... and starts spewing his hatred...

.... news at 11.

-- 
Rick

Rick wrote:
> .. and starts spewing his hatred...
> 
> ... news at 11.

Yup, lies and all, nothing new.

-- 
HPT

High Plains Thumper wrote:
> Rick wrote:
>> .. and starts spewing his hatred...
>>
>> ... news at 11.
>
> Yup, lies and all, nothing new.


What lies?

How many cola nyms have you posted with?

There's 2 challenges for you to run from.  Run HPT!

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:41:46 -0500, DFS wrote:

> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> Rick wrote:
>>> .. and starts spewing his hatred...
>>>
>>> ... news at 11.
>>
>> Yup, lies and all, nothing new.
> 
> 
> What lies?
> 
> How many cola nyms have you posted with?
> 
> There's 2 challenges for you to run from.  Run HPT!

So, tell us all, DFS...

What is number of complaints about an OS/distro or OS/distro release is 
OK? 0? 5? 5000? What? And why is Windows OK with all of its related 
complaints and Linux related distros not?

-- 
Rick

On Dec 21, 6:56=A0am, Rick <n...@mail.invalid> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:41:46 -0500, DFS wrote:
> > High Plains Thumper wrote:
> >> Rick wrote:
> >>> .. and starts spewing his hatred...
>
> >>> ... news at 11.
>
> >> Yup, lies and all, nothing new.
>
> > What lies?
>
> > How many cola nyms have you posted with?
>
> > There's 2 challenges for you to run from. =A0Run HPT!
>
> So, tell us all, DFS...
>
> What is number of complaints about an OS/distro or OS/distro release is
> OK? 0? 5? 5000? What? And why is Windows OK with all of its related
> complaints and Linux related distros not?
>

Windows is not human, so it is incapable of being "OK" with anything.
Don't post drunk.

On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:05:48 -0800, cc wrote:

> On Dec 21, 6:56 am, Rick <n...@mail.invalid> wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:41:46 -0500, DFS wrote:
>> > High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> >> Rick wrote:
>> >>> .. and starts spewing his hatred...
>>
>> >>> ... news at 11.
>>
>> >> Yup, lies and all, nothing new.
>>
>> > What lies?
>>
>> > How many cola nyms have you posted with?
>>
>> > There's 2 challenges for you to run from.  Run HPT!
>>
>> So, tell us all, DFS...
>>
>> What is number of complaints about an OS/distro or OS/distro release is
>> OK? 0? 5? 5000? What? And why is Windows OK with all of its related
>> complaints and Linux related distros not?
>>
>>
> Windows is not human, so it is incapable of being "OK" with anything.
> Don't post drunk.

You can't answer the question.... ah, well...

-- 
Rick

On 2009-12-21, the following emerged from the brain of cc:
> On Dec 21, 6:56 am, Rick <n...@mail.invalid> wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:41:46 -0500, DFS wrote:
>> > High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> >> Rick wrote:
>> >>> .. and starts spewing his hatred...
>>
>> >>> ... news at 11.
>>
>> >> Yup, lies and all, nothing new.
>>
>> > What lies?
>>
>> > How many cola nyms have you posted with?
>>
>> > There's 2 challenges for you to run from.  Run HPT!
>>
>> So, tell us all, DFS...
>>
>> What is number of complaints about an OS/distro or OS/distro release is
>> OK? 0? 5? 5000? What? And why is Windows OK with all of its related
>> complaints and Linux related distros not?
>>
>
> Windows is not human, so it is incapable of being "OK" with anything.
> Don't post drunk.

May I suggest to not read drunk then?

-- 
Middle age is having a choice between two temptations and choosing the
one that'll get you home earlier.
	~ Dan Bennett

On Dec 21, 7:36=A0am, Rick <n...@mail.invalid> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:05:48 -0800, cc wrote:
> > On Dec 21, 6:56=A0am, Rick <n...@mail.invalid> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:41:46 -0500, DFS wrote:
> >> > High Plains Thumper wrote:
> >> >> Rick wrote:
> >> >>> .. and starts spewing his hatred...
>
> >> >>> ... news at 11.
>
> >> >> Yup, lies and all, nothing new.
>
> >> > What lies?
>
> >> > How many cola nyms have you posted with?
>
> >> > There's 2 challenges for you to run from. =A0Run HPT!
>
> >> So, tell us all, DFS...
>
> >> What is number of complaints about an OS/distro or OS/distro release i=
s
> >> OK? 0? 5? 5000? What? And why is Windows OK with all of its related
> >> complaints and Linux related distros not?
>
> > Windows is not human, so it is incapable of being "OK" with anything.
> > Don't post drunk.
>
> You can't answer the question.... ah, well...
>

Well Windows called me and we discussed why I should be answering
questions directed at DFS. We also discussed that your question is so
grammatically incorrect, that it's hard to know exactly what you mean.
Do you mean why is it ok to complain about Linux and not about
Windows? Well contrary to popular belief I'm not DFS, but in my
opinion it's completely fine to find complaints about both,
considering what this group is as opposed to what it should be.

On Dec 21, 7:58=A0am, TomB <tommy.bongae...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2009-12-21, the following emerged from the brain of cc:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 21, 6:56=A0am, Rick <n...@mail.invalid> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:41:46 -0500, DFS wrote:
> >> > High Plains Thumper wrote:
> >> >> Rick wrote:
> >> >>> .. and starts spewing his hatred...
>
> >> >>> ... news at 11.
>
> >> >> Yup, lies and all, nothing new.
>
> >> > What lies?
>
> >> > How many cola nyms have you posted with?
>
> >> > There's 2 challenges for you to run from. =A0Run HPT!
>
> >> So, tell us all, DFS...
>
> >> What is number of complaints about an OS/distro or OS/distro release i=
s
> >> OK? 0? 5? 5000? What? And why is Windows OK with all of its related
> >> complaints and Linux related distros not?
>
> > Windows is not human, so it is incapable of being "OK" with anything.
> > Don't post drunk.
>
> May I suggest to not read drunk then?
>

If I was drunk,  maybe I'd understand what "[w]hat is number of
complaints" means and "why is Windows OK with all of its related
complaints" means. Does it mean that Windows is okay with people
complaining about it and Linux is not? Well maybe Windows just has
more self-esteem. Maybe Linux wants to be taken more seriously and
feels the need to defend itself from attacks.

On 2009-12-21, the following emerged from the brain of cc:
> On Dec 21, 7:58 am, TomB <tommy.bongae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2009-12-21, the following emerged from the brain of cc:
>> > On Dec 21, 6:56 am, Rick <n...@mail.invalid> wrote:
>> >> What is number of complaints about an OS/distro or OS/distro
>> >> release is OK? 0? 5? 5000? What? And why is Windows OK with all
>> >> of its related complaints and Linux related distros not?
>>
>> > Windows is not human, so it is incapable of being "OK" with
>> > anything.  Don't post drunk.
>>
>> May I suggest to not read drunk then?
>
> If I was drunk,  maybe I'd understand what "[w]hat is number of
> complaints" means

If you were sober you'd probably notice that the 'is' is redundant.
Or perhaps you are sober, and just acting silly?

> and "why is Windows OK with all of its related complaints" means.
> Does it mean that Windows is okay with people complaining about it
> and Linux is not?

Let me rephrase it for you:

Why, with all of its related complains, is Windows OK (...) ?

Now, was that so hard?

> Well maybe Windows just has more self-esteem. Maybe Linux wants to
> be taken more seriously and feels the need to defend itself from
> attacks.

Windows and Linux are not human, so they are incapable of having
self-esteem, the desire to be taken more seriously, or to defend
themselves.

-- 
Sex is one of the most wholesome, beautiful and natural experiences
that money can buy.
	~ Steve Martin

On Dec 21, 8:59=A0am, TomB <tommy.bongae...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2009-12-21, the following emerged from the brain of cc:
>
> > On Dec 21, 7:58=A0am, TomB <tommy.bongae...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 2009-12-21, the following emerged from the brain of cc:
> >> > On Dec 21, 6:56=A0am, Rick <n...@mail.invalid> wrote:
> >> >> What is number of complaints about an OS/distro or OS/distro
> >> >> release is OK? 0? 5? 5000? What? And why is Windows OK with all
> >> >> of its related complaints and Linux related distros not?
>
> >> > Windows is not human, so it is incapable of being "OK" with
> >> > anything. =A0Don't post drunk.
>
> >> May I suggest to not read drunk then?
>
> > If I was drunk, =A0maybe I'd understand what "[w]hat is number of
> > complaints" means
>
> If you were sober you'd probably notice that the 'is' is redundant.
> Or perhaps you are sober, and just acting silly?

I'm sorry, is what Rick wrote perfectly written English? Mediocre
English? Or so poorly worded and punctuated as to be ambiguous? If
English isn't his first language, I apologize.


> > and "why is Windows OK with all of its related complaints" means.
> > Does it mean that Windows is okay with people complaining about it
> > and Linux is not?
>
> Let me rephrase it for you:

Thank you.

>
> Why, with all of its related complains, is Windows OK (...) ?


Look at what you wrote, then look at what Rick wrote. A modicum of
grammar makes all the difference.

> Now, was that so hard?


No it wasn't, because you can write a proper sentence. I guess to
answer that question, and to get all Bill Clinton on you, it depends
on what OK means. Windows isn't perfect, and the complaints verify
that, but OK doesn't mean perfect. I would classify OK as something
useful and useable, which I think Windows falls under. Same as Linux.
Do we have different opinions on what OK means? Is Windows not OK
because people complain about it?

Why, with all the complaints about it, is democracy OK? These kinds of
questions make little sense to ask and have no real answer.

>
> > Well maybe Windows just has more self-esteem. Maybe Linux wants to
> > be taken more seriously and feels the need to defend itself from
> > attacks.
>
> Windows and Linux are not human, so they are incapable of having
> self-esteem, the desire to be taken more seriously, or to defend
> themselves.
>

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo shit.

TomB wrote:

> ccretin:
>>
>> Well maybe Windows just has more self-esteem. Maybe Linux wants to
>> be taken more seriously and feels the need to defend itself from
>> attacks.
>
>Windows and Linux are not human, so they are incapable of having
>self-esteem,

Still, zero is still more self-esteem that what ccretin has, to be a
"Hadron" leg-humper...