http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1468165


Do they even test this Ubuntu Linux turdware before releasing it
on the unsuspecting public?

It sure doesn't seem like it.


"My mouse and keyboard are not working(in Ubuntu 10.04)
oday I trying to install Ubuntu 10.04 but when I installing 10.04
from CD my keyboard works only in the startup menu when choosing
whether to install or check for disk errors. but when I get to the
actual installation and need to choose time zone, partitions and
such, both keyboard and mouse are not working.

My pc configuration is: motherboard intel d102gcc2, processor
Pentium D 2.8Ghz, ram 1gb. keyboard
a4tech(ps/2),mouse:eyesee(ps/2) optical"

Another person with the same problem....

" Re: My mouse and keyboard are not working(in Ubuntu 10.04)
I upgraded my Ubuntu to lucid lynx this morning and the keyboard
stopped working. It seems like a lot of people are having similar
problems. I was thinking of waiting for some time in case someone
fixes the problem. I'm using my other operating systems in the
meantime."

......And yet another person with the same problem.

"Just wanted to add that I'm having the same problem. Did the
upgrade from Karmic to Lucid, keyboard and mouse lock up whenever
I either click on my user name or highlight the name and hit
enter.

I was able to boot into rescue mode. I chose repair packages and
let the OS do it's thing. Then I selected resume normal boot,
entered username and password and "startx" and the mouse and
keyboard worked.

The I couldn't get on to the Internet. NIC seemed to be working,
status showed eth0 connected. IF config showed NIC was working,
but trying to ping the router was unsuccessful.

Anyway, when I rebooted I had the same lock up of the mouse and
keyboard as before. "

Moshe <goldee_loxnbagels@gmail.com> writes:

> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1468165
>
> Do they even test this Ubuntu Linux turdware before releasing it
> on the unsuspecting public?
>
> It sure doesn't seem like it.
>
> "My mouse and keyboard are not working(in Ubuntu 10.04)
> oday I trying to install Ubuntu 10.04 but when I installing 10.04
> from CD my keyboard works only in the startup menu when choosing
> whether to install or check for disk errors. but when I get to the
> actual installation and need to choose time zone, partitions and
> such, both keyboard and mouse are not working.
>
> My pc configuration is: motherboard intel d102gcc2, processor
> Pentium D 2.8Ghz, ram 1gb. keyboard
> a4tech(ps/2),mouse:eyesee(ps/2) optical"
>
> Another person with the same problem....
>
> " Re: My mouse and keyboard are not working(in Ubuntu 10.04)
> I upgraded my Ubuntu to lucid lynx this morning and the keyboard
> stopped working. It seems like a lot of people are having similar
> problems. I was thinking of waiting for some time in case someone
> fixes the problem. I'm using my other operating systems in the
> meantime."
>
> .....And yet another person with the same problem.
>
> "Just wanted to add that I'm having the same problem. Did the
> upgrade from Karmic to Lucid, keyboard and mouse lock up whenever
> I either click on my user name or highlight the name and hit
> enter.
>
> I was able to boot into rescue mode. I chose repair packages and
> let the OS do it's thing. Then I selected resume normal boot,
> entered username and password and "startx" and the mouse and
> keyboard worked.
>
> The I couldn't get on to the Internet. NIC seemed to be working,
> status showed eth0 connected. IF config showed NIC was working,
> but trying to ping the router was unsuccessful.
>
> Anyway, when I rebooted I had the same lock up of the mouse and
> keyboard as before. "

The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL that
was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" and then
someone, Homer maybe (not sure), gave Smartie an xorg.conf to get his
video working. Apparently Creepy had been "xorg'less" for ages - if you
believe a word he ever says.

On Sun, 02 May 2010 17:12:52 +0200, Hadron wrote:

> Moshe <goldee_loxnbagels@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1468165
>>
>> Do they even test this Ubuntu Linux turdware before releasing it
>> on the unsuspecting public?
>>
>> It sure doesn't seem like it.
>>
>> "My mouse and keyboard are not working(in Ubuntu 10.04)
>> oday I trying to install Ubuntu 10.04 but when I installing 10.04
>> from CD my keyboard works only in the startup menu when choosing
>> whether to install or check for disk errors. but when I get to the
>> actual installation and need to choose time zone, partitions and
>> such, both keyboard and mouse are not working.
>>
>> My pc configuration is: motherboard intel d102gcc2, processor
>> Pentium D 2.8Ghz, ram 1gb. keyboard
>> a4tech(ps/2),mouse:eyesee(ps/2) optical"
>>
>> Another person with the same problem....
>>
>> " Re: My mouse and keyboard are not working(in Ubuntu 10.04)
>> I upgraded my Ubuntu to lucid lynx this morning and the keyboard
>> stopped working. It seems like a lot of people are having similar
>> problems. I was thinking of waiting for some time in case someone
>> fixes the problem. I'm using my other operating systems in the
>> meantime."
>>
>> .....And yet another person with the same problem.
>>
>> "Just wanted to add that I'm having the same problem. Did the
>> upgrade from Karmic to Lucid, keyboard and mouse lock up whenever
>> I either click on my user name or highlight the name and hit
>> enter.
>>
>> I was able to boot into rescue mode. I chose repair packages and
>> let the OS do it's thing. Then I selected resume normal boot,
>> entered username and password and "startx" and the mouse and
>> keyboard worked.
>>
>> The I couldn't get on to the Internet. NIC seemed to be working,
>> status showed eth0 connected. IF config showed NIC was working,
>> but trying to ping the router was unsuccessful.
>>
>> Anyway, when I rebooted I had the same lock up of the mouse and
>> keyboard as before. "
> 
> The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL that
> was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" and then
> someone, Homer maybe (not sure), gave Smartie an xorg.conf to get his
> video working. Apparently Creepy had been "xorg'less" for ages - if you
> believe a word he ever says.

I don't believe anything the Linux vermin in COLA claim.
They are proven to be liars.

Judging by the bug reports, this Ubuntu 10.04 LTS seems to be an
even bigger turd than the 9.10 version which was pretty bad when
released.

So much for LTS..

"Moshe" <goldee_loxnbagels@gmail.com> schreef in bericht 
news:16t9mygkhkyvp$.b2mowd9ti3um$.dlg@40tude.net...
>
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1468165
>
>
> Do they even test this Ubuntu Linux turdware before releasing it
> on the unsuspecting public?
>
> It sure doesn't seem like it.
>
>
> "My mouse and keyboard are not working(in Ubuntu 10.04)

Same here, only the mouse is working but I can't login because of the 
keyboard that isn't working!
The "crash_O'_matic" Ubuntu 10.04 is officially declared dead and has to be 
removed.
I bet that of all the downloaded Ubuntu 10.04 crapware editions 60% will be 
removed within a few days!

> oday I trying to install Ubuntu 10.04 but when I installing 10.04
> from CD my keyboard works only in the startup menu when choosing
> whether to install or check for disk errors. but when I get to the
> actual installation and need to choose time zone, partitions and
> such, both keyboard and mouse are not working.
>
> My pc configuration is: motherboard intel d102gcc2, processor
> Pentium D 2.8Ghz, ram 1gb. keyboard
> a4tech(ps/2),mouse:eyesee(ps/2) optical"
>
> Another person with the same problem....
>
> " Re: My mouse and keyboard are not working(in Ubuntu 10.04)
> I upgraded my Ubuntu to lucid lynx this morning and the keyboard
> stopped working. It seems like a lot of people are having similar
> problems. I was thinking of waiting for some time in case someone
> fixes the problem. I'm using my other operating systems in the
> meantime."
>
> .....And yet another person with the same problem.
>
> "Just wanted to add that I'm having the same problem. Did the
> upgrade from Karmic to Lucid, keyboard and mouse lock up whenever
> I either click on my user name or highlight the name and hit
> enter.
>
> I was able to boot into rescue mode. I chose repair packages and
> let the OS do it's thing. Then I selected resume normal boot,
> entered username and password and "startx" and the mouse and
> keyboard worked.
>
> The I couldn't get on to the Internet. NIC seemed to be working,
> status showed eth0 connected. IF config showed NIC was working,
> but trying to ping the router was unsuccessful.
>
> Anyway, when I rebooted I had the same lock up of the mouse and
> keyboard as before. "
>

On 2010-05-02, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>
> The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL
> that was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" 

"All lied" you say? Okay then, time to put your money where your mouth
is. Point to *one single post* where *I* claimed that having no
xorg.conf "works for me". regardless of the hardware.

If you can't, I'll leave it up to chrisv to document yet another
Hadron lie.

-- 
BOFH excuse #58:

high pressure system failure

TomB pulled this Usenet boner:

> On 2010-05-02, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>
>> The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL
>> that was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" 
>
> "All lied" you say? Okay then, time to put your money where your mouth
> is. Point to *one single post* where *I* claimed that having no
> xorg.conf "works for me". regardless of the hardware.
>
> If you can't, I'll leave it up to chrisv to document yet another
> Hadron lie.

It's a troll, through and through.  Only a true arsehole would sneer
at various actual experiences and lump them all into one category,
and then claimed they all lied.  The man is a sociopath (as is the
poster he is fluffing).

My Acer laptop has no xorg.conf; my home server has one.  As I have
already noted.  Different setups for different combinations of chipset and
monitors.  Who'd 'ave thunk it?

By the way, it is useless to ask that thick plank for links.
I'm assuming the question is rhetorical, TomB.

-- 
You get along very well with everyone except animals and people.

On 2010-05-02, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> claimed:
> On 2010-05-02, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>
>> The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL
>> that was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" 
>
> "All lied" you say? Okay then, time to put your money where your mouth
> is. Point to *one single post* where *I* claimed that having no
> xorg.conf "works for me". regardless of the hardware.
>
> If you can't, I'll leave it up to chrisv to document yet another
> Hadron lie.

You may have never said it. But I did. I stand by it. Here's what I
have:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
kcsmart@acermobile:~ $ dir /etc/X11
app-defaults             fonts    rgb.txt   X      xkb         Xsession    Xsession.options  Xwrapper.config
default-display-manager  openbox  sessions  xinit  Xresources  Xsession.d  XvMCConfig

kcsmart@acermobile:~ $ locate xorg.conf
/usr/share/man/man5/xorg.conf.5.gz
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A manpage. That's it. It's the same on the other netbook. I'm not sure
if the desktop has an xorg.conf or not. I connect to it from the
netbooks, almost never sitting in front of it any more. So I don't even
care if it has X running or not.

Here's what /does/ work for me on both netbooks, placed in a login
script:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
xrandr --addmode VGA1 1024x768
xrandr --addmode LVDS1 1024x600
xrandr --output VGA1 --mode 1024x768
xrandr --output LVDS1 --mode 1024x600
xrandr --output VGA1 --left-of LVDS1
---------------------------------------------------------------------

If I have the external monitor connected, it will make it 1024x768 and
place it, with the taskbar on it, to the left of the netbook screen,
which is set to 1024x600. If the external monitor isn't connected, it
basically sets it up as 1024x600 for the netbook, leaves the taskbar
there and ignores the rest.

If message-ID Quirk really used linux he'd know these things are
possible. Since "Hadron" Qualig has never really used linux he can't
know these things. He thinks since everything has to be set up using a
gooey on Windwoes then it also has to be done that way on everything
else.

Don't expect Queef to show any message IDs where you claimed anything.
He can't. So he'll settle for calling you a liar without any evidence
to support it.

-- 
Ethernet n.: something used to catch the etherbunny.
Aspire One, Linux Mint 8 (LXDE)
Friends don't let friends use Windows

TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> writes:

> On 2010-05-02, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>
>> The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL
>> that was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" 
>
> "All lied" you say? Okay then, time to put your money where your mouth
> is. Point to *one single post* where *I* claimed that having no
> xorg.conf "works for me". regardless of the hardware.
>
> If you can't, I'll leave it up to chrisv to document yet another
> Hadron lie.

Don't be such so pathetic. I dont even know if you were in that
thread. The gist of the statement is true and you know it.

Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> writes:

> On 2010-05-02, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> claimed:
>> On 2010-05-02, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>>
>>> The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL
>>> that was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" 
>>
>> "All lied" you say? Okay then, time to put your money where your mouth
>> is. Point to *one single post* where *I* claimed that having no
>> xorg.conf "works for me". regardless of the hardware.
>>
>> If you can't, I'll leave it up to chrisv to document yet another
>> Hadron lie.
>
> You may have never said it. But I did. I stand by it. Here's what I
> have:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> kcsmart@acermobile:~ $ dir /etc/X11
> app-defaults             fonts    rgb.txt   X      xkb         Xsession    Xsession.options  Xwrapper.config
> default-display-manager  openbox  sessions  xinit  Xresources  Xsession.d  XvMCConfig
>
> kcsmart@acermobile:~ $ locate xorg.conf
> /usr/share/man/man5/xorg.conf.5.gz
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> A manpage. That's it. It's the same on the other netbook. I'm not sure
> if the desktop has an xorg.conf or not. I connect to it from the
> netbooks, almost never sitting in front of it any more. So I don't even
> care if it has X running or not.
>
> Here's what /does/ work for me on both netbooks, placed in a login
> script:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> xrandr --addmode VGA1 1024x768
> xrandr --addmode LVDS1 1024x600
> xrandr --output VGA1 --mode 1024x768
> xrandr --output LVDS1 --mode 1024x600
> xrandr --output VGA1 --left-of LVDS1
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> If I have the external monitor connected, it will make it 1024x768 and
> place it, with the taskbar on it, to the left of the netbook screen,
> which is set to 1024x600. If the external monitor isn't connected, it
> basically sets it up as 1024x600 for the netbook, leaves the taskbar
> there and ignores the rest.
>
> If message-ID Quirk really used linux he'd know these things are
> possible. Since "Hadron" Qualig has never really used linux he can't
> know these things. He thinks since everything has to be set up using a
> gooey on Windwoes then it also has to be done that way on everything
> else.
>
> Don't expect Queef to show any message IDs where you claimed anything.
> He can't. So he'll settle for calling you a liar without any evidence
> to support it.

I know all that is possible and have posted on it in the past. What the
hell are you talking about?

Clogwog wrote:

> Same here, only the mouse is working but I can't login because of the 
> keyboard that isn't working!

Same here.

-- 
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC

....I'm a master of Kung Fu, Tofu, Snafu...and plain foo.

On 2010-05-02, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
> TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 2010-05-02, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>>
>>> The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL
>>> that was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" 
>>
>> "All lied" you say? Okay then, time to put your money where your mouth
>> is. Point to *one single post* where *I* claimed that having no
>> xorg.conf "works for me". regardless of the hardware.
>>
>> If you can't, I'll leave it up to chrisv to document yet another
>> Hadron lie.
>
> Don't be such so pathetic. I dont even know if you were in that
> thread. The gist of the statement is true and you know it.

No, the statement is yet another one of your pathetic trolls. Most
comments in that particular thread (including mine) were about X being
able to run without a configuration file in a lot of cases, but
certainly not all. And that's a fact.

-- 
BOFH excuse #233:

TCP/IP UDP alarm threshold is set too low.

TomB pulled this Usenet boner:

> On 2010-05-02, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>> TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 2010-05-02, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>>>>
>>>> The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL
>>>> that was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" 
>>>
>>> "All lied" you say? Okay then, time to put your money where your mouth
>>> is. Point to *one single post* where *I* claimed that having no
>>> xorg.conf "works for me". regardless of the hardware.
>>>
>>> If you can't, I'll leave it up to chrisv to document yet another
>>> Hadron lie.
>>
>> Don't be such so pathetic. I dont even know if you were in that
>> thread. The gist of the statement is true and you know it.

Nope.  Not even the *gist* is true.  "And you know it."  LOL.

> No, the statement is yet another one of your pathetic trolls. Most
> comments in that particular thread (including mine) were about X being
> able to run without a configuration file in a lot of cases, but
> certainly not all. And that's a fact.

Indeed.  It is truly strange that "Hadron" doesn't know that his system
might not require an Xorg.  It's right on the wiki page:

   http://wiki.debian.org/Xorg

   What if I do not have an xorg config file?

   If xorg.conf is missing for some reason, Xorg will probe your hardware on
   every startup. Though this works fine in most cases, some settings remain
   inaccessible.  ====================================

-- 
Q:	Why did the chicken cross the road?
A:	He was giving it last rites.

"Tattoo Vampire" <sitting@this.computer> schreef in bericht 
news:qaja2ofuk1d4$.dlg@sitting.at.this.computer...
> Clogwog wrote:
>
>> Same here, only the mouse is working but I can't login because of the
>> keyboard that isn't working!
>
> Same here.
>
I tried again and now it has a working keyboard:
Installed / upgraded VMware Workstation 6.5 to 7.0.0 build-203739
Installed ubuntu-910.7z from
http://www.vmware.com/appliances/
VariableAdmin.com version
Upgraded to ubuntu 10.04
Firefox was still a mess, so I use Opera instead.
Standard sounddevice was not recognised, but it works.(?)
--
<snip>

Clogwog wrote:

> I tried again and now it has a working keyboard:
> Installed / upgraded VMware Workstation 6.5 to 7.0.0 build-203739
> Installed ubuntu-910.7z from
> http://www.vmware.com/appliances/
> VariableAdmin.com version
> Upgraded to ubuntu 10.04
> Firefox was still a mess, so I use Opera instead.
> Standard sounddevice was not recognised, but it works.(?)

I had an existing VM running Ubuntu 9.10 and I'm trying the upgrade option
right now...

-- 
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC

....I'm a master of Kung Fu, Tofu, Snafu...and plain foo.

Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> I had an existing VM running Ubuntu 9.10 and I'm trying the upgrade option
> right now...

Pffft. Restarted after the upgrade and the keyboard doesn't work.

I'll stuck with Mint, I think.

-- 
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC

....I'm a master of Kung Fu, Tofu, Snafu...and plain foo.

On Sun, 2 May 2010 16:46:25 -0400, Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> 
>> I had an existing VM running Ubuntu 9.10 and I'm trying the upgrade option
>> right now...
> 
> Pffft. Restarted after the upgrade and the keyboard doesn't work.
> 
> I'll stuck with Mint, I think.

Amazing that they can let a steaming pile of crap like this Ubuntu
10.04 out loose in the community.

You might want to try PCLOS 2010 latest that was just released.

Reports are very positive for that distribution.

On Sun, 02 May 2010 16:49:25 -0400, Moshe wrote:

> On Sun, 2 May 2010 16:46:25 -0400, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> 
>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>> 
>>> I had an existing VM running Ubuntu 9.10 and I'm trying the upgrade
>>> option right now...
>> 
>> Pffft. Restarted after the upgrade and the keyboard doesn't work.
>> 
>> I'll stuck with Mint, I think.
> 
> Amazing that they can let a steaming pile of crap like this Ubuntu 10.04
> out loose in the community.

It's amazing that you think anyone takes you seriously.

And, AGAIN, 10.04 is doing well compared to previous Ubuntu releases, 
including the last LTS.

> 
> You might want to try PCLOS 2010 latest that was just released.
> 
> Reports are very positive for that distribution.

Yes, there are positive reports. There are also  problems reported in the 
forums.


-- 
Rick

"Rick" <none@mail.invalid> schreef in bericht 
news:eN-dnQgIfKU8bUDWnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@supernews.com...
> On Sun, 02 May 2010 16:49:25 -0400, Moshe wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2 May 2010 16:46:25 -0400, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>
>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>>
>>>> I had an existing VM running Ubuntu 9.10 and I'm trying the upgrade
>>>> option right now...
>>>
>>> Pffft. Restarted after the upgrade and the keyboard doesn't work.
>>>
>>> I'll stuck with Mint, I think.
>>
>> Amazing that they can let a steaming pile of crap like this Ubuntu 10.04
>> out loose in the community.
>
> It's amazing that you think anyone takes you seriously.
>
> And, AGAIN, 10.04 is doing well compared to previous Ubuntu releases,
> including the last LTS.
>
>>
>> You might want to try PCLOS 2010 latest that was just released.
>>
>> Reports are very positive for that distribution.
>
> Yes, there are positive reports. There are also  problems reported in the
> forums.
>
You completely ignore the issue at hand: the inability to login because of a 
keyboard that doesn't work in Ubuntu 10.04, which worked well in version 
9.10.
Like all you COLA loon vermin, you have nothing to offer to help us out, you 
trolling (p)Rick!
It has been noted that you have not one tiny suggestion to make.
As always you utter useless off topic tales.
You are a windbag (p)Rick!

On 2010-05-02, Moshe <goldee_loxnbagels@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 02 May 2010 17:12:52 +0200, Hadron wrote:
>
>> Moshe <goldee_loxnbagels@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1468165
[deletia]
>> The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL that
>> was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" and then
>> someone, Homer maybe (not sure), gave Smartie an xorg.conf to get his
>> video working. Apparently Creepy had been "xorg'less" for ages - if you
>> believe a word he ever says.
>
> I don't believe anything the Linux vermin in COLA claim.

I don't believe anything the Lemming vermin in COLA claim.

They are proven liars.

OTOH, you can try Ubuntu for free risk free. You don't have to 
listen to fear mongers. You can make up your own mind. This is
how it's always been.

You can even boot off of the CD and not bother your current OS.

-- 
     If it were really about "being good", then Microsoft would       ||| 
have been put out of business by Apple before the first line of      / | \
the Linux kernel was ever written.

On Mon, 03 May 2010 15:37:33 +0200, Clogwog wrote:

> "Rick" <none@mail.invalid> schreef in bericht
> news:eN-dnQgIfKU8bUDWnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@supernews.com...
>> On Sun, 02 May 2010 16:49:25 -0400, Moshe wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2 May 2010 16:46:25 -0400, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I had an existing VM running Ubuntu 9.10 and I'm trying the upgrade
>>>>> option right now...
>>>>
>>>> Pffft. Restarted after the upgrade and the keyboard doesn't work.
>>>>
>>>> I'll stuck with Mint, I think.
>>>
>>> Amazing that they can let a steaming pile of crap like this Ubuntu
>>> 10.04 out loose in the community.
>>
>> It's amazing that you think anyone takes you seriously.
>>
>> And, AGAIN, 10.04 is doing well compared to previous Ubuntu releases,
>> including the last LTS.
>>
>>
>>> You might want to try PCLOS 2010 latest that was just released.
>>>
>>> Reports are very positive for that distribution.
>>
>> Yes, there are positive reports. There are also  problems reported in
>> the forums.
>>
> You completely ignore the issue at hand: the inability to login because
> of a keyboard that doesn't work in Ubuntu 10.04, which worked well in
> version 9.10.

I'm not ignoring it. I am sure the bug exists.

> Like all you COLA loon vermin, you have nothing to offer to help us out,
> you trolling (p)Rick!

Did you wake up from your nap too soon, Kindergarten Boy?

> It has been noted that you have not one tiny suggestion to make. As
> always you utter useless off topic tales. You are a windbag (p)Rick!

Read the numbers and wail, Kindergarten Boy. 10.04 is doing well compared 
to previous releases of Ubunto, including the last LTS.

And if you really wanted help with the bug, you ask in an appropriate 
forum/group.

-- 
Rick

TomB wrote:

> Larry lied:
>>
>> TomB writes:
>>>
>>> Larry lied:
>>>>
>>>> The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL
>>>> that was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" 
>>>
>>> "All lied" you say? Okay then, time to put your money where your mouth
>>> is. Point to *one single post* where *I* claimed that having no
>>> xorg.conf "works for me". regardless of the hardware.
>>>
>>> If you can't, I'll leave it up to chrisv to document yet another
>>> Hadron lie.
>>
>> Don't be such so pathetic. I dont even know if you were in that
>> thread. The gist of the statement is true and you know it.
>
>No, the statement is yet another one of your pathetic trolls. Most
>comments in that particular thread (including mine) were about X being
>able to run without a configuration file in a lot of cases, but
>certainly not all. And that's a fact.

Exactly.  We were there, and we know that Larry is lying.

"Hadron" is a liar.  "Hadron" is a POS.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> TomB pulled this Usenet boner:
>>
>> Larry lied:
>>>
>>> The wonders of "works for me" xorg.conf'less setups no doubt. LOL
>>> that was a GREAT thread. All lied and said it worked "for them" 

Another Quack bald-faced lie.  Documented.

>> "All lied" you say? Okay then, time to put your money where your mouth
>> is. Point to *one single post* where *I* claimed that having no
>> xorg.conf "works for me". regardless of the hardware.
>>
>> If you can't, I'll leave it up to chrisv to document yet another
>> Hadron lie.

The lying POS won't even be able to show *one* of us lying about it,
much less "all".  

Message-ID Larry is such a buffoon, such a pathetic, shitty little
loser.  LOL

>It's a troll, through and through.  Only a true arsehole would sneer
>at various actual experiences and lump them all into one category,
>and then claimed they all lied.  The man is a sociopath (as is the
>poster he is fluffing).

His mother should be so proud, of raising that POS.

>By the way, it is useless to ask that thick plank for links.
>I'm assuming the question is rhetorical, TomB.