RHAT up $2.50 - comp.os.linux.advocacy

"Erico Di Gelato" <italianice@cosanostra.gov> wrote in message news:ce0ba9a7dbed31d1203fd9673ecce25f@news.teranews.com... > RHAT up $2.50 that's for the investors, but it is $799 per-server per-year for retards who still don't know windows server 2003 is cheaper, offers more value to the customer and has a lowet tco.

cola_moderator wrote: > "Erico Di Gelato" <italianice@cosanostra.gov> wrote in message > news:ce0ba9a7dbed31d1203fd9673ecce25f@news.teranews.com... >> RHAT up $2.50 > > that's for the investors, but it is $799 per-server per-year for retards > who still don't know windows server 2003 is cheaper, offers more value to > the customer and has a lowet tco. You are the only retard around here. Prove that windows trash 2003 is cheaper. -- A fatal exception 0E has occurred at 0028:C000BD1D in VXD VMM(01) + 0000AD1D. The current application will be terminated.

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:56:55 -0500, "cola_moderator" <cola_moderator@msn.com> wrote: >"Erico Di Gelato" <italianice@cosanostra.gov> wrote in message >news:ce0ba9a7dbed31d1203fd9673ecce25f@news.teranews.com... >> RHAT up $2.50 > >that's for the investors, but it is $799 per-server per-year for retards who >still don't know windows server 2003 is cheaper, offers more value to the >customer and has a lowet tco. > > Hey don't forget the $99 per-workstation-per-year on top of that. Surely it is laughable to see who's gonna pay for a workstation license rip-off like that. Oh yeah wait, you got to get some of your IT people to get a useless RHCE certificate that you gonna pay $$$ for it and still have to struggle crap and cryptic, goofy, stone age installation and support structure. There are suckers out there that fall for this scam that Linux is free.

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:06:47 GMT, Dr alw <alw@LinuxRules.org> wrote: >cola_moderator wrote: > >> "Erico Di Gelato" <italianice@cosanostra.gov> wrote in message >> news:ce0ba9a7dbed31d1203fd9673ecce25f@news.teranews.com... >>> RHAT up $2.50 >> >> that's for the investors, but it is $799 per-server per-year for retards >> who still don't know windows server 2003 is cheaper, offers more value to >> the customer and has a lowet tco. > >You are the only retard around here. You must be talking to your mirror image. >Prove that windows trash 2003 is >cheaper. Do the math, idiot. Wait a second, you cannot, you didn't go to school.

Dr alw wrote: > cola_moderator wrote: > >> "Erico Di Gelato" <italianice@cosanostra.gov> wrote in message >> news:ce0ba9a7dbed31d1203fd9673ecce25f@news.teranews.com... >>> RHAT up $2.50 >> >> that's for the investors, but it is $799 per-server per-year for retards >> who still don't know windows server 2003 is cheaper, offers more value to >> the customer and has a lowet tco. > > You are the only retard around here. Prove that windows trash 2003 is > cheaper. > > debian remains cheaper still

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:46:52 GMT, Dr alw <alw@LinuxRules.org> wrote: >COLA Facts wrote: > > >> You must be talking to your mirror image. > >Just at you. You're still in denial. >>>Prove that windows trash 2003 is >>>cheaper. >> >> Do the math, idiot. > >My math // flush Nobody wants to listen to your whining, get an education. >> Wait a second, you cannot, you didn't go to school. > >Are you sure? Yes.

COLA Facts wrote: > You must be talking to your mirror image. Just at you. > >>Prove that windows trash 2003 is >>cheaper. > > Do the math, idiot. My math says you winfucks are liars... the burden of proof lies on the one making the claim. > Wait a second, you cannot, you didn't go to school. Are you sure? -- A fatal exception 0E has occurred at 0028:C000BD1D in VXD VMM(01) + 0000AD1D. The current application will be terminated.

On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:42:23 GMT, bob <bobertlo@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >COLA Facts wrote: > >*snip* >> Nobody wants to listen to your whining, get an education. >*snip* > >get a life you trolltard Said the idiot who keeps snipping posts and editing them.

Fearing a spontaneous XP reboot, Dr alw mumbled this incantation: > cola_moderator wrote: > >> "Erico Di Gelato" <italianice@cosanostra.gov> wrote in message >> news:ce0ba9a7dbed31d1203fd9673ecce25f@news.teranews.com... >>> RHAT up $2.50 >> >> that's for the investors, but it is $799 per-server per-year for retards >> who still don't know windows server 2003 is cheaper, offers more value to >> the customer and has a lowet tco. > > You are the only retard around here. Prove that windows trash 2003 is > cheaper. And illustrate how it has more value. From what I've seen of it, it is full of features, but sometimes incredibly slow (in a cluster of 2 machines). Also the usual assortment of mysterious behaviors common to Microsoft software. -- No, I won't fix your Windows computer!

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:12:54 -0600, Lin�nut <lin�nut@bone.com> wrote: >Fearing a spontaneous XP reboot, Dr alw mumbled this incantation: > >> cola_moderator wrote: >> >>> "Erico Di Gelato" <italianice@cosanostra.gov> wrote in message >>> news:ce0ba9a7dbed31d1203fd9673ecce25f@news.teranews.com... >>>> RHAT up $2.50 >>> >>> that's for the investors, but it is $799 per-server per-year for retards >>> who still don't know windows server 2003 is cheaper, offers more value to >>> the customer and has a lowet tco. >> >> You are the only retard around here. Prove that windows trash 2003 is >> cheaper. > >And illustrate how it has more value. From what I've seen of it, it is >full of features, but sometimes incredibly slow (in a cluster of 2 >machines). > It means that you haven't seen anything. >Also the usual assortment of mysterious behaviors common to Microsoft >software. This coming from a Linux drone? Go read any newbie horror story when installing Linux.

COLA Facts <COLA@facts.not> wrote: > On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:42:23 GMT, bob <bobertlo@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >>COLA Facts wrote: >> >>*snip* >>> Nobody wants to listen to your whining, get an education. >>*snip* >> >>get a life you trolltard > > Said the idiot who keeps snipping posts and editing them. > Said the idiot who keeps snipping posts and editing them. At least I only shortened it by snipping out your b/s that was irrelevent to my response and left what I was replying to. You on the other hand, shortened one of the lines you commented on, taking out the well written constructive point then accused him of whining, and told him to get an education. So... /me clears his throat SHUT THE FUCK UP YOUR DOUCHE FUCKING TROLL TARD! -bob

On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 00:06:23 GMT, bobertlo@yahoo.com (bob) wrote: >COLA Facts <COLA@facts.not> wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:42:23 GMT, bob <bobertlo@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>COLA Facts wrote: >>> >>>*snip* >>>> Nobody wants to listen to your whining, get an education. >>>*snip* >>> >>>get a life you trolltard >> >> Said the idiot who keeps snipping posts and editing them. >> > >Said the idiot who keeps snipping posts and editing them. > Glad you agree. Now start repeating that again until you memorize it, dumbass. Next grow up, and start to get an education, after you get some help.

COLA Facts <COLA@facts.not> wrote: > On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 00:06:23 GMT, bobertlo@yahoo.com (bob) wrote: > >>COLA Facts <COLA@facts.not> wrote: >>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:42:23 GMT, bob <bobertlo@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>COLA Facts wrote: >>>> >>>>*snip* >>>>> Nobody wants to listen to your whining, get an education. >>>>*snip* >>>> >>>>get a life you trolltard >>> >>> Said the idiot who keeps snipping posts and editing them. >>> >> >>Said the idiot who keeps snipping posts and editing them. >> > > > Glad you agree. > > Now start repeating that again until you memorize it, dumbass. > > Next grow up, and start to get an education, after you get some help. > > said he who bitches about people who who snip posts after doing it much worse than any of them.