsoft, Apple, Linux.

The problem with that is that two of those things are companies and the 
third is a kernel. Gains for Apple and Microsoft platforms benefit Apple 
and Microsoft, so at least from a market analysis perspective it might 
make sense to group each company's platforms together. But gains for 
"Linux" aren't all aggregated by any single entity.

IMO the only meaningful way to make like-for-like comparisons is to 
segment the market at the "platform" level, with each "platform" being 
defined as encompassing a set of devices that are both technically 
capable of running a common set of apps _and_ that provide compatibility 
useful enough that's it's actually widely used.

> This is imo going to become more obvious as time goes on and these "new 
> devices" become increasingly prevalent.

-- 
"The game of professional investment is intolerably boring and over-exacting to
anyone who is entirely exempt from the gambling instinct; whilst he who has it
must pay to this propensity the appropriate toll." -- John Maynard Keynes
0
ZnU
1/26/2011 6:20:13 PM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

WinPhone7 is the most stable smartphone OS. Android Linux is the least stable smartphone OS.
"Out of the six modern smartphone operating systems, Android is clearly the least stable of them all. I have seen numerous low memory issues, force close warnings, random resets, freezes on apps and connections, and more. With so many different manufacturers, different versions of the OS out and available, and thousands of apps that are clearly not built well enough to prevent issues Android is clearly in last in the stability department." http://www.zdnet.com/blog/cell-phones/microsofts-windows-phone-7-is-the-most-stable-mobile-phone-os/6456 Android Linux is bumbleware? Say it ain't so! On 02/02/2012 09:07 PM, DFS wrote: > "Out of the six modern smartphone operating systems, Android is > clearly the least stable of them all. I have seen numerous low > memory issues, force close warnings, random resets, freezes on apps > and connections, and more. With so many different manufacturers, > different versions of the OS out and available, and thousands of > apps that are clearly not built well enough to prevent issues Android > is clearly in last in the stability department." > > http://www.zdnet.com/blog/cell-phones/microsofts-windows-phone-7-is-the-most-stable-mobile-phone-os/6456 > > Android Linux is bumbleware? Say it ain't so! [quote] Fellow Microsoft MVP�s [...] and Matt Miller [/quote] http://www.coolsmartphone.com/2011/01/21/windows-phone-7-a-year-after-launch/ Yup, a really unbiased article (...

os.linux.advocacy
Dear Friend, I have found some great articles at: http://www.familyandtwist.com/ http:www.articlestwist.com/ http://www.downloadstwist.com/ http://www.wallpaperstwist.com/ Read them all. Thanks mahmar07@gmail.com came up with this when s/he headbutted the keyboard a moment ago in comp.os.linux.advocacy: > Dear Friend, > > I have found some great articles at: > <URLs snipped> > Read them all. > > Thanks Not without a summary, I ain't. -- Spanking brand new high end desktop computer: £1700 Spanking brand new colour laser printer/scanner/copier/fax: £600 Vista Ultimate: £369 The look on your face when nothing works: priceless Verily I say unto thee, that Jim spake thusly: > mahmar07@gmail.com came up with this when s/he headbutted the keyboard a > moment ago in comp.os.linux.advocacy: > >> Dear Friend, >> >> I have found some great articles at: >> > <URLs snipped> >> Read them all. >> >> Thanks > > Not without a summary, I ain't. It's worse than that, it's spam Jim, spam Jim, spam Jim. It's worse than that, it's spam Jim, spam Jim, spam. -- K. http://slated.org ..---- | "People are not happy in stinking hellholes of abject poverty, what | is true is that once you cross subsistence ... additional increases | in wealth have virtually no effect on well-being ... This is worth | knowing in case you have a choice between "X...

[News] Making Linux More Like OS X and OS X More Like Linux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mac OS X - Highly Customized Linux ,----[ Quote ] | Few players in the Linux arena creates their Linux distro to look like Mac OS | X or Windows.... | | Here I'm going to list some distro which looks like Mac OS. `---- http://linuxtreat.blogspot.com/2008/07/mac-os-x-highly-customized-linux.html A Linux User's Guide to Mac ,----[ Quote ] | Take a deep breath and repeat after me: A computer is just a tool. It is only | so good as it serves to make life better for users. A "better" life is | obviously not the same thing for everyone. For me, it means making my Mac | more like Linux, as I began to discuss in my last article. `---- http://www.ofb.biz/safari/article/474.html Yesterday: Ubuntu: Challenge the Mac ,----[ Quote ] | Normally I would just provide a Diigo link to this if it weren’t something | I’ve been saying a lot in talks. Over at InformationWeek, Serdar Yegulaip was | a piece called “Shuttleworth’s Ubuntu Ambitions: Challenge the Mac”. He | quotes Mark Shuttleworth saying in a Datamation article: | |     … our goal, very simply, is to make sure the Free software ecosystem can |     deliver a Mac OS-like experience, or an experience that will compete with |     the Mac OS. | | I think this is exactly right. It’s time to look past Windows, even with its | huge installed base, as any sort of “gold standard” (as Mark calls it), | especially for user interface. ...

Android Linux OS being sold with netbooks
Android Linux OS being sold with netbooks ----------------------------------------- http://www.ebuyer.com/product/242282 I expect micoshaftees to do the monopoly anti-trust thing and contact Ebuyer and Acer to stop selling Linux and android and threaten to sue them. In EU that is not possible - under anti-trust agreements filed with EU commission, if they did that, the payola this time will be huge after the 600 million last time. Barnes and Noble could take note of this with their Nook and file anti-trust complaints in the EU over the lawsuits brought on by micoshaft against them. Google could also spread the case into EU as they are an indirect target. At the very least between them and lawyers, they should be able to collect 1 billion dollars from micoshaft for abusive anti-trust patent litigation aimed at stifling market competition - hopefully 3 billion if the EU decides to award tripple damages. ...

[News] Motorola Lowers Cost of Linux/Android Phone; fZiiLabs EGG Runs Linux/Android
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Motorola Pledges Cheaper Android Phones ,----[ Quote ] | Android smart phones. Cheap Android phones. Android phones on the | Nextel/Boost iDen network. Motorola CEO Sanjay Jha said many of next year's | Motorola phones will run the Google Android OS in a call with analysts today, | continuing a big bet on the Linux-based system. `---- http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2350949,00.asp ZiiLabs Announces EGG StemCell Computer. ,----[ Quote ] | Another Android-capable device comes down the line, but this one is different | from anything currently out on the market. ZiiLabs created the StemCell | computer to be an open standards development platform, capable of running a | Linux distro or Android with equal ease. This ZiiLabs EGG is not a phone, but | it can be upgraded with the proper chipset to become one. `---- http://www.i4u.com/article26139.html Recent: Motorola pushes ahead with Android phones ,----[ Quote ] | Jha praised Android, noting that 3,000 applications have already been | developed for it. Motorola will focus on integrating messaging and social | networking with the Android devices, he said, and will offer a range of | devices in the high- and mid-tier price ranges. "We are probably investing as | much as anybody on the Android platform," he added. `---- http://www.linuxworld.com.au/article/301565/motorola_pushes_ahead_android_phones?rid=-50 Motorola smartphone gets widgety ,--...

Linux-based Android OS Gets More Versatile
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tablet and smartphone run on Android-based Grid OS ,----[ Quote ] | Fusion Garage announced a 10.1-inch tablet and four-inch smartphone, | both running an "Grid OS" operating system that's based on Android -- | and said to run its apps -- but adds predictive features and a grid-like | UI. Available for purchase now, the Grid-10 tablet features an Nvidia Tegra | 2 processor and 1366 x 768-pixel screen resolution, while the Grid-4 smartphone | due later this year offers a Qualcomm Snapdragon processor. `---- http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/Fusion-Garage-Grid-OS-plus-Grid10-and-Grid4/?kc=rss -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk5KvTgACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6SewCghjja1SJl8e0LYFxWCai1psd+ vkYAn2StKSwfxhkmbiUPAOrGINNZEniS =AdFO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ...

the new computer -os-linux+advocacy in 2008
gwedfw edhklsc jfdh fefgh n http://www.freewebs.com/thuiss/ http://indianfriendfinder.com/go/g924418-pmem ...

Android is not Linux; Android is insular.
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/reviews/2009/02/an-introduction-to-google-android-for-developers.ars > February 23, 2009 > Design philosophy > > Although Android is built on top of the Linux kernel, the platform has very little in common with the conventional desktop Linux stack. In fact, during a presentation at the Google IO conference, Google engineer Patrick Brady stated unambiguously that Android is not Linux. > Much of the Android userspace operates within the constraints of Dalvik, Google's own custom Java virtual machine. Dalvik uses its own bytecode format ca...

[News] Android and Linux Run on Dual OS Boot Smartphone, Apple hypePod
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yuhua X2 – Linux 2.6 and Android Dual OS Boot Smartphone ,----[ Quote ] | There are rumors that Yuhua intends to | launch its dual operating system | smartphone- Yuhua X2. YUHUA X2 runs on | Linux 2.6 and Android OS. Sporta 3-inch | touchscreen with 240 x 400 pixels | resolution, Yuhua X2 also packs a DVB-T | mobile TV tuner. Other features including | a 5 megapixel autofocus camera, Wi-Fi, GPS | and a 1200 mAh battery. Don’t expect Yuhua | X2 to be as fast as Nexus One sincde it | only packs 256MB ROM and 128MB RAM. `-...

Android microSD card won't mount on Linux OS (Unable to access). Why?
Android microSD card won't mount on Linux OS (Unable to access). Why? What is this error telling me? a. Dolphin: http://i.imgur.com/DABMmKP.jpg b. Nautilus http://i.imgur.com/6XgdcI1.jpg ================================================================== Unable to access "134 GB Volume" Error mounting /dev/mmcblk0p1 at /media/guest/21E3-00CC: Command-line `mount -t "exfat" -o "uhelper=udisks2,nodev,nosuid,uid=1000,gid=1000, iocharset=utf8,namecase=0,errors=remount-ro,umask=0077" "/dev/mmcblk0p1" "/media/guest/21E3-00CC"' exit...

Advanced single board computer supporting Android and Linux OS based on the Freescale SoC
Hello, I'm looking for advanced single board computer supporting Android and Linux OS based on the Freescale SoC. I would like to hear any recommendations from users who have had experiences with them. --------------------------------------- Posted through http://www.EmbeddedRelated.com ...

Linux Kernel Exploit Ported to Linux Android
Linux Kernel Exploit Ported to Linux Android http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/linux-kernel-exploit-ported-android "Malware authors are notorious for quickly leveraging new exploits in the public domain for nefarious purposes. The recent discovery of a Linux Kernel CVE-2013-2094 Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability (CVE-2013-2094) in the Performance Counters for Linux (PCL)-currently being exploited on various platforms-has now been modified to work on the Android operating system." Choose Linux Android when you want to make sure that making a simple phonecall becomes "high risk". -- Major Linux Problems on the Desktop or Why Linux is not (yet) Ready for the Desktop, 2013 edition http://bit.ly/gBOiz6 Cola Zealot wrote: > L Android exploits wiped out in 5 minutes of being reported. Any device connecting to net has the exploit zapped. Scroogle paid troll "Cola Zealot" still trying to figure that one out. 7 wrote: > Cola Zealot wrote: > >> L > > A Fasten your safety harness, notify your nearest and dearest, and tightly secure your crash helmet, because fraud "7" escaped from his padded cell and came to COLA once again. http://sj.blacksteel.com/padded-cell/Posey03.jpg <bitchslap> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!, Tar & Feathers for "7": http://www.visualphotos.com/photo/1x4179072/portrait_of_businessman_covered_in_tar_and_7...

Uncovering Linux Android Master Key That Makes 99% of Linux Devices Vulnerable, nearly 900 million Linux devices
The Bluebox Security research team - Bluebox Labs - recently discovered a vulnerability in Linux Android's security model that allows a hacker to modify APK code without breaking an application's cryptographic signature, to turn any legitimate application into a malicious Trojan, completely unnoticed by the app store, the phone, or the end user. The implications are huge! This vulnerability, around at least since the release of Android 1.6 (codename: "Donut" ), could affect any Android phone released in the last 4 years1 - or nearly 900 million Linux devices2- and depending on the type of application, a hacker can exploit the vulnerability for anything from data theft to creation of a mobile botnet." http://bluebox.com/corporate-blog/bluebox-uncovers-android-master-key/ OMG........... "7"? , Grufftard?......... Kohltard?..... please come and tell us this isn't so!!!!!!!! <chuckle> -- Major Linux Problems on the Desktop or Why Linux is not (yet) Ready for the Desktop, 2013 edition http://bit.ly/gBOiz6 Cola Zealot wrote: > The Bluebox Security research team - Bluebox Labs - recently discovered a > vulnerability in Linux Android's security model that allows a hacker to > modify APK code without breaking an application's cryptographic signature, > to turn any legitimate application into a malicious Trojan, completely > unnoticed by the app store, the phone, or the end us...

Linux should disown elementary OS Linux for the Scam that it is.
No Problem'o, DooFuS. I can blame it all on the Linux Mint TEXT size being = too small on my 19 inch monitor. As Moi was saying... I tried two more additional downloads of elementary OS Linux. Both of them= likewise failed. While they could have been discriminating against Moi for his ZERO contribu= tion, I will be damned if I am going to PAY GOOD money for something when t= here is no guarantee that the stupid DOWNLOAD wont fail, JUST TO FIND OUT t= hat it WONT work at all on my computer hardware, let alone whether OR NOT i= t will actually do what is being claimed. Moi has NEVER experienced a download problem with Linux Mint. From what I have seen, elementary OS Linux is a scam, much like those Windo= ws come ons that claim that they can fix your computer problems merely by m= ucking with the Windows Registry. The Linux World should disown elementary OS Linux for being the Scam that i= t is. Or, can any phony distro claim to be Linux? Yeah, where are the Linu= x police? On 7/8/2015 8:22 AM, John Gohde wrote: > No Problem'o, DooFuS. I can blame it all on the Linux Mint TEXT size > being too small on my 19 inch monitor. I blame it on your small cerebrum. > The Linux World should disown elementary OS Linux for being the Scam > that it is. Or, can any phony distro claim to be Linux? Yeah, where > are the Linux police? The Linux police are outside your door right now. I'm not kidding. Look out...

ROX Linux and ROX on OS X and arm linux
Hi I've just just done some searches on Google for ROX linux, and ROX on other platforms. I've not managed to find anything. Is ROX available for OS X? Is ROX available for Acorn\Iyonix Arm linux? Did ROX Linux ever come to anything? I was a member of the mailing list a while ago, it started off interesting and then seemed to go off on a tangent then it all went quiet. It seemed like an excellent idea, a linux distro structured like RISC OS. It would have been an ideal compliment to a RISC OS system, same UI but different set of applications (probably not quite so consistent as we are used to though). It could also have been a life boat if RISC OS were ever to grind to a halt. Presumably some sorts of common apps (python perhaps) would have been possible and if RISCOSE or similar were to be developed too, the possibilities would be even greater. Do others consider it would have been desirable? -- Jess Iyonix contact http://jess.itworkshop-nexus.net Hotmail is my spam trap - don't email valid - mailto:nospam@jess.itworkshop-nexus.net In message <729a59544e.jess@itworkshop.invalid> Jess <phantasm_39@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I've just just done some searches on Google for ROX linux, and ROX on > other platforms. > These starting points might help. http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&q=ROX filer desktop http://rox.sourceforge.net/phpwiki/ http://rox.sourceforg...

[News] Tips for Linux Advocacy (from Linux-hostile Site)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 10 Things for Linux Desktop Evangelists to Ponder ,----[ Quote ] | Continuing the theme from #6, be willing to pay for Linux. Be willing to | discuss Linux as a product people buy. Be willing to say "not free" isn't | always a bad thing. | | I know Linux proscribes selling Linux, but there are many success stories | where Linux is the cornerstone of a profitable product (think TiVo). A nicely | constructed Linux Desktop is worth money, whether FOSS thinks so or not. `---- http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/10-Things-for-Linux-Desktop-Evangelists-to-Ponder-67559.html Linux, FOSS, and the Time-Honored Tradition of Charging More for Less ,----[ Quote ] | There is something fundamentally defective with a business that feels it | can't survive by giving customers a fair deal. Stick with FOSS. What you see | is what you get, warts, roses, everything, with no place to hide tricksy | dealings or dishonesty. `---- http://www.linuxtoday.com/infrastructure/2009071002535OPCY Recent: Why Use Linux? ,----[ Quote ] | 'I Would Pay for Linux' | | "I use Linux first and foremost because it's Unix, and I've been a big fan of | the Unix paradigm for 20+ years," Slashdot blogger yagu told | LinuxInsider. "With GNU software, Linux is better than industrial (HP, Sun, | et al.) Unix because it leverages the best extensions of familiar commands, | making them friendlier (color syntax...

[News] [Linux] Linux Has Advantage in the Mobile OS World
How Linux morphed from a server to a mobile OS ,----[ Quote ] | When evaluating Linux as a possible OS candidate, it is important to | remember that the Linux "model" for mobile devices is horizontal. That | is, Linux is not presented as a vertically integrated top to bottom | solution for a mobile device supplied by one vendor. | | It's a sharp contrast to the other OS suppliers such as Microsoft | with Windows Mobile, Symbian and PalmSource. These suppliers | support a highly integrated software stack, incorporating not | only an OS but also extensive middleware and application layer | pieces. Arguably the price for such integration is lack of | flexibility and loss of control. `---- http://www.wirelessnetdesignline.com/howto/broadband/199600344;jsessionid=N1IAB5VKZRD0QQSNDLRCKH0CJUNN2JVN http://tinyurl.com/2c3z7z Microsoft taps mobiles for developing world ,----[ Quote ] | Microsoft is facing fierce competition from Linux, however, most | notably the One Laptop per Child project to ship low cost | notebooks to schools in developing nations. | | Linux vendor Red Hat unveiled a Global Desktop last week | targeting computers at small and medium sized businesses as | well as governments in third world nations. `---- http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2189936/microsoft-taps-mobile-tech Related: 70 percent of smartphones use Symbian ,----[ Quote ] | At 3GSM it became clear that 70 percent of all smartphones use Symbian. | | Linux accounts for 16.9 perc...

[News] Gartner Pretends That Android is Not Linux at All to Belittle Linux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gartner: Android leapfrogs Linux and Windows Mobile http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/Gartner-1Q-2010-smartphone-study/ http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2010-05-20-009-35-NW-MO-0000 "I wonder why they have separated Android and Linux. Since Android is Linux with a particular software stack. I mean to be consistent wouldn't they have to divide Symbian up among different software stacks available for it? I suppose I should just realize it is Gartner and just ignore them." http://www.linuxtoday.com/ne...

Why linux is linux
We don't destroy, we create. We don't imitate, we build. We are not a network, we are a personal OS. -- http://www.texeme.com Hi John, Attempting to Speak for Linux, You wrote: << We don't destroy, we create. We don't imitate, we build. We are not a network, we are a personal OS. >> Linux is more like this: << Like everything else, we consume and are consumed. We exchange ideas with everyone, to the point where it's almost impossible to track. We are artisans, not mass producers. >> Jeff Relf wrote: > Linux is mo...

Android OS
So it seems all the Tablet PCs either run on the Apple Os or Android and as I know very little about either... It's a given... If I get a tablet it will not be running Apple OS, so that halves my question. I'm interested, and asking because of Virtual RPC... 1) Will any Virtual RISC OS version be able to run on Android? 2) If No, anyone know if there'll be any tablets running a version of Windows so that VRPC can be run. Thanks Dave -- Dave Triffid Dave Symes <dave@triffid.co.uk> wrote: > 1) Will any Virtual RISC OS version be able to run on Android? Android isn&#...

Android on Linux
Larry, Thank you for your reply to my last post. On a different topic, I want to evaluate Android on a standalone Linux box. I clearly need Xwindows, XTEST, and Xscope. Is there a particular Linux distribution that you would recommend? My eventual target is Solaris, probably Solaris8 as those applications have the most need for automated, GUI level, regression testing. --Thank you, --Mike Jr. On Oct 17, 11:01 pm, Mike <n00s...@comcast.net> wrote: > Larry, > Thank you for your reply to my last post. On a different topic, I > want to evaluate Android on a standalone Linux box. I clearly need > Xwindows, XTEST, and Xscope. Is there a particular Linux distribution > that you would recommend? > > My eventual target is Solaris, probably Solaris8 as those applications > have the most need for automated, GUI level, regression testing. I have been busy digging and I think that I now have a better appreciation of my problem and why the silence. 1. CDE is pretty much dead on Linux 2. xscope is going to be difficult to find outside of Solaris I think that my best option is OpenSolaris (http://www.opensolaris.org/ os/ ) Linux will have to be a dual boot option. :-) > > --Thank you, > --Mike Jr. On Oct 19, 1:17 pm, Mike <n00s...@comcast.net> wrote: > On Oct 17, 11:01 pm, Mike <n00s...@comcast.net> wrote: > > > Larry, > > Thank you for your reply to my last post. On a different topic, I > >...

Android on Linux ??
Hi, Did you know if the new system Android of google works on linux ? This is the presentation of Android : http://enews.freetzi.com/android_demo.html (I love this demo) ++ On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:14:05 -0800, baary wrote: > Hi, > > Did you know if the new system Android of google works on linux ? > > This is the presentation of Android : > http://enews.freetzi.com/android_demo.html (I love this demo) > > ++ Android is based on Linux. There SDK is available for Linux as Well as Windows and Mac. On Nov 27, 3:19 pm, General Schvantzkoph <schvantzk...@yahoo.co...

[News] [Linux] More Speculations About a Google OS Based on GNU/Linux
Google admits that it is going after Microsoft Office... Is Windows next? ,----[ Quote ] | So that brings us to the obvious question: What about the operating | system? There have been rumors for years about a Google PC and/or | Google OS that was based on Linux and aimed at providing a simple, | intuitive desktop for the masses. Naturally, that Google PC would | primarily be an Internet terminal that features Google's online | applications. `---- http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/hiner/?p=465 Still getting slapped for spyware (Dell) and news aggregators... Google stands firm behind News search site ,----[ Quote ] | All along, Google has defended News saying that it is protected by | the fair use principle -- because it only reproduces headlines, text | snippets and thumbnail images -- and that it provides great benefit | to media Web sites by sending them readers. `---- http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;535941450;fp;;fpid;;pf;1 ...

Is Android Linux?
http://www.androidcentral.com/ask-ac-android-linux "While trawling through the Internet today I came across the Linux Foundation's page, and my eyes were pulled to their top story. Now this is nothing new, I often find plenty of great articles and news to read there, but this was different. This was a post that was about Android. It got me thinking (sometimes I do that) -- is Android Linux? The folks at the Linux Foundation seem to think so (and seem awfully happy about it), and I'm going to have to agree with them. Now before you purists come to West Virginia to beat some sense into me, I'm not saying that Android is unadulterated GNU Linux. Clearly it's not, there's far too many differences and psudeo-open source licensing at play to call it pure. But for all intents and purposes, it's close enough." Not that I entirely agree with the article - I don't like calling anything than the kernel Linux - but in a world were "Linux" is used to refer to a broad range of desktop distributions calling Android "a Linux system" is completely accurate. And through Android, the year of Linux-based personal computing has been happening for several years now. Actually, in next-gen personal computing (aka "mobile") Linux has taken the absolute lead. On a side note, from the comments: "All distributions runs same software, what distribution is responsible of is software distribution and ...

Web resources about - Confused about Android - comp.os.linux.advocacy

Dazed and Confused (film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dazed and Confused is a 1993 coming of age comedy film written and directed by Richard Linklater . The film features a large ensemble cast of ...

Confused.com Turns Facebook Into House Of Horrors
U.K.-based price-comparison website Confused.com created a Take This Lollipop -inspired video application to promote the benefits of home insurance ...

FAQ: How do you do dis? I confused! - Facebook
Keith "Aieron" Knight hat eine Notiz mit dem Titel FAQ: How do you do dis? I confused! geschrieben. Du kannst den vollständigen Text hier lesen. ...

If You're Not Confused - Flickr - Photo Sharing!
"If you're not confused, you're not paying attention." Tom Peters Shaun and Alexis reacting to something. This is a spoof on another shot involving ...

YouTube - High School Girls - Dazed and Confused (9/12) Movie CLIP (1993) HD
Veröffentlicht am 16.06.2011 Dazed and Confused Movie Clip - watch all clips http://j.mp/y23fhm click to subscribe http://j.mp/sNDUs5 Aging ...

UAE students considering online study confused by new advice
University students can now browse a list of institutions in the US, UK and Australia offering online degrees that are accredited by the Ministry ...

Abbey Road, London - Two roads leave Beatles tourists confused
Wrong turn: new Abbey Road leaves Beatles tourists bamboozled

Negative gearing. Confused by the economic modelling? That's the whole idea
Politics is about trust but it pays to be skeptical.

Instruction confused with education with religion in Qld state schools
More parents are pushing for transparency at their children's schools.

Confused about the word 'Eskimo'? It helps to look deeper.
As the word 'Eskimo' gets ready to depart from writing and polite conversation, I’ve regretted having to say goodbye, so I called an old friend ...

Resources last updated: 3/26/2016 5:23:12 AM