<bitchslap>

You are fucking scumbag liar who claimed to be the "European Inventor of the 
Year" which is total bullshit.
http://www.leitl.org/sci.nano/1489.html
*------------------| EUROPEAN INVENTOR OF THE YEAR 1995 |----------------*
>  Joseph Michael                  *    Robodyne Cybernetics Ltd         |

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Inventor_of_the_Year
The first European Inventor of the Year awards took place at the
AutoWorld Museum in Brussels on 3 May 2006.

Untill you admit you were lying back then, anything you say, 7, is suspected 
to be a lie. 

>
>
>"Clogwog"  wrote in message 
>news:201102051717.p15HH4R04841@smtp.cobalt.loc...
><bitchslap>
>
>You are fucking scumbag liar who claimed to be the "European Inventor of 
>the Year" which is total bullshit.
>http://www.leitl.org/sci.nano/1489.html
>*------------------| EUROPEAN INVENTOR OF THE YEAR 1995 |----------------*
>>  Joseph Michael                  *    Robodyne Cybernetics Ltd         |
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Inventor_of_the_Year
>The first European Inventor of the Year awards took place at the
>AutoWorld Museum in Brussels on 3 May 2006.
>
>Untill you admit you were lying back then, anything you say, 7, is 
>suspected to be a lie.

What's interesting is how quick some people here are willing to accuse 
Michael Dell of lying with no evidence.

Then you have something like this.

Ezekiel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> What's interesting is how quick some people here are willing to accuse 
> Michael Dell of lying with no evidence.

No evidence?

Homer showed that Michael Dell /has/ lied, in regard to Intel.

It seems pretty likely he also lied in regard to Microsoft.  And that would
be an easier lie, if Microsoft merely contacted him to remind him of his
"relationship" with Microsoft.  And even if Michael Dell spoke the truth
about "pressure", that still leaves open "bribes".   I mean, "incentives".

<"Look at the Wookie" ploy regarding "7" snipped.>

-- 
BOFH excuse #32:
 
techtonic stress

>
>
>"Chris Ahlstrom"  wrote in message 
>news:iikb6f$t9v$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>Ezekiel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> What's interesting is how quick some people here are willing to accuse
>> Michael Dell of lying with no evidence.
>
>
>It seems pretty likely he also lied...
An opinion of "Pretty likely" doesn't prove anything.

> would be an easier lie,
"would be"

> if Microsoft merely contacted him
*if*

> that still leaves open "bribes".   I mean, "incentives".
So now you're suggesting "bribes."  Can you show where any laws were broken? 
Last time I looked out at the real world incentives were common in 
practically every business. Complaining that the world isn't a Utopian 
society seems rather pointless.


><"Look at the Wookie" ploy regarding "7" snipped.>

I looked and didn't see any Wookie. What I saw was actual evidence that he's 
a liar.

Chris Ahlstrom stated in post iikb6f$t9v$1@news.eternal-september.org on
2/5/11 1:17 PM:

> Ezekiel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> What's interesting is how quick some people here are willing to accuse
>> Michael Dell of lying with no evidence.
> 
> No evidence?
> 
> Homer showed that Michael Dell /has/ lied, in regard to Intel.
> 
> It seems pretty likely he also lied in regard to Microsoft.  And that would
> be an easier lie, if Microsoft merely contacted him to remind him of his
> "relationship" with Microsoft.  And even if Michael Dell spoke the truth
> about "pressure", that still leaves open "bribes".   I mean, "incentives".
> 
> <"Look at the Wookie" ploy regarding "7" snipped.>

You have no evidence his comment is not true.  None.

No matter what games you play, this will not change.

-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> writes:

> Ezekiel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> What's interesting is how quick some people here are willing to accuse 
>> Michael Dell of lying with no evidence.
>
> No evidence?
>
> Homer showed that Michael Dell /has/ lied, in regard to Intel.
>
> It seems pretty likely he also lied in regard to Microsoft.  And that would
> be an easier lie, if Microsoft merely contacted him to remind him of his
> "relationship" with Microsoft.  And even if Michael Dell spoke the truth
> about "pressure", that still leaves open "bribes".   I mean, "incentives".
>
> <"Look at the Wookie" ploy regarding "7" snipped.>

And I have posted links to you telling lies when showing off here and
trying to impress the other "advocates". It doesn't mean I think you are
lying ALL the time. e.g I can believe your claim that you edit your
company's documents with Open Office, thus endangering their data and
layout, without your bosses knowing in order to scratch some strange
itch you have to impress COLA residents.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> trolling fsckwit wrote:
>>
>> What's interesting is how quick some people here are willing to accuse 
>> Michael Dell of lying with no evidence.
>
>No evidence?
>
>Homer showed that Michael Dell /has/ lied, in regard to Intel.
>
>It seems pretty likely he also lied in regard to Microsoft.  And that would
>be an easier lie, if Microsoft merely contacted him to remind him of his
>"relationship" with Microsoft.  And even if Michael Dell spoke the truth
>about "pressure", that still leaves open "bribes".   I mean, "incentives".

Exactly.  It's just absurd to argue that M$ doesn't have undue power
over the big OEM's, which have no choice but to buy (a lot of) M$
products.

There's *tons* of evidence.  

It's not the cola advocates who have hauled M$ into court on various
occasions!

"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:o200l6h0u33fnecqilvk9u22m2tdu0vhv4@4ax.com...


more documented lies from the stupid asshole chrisv.

"chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a completely worthless piece of shit.

Turd wrote news:o200l6h0u33fnecqilvk9u22m2tdu0vhv4@4ax.com...
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> trolling fsckwit wrote:
>>>
>>> What's interesting is how quick some people here are willing to accuse
>>> Michael Dell of lying with no evidence.
>>
>>No evidence?
>>
>>Homer showed that Michael Dell /has/ lied, in regard to Intel.
>>
>>It seems pretty likely he also lied in regard to Microsoft.  And that 
>>would
>>be an easier lie, if Microsoft merely contacted him to remind him of his
>>"relationship" with Microsoft.  And even if Michael Dell spoke the truth
>>about "pressure", that still leaves open "bribes".   I mean, "incentives".
>
> Exactly.  It's just absurd to argue that M$ doesn't have undue power
> over the big OEM's, which have no choice but to buy (a lot of) M$
> products.
>
> There's *tons* of evidence.

You can't provide, eh turd!