Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !

In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:

>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !

And stupid too.
An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.

Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.

Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 18:46, the world stopped and
listened as Shane D. Maudiss contributed this to humanity:

> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !

Another winfag troll.

-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 19:17, the world stopped and
listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:

> In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
> shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:
> 
> 
>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
> 
> 
> And stupid too.
> An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.
> 
> Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.
> 

Such as yourself?

-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:46:06 -0800, Shane D. Maudiss wrote:

> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !

Idiot & *PLONK*

-- 
Mark
Registered Linux User #329755 -  http://counter.li.org
If you must email me then address to :
uk.co.demon.mwgary.nospam@mark (just reverse it and remove nospam)

In article <Tqdyb.27975$xL.15543@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com> 
Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 18:46, the world stopped and
>listened as Shane D. Maudiss contributed this to humanity:
>
>> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>
>Another winfag troll.

Idiot.

In article <ezdyb.27988$xL.22236@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com> 
Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 19:17, the world stopped and
>listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:
>
>> In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
>> shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>> 
>> 
>> And stupid too.
>> An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.
>> 
>> Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.
>> 
>
>Such as yourself?

I don't support such a pathetic OS, I despise it and despise its
advocates.

But hey, I hit a nerve, you obviously are upset because you fit the
above description.

Idiot.

In article <pan.2003.11.30.03.56.58.57355@nospam.co.uk> 
Mark Gary <markg@nospam.co.uk> wrote:

>On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:46:06 -0800, Shane D. Maudiss wrote:
>
>> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>
>Idiot & *PLONK*

Idiot.


>-- 
>Mark
>Registered Linux User #329755 

Registered idiot?
You think that is a good thing?

What a moron.

Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 20:06, the world stopped and
listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:

> In article <ezdyb.27988$xL.22236@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com> 
> Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 19:17, the world stopped and
>>listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:
>>
>>
>>>In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
>>>shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>>
>>>
>>>And stupid too.
>>>An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.
>>>
>>>Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.
>>>
>>
>>Such as yourself?
> 
> 
> I don't support such a pathetic OS, I despise it and despise its
> advocates.

Linux/BSD is more pathetic than Windows?  Ha.  Don't make me laugh.  We
all know Windows sucks and blows at the same time.

> But hey, I hit a nerve, you obviously are upset because you fit the
> above description.

Upset?  Nah.

> Idiot.
> 

Winfaggot/

-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 20:05, the world stopped and
listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:

> In article <Tqdyb.27975$xL.15543@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com> 
> Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 18:46, the world stopped and
>>listened as Shane D. Maudiss contributed this to humanity:
>>
>>
>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>
>>Another winfag troll.
> 
> 
> Idiot.
> 

Winfaggot/

-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 20:07, the world stopped and
listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:

> In article <pan.2003.11.30.03.56.58.57355@nospam.co.uk> 
> Mark Gary <markg@nospam.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:46:06 -0800, Shane D. Maudiss wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>
>>Idiot & *PLONK*
> 
> 
> Idiot.
> 

Winfaggot/

> 
> 
>>-- 
>>Mark
>>Registered Linux User #329755 
> 
> 
> Registered idiot?
> You think that is a good thing?
> 
> What a moron.
> 

Look who's talking.
-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

On 29 Nov 2003 18:46:06 -0800, Shane D. Maudiss 
  <shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !

Just the sort of post that one would expect from a WinIdiot.  Banned 
where?  Dangerous to whom?

-- 
Thanks to Nigeria, any email with the word "urgent" in the subject 
or address will be deleted.

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 03:25:39 GMT, Daniel Rudy
<dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 18:46, the world stopped and
>listened as Shane D. Maudiss contributed this to humanity:
>
>> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>
>Another winfag troll.

Please.  Don't feed the trolls.

On 29 Nov 2003 18:46:06 -0800, shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D.
Maudiss) wrote:

>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !

*plonk*

begin  In <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com>, on
11/29/2003
   at 06:46 PM, shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) said:

>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !

Nu, faygeleh, is that the best you can do? You could at least invent a
source for your specious claim that it has been banned.

so tell me, tonto, has Deutsche Telekom AG sent its users a notice
that they must not use Linux? If not, why not? If so, feel free to
post a copy.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action.  I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.

Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me.  Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org

shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote in message news:<eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com>...
> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !

Paperclips are dangerous in the hands of a retard.

I would recommend continuing using your preferded Windows operating
system,
specificaly designed for retards, you obviously don't have the mental
aquity to constuct a full paragraph. So please shut the F!!k up

Your sincerely

A non retarded linux user

Linux Sucks <linux@sucks.sucks> wrote in message news:<k3oisvc0qkcjsigmu7e8lut4emrna554lh@4ax.com>...
> In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
> shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:
> 
> >Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
> 
> And stupid too.
> An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.
> 
> Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.

I generally don't throw bread at the trolls, but I gotta in this case.

Here are my requirements for an OS:
1) Stability
2) Cost efficient
3) Not locked into how someone else THINKS my computer should work
4) Customizable
5) Portable
6) Easy to use
7) Did I say Stability?

Other then #6 above, Windows DOES NOT fit these characteristics.  It's
unstable, NOT cost efficient, crashes too much, too many errors for NO
REASON, plus I don't like the OS telling me what I can and can't do. 
When I tell a program to close, I don't want to be told it's being
'debugged'... just CLOSE the freakin' program.  Anyway, Windows is
just way too unstable and crappy to touch my hard drive.

blackpikex@yahoo.co.uk (blackpikex) writes:

> shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote in message news:<eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com>...
>> Linux has been banned because it's dangerous !
>
> Paperclips are dangerous in the hands of a retard.
>
> I would recommend continuing using your preferded Windows operating
> system,
> specificaly designed for retards, you obviously don't have the mental
> aquity to constuct a full paragraph. So please shut the F!!k up
>
> Your sincerely
>
> A non retarded linux user

It would be better if you had formatted your paragraph properly when
commenting on his construction skills, no?

-- 
What you want with a hen?             What you want with a woman 
Won't cackle when she lays            when she won't do nothin' I say?  
What you want with a hen?              -- Charlie Patton,
Won't cackle when she lays               "Banty Rooster Blues"
 

Linux Sucks <linux@sucks.sucks> wrote in message news:<k3oisvc0qkcjsigmu7e8lut4emrna554lh@4ax.com>...
> In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
> shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:
> 
> >Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
> 
> And stupid too.
> An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.
> 
> Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.

LOL Badmouthed and slandered by Sissy Boys who have to hide behind
fake user names????

Jim

In article <oswyb.62618$de2.50004@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> 
Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 20:06, the world stopped and
>listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:
>
>> In article <ezdyb.27988$xL.22236@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com> 
>> Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 19:17, the world stopped and
>>>listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
>>>>shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>And stupid too.
>>>>An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.
>>>>
>>>>Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Such as yourself?
>> 
>> 
>> I don't support such a pathetic OS, I despise it and despise its
>> advocates.
>
>Linux/BSD is more pathetic than Windows?  Ha.  Don't make me laugh.  We
>all know Windows sucks and blows at the same time.
>
>> But hey, I hit a nerve, you obviously are upset because you fit the
>> above description.
>
>Upset?  Nah.
>
>> Idiot.
>> 
>
>Winfaggot/

Idiot.

In article <Aswyb.62619$de2.29199@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> 
Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 20:05, the world stopped and
>listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:
>
>> In article <Tqdyb.27975$xL.15543@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com> 
>> Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 18:46, the world stopped and
>>>listened as Shane D. Maudiss contributed this to humanity:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>>
>>>Another winfag troll.
>> 
>> 
>> Idiot.
>> 
>
>Winfaggot/

Idiot.

In article <7twyb.62620$de2.50626@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> 
Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 20:07, the world stopped and
>listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:
>
>> In article <pan.2003.11.30.03.56.58.57355@nospam.co.uk> 
>> Mark Gary <markg@nospam.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 18:46:06 -0800, Shane D. Maudiss wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>>
>>>Idiot & *PLONK*
>> 
>> 
>> Idiot.
>> 
>
>Winfaggot/
>
>> 
>> 
>>>-- 
>>>Mark
>>>Registered Linux User #329755 
>> 
>> 
>> Registered idiot?
>> You think that is a good thing?
>> 
>> What a moron.
>> 
>
>Look who's talking.

Idiot.

In article <jfomsv4012nqtmfgvjogbais7107u0bfvn@4ax.com> 
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 03:25:39 GMT, Daniel Rudy
><dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
>
>>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 18:46, the world stopped and
>>listened as Shane D. Maudiss contributed this to humanity:
>>
>>> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>
>>Another winfag troll.
>
>Please.  Don't feed the trolls.

Troll idiot.

In article <2ba4b4eb.0312011421.7de4a395@posting.google.com> 
alex@totallynerd.com (Alex) wrote:

>Linux Sucks <linux@sucks.sucks> wrote in message news:<k3oisvc0qkcjsigmu7e8lut4emrna554lh@4ax.com>...
>> In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
>> shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:
>> 
>> >Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>> 
>> And stupid too.
>> An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.
>> 
>> Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.
>
>I generally don't throw bread at the trolls, but I gotta in this case.
>
>Here are my requirements for an OS:
>1) Stability

Linux fails in this.

>2) Cost efficient

Linux fails in this.

>3) Not locked into how someone else THINKS my computer should work

Linux fails in this.

>4) Customizable

Linux fails in this.

>5) Portable

Linux fails in this.

>6) Easy to use

Linux fails in this big time.


>7) Did I say Stability?

Linux fails in this.

In article <4db3c04.0312011512.a67e235@posting.google.com> 
jimlascola@yahoo.com (Jim Lascola) wrote:

>Linux Sucks <linux@sucks.sucks> wrote in message news:<k3oisvc0qkcjsigmu7e8lut4emrna554lh@4ax.com>...
>> In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
>> shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:
>> 
>> >Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>> 
>> And stupid too.
>> An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.
>> 
>> Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.
>
>LOL Badmouthed and slandered by Sissy Boys who have to hide behind
>fake user names????
>
>Jim

Like yours, dickhead?

Linux makes you stupid, and you proved it.

Somewhere around the time of 12/01/2003 21:13, the world stopped and
listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:

> In article <oswyb.62618$de2.50004@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> 
> Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 20:06, the world stopped and
>>listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:
>>
>>
>>>In article <ezdyb.27988$xL.22236@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com> 
>>>Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 19:17, the world stopped and
>>>>listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
>>>>>shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>And stupid too.
>>>>>An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.
>>>>>
>>>>>Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Such as yourself?
>>>
>>>
>>>I don't support such a pathetic OS, I despise it and despise its
>>>advocates.
>>
>>Linux/BSD is more pathetic than Windows?  Ha.  Don't make me laugh.  We
>>all know Windows sucks and blows at the same time.
>>
>>
>>>But hey, I hit a nerve, you obviously are upset because you fit the
>>>above description.
>>
>>Upset?  Nah.
>>
>>
>>>Idiot.
>>>
>>
>>Winfaggot/
> 
> 
> Idiot.
> 

Winfaggot/

-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

Somewhere around the time of 12/01/2003 21:14, the world stopped and
listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:

> In article <2ba4b4eb.0312011421.7de4a395@posting.google.com> 
> alex@totallynerd.com (Alex) wrote:
> 
> 
>>Linux Sucks <linux@sucks.sucks> wrote in message news:<k3oisvc0qkcjsigmu7e8lut4emrna554lh@4ax.com>...
>>
>>>In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
>>>shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>>
>>>And stupid too.
>>>An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.
>>>
>>>Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.
>>
>>I generally don't throw bread at the trolls, but I gotta in this case.
>>

Ok, I'm going to shift the focus here off Linux onto my pet, FreeBSD.
Now, let's go down the hit list, shall we?

>>Here are my requirements for an OS:
>>1) Stability
> 
> 
> Linux fails in this.
> 
> 

FreeBSD is Far Far Far superior to Windows in this.

>>2) Cost efficient
> 
> 
> Linux fails in this.
> 
> 

FreeBSD is...well...Free.

>>3) Not locked into how someone else THINKS my computer should work
> 
> 
> Linux fails in this.
> 
> 

Windows fails in this, big time, but FreeBSD is superior in this.

>>4) Customizable
> 
> 
> Linux fails in this.
> 
> 

Really?  Then why am I limited to three different color schems in WinXPs
new interface?  They are Blue, Olive Green, and Silver.  Both Linux AND
FreeBSD are superior in this in I can have, what, 8, 9, or more window
managers?  Each with a different feel, different features, etc.?  All
which can be running AT THE SAME TIME?  The only thing that I see in
Windows is explorer.exe which dies on a regular basis.

>>5) Portable
> 
> 
> Linux fails in this.
> 

I don't see Windows running on Alpha, PowerPC, Big Iron, Sparc, etc
platforms.  Only Intel, and maybe Itainium, but that's Intel also.  Even
FreeBSD has PowerPC, Alpha, IA32, IA64, and Sparc platforms.  You lose
again, moron.

>>6) Easy to use
> 
> 
> Linux fails in this big time.
> 
> 
> 

Far be it for me to concede a point to a wintroll, but Windows is easy
to use.  But, that is its only strength.  Because if it wasn't, we
wouldn't have wintrolls/winfaggots like you roaming the internet because
you would still be trying to figure out how to get your modem to dial out.

>>7) Did I say Stability?
> 
> 
> Linux fails in this.
> 


Don't know about Linux, but *BSD machines OWN the netcraft uptime page:
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html  In fact, of the top 50
sites, Um...all 50 are one version or another of BSD, whether it be the
commercial BSD/OS or FreeBSD.


Ok, Mr. Linux Sucks, I want to hear something intelligent from you.  If
you respond with something moronic as 'Idiot' or some such bullshit, I'm
plonking you.  You have been given fair warning.


Oh, and here's a head start: http://www.freebsd.org


And if you want CD images:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/4.9/ for 4.9-RELEASE
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/5.1/ for 5.1-RELEASE


I'd recommend the 4.9-RELEASE for now though, 5.1 is still beta and is
not ready for primetime until 5.2 or 5.3.


--
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

Somewhere around the time of 12/01/2003 21:14, the world stopped and
listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:

> In article <4db3c04.0312011512.a67e235@posting.google.com> 
> jimlascola@yahoo.com (Jim Lascola) wrote:
> 
> 
>>Linux Sucks <linux@sucks.sucks> wrote in message news:<k3oisvc0qkcjsigmu7e8lut4emrna554lh@4ax.com>...
>>
>>>In article <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com> 
>>>shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>>
>>>And stupid too.
>>>An ancient OS stuck in the stone age mentality and technologies.
>>>
>>>Supported and used by bunch of freaks, assholes and incompetent idiots.
>>
>>LOL Badmouthed and slandered by Sissy Boys who have to hide behind
>>fake user names????
>>
>>Jim
> 
> 
> Like yours, dickhead?
> 
> Linux makes you stupid, and you proved it.
> 

Really?

Windows made you stupid, and you've been proving it ever since you
showed up here.

-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

Somewhere around the time of 12/01/2003 21:13, the world stopped and
listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:

> In article <Aswyb.62619$de2.29199@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> 
> Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 20:05, the world stopped and
>>listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:
>>
>>
>>>In article <Tqdyb.27975$xL.15543@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com> 
>>>Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 18:46, the world stopped and
>>>>listened as Shane D. Maudiss contributed this to humanity:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>>>
>>>>Another winfag troll.
>>>
>>>
>>>Idiot.
>>>
>>
>>Winfaggot/
> 
> 
> Idiot.
> 

Winfaggot/

-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

Somewhere around the time of 12/01/2003 07:45, the world stopped and
listened as chrisv contributed this to humanity:

> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 03:25:39 GMT, Daniel Rudy
> <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Somewhere around the time of 11/29/2003 18:46, the world stopped and
>>listened as Shane D. Maudiss contributed this to humanity:
>>
>>
>>>Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>>
>>Another winfag troll.
> 
> 
> Please.  Don't feed the trolls.
> 

Ok Chris, I'll stop playing with them.  I have to admit though, it was
more entertaining than Jerry Springer.


Later.
-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

Linux Sucks <linux@sucks.sucks> wrote:
>>Here are my requirements for an OS:
>>1) Stability

> Linux fails in this.

How?

>>2) Cost efficient

> Linux fails in this.

How?


>>3) Not locked into how someone else THINKS my computer should work

> Linux fails in this.

How?


>>4) Customizable

> Linux fails in this.

How?


>>5) Portable

> Linux fails in this.

How?


>>6) Easy to use

> Linux fails in this big time.

No it doesn't... and...

>>7) Did I say Stability?

> Linux fails in this.

How?

Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
> Ok Chris, I'll stop playing with them.  I have to admit though, it was
> more entertaining than Jerry Springer.

A drill through the skull's more entertaining than jerry springer...

shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote in message news:<eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com>...
> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !

Linux has messed up a bunch of CD drives and it seems to delete the
Windows partitions during installation. That is probably one of the
many reasons why less than 1% of the world's computer users care for
Linux. Nobody seems to want it, even at no cost. You get what you pay
for.

COLA_MODERATOR
---

COLA_MODERATOR wrote:

< snip >

Idiot
-- 
Microsoft's Guide To System Design:
        Let it get in YOUR way. The problem for your problem.
�

<spike1@freenet.co.uk> wrote:

> Linux Sucks <linux@sucks.sucks> wrote:
> >>Here are my requirements for an OS:
> >>1) Stability
> 
> > Linux fails in this.
> 
> How?
> 
> >>2) Cost efficient
> 
> > Linux fails in this.
> 
> How?
> 
> 
> >>3) Not locked into how someone else THINKS my computer should work
> 
> > Linux fails in this.
> 
> How?
> 
> 
> >>4) Customizable
> 
> > Linux fails in this.
> 
> How?
> 
> 
> >>5) Portable
> 
> > Linux fails in this.
> 
> How?
> 
> 
> >>6) Easy to use
> 
> > Linux fails in this big time.
> 
> No it doesn't... and...
> 
> >>7) Did I say Stability?
> 
> > Linux fails in this.
> 
> How?

Don't hold your breath for an answer...

Peter

On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:20:11 GMT, Daniel Rudy
<dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

><snip>

Idiot.

On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:22:00 GMT, Daniel Rudy
<dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:


><snip>

Idiot.

On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:25:18 GMT, Daniel Rudy
<dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

><snip>

Idiot.

On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:22:11 GMT, Daniel Rudy
<dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

><snip>

Idiot.

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 01:32:55 +0100, Peter K�hlmann
<Peter.Koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:

><snip>

Idiot.

begin  In <%WXyb.30231$BX3.16604@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com>, on
12/02/2003
   at 08:20 AM, Daniel Rudy
<dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> said:

>Far be it for me to concede a point to a wintroll, but Windows is
>easy to use. 

Do not confuse familiarity with ease of use. The ergonomics of windoze
are appalling.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action.  I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.

Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me.  Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org

begin  In <IYXyb.30233$BX3.22597@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com>, on
12/02/2003
   at 08:22 AM, Daniel Rudy
<dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> said:

>Windows made you stupid, 

How do you know he wasn't born that way? He do you know that his
illness wasn't the result of a head trauma?

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action.  I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.

Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me.  Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org

begin  In <7bdf38d7.0312021410.44875fd@posting.google.com>, on
12/02/2003
   at 02:10 PM, colamoderator@yahoo.com (COLA_MODERATOR) said:

>Linux has messed up a bunch of CD drives

You were supposed to take the CD out of the box before you put it in
the drive.

>and it seems to delete the Windows partitions during installation.

Please, tonto, come up with a new lie; that one has been overused. The
fact is that windoze is the one that removes competing operating
systems. Linux coexists quite nicely with other systems.

>That is probably one of the many reasons why less than 1% of the 
>world's computer users care for Linux.

That lie, also, has been over used. If you want to be amusing you must
come of with creative idiocy, not recycle the same old discredited BS.

*PLONK*

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action.  I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.

Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me.  Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Shane D. Maudiss
<shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com>
 wrote
on 29 Nov 2003 18:46:06 -0800
<eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com>:
> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !

[1] So was "Catcher in the Rye" and a few other works.
[2] Could you be any *less* specific?
[3] Dangerous to whom?
[4] Mmmm, Yahoo.  Almost as bad as Google, with respect to drive-by postings.
[5] Closest match found for "shanedmaudiss": "Shame, Maw, this" -- a
    rough translation would be "Gosh, COLA's just terrible, Mother." :-)
[6] One-liners were more the specialty of such experts as
    Bob Hope, Rodney Dangerfield, and Don Nickles.  Don't quit
    your day job... :-)

-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net -- it's night here in America, at the moment... :-)
It's still legal to go .sigless.

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, blackpikex
<blackpikex@yahoo.co.uk>
 wrote
on 1 Dec 2003 14:19:30 -0800
<f46cd410.0312011419.7d0b4f9f@posting.google.com>:
> shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com (Shane D. Maudiss) wrote in message news:<eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com>...
>> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
> 
> Paperclips are dangerous in the hands of a retard.

Especially when named "Clippy". :-)

[rest snipped]

-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.

Somewhere around the time of 12/02/2003 17:45, the world stopped and
listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:20:11 GMT, Daniel Rudy
> <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
> 
> 
>><snip>
> 
> 
> Idiot.
> 

What's the matter?  Did I get under your skin.  Oh, I did warn you.

PLONK

And another moron bites the dust.

-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

Somewhere around the time of 12/02/2003 18:45, the world stopped and
listened as Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz contributed this to humanity:

> begin  In <IYXyb.30233$BX3.22597@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com>, on
> 12/02/2003
>    at 08:22 AM, Daniel Rudy
> <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> said:
> 
> 
>>Windows made you stupid, 
> 
> 
> How do you know he wasn't born that way? He do you know that his
> illness wasn't the result of a head trauma?
> 

That's a very good point, but it seems that most of the trolls in here
use Windows...Must be genetic.

-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

Somewhere around the time of 12/02/2003 08:43, the world stopped and
listened as spike1@freenet.co.uk contributed this to humanity:

> Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
> 
>>Ok Chris, I'll stop playing with them.  I have to admit though, it was
>>more entertaining than Jerry Springer.
> 
> 
> A drill through the skull's more entertaining than jerry springer...

Unless of course you are watching the COLA channel.  Sweet and
refreshing, especially over ice.

-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

In article <Mjfzb.64497$Nt5.58055@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> 
Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

>Somewhere around the time of 12/02/2003 17:45, the world stopped and
>listened as Linux Sucks contributed this to humanity:
>> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 08:20:11 GMT, Daniel Rudy
>> <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>><snip>
>> 
>> 
>> Idiot.
>> 
>
>What's the matter?  Did I get under your skin.  Oh, I did warn you.
>

ROFL!

Looks like I spanked you so hard you had to follow every post of mine,
yet still get spanked.


>PLONK
>
>And another moron bites the dust.

Plonk This dickhead.


Idiot.

In article <Nlfzb.64501$Nt5.21371@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> 
Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

>Somewhere around the time of 12/02/2003 18:45, the world stopped and
>listened as Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz contributed this to humanity:
>
>> begin  In <IYXyb.30233$BX3.22597@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com>, on
>> 12/02/2003
>>    at 08:22 AM, Daniel Rudy
>> <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> said:
>> 
>> 
>>>Windows made you stupid, 
>> 
>> 
>> How do you know he wasn't born that way? He do you know that his
>> illness wasn't the result of a head trauma?
>> 
>
>That's a very good point, but it seems that most of the trolls in here
>use Windows...Must be genetic.

Idiot.

In article <6ofzb.64504$Nt5.5734@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> 
Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:

>Somewhere around the time of 12/02/2003 08:43, the world stopped and
>listened as spike1@freenet.co.uk contributed this to humanity:
>
>> Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
>> 
>>>Ok Chris, I'll stop playing with them.  I have to admit though, it was
>>>more entertaining than Jerry Springer.
>> 
>> 
>> A drill through the skull's more entertaining than jerry springer...
>
>Unless of course you are watching the COLA channel.  Sweet and
>refreshing, especially over ice.

Idiot.

Peter Hayes <me@privacy.net> wrote:
> Don't hold your breath for an answer...

I wasn't expecting one... The first how? probably put too much load on what
passes for a brain in his head, causing severe headaches.

Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
>> How do you know he wasn't born that way? He do you know that his
>> illness wasn't the result of a head trauma?
>> 

> That's a very good point, but it seems that most of the trolls in here
> use Windows...Must be genetic.

You're forgetting to correlate head trauma with windows use...
"AAAARGH! FUCKING BLUE SCREEN!" <bangs head against wall repeatedly>

Somewhere around the time of 12/03/2003 03:34, the world stopped and
listened as spike1@freenet.co.uk contributed this to humanity:

> Daniel Rudy <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote:
> 
>>>How do you know he wasn't born that way? He do you know that his
>>>illness wasn't the result of a head trauma?
>>>
> 
> 
>>That's a very good point, but it seems that most of the trolls in here
>>use Windows...Must be genetic.
> 
> 
> You're forgetting to correlate head trauma with windows use...
> "AAAARGH! FUCKING BLUE SCREEN!" <bangs head against wall repeatedly>

Hmm...  Never thought of it that way.  But why get up from your seat to
bang your head on the wall when you have a desk, monitor, keyboard, or
computer (If you are using a desktop) right there?  That seems to be the
more imeadiate action to take.  But then again, the people we are
talking about have no semblence of logical thought anyways...

-- 
Daniel Rudy

Remove nospam, invalid, and 0123456789 to reply.

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:31:42 +0000, spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote:

>Peter Hayes <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>> Don't hold your breath for an answer...
>
>I wasn't expecting one... The first how? probably put too much load on what
>passes for a brain in my head, causing severe headaches.

I agree.

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:00:29 -0500, The Ghost In The Machine wrote:

> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Shane D. Maudiss <shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com>
>  wrote
> on 29 Nov 2003 18:46:06 -0800
> <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com>:
>> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
> 
> [2] Could you be any *less* specific?

Sure:  "Linux has been banned."

Or, even better:  "Linux".

;-)

Oh, wait, was that a serious question?

> [6] One-liners were more the specialty of such experts as
>     Bob Hope, Rodney Dangerfield, and Don Nickles.  Don't quit your day
>     job... :-)

You're assuming that Shane _has_ a day job. ;-)

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Lyle H Gray
<gray@nospam.cs.umass.edu.invalid>
 wrote
on Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:39:15 GMT
<pan.2003.12.03.18.39.25.602719.13802@nospam.cs.umass.edu.invalid>:
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:00:29 -0500, The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
> 
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Shane D. Maudiss <shane_d_maudiss@yahoo.com>
>>  wrote
>> on 29 Nov 2003 18:46:06 -0800
>> <eea3eba2.0311291846.1f964ffd@posting.google.com>:
>>> Linux has been banned because it�s dangerous !
>> 
>> [2] Could you be any *less* specific?
> 
> Sure:  "Linux has been banned."
> 
> Or, even better:  "Linux".
> 
> ;-)
> 
> Oh, wait, was that a serious question?

Well, I was hoping to elicit a response from SDM but apparently
he's a drive-by yahoo poster. :-)

> 
>> [6] One-liners were more the specialty of such experts as
>>     Bob Hope, Rodney Dangerfield, and Don Nickles.  Don't quit your day
>>     job... :-)
> 
> You're assuming that Shane _has_ a day job. ;-)

True.  Unless this is it, in which case I'd have to wonder.

-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net -- mine pays reasonably well at least
It's still legal to go .sigless.