the only retards in the world who do not believe in intellectual property 
are the freetards in cola who have no intellect to protect.

even redhat knows that patents are valuable things.

BAWAWWAWWAAAA!!!!!!!



http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3929261/What+is+the+Value+of+Red+Hats+Patents.htm


What is the Value of Red Hat's Patents?
Linux leader Red Hat has now been recognized for the strength of its 
patents, what is it doing with all that intellectual property?

According to a recent study from The Patent Board, Red Hat's patent 
portfolio is now ranked 50th in the Information Technology category. The top 
patent holder in the IT category is IBM. Red Hat's position at number 50 is 
a 16 spot jump since November of 2010. Red Hat now holds 137 granted U.S. 
patents as part of its *intellectual property* portfolio.

On Monday 28 March 2011 16:08 Tiger Blood wrote:

> the only retards in the world who do not believe in intellectual property 
> are the freetards in cola who have no intellect to protect.

You have been listening too much and for too long to the cola clown who 
calls himself "flatfish" and a few hundred other nyms.

As far as the serious Linux enthusiasts here are concerned, I think that you 
will find that they recognise the three aspectswhich have collectively 
become known as "Intellectual Property", viz:-

1. Trademarks.  You will not find many here disputing that (for example) 
"Linux" is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.  They (we) recognise 
trademarks.

2.  Copyright.  What do you think protects FOSS if it is not copyright?
I doubt that any Linux enthusiast here do *not* recognise copyright (I 
exclude Raylopez99 etc, who seems to consider that S/W copyright 
infringements, aka "piracy", are OK)

3. Patents.  You will hear a lot said here about frivolous S/W patents.  I 
don't consider that Linux enthusiasts here "don't believe in them".  On the 
contrary, they simply think that the U.S. patents office is nuts for 
granting many of the S/W patents that it does, and some think that it's 
wrong to grant solely-software patents anyway.

So....where is your beef?  How about a reasoned response, and a bit less of 
the "follow my leader" wrt flatfish?

On 3/28/2011 11:08 AM, Tiger Blood wrote:
> the only retards in the world who do not believe in intellectual property
> are the freetards in cola who have no intellect to protect.
>
> even redhat knows that patents are valuable things.
>
> BAWAWWAWWAAAA!!!!!!!
>
>
>
> http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3929261/What+is+the+Value+of+Red+Hats+Patents.htm
>
>
> What is the Value of Red Hat's Patents?
> Linux leader Red Hat has now been recognized for the strength of its
> patents, what is it doing with all that intellectual property?
>
> According to a recent study from The Patent Board, Red Hat's patent
> portfolio is now ranked 50th in the Information Technology category. The top
> patent holder in the IT category is IBM. Red Hat's position at number 50 is
> a 16 spot jump since November of 2010. Red Hat now holds 137 granted U.S.
> patents as part of its *intellectual property* portfolio.


uh oh... another distro [H]orrific [H]ypocrite [H]omer can't use...



Good find, OSOK!

On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:07:35 -0400, DFS wrote:

> On 3/28/2011 11:08 AM, Tiger Blood wrote:
>> the only retards in the world who do not believe in intellectual property
>> are the freetards in cola who have no intellect to protect.
>>
>> even redhat knows that patents are valuable things.
>>
>> BAWAWWAWWAAAA!!!!!!!
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3929261/What+is+the+Value+of+Red+Hats+Patents.htm
>>
>>
>> What is the Value of Red Hat's Patents?
>> Linux leader Red Hat has now been recognized for the strength of its
>> patents, what is it doing with all that intellectual property?
>>
>> According to a recent study from The Patent Board, Red Hat's patent
>> portfolio is now ranked 50th in the Information Technology category. The top
>> patent holder in the IT category is IBM. Red Hat's position at number 50 is
>> a 16 spot jump since November of 2010. Red Hat now holds 137 granted U.S.
>> patents as part of its *intellectual property* portfolio.
> 
> 
> uh oh... another distro [H]orrific [H]ypocrite [H]omer can't use...
> 
> 
> 
> Good find, OSOK!

Let's domain squat on www.boycottRedhatLinux.org :)
Better hurry quick before Slimeowitz beats us to it.

"flatfish+++" <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote in message 
news:1emqxogguw7kh$.wl7qx81pe9ic.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:07:35 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>> On 3/28/2011 11:08 AM, Tiger Blood wrote:
>>> the only retards in the world who do not believe in intellectual 
>>> property
>>> are the freetards in cola who have no intellect to protect.
>>>
>>> even redhat knows that patents are valuable things.
>>>
>>> BAWAWWAWWAAAA!!!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3929261/What+is+the+Value+of+Red+Hats+Patents.htm
>>>
>>>
>>> What is the Value of Red Hat's Patents?
>>> Linux leader Red Hat has now been recognized for the strength of its
>>> patents, what is it doing with all that intellectual property?
>>>
>>> According to a recent study from The Patent Board, Red Hat's patent
>>> portfolio is now ranked 50th in the Information Technology category. The 
>>> top
>>> patent holder in the IT category is IBM. Red Hat's position at number 50 
>>> is
>>> a 16 spot jump since November of 2010. Red Hat now holds 137 granted 
>>> U.S.
>>> patents as part of its *intellectual property* portfolio.
>>
>>
>> uh oh... another distro [H]orrific [H]ypocrite [H]omer can't use...
>>
>>
>>
>> Good find, OSOK!
>
> Let's domain squat on www.boycottRedhatLinux.org :)
> Better hurry quick before Slimeowitz beats us to it.
>

One day "there's no such thing as intellectual property" and the next day 
there is.

Then another day software patents are bad and advocates refuse to 
acknowledge them while at the same time Redhat is building up their patent 
portfolio.

On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 20:38:21 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:

> "flatfish+++" <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote in message 
> news:1emqxogguw7kh$.wl7qx81pe9ic.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:07:35 -0400, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/28/2011 11:08 AM, Tiger Blood wrote:
>>>> the only retards in the world who do not believe in intellectual 
>>>> property
>>>> are the freetards in cola who have no intellect to protect.
>>>>
>>>> even redhat knows that patents are valuable things.
>>>>
>>>> BAWAWWAWWAAAA!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3929261/What+is+the+Value+of+Red+Hats+Patents.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is the Value of Red Hat's Patents?
>>>> Linux leader Red Hat has now been recognized for the strength of its
>>>> patents, what is it doing with all that intellectual property?
>>>>
>>>> According to a recent study from The Patent Board, Red Hat's patent
>>>> portfolio is now ranked 50th in the Information Technology category. The 
>>>> top
>>>> patent holder in the IT category is IBM. Red Hat's position at number 50 
>>>> is
>>>> a 16 spot jump since November of 2010. Red Hat now holds 137 granted 
>>>> U.S.
>>>> patents as part of its *intellectual property* portfolio.
>>>
>>>
>>> uh oh... another distro [H]orrific [H]ypocrite [H]omer can't use...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Good find, OSOK!
>>
>> Let's domain squat on www.boycottRedhatLinux.org :)
>> Better hurry quick before Slimeowitz beats us to it.
>>
> 
> One day "there's no such thing as intellectual property" and the next day 
> there is.
> 
> Then another day software patents are bad and advocates refuse to 
> acknowledge them while at the same time Redhat is building up their patent 
> portfolio.

Only in the Linux / FOSS community and in particular COLA.

These Linux advocates define the very term hypocrite.

Ezekiel wrote:

>One day "there's no such thing as intellectual property" and the next day 
>there is.

Your words, fsckwit, not ours.

Again, you *lie*.

Again, you *fail* in your Quixotic quest to paint us as "hypocrites".

>Then another day software patents are bad and advocates refuse to 
>acknowledge them while at the same time Redhat is building up their patent 
>portfolio.

I see that you're too God-damned *stupid* to understand that, as long
as software patents are a reality, a company like Redhat has little
choice but to build it's own portfolio as a defense.

There's *zero* wrong with anyone doing that, while at the same time
thinking that sofware patents are wrong.

stupid turd "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:c496p6hehht8od22ml8lm7cl7n8h9j2i8u@4ax.com...

more documented lies from the lying piece of shit turd.

"chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a lying piece of shit.