Dumb Willie wrote:

"Like he did in India?
You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to 
fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in 
an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."



Where's the evidence?

DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Dumb Willie wrote:
>
> "Like he did in India?
> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to 
> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in 
> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
>
> Where's the evidence?

Start here:

   http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/

-- 
The first sign of maturity is the discovery that the volume knob also turns to
the left.

Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Chris Ahlstrom
on 30/1/2011 23:43 shattered the silence with:

> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>
>> "Like he did in India?
>> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to 
>> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in 
>> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
>>
>> Where's the evidence?
>
> Start here:
>
>    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/

Obviously the dumb M$ zealot doesn't even know how to use the M$ search
engine "Bing" (as it probably wouldn't use Google!)
And DumbForSure calls me "Dumb Willie"! Too funny! LOL
See sig. ;-)

-- 
Don't confuse a wintroll with facts, its mind is already made up.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> DFS wrote this:
>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>
>> "Like he did in India? You know, when the popular press trumpeted
>> that Gates gave $100m to fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report
>> was that he also gave $421m in an attempt to stop Linux being
>> adopted."
>>
>> Where's the evidence?
>
> Start here:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/

[quote]
Gates gives $100m to fight HIV, $421m to fight Linux
News from India and some letters
By Thomas C Greene in Washington DC
Posted in Software, 13th November 2002 04:23 GMT

We do hate to rain on a high-profile corporate love-fest, but we have to 
point out that in addition to the much trumpeted $100 million Billg has 
donated to India's fight against HIV, he's funding the Microsoft jihad 
against Linux to the far more impressive tune of $421 million. That 
means that Linux is more than four times worse than AIDS to Billg and 
his happy Redmond family.
[/quote]

Jihad against Linux is 4 times more important than funding AIDS research 
further, to find a cure. Hmmmmm ....

Whilst souls are perishing due to the lack of a cure, preventing Linux 
from falling into the hands of others, to keep the monopoly going so 
others may purchase prone to virus software at greater cost is more 
important.

-- 
HPT

On 1/30/2011 6:43 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>
>> "Like he did in India?
>> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to
>> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in
>> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
>>
>> Where's the evidence?
>
> Start here:
>
>     http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/


Dumb Willie made two claims.  When will he (or someone else) pony up all 
the evidence for both claims?

DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
> On 1/30/2011 6:43 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> > DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >
> >> Dumb Willie wrote:
> >>
> >> "Like he did in India?
> >> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to
> >> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in
> >> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
> >>
> >> Where's the evidence?
> >
> > Start here:
> >
> >     http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/


> Dumb Willie made two claims.  When will he (or someone else) pony up all 
> the evidence for both claims?

Why don't you just stalk some evidence, you perverted stalking freak?

On 1/30/2011 7:05 PM, High Plains Thumper wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> DFS wrote this:
>>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>>
>>> "Like he did in India? You know, when the popular press trumpeted
>>> that Gates gave $100m to fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report
>>> was that he also gave $421m in an attempt to stop Linux being
>>> adopted."
>>>
>>> Where's the evidence?
>>
>> Start here:
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/
>
> [quote]
> Gates gives $100m to fight HIV, $421m to fight Linux
> News from India and some letters
> By Thomas C Greene in Washington DC
> Posted in Software, 13th November 2002 04:23 GMT
>
> We do hate to rain on a high-profile corporate love-fest, but we have to
> point out that in addition to the much trumpeted $100 million Billg has
> donated to India's fight against HIV, he's funding the Microsoft jihad
> against Linux to the far more impressive tune of $421 million. That
> means that Linux is more than four times worse than AIDS to Billg and
> his happy Redmond family.
> [/quote]
>
> Jihad against Linux is 4 times more important than funding AIDS research
> further, to find a cure. Hmmmmm ....

Oh look, the HPT shitbag refused to post the salient quote:

"Billg's personal $100 million goes to health initiatives over ten 
years, while $421 million of Microsoft's money goes..."

blink... "Microsoft's money"... huh?

But just above, Dumb Willie said it was $421M of Gates' money...

Another pile of trash Linux liar thinks he can get away with his scummy 
lies about Gates\MS\Windows.





> Whilst souls are perishing due to the lack of a cure, preventing Linux
> from falling into the hands of others, to keep the monopoly going so
> others may purchase prone to virus software at greater cost is more
> important.

Gates Foundation gives $10 billion for vaccines...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703389004575032741056727552.html?mod=djemalertNEWS



.... while the soulless, evil scum at the Free Software Foundation use 
the Haiti earthquake to promote their shitty software.

http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/free-software-haiti-aid

Chris Ahlstrom stated in post ii4t0n$d8k$4@news.eternal-september.org on
1/30/11 4:43 PM:

> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>> 
>> "Like he did in India?
>> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to
>> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in
>> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
>> 
>> Where's the evidence?
> 
> Start here:
> 
>    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/

Would you expect Shuttleworth to donate to Windows and OS X development?
Would you call him out on his actions if he donated his own money toward OSS
development.

Oh.

He does.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

On 1/30/2011 7:04 PM, William Poaster wrote:


> "Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves.
> Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods."
> -- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --


And Linux can't beat "low-quality goods"?  Why not?

Everywhere else in life consumers stampede to free, high-quality 
products... but Lunix crapware can only get 1 in 100 users to adopt it?


MS is doomed.

DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 1/30/2011 6:43 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>>
>>> "Like he did in India?
>>> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to
>>> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in
>>> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
>>>
>>> Where's the evidence?
>>
>> Start here:
>>
>>     http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/
>
> Dumb Willie made two claims.  When will he (or someone else) pony up all 
> the evidence for both claims?

I dunno.  That story is from 2002, so no doubt it was well-covered in COLA,
and denied denied denied by you.

You know, I wouldn't be surprised if "Hadron" has made his mother cry in the
past.

But I definitely wouldn't be surprised to find out you made your mother
*scared*.

I'm sick of your relentless nastiness.  It's of a completely different order
of foulness from anything I've seen in this newsgroup.

Buh bye for now.

-- 
What I want is all of the power and none of the responsibility.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> I'm sick of your relentless nastiness.  It's of a completely different order
> of foulness from anything I've seen in this newsgroup.

If we were to hand out a Biggest Anus in COLA award, it would be a tie
between d00F and Hadron Queeg.
-- 
Best regards,
[tv]
Owner, Trollus Amongus LLC

Chuck Norris can judge a book by its cover

Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> wrote:
> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> > Dumb Willie made two claims.  When will he (or someone else) pony up all 
> > the evidence for both claims?

> I dunno.  That story is from 2002, so no doubt it was well-covered in COLA,
> and denied denied denied by you.

> You know, I wouldn't be surprised if "Hadron" has made his mother cry in the
> past.

> But I definitely wouldn't be surprised to find out you made your mother
> *scared*.

> I'm sick of your relentless nastiness.  It's of a completely different order
> of foulness from anything I've seen in this newsgroup.

> Buh bye for now.

Don't let your guard down in real life.  No telling what that stalking
freak DFS might do.
 

Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> I'm sick of your relentless nastiness.  It's of a completely different order
>> of foulness from anything I've seen in this newsgroup.
>
> If we were to hand out a Biggest Anus in COLA award, it would be a tie
> between d00F and Hadron Queeg.

Except that "Hadron" occasionally seems happy.  :-D

Both are relentless rivers of bile.  Incredible.

-- 
Humans do claim a great deal for that particular emotion (love).
		-- Spock, "The Lights of Zetar", stardate 5725.6

Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
[snip DooFy's blatant denialism and savage belligerence]

> I'm sick of your relentless nastiness.  It's of a completely different
> order of foulness from anything I've seen in this newsgroup.
>
> Buh bye for now.

I'm amazed anyone let's their "DFS" filters expire. Ever.

The bastard's pure evil, an unbelievable denialist, and now apparently
he's even stooped to cyberstalking and intimidation. And for what? To
defend a damned /software company/, and the world's most disreputable
one at that - a company that's almost as evil as he is. The psycho
definitely needs institutionalised. It's just a question of whether they
use handcuffs or a straitjacket.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 37 days  | about GNU/Linux."

Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
[snip DooFy's vicious vitriol]

> But I definitely wouldn't be surprised to find out you made your
> mother *scared*.

I wouldn't be surprised if he was a wife beater, she left him (or worse,
after all he does seem to have a very unhealthy obsession with Reiser),
and now he's come slithering back here looking for a substitute.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 37 days  | about GNU/Linux."

Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
> Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> wrote:

>> Buh bye for now.
>
> Don't let your guard down in real life.  No telling what that stalking
> freak DFS might do.

There's already more than enough there to justify going to the Feds,
IMO.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 37 days  | about GNU/Linux."

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:08:24 +0000, Homer chinwagged:

> Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> [snip DooFy's blatant denialism and savage belligerence]
> 
>> I'm sick of your relentless nastiness.  It's of a completely different
>> order of foulness from anything I've seen in this newsgroup.
>>
>> Buh bye for now.
> 
> I'm amazed anyone let's their "DFS" filters expire. Ever.

If he had been filtered, I would not have noticed that he located some of 
my personal information and posted it in the manner in which he did.

Whether his behavior is actionable depends on what takes place in the 
immediate future.

> The bastard's pure evil, an unbelievable denialist, and now apparently
> he's even stooped to cyberstalking and intimidation. And for what? To
> defend a damned /software company/, and the world's most disreputable
> one at that - a company that's almost as evil as he is. The psycho
> definitely needs institutionalised. It's just a question of whether they
> use handcuffs or a straitjacket.

On 2011-01-31, Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> claimed:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> I'm sick of your relentless nastiness.  It's of a completely different order
>> of foulness from anything I've seen in this newsgroup.
>
> If we were to hand out a Biggest Anus in COLA award, it would be a tie
> between d00F and Hadron Queeg.

That would be the /upgraded/ Doof. He's a charter member of the Order
of Grand Assholes. But he seems to be trying for Grand Pooba since his
recent reprogramming session at Redmond.

-- 
Patience is a virtue, it's just not one of my better virtues.
Aspire One, Peppermint Ice
Friends don't let friends use Windows

Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> writes:

> Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sick of your relentless nastiness.  It's of a completely different order
>>> of foulness from anything I've seen in this newsgroup.
>>
>> If we were to hand out a Biggest Anus in COLA award, it would be a tie
>> between d00F and Hadron Queeg.
>
> Except that "Hadron" occasionally seems happy.  :-D
>
> Both are relentless rivers of bile.  Incredible.

Yet you call OSS developers "fuckheads".

Find that from me you spineless suckup.

On 1/30/2011 9:45 PM, An Old Friend wrote:

> If he had been filtered, I would not have noticed that he located some of
> my personal information and posted it in the manner in which he did.


Get over yourself.


You posted it.  Remember?

"My piano book 'Learning the Code'"
http://www.myspace.com/jlking3
http://imslp.org/wiki/Learning_the_Code_%28King,_James_L.%29

Your school posted it, remember?
http://www.fkcc.edu/skins/userfiles/file/Syllabi/10023.pdf

archive.org posted it, remember?
http://www.archive.org/details/LearningTheCode


Lamer.  Why don't you take responsibility for keeping your "personal 
information" personal?  Oh, I forgot: in the world of cola, it's always 
someone else's fault (usually Microsoft's).




> Whether his behavior is actionable depends on what takes place in the
> immediate future.

What do you have to hide that makes you so totally paranoid?

On 1/30/2011 9:22 PM, Homer wrote:
> Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
>> Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>  wrote:
>
>>> Buh bye for now.
>>
>> Don't let your guard down in real life.  No telling what that stalking
>> freak DFS might do.
>
> There's already more than enough there to justify going to the Feds,
> IMO.


Please do, [H]ypocrite.  Please waste as much of your time and money as 
possible.

"going to the Feds" about me will be just as good an investment as you 
trying to sell Linux crapware along with coffee and donuts.

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 01:36:23 -0500, DFS chinwagged:

> On 1/30/2011 9:45 PM, An Old Friend wrote:
> 
>> If he had been filtered, I would not have noticed that he located some
>> of my personal information and posted it in the manner in which he did.
> 
> 
> Get over yourself.
> 
> 
> You posted it.  Remember?

But it's the intent with which you posted the information that makes a 
difference. It appears that you did not post my information with a 
positive agenda. Rather, it appears that you collected my information for 
the benefit of others who might wish to use it to cause harm.

I have already received prank phone calls which are being preserved as 
evidence if I need to use it.

> "My piano book 'Learning the Code'"
> http://www.myspace.com/jlking3
> http://imslp.org/wiki/Learning_the_Code_%28King,_James_L.%29

What I particularly find interesting here is that if I had just mentioned 
that I wrote a piano book and made it available under a copyleft license, 
you would have called me a liar until I posted proof.

> Your school posted it, remember?
> http://www.fkcc.edu/skins/userfiles/file/Syllabi/10023.pdf

I'm flattered that you're considering moving to the Keys and taking my 
class. Otherwise, why would you be so interested in the syllabus for my 
class?

That is, unless you had another more unsavory motive for reposting the 
syllabus.

> archive.org posted it, remember?
> http://www.archive.org/details/LearningTheCode

The book is available in many places.

> Lamer.  Why don't you take responsibility for keeping your "personal
> information" personal?  Oh, I forgot: in the world of cola, it's always
> someone else's fault (usually Microsoft's).

Those of us who actually create intellectual property rarely stay 
anonymous, because the nature of intellectual property requires that the 
creator be known in some legal fashion. Even pen names and pseudonyms 
only go so far to protect the privacy of individuals.

If you or anyone else takes the information you've gathered and does 
something illegal with it, I will not hesitate to protect my rights and 
my reputation. Nor will I be intimidated off of a Usenet discussion group 
by someone who tries to do so by collecting information about me and 
making it more easily available to others who might wish me harm for 
whatever reasons they may have.

Govern your actions accordingly, as you cannot undo what you have already 
done.

>> Whether his behavior is actionable depends on what takes place in the
>> immediate future.
> 
> What do you have to hide that makes you so totally paranoid?

I have nothing to hide, but if someone uses the information to spread 
lies about me, it takes time, effort, energy and possibly money to rebut 
the false information and restore trust.

Time and energy I could have spent improving my teaching skills and 
materials for my students.

DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
> On 1/30/2011 9:22 PM, Homer wrote:
>> Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>  wrote:
>>
>>>> Buh bye for now.
>>>
>>> Don't let your guard down in real life.  No telling what that stalking
>>> freak DFS might do.
>>
>> There's already more than enough there to justify going to the Feds,
>> IMO.
> 
> 
> Please do, [H]ypocrite.  Please waste as much of your time and money as 
> possible.
> 
> "going to the Feds" about me will be just as good an investment as you 
> trying to sell Linux crapware along with coffee and donuts.
> 

It really doesn't matter if you're found guilty or not.  An arrest
alone will ensure that your personal info gets linked online to those
you stalk.  That alone would be hilarious and worth the effort of filing
a complaint.

And verily, didst Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> hastily babble thusly:
> Chris Ahlstrom stated in post ii4t0n$d8k$4@news.eternal-september.org on
> 1/30/11 4:43 PM:
> 
>> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>> 
>>> "Like he did in India?
>>> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to
>>> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in
>>> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
>>> 
>>> Where's the evidence?
>> 
>> Start here:
>> 
>>    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/
> 
> Would you expect Shuttleworth to donate to Windows and OS X development?
> Would you call him out on his actions if he donated his own money toward OSS
> development.
> 
> Oh.
> 
> He does.
> 
> 
How does equating someone spending millions to TRASH a rival with someone
DONATING resources to rivals work again?
-- 
|   spike1@freenet.co.uk   |                                                 |
|   Andrew Halliwell BSc   | "ARSE! GERLS!! DRINK! DRINK! DRINK!!!"          |
|            in            | "THAT WOULD BE AN ECUMENICAL MATTER!...FECK!!!! |
|     Computer Science     | - Father Jack in "Father Ted"                   |

An Old Friend wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 01:36:23 -0500, DFS chinwagged:
>
>> On 1/30/2011 9:45 PM, An Old Friend wrote:
>> 
>>> If he had been filtered, I would not have noticed that he located some
>>> of my personal information and posted it in the manner in which he did.
>> 
>> You posted it.  Remember?

"She was asking for it!"

> But it's the intent with which you posted the information that makes a 
> difference. It appears that you did not post my information with a 
> positive agenda. Rather, it appears that you collected my information for 
> the benefit of others who might wish to use it to cause harm.
>
> I have already received prank phone calls which are being preserved as 
> evidence if I need to use it.
>
>> "My piano book 'Learning the Code'"
>> http://www.myspace.com/jlking3
>> http://imslp.org/wiki/Learning_the_Code_%28King,_James_L.%29
>
> What I particularly find interesting here is that if I had just mentioned 
> that I wrote a piano book and made it available under a copyleft license, 
> you would have called me a liar until I posted proof.

That's the way guys like him work.  They browbeat you from many angles until
they find a soft spot.

>> Lamer.  Why don't you take responsibility for keeping your "personal
>> information" personal?  Oh, I forgot: in the world of cola, it's always
>> someone else's fault (usually Microsoft's).

What about the fault of the fellow who actively dug for the personal
information, posted it, and accompanies it with nasty, sick talk and
the kind of rationalizations you hear from stalkers.

Has he said he "owns" you yet?

> Those of us who actually create intellectual property rarely stay 
> anonymous, because the nature of intellectual property requires that the 
> creator be known in some legal fashion. Even pen names and pseudonyms 
> only go so far to protect the privacy of individuals.
>
> If you or anyone else takes the information you've gathered and does 
> something illegal with it, I will not hesitate to protect my rights and 
> my reputation. Nor will I be intimidated off of a Usenet discussion group 
> by someone who tries to do so by collecting information about me and 
> making it more easily available to others who might wish me harm for 
> whatever reasons they may have.
>
> Govern your actions accordingly, as you cannot undo what you have already 
> done.
>
>>> Whether his behavior is actionable depends on what takes place in the
>>> immediate future.

Out of one side of his mouth "You fool, you let your info be public."

Out of the other side:

>> What do you have to hide that makes you so totally paranoid?
>
> I have nothing to hide, but if someone uses the information to spread 
> lies about me, it takes time, effort, energy and possibly money to rebut 
> the false information and restore trust.
>
> Time and energy I could have spent improving my teaching skills and 
> materials for my students.

Take heed.  Old Friend posted some anecdotes about his usage of open source
software, and was basically polite and (too) accomodating.  And yet here he
is, under attack by someone who relentlessly boosts Microsoft.

-- 
I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.

Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Chris Ahlstrom
on 31/1/2011 01:23 shattered the silence with:

> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 1/30/2011 6:43 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Like he did in India?
>>>> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to
>>>> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in
>>>> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
>>>>
>>>> Where's the evidence?
>>>
>>> Start here:
>>>
>>>     http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/
>>
>> Dumb Willie made two claims.  When will he (or someone else) pony up all 
>> the evidence for both claims?
>
> I dunno.  That story is from 2002, so no doubt it was well-covered in COLA,
> and denied denied denied by you.

Indeed.

So as well as being stupid & not being able to use Bing or Google, DooFu$,
can't read  the evidence in front of him! 

"Billg's personal $100 million goes to health initiatives over ten years,
while $421 million of Microsoft's money goes, over a mere three years, to
support MS-friendly development and 'educational' initiatives. And being a
monster MS shareholder himself, a 'Big Win' in India will enrich him
personally, perhaps well in excess of the $100 million he's donating to
the AIDS problem. Makes you wonder who the real beneficiary of charity is
here."
[==]
"Interestingly, the NYT neglected to mention the gargantuan MS marketing
tie-in and obvious bribe against, and obstacle to, Linux adoption in
India."

> You know, I wouldn't be surprised if "Hadron" has made his mother cry in the
> past.

> But I definitely wouldn't be surprised to find out you made your mother
> *scared*.
>
> I'm sick of your relentless nastiness.  It's of a completely different order
> of foulness from anything I've seen in this newsgroup.
>
> Buh bye for now.

Why not "bye, bye, *period*" as the moronic M$ zealot is very unlikely to
change.

-- 
ASCII a stupid question, get a stupid ANSI!
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> And verily, didst Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> hastily babble thusly:
>> Chris Ahlstrom stated in post ii4t0n$d8k$4@news.eternal-september.org on
>> 1/30/11 4:43 PM:
>> 
>>> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> "Like he did in India?
>>>> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to
>>>> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in
>>>> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
>>>> 
>>>> Where's the evidence?
>>> 
>>> Start here:
>>> 
>>>    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/
>> 
>> Would you expect Shuttleworth to donate to Windows and OS X development?
>> Would you call him out on his actions if he donated his own money toward OSS
>> development.
>> 
>> Oh.
>> 
>> He does.
>> 
> How does equating someone spending millions to TRASH a rival with someone
> DONATING resources to rivals work again?

Being a crank tends to make one illogical.  And worse.

-- 
What is irritating about love is that it is a crime that requires an accomplice.
		-- Charles Baudelaire

spike1@freenet.co.uk stated in post ckgi18-90a.ln1@librarian.sky.com on
1/31/11 3:48 AM:

> And verily, didst Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> hastily babble thusly:
>> Chris Ahlstrom stated in post ii4t0n$d8k$4@news.eternal-september.org on
>> 1/30/11 4:43 PM:
>> 
>>> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> "Like he did in India?
>>>> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to
>>>> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in
>>>> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
>>>> 
>>>> Where's the evidence?
>>> 
>>> Start here:
>>> 
>>>    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/
>> 
>> Would you expect Shuttleworth to donate to Windows and OS X development?
>> Would you call him out on his actions if he donated his own money toward OSS
>> development.
>> 
>> Oh.
>> 
>> He does.
>> 
>> 
> How does equating someone spending millions to TRASH a rival with someone
> DONATING resources to rivals work again?

Excellent question.  How is Bill Gate's work that benefits Windows / MS the
same as trashing Linux?


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Chris Ahlstrom stated in post ii66iq$qol$5@news.eternal-september.org on
1/31/11 4:33 AM:

> spike1@freenet.co.uk wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> And verily, didst Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> hastily babble thusly:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom stated in post ii4t0n$d8k$4@news.eternal-september.org on
>>> 1/30/11 4:43 PM:
>>> 
>>>> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Like he did in India?
>>>>> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to
>>>>> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in
>>>>> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
>>>>> 
>>>>> Where's the evidence?
>>>> 
>>>> Start here:
>>>> 
>>>>    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/
>>> 
>>> Would you expect Shuttleworth to donate to Windows and OS X development?
>>> Would you call him out on his actions if he donated his own money toward OSS
>>> development.
>>> 
>>> Oh.
>>> 
>>> He does.
>>> 
>> How does equating someone spending millions to TRASH a rival with someone
>> DONATING resources to rivals work again?
> 
> Being a crank tends to make one illogical.  And worse.

I think you are being a bit rough on the author of the article.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Homer wrote:

> Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>>
>> Buh bye for now.

"For now"?  So he just just do it again?

>I'm amazed anyone let's their "DFS" filters expire. Ever.

Exactly.  I just do no not "get it".  IMO, those who have not filtered
him are somewhat responsible for the current nastiness.

I mean, why shouldn't they be nasty?  They get a ton of responses,
they don't get plonked (by anyone who hasn't already plonked them),
and the same people who are getting called every name in the book will
still have a pleasant discussion with the mentally-stunted creep in
some other thread!

There seems to be "zero* downside for them!

>The bastard's pure evil, an unbelievable denialist, and now apparently
>he's even stooped to cyberstalking and intimidation. And for what? To
>defend a damned /software company/, and the world's most disreputable
>one at that - a company that's almost as evil as he is.

It would be a terrible thing for him to look in the mirror and
honestly reflect on what kind of stinking shit he really is.  The
self-loathing must be *immense*.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>Tattoo Vampire wrote::
>>
>> If we were to hand out a Biggest Anus in COLA award, it would be a tie
>> between d00F and Hadron Queeg.
>
>Except that "Hadron" occasionally seems happy.  :-D

When Larry is lying, he's happy (IOW, pretty-much all the time).

>Both are relentless rivers of bile.  Incredible.

Most such brained-fscked shit are in prison.  I guess these two have
found a legal means of exercising their sociopathic tendencies...

"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:sbjdk6h4r2pf30gtsk7ri4rpomfmp4ocfu@4ax.com...
>
> Most such brained-fscked shit are in prison.  I guess these two have
> found a legal means of exercising their sociopathic tendencies...
>

why does not a worthless fsckwit like you "chrisv" say buh-bye and leave 
this newsgroup.

better yet neck yourself and leave humanity you worthless fscking 
sociopathic piece of shit.

chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Homer wrote:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>>>
>>> Buh bye for now.
>
> "For now"?  So he just just do it again?

I never say "never".

>>I'm amazed anyone let's their "DFS" filters expire. Ever.
>
> Exactly.  I just do no not "get it".  IMO, those who have not filtered
> him are somewhat responsible for the current nastiness.
>
> I mean, why shouldn't they be nasty?  They get a ton of responses,
> they don't get plonked (by anyone who hasn't already plonked them),
> and the same people who are getting called every name in the book will
> still have a pleasant discussion with the mentally-stunted creep in
> some other thread!
>
> There seems to be "zero* downside for them!

Well, I've noticed that the worst of them don't need *any* response to
their filth to keep on posting more filth.

Look at what just happened to "Old Friend".  Two unprovoked attacks.

I would prefer to know when this stuff gets particularly vicious.

>>The bastard's pure evil, an unbelievable denialist, and now apparently
>>he's even stooped to cyberstalking and intimidation. And for what? To
>>defend a damned /software company/, and the world's most disreputable
>>one at that - a company that's almost as evil as he is.
>
> It would be a terrible thing for him to look in the mirror and
> honestly reflect on what kind of stinking shit he really is.  The
> self-loathing must be *immense*.

And so is his bluster.

-- 
The gent who wakes up and finds himself a success hasn't been asleep.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>Out of one side of his mouth "You fool, you let your info be public."
>
>Out of the other side:
>
>>> What do you have to hide that makes you so totally paranoid?

I've said it for years.  Dumfsck is a cheap-shot artist, and he'll
take his cheap shots from any angle he can.  There is no regard for
logic, honesty, consistency, or morality.

Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> writes:

> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Homer wrote:
>>
>>> Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>>>>
>>>> Buh bye for now.
>>
>> "For now"?  So he just just do it again?
>
> I never say "never".
>
>>>I'm amazed anyone let's their "DFS" filters expire. Ever.
>>
>> Exactly.  I just do no not "get it".  IMO, those who have not filtered
>> him are somewhat responsible for the current nastiness.
>>
>> I mean, why shouldn't they be nasty?  They get a ton of responses,
>> they don't get plonked (by anyone who hasn't already plonked them),
>> and the same people who are getting called every name in the book will
>> still have a pleasant discussion with the mentally-stunted creep in
>> some other thread!
>>
>> There seems to be "zero* downside for them!
>
> Well, I've noticed that the worst of them don't need *any* response to
> their filth to keep on posting more filth.
>
> Look at what just happened to "Old Friend".  Two unprovoked attacks.
>
> I would prefer to know when this stuff gets particularly vicious.


You're like an old fish wife.

"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:r0ndk69s9ag76su60sn7o0874cobe6rfmm@4ax.com...
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>Out of one side of his mouth "You fool, you let your info be public."
>>
>>Out of the other side:
>>
>>>> What do you have to hide that makes you so totally paranoid?
>
> I've said it for years.  Dumfsck is a cheap-shot artist, and he'll

you have been a vile piece of shit for years. get your own house in order 
first you fscking asshole.


> take his cheap shots from any angle he can.  There is no regard for
> logic, honesty, consistency, or morality.

pot. kettle. black.

figures that a fscking hypocrite liar like "chrisv" would accuse his 
intellectual and moral superiors without even once realizing that he is the 
biggest piece of shit scumbag in this newsgroup.

On 1/31/2011 4:54 AM, owl wrote:
> DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>  wrote:
>> On 1/30/2011 9:22 PM, Homer wrote:
>>> Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Buh bye for now.
>>>>
>>>> Don't let your guard down in real life.  No telling what that stalking
>>>> freak DFS might do.
>>>
>>> There's already more than enough there to justify going to the Feds,
>>> IMO.
>>
>>
>> Please do, [H]ypocrite.  Please waste as much of your time and money as
>> possible.
>>
>> "going to the Feds" about me will be just as good an investment as you
>> trying to sell Linux crapware along with coffee and donuts.
>>
>
> It really doesn't matter if you're found guilty or not.  An arrest
> alone will ensure that your personal info gets linked online to those
> you stalk.  That alone would be hilarious and worth the effort of filing
> a complaint.


Please go ahead and "file a complaint", luser.

"DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> schreef in bericht 
news:ii502b$3f0$2@news.eternal-september.org...
> On 1/30/2011 7:05 PM, High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> DFS wrote this:
>>>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Like he did in India? You know, when the popular press trumpeted
>>>> that Gates gave $100m to fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report
>>>> was that he also gave $421m in an attempt to stop Linux being
>>>> adopted."
>>>>
>>>> Where's the evidence?
>>>
>>> Start here:
>>>
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/
>>
>> [quote]
>> Gates gives $100m to fight HIV, $421m to fight Linux
>> News from India and some letters
>> By Thomas C Greene in Washington DC
>> Posted in Software, 13th November 2002 04:23 GMT
>>
>> We do hate to rain on a high-profile corporate love-fest, but we have to
>> point out that in addition to the much trumpeted $100 million Billg has
>> donated to India's fight against HIV, he's funding the Microsoft jihad
>> against Linux to the far more impressive tune of $421 million. That
>> means that Linux is more than four times worse than AIDS to Billg and
>> his happy Redmond family.
>> [/quote]
>>
>> Jihad against Linux is 4 times more important than funding AIDS research
>> further, to find a cure. Hmmmmm ....
>
> Oh look, the HPT shitbag refused to post the salient quote:
>
> "Billg's personal $100 million goes to health initiatives over ten years, 
> while $421 million of Microsoft's money goes..."
>
> blink... "Microsoft's money"... huh?

$421 million well spent, b.t.w.!
>
> But just above, Dumb Willie said it was $421M of Gates' money...
>
> Another pile of trash Linux liar thinks he can get away with his scummy 
> lies about Gates\MS\Windows.
>
>
>
>
>
>> Whilst souls are perishing due to the lack of a cure, preventing Linux
>> from falling into the hands of others, to keep the monopoly going so
>> others may purchase prone to virus software at greater cost is more
>> important.
>
> Gates Foundation gives $10 billion for vaccines...
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703389004575032741056727552.html?mod=djemalertNEWS
>
>
>
> ... while the soulless, evil scum at the Free Software Foundation use the 
> Haiti earthquake to promote their shitty software.
>
> http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/free-software-haiti-aid
>
>
>

On 1/31/2011 11:24 AM, Clogwog wrote:
> "DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> schreef in bericht


>> Oh look, the HPT shitbag refused to post the salient quote:
>>
>> "Billg's personal $100 million goes to health initiatives over ten
>> years, while $421 million of Microsoft's money goes..."
>>
>> blink... "Microsoft's money"... huh?
>
> $421 million well spent, b.t.w.!


It really was.  Getting dirt-poor Indians that don't know any better 
hooked on crummy open source software is a shame.

"High Plains Thumper" <hpt@invalid.invalid> wrote in message 
news:4d45fcea$0$4321$6e1ede2f@read.cnntp.org...
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> DFS wrote this:
>>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>>
>>> "Like he did in India? You know, when the popular press trumpeted
>>> that Gates gave $100m to fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report
>>> was that he also gave $421m in an attempt to stop Linux being
>>> adopted."
>>>
>>> Where's the evidence?
>>
>> Start here:
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/
>
> [quote]
> Gates gives $100m to fight HIV, $421m to fight Linux
> News from India and some letters
> By Thomas C Greene in Washington DC
> Posted in Software, 13th November 2002 04:23 GMT
>
> We do hate to rain on a high-profile corporate love-fest, but we have to 
> point out that in addition to the much trumpeted $100 million Billg has 
> donated to India's fight against HIV, he's funding the Microsoft jihad 
> against Linux to the far more impressive tune of $421 million. That means 
> that Linux is more than four times worse than AIDS to Billg and his happy 
> Redmond family.
> [/quote]
>
> Jihad against Linux is 4 times more important than funding AIDS research 
> further, to find a cure. Hmmmmm ....
>
> Whilst souls are perishing due to the lack of a cure, preventing Linux 
> from falling into the hands of others, to keep the monopoly going so 
> others may purchase prone to virus software at greater cost is more 
> important.
>

You conveniently ignore the truth here.  Even this cite goes on to admit:

"Billg's personal $100 million goes to health initiatives over ten years, 
while $421 million of Microsoft's money goes, over a mere three years, to 
support MS-friendly development and 'educational' initiatives. ..."

Now Bill has the money in his pocket, which he is willing to share.  The 
$421 million is some figure invested by Microsoft as a corporation to 
further its business presumably and hardly a "contribution" of any sort. 
Since the link to the article about the $421M is broken, it is not even 
possible to see what it was actually spent on.  It is common for the 
self-centered Linux advocates to somehow presume that anything done by 
Microsoft to promote Windows is an "attack on Linux", but they are just 
hoping for some recognition that never seems to come.  In any event, the 
claim that the two are offsetting examples is just plain ignorance. 

"Tattoo Vampire" <sitting@this.computer> schreef in bericht 
news:1r6xcv74ics6b$.dlg@sitting.at.this.computer...
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> I'm sick of your relentless nastiness.  It's of a completely different 
>> order
>> of foulness from anything I've seen in this newsgroup.
>
> If we were to hand out a Biggest Anus in COLA award, it would be *MARTI*

"Marti is the female in the relationship likes to be dominated. Marti is not 
looking for some girly boy who is weak and timid like he is.
Marti likes it when a big hairy dude takes control and pounds his ass til he 
can't walk anymore.
None of that gentle shit - Marti wants a real man to treat him like the 
helpless little bitch that he is."

You seem to be the perfect match for him!
http://www.era-advantagerealty.com/shared/get/uphoto.php?uid=021400042
[q]
Marti: "Don is yet another good looking dude"
Tattoo Vampire / Don Zeigler: "A little experimentation in college does not 
make one gay"
http://groups.google.nl/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8158b1dcb1bab083?hl=nl&dmode=source&output=gplain
[q/]

lol lercoaster 

"owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> schreef in bericht 
news:hfd8a0.9a@rooftop.invalid...
> DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
>> On 1/30/2011 9:22 PM, Homer wrote:
>>> Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Buh bye for now.
>>>>
>>>> Don't let your guard down in real life.  No telling what that stalking
>>>> freak DFS might do.
>>>
>>> There's already more than enough there to justify going to the Feds,
>>> IMO.
>>
>>
>> Please do, [H]ypocrite.  Please waste as much of your time and money as
>> possible.
>>
>> "going to the Feds" about me will be just as good an investment as you
>> trying to sell Linux crapware along with coffee and donuts.
>>
>
> It really doesn't matter if you're found guilty or not.  An arrest
> alone will ensure that your personal info gets linked online to those
> you stalk.  That alone would be hilarious and worth the effort of filing
> a complaint.
>

Oh please, dear Mr. Owl "going to the Feds", I like that, me too!, me too!
I got some ammo for you!
\begin{swearing}
You fuck unclefucker motherfucker belgium shit frick puke wanker You 
cocksucker puke shit sonofabitch ass dick heck hell You cocksucker 
motherfucker crap You damn shithead dingleberries damn goddamn crap wanker 
ass unclefucker dingleberries motherfucker unclefucker sonofabitch prick 
cunt unclefucker motherfucker You prick frick shit unclefucker eat my monkey 
unclefucker belgium You cunt sonofabitch motherfucker You damn dick shithead 
You asshole damn crap eat my monkey cunt You dick fuck unclefucker fart 
prick sonofabitch ass wanker sonofabitch You crap hell cunt damn fart ass 
damn goddamn asshole dick crap eat my monkey sonofabitch damn eat my monkey 
dingleberries hell shit dick fart shit cocksucker puke asshole fuck goddamn 
dingleberries prick ass wanker prick fart sonofabitch sonofabitch 
dingleberries belgium asshole fuck frick frick dick shithead shit shithead 
fart dingleberries dick shit You heck puke shit ass shithead puke prick damn 
asshole shit unclefucker eat my monkey cunt goddamn dingleberries asshole 
crap dingleberries frick motherfucker heck unclefucker fuck belgium eat my 
monkey fart eat my monkey dick motherfucker fart dick asshole unclefucker 
eat my monkey damn goddamn unclefucker asshole cunt cocksucker fart 
sonofabitch shit crap unclefucker fuck shit You dingleberries goddamn 
motherfucker shit shit motherfucker fuck dingleberries frick eat my monkey 
motherfucker shithead unclefucker fuck crap frick puke cunt asshole 
motherfucker cocksucker heck eat my monkey shit motherfucker puke ass fuck 
puke prick fuck eat my monkey You ass fart shit You dingleberries belgium 
heck asshole crap You crap motherfucker crap unclefucker heck You goddamn 
shithead heck dick motherfucker crap wanker heck fart damn damn crap damn 
puke frick cunt asshole crap dick dick crap fart cocksucker asshole fart 
dick sonofabitch heck frick motherfucker sonofabitch asshole damn 
motherfucker heck dick eat my monkey cocksucker belgium dick crap wanker You 
cunt puke frick sonofabitch cunt unclefucker shithead sonofabitch You dick 
goddamn asshole crap fuck dingleberries cunt frick crap fart fuck prick hell 
frick damn fuck dick wanker asshole wanker You dick dick puke You eat my 
monkey ass dick prick dick dick shit fuck crap prick damn cocksucker damn 
prick unclefucker dingleberries prick damn sonofabitch puke hell heck 
goddamn heck dingleberries motherfucker cocksucker cunt fuck sonofabitch ass 
puke dick damn frick sonofabitch fart ass heck damn You crap motherfucker 
fuck puke fuck belgium frick sonofabitch damn hell goddamn frick unclefucker 
shithead heck shit You puke sonofabitch shit goddamn fuck asshole ass frick 
dingleberries frick eat my monkey hell ass eat my monkey prick belgium fart 
goddamn belgium eat my monkey eat my monkey damn belgium You dick cocksucker 
cunt cocksucker ass asshole hell goddamn dingleberries frick eat my monkey 
dingleberries You hell hell belgium dick wanker shit fuck puke unclefucker 
belgium dick wanker puke goddamn fart wanker crap shithead cunt dick crap 
fart fuck wanker fuck ass dingleberries crap hell shithead crap ass You 
frick fuck fuck motherfucker fuck puke fuck You ass shit puke belgium 
dingleberries fart heck unclefucker motherfucker fart You cocksucker 
dingleberries You frick crap fart shithead prick cunt fuck fuck prick crap 
fuck dick eat my monkey shit goddamn dingleberries shit puke belgium 
dingleberries fart puke shithead wanker ass damn eat my monkey goddamn 
goddamn asshole frick eat my monkey wanker sonofabitch motherfucker dick 
fart motherfucker dick crap puke unclefucker belgium asshole eat my monkey 
cocksucker prick dingleberries sonofabitch ass shithead belgium frick ass 
You eat my monkey dick asshole damn fuck goddamn prick eat my monkey goddamn 
shithead sonofabitch fuck ass unclefucker dick fart cunt cocksucker asshole 
hell shit wanker eat my monkey belgium hell hell asshole shit cunt 
sonofabitch shit cocksucker fart fart ass fart hell fuck dick cunt shithead 
fart cunt cocksucker goddamn hell fuck belgium ass fart sonofabitch dick eat 
my monkey dingleberries prick fuck sonofabitch sonofabitch sonofabitch 
asshole crap heck fuck damn wanker ass You sonofabitch cunt dick eat my 
monkey heck crap cocksucker cunt puke cunt dick fart wanker motherfucker You 
unclefucker heck dingleberries damn heck wanker crap goddamn asshole eat my 
monkey dick asshole You cunt hell dingleberries fart shithead cunt prick 
wanker dingleberries fart cunt asshole goddamn hell ass crap dick ass fuck 
fart frick sonofabitch fuck frick cunt goddamn fuck cocksucker fuck asshole 
hell cunt belgium sonofabitch goddamn dick asshole belgium unclefucker dick 
eat my monkey sonofabitch crap damn goddamn dingleberries prick You frick 
prick puke dick unclefucker belgium You heck crap You prick crap asshole eat 
my monkey You cunt dingleberries crap hell dick heck puke hell You fuck 
prick fuck motherfucker crap prick motherfucker shithead wanker heck crap 
shithead hell frick belgium prick frick ass puke shit heck dingleberries 
dick sonofabitch hell dingleberries eat my monkey ass eat my monkey wanker 
goddamn eat my monkey cunt ass heck You fuck eat my monkey unclefucker shit 
fuck fuck puke heck frick eat my monkey shithead shithead cocksucker 
unclefucker eat my monkey ass ass goddamn shithead shithead frick 
motherfucker sonofabitch fuck ass dick dingleberries wanker damn sonofabitch 
wanker damn dingleberries asshole heck belgium asshole shit damn shit 
dingleberries dingleberries eat my monkey damn ass cunt asshole belgium 
belgium crap dick heck puke fart frick crap crap sonofabitch frick 
motherfucker frick crap dick sonofabitch wanker puke damn unclefucker You 
hell asshole fart sonofabitch ass You dick wanker asshole dick wanker wanker 
heck cocksucker dingleberries fuck cunt hell crap fart cunt dingleberries 
shit dingleberries prick cocksucker puke goddamn goddamn cunt frick 
unclefucker hell sonofabitch eat my monkey eat my monkey hell motherfucker 
shithead puke wanker eat my monkey puke hell wanker eat my monkey hell 
unclefucker You unclefucker goddamn ass cunt prick motherfucker damn eat my 
monkey frick prick hell puke dingleberries belgium damn fuck unclefucker 
puke hell damn dick shit shit crap You crap goddamn shithead dick shit 
unclefucker cocksucker motherfucker sonofabitch fart wanker cunt belgium eat 
my monkey dingleberries ass belgium eat my monkey frick dingleberries puke 
frick prick shithead cunt asshole frick shithead eat my monkey shithead 
unclefucker sonofabitch sonofabitch frick shithead heck wanker wanker 
shithead heck puke shithead puke shithead motherfucker eat my monkey 
sonofabitch goddamn prick ass cocksucker frick puke puke fuck ass ass 
goddamn sonofabitch cocksucker shit puke goddamn cocksucker sonofabitch damn 
ass hell sonofabitch hell goddamn You dingleberries heck eat my monkey crap 
fuck dingleberries fart prick goddamn damn belgium frick belgium wanker puke 
ass crap fuck shithead ass puke hell shithead fuck crap hell heck ass 
motherfucker asshole goddamn cocksucker You damn asshole wanker shit 
motherfucker ass prick cunt motherfucker dingleberries prick goddamn asshole 
You shithead asshole eat my monkey heck prick belgium fuck dick frick hell 
fart eat my monkey asshole ass hell wanker ass goddamn unclefucker 
motherfucker prick damn wanker wanker unclefucker goddamn dingleberries 
sonofabitch fart
\end{swearing} 

On 1/31/2011 4:02 AM, An Old Friend wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 01:36:23 -0500, DFS chinwagged:
>
>> On 1/30/2011 9:45 PM, An Old Friend wrote:
>>
>>> If he had been filtered, I would not have noticed that he located some
>>> of my personal information and posted it in the manner in which he did.
>>
>>
>> Get over yourself.
>>
>>
>> You posted it.  Remember?
>
> But it's the intent with which you posted the information that makes a
> difference.

I didn't post the information.  You did.  www.fkcc.edu did.



> It appears that you did not post my information with a
> positive agenda. Rather, it appears that you collected my information for
> the benefit of others who might wish to use it to cause harm.

It appears that way to you because you've become a full-blown cola 
idiot, full of unjustified paranoia.

If you are so paranoid, you must be hiding something.  What is it?




> I have already received prank phone calls which are being preserved as
> evidence if I need to use it.

Prank phone calls?  That's it?

Consider yourself lucky.  Some piece of cola Linux trash in the past 
contacted an anti-Linux poster's employer and lied about him.  Another 
piece of cola shit stole Erik Funkenbusch's identity and opened an email 
account in his name.

Also, show us the evidence of these "prank calls".  What phone number 
called you?

Here at home I get weekly hang-up calls and other 'no number available' 
calls at all hours.  Must be you or some other cola nutjobs stalking me.





>> "My piano book 'Learning the Code'"
>> http://www.myspace.com/jlking3
>> http://imslp.org/wiki/Learning_the_Code_%28King,_James_L.%29
>
> What I particularly find interesting here is that if I had just mentioned
> that I wrote a piano book and made it available under a copyleft license,
> you would have called me a liar until I posted proof.

No.  That's not the type of ludicrous claim, posted often by cola liars, 
that has to be challenged.



>> Your school posted it, remember?
>> http://www.fkcc.edu/skins/userfiles/file/Syllabi/10023.pdf
>
> I'm flattered that you're considering moving to the Keys and taking my
> class.

I'm not flattered you think I would want to take your class.




> Otherwise, why would you be so interested in the syllabus for my
> class?
>
> That is, unless you had another more unsavory motive for reposting the
> syllabus.

Was there something "unsavory" about the syllabus or the class or you?

Why else would you suspect an "unsavory motive"?





>> archive.org posted it, remember?
>> http://www.archive.org/details/LearningTheCode
>
> The book is available in many places.
>
>> Lamer.  Why don't you take responsibility for keeping your "personal
>> information" personal?  Oh, I forgot: in the world of cola, it's always
>> someone else's fault (usually Microsoft's).
>
> Those of us who actually create intellectual property rarely stay
> anonymous, because the nature of intellectual property requires that the
> creator be known in some legal fashion. Even pen names and pseudonyms
> only go so far to protect the privacy of individuals.

You could've stayed anonymous indefinitely; instead, you chose to reveal 
information about who you are.




> If you or anyone else takes the information you've gathered and does
> something illegal with it, I will not hesitate to protect my rights and
> my reputation.

Nor should you.




> Nor will I be intimidated off of a Usenet discussion group
> by someone who tries to do so by collecting information about me and
> making it more easily available to others who might wish me harm for
> whatever reasons they may have.

Such sweet paranoia.  You belong right here on cola, amongst the other 
wackjobs.




> Govern your actions accordingly, as you cannot undo what you have already
> done.

Kiss my ass accordingly.

What I've done is posted public information previously posted by you or 
your employer(s).

You don't like it?  Too bad.  Keep it to yourself next time.  Whine to 
Google, or your employers.

You reading, Linosuck?  Same goes for you.

Also, feel free to dig up whatever info you can find on me, and post it 
here.  It's certainly out there.




>>> Whether his behavior is actionable depends on what takes place in the
>>> immediate future.
>>
>> What do you have to hide that makes you so totally paranoid?
>
> I have nothing to hide,

Yes, you do.  Nobody that's innocent makes the paranoid, almost 
hysterical posts about "causing me harm, lying about me, protecting my 
rights", etc.




> but if someone uses the information to spread
> lies about me, it takes time, effort, energy and possibly money to rebut
> the false information and restore trust.
>
> Time and energy I could have spent improving my teaching skills and
> materials for my students.

All the time you waste on cola could've been used for that.

On 1/31/2011 11:01 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Out of one side of his mouth "You fool, you let your info be public."
>>
>> Out of the other side:
>>
>>>> What do you have to hide that makes you so totally paranoid?
>
> I've said it for years.  Dumfsck is a cheap-shot artist, and he'll
> take his cheap shots from any angle he can.

Why would a hypocrite piece of trash like you care?  That's how you and 
the Linux "community" has behaved towards MS\Windows its entire life 
(when you're not busy making a living with their products).



> There is no regard for
> logic, honesty, consistency, or morality.

I've asked you for proof of my lies about 50 times.  Not once have you 
responded.  Not one time.


On the other hand, turd, you said:
==============================================================
"Vista needs 4G and 2 fast CPU's to run acceptably well."

"Windows fits only one situation: a single-user desktop PC"

"DFS is a liar"

"Microsoft imposes the Windows tax upon even the poorest of third-world 
countries"
==============================================================

That's 5 lies right there, you piece of shit.


Consistency and morality?  To this day you buy and use Windows just to 
make money by day, while turning around at night and lying about Windows 
and Microsoft.  You defend morons like Homer and Gortard.


You're an unethical, hypocritical liar.  That's a fact.

Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> writes:

> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 1/30/2011 6:43 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> DFS wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> Dumb Willie wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Like he did in India?
>>>> You know, when the popular press trumpeted that Gates gave $100m to
>>>> fight HIV, but what they *didn't* report was that he also gave $421m in
>>>> an attempt to stop Linux being adopted."
>>>>
>>>> Where's the evidence?
>>>
>>> Start here:
>>>
>>>     http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/
>>
>> Dumb Willie made two claims.  When will he (or someone else) pony up all 
>> the evidence for both claims?
>
> I dunno.  That story is from 2002, so no doubt it was well-covered in COLA,
> and denied denied denied by you.
>
> You know, I wouldn't be surprised if "Hadron" has made his mother cry in the
> past.
>
> But I definitely wouldn't be surprised to find out you made your mother
> *scared*.
>
> I'm sick of your relentless nastiness.  It's of a completely different order
> of foulness from anything I've seen in this newsgroup.

You're telling porkies again. There have been many equally nasty things and
more posted by the likes of chrisv and TV.Not to mention Smarti posting
graphic details of his anal sex sessions with his expired boyfriend. You
really should let things drop instead of plastering your name all over
usenet linked with such unflattering commentary and people laughing at
you.

Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
> DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:

>> Please do, [H]ypocrite.  Please waste as much of your time and money
>> as possible.
>> 
>> "going to the Feds" about me will be just as good an investment as
>> you trying to sell Linux crapware along with coffee and donuts.
>
> It really doesn't matter if you're found guilty or not.  An arrest
> alone will ensure that your personal info gets linked online to those
> you stalk.  That alone would be hilarious and worth the effort of
> filing a complaint.

And note yet again how DFS only cares about the financial attribute of
something far more important than money: justice, just like he does with
freedom, and no doubt everything else in his worthless life.

Meanwhile, I make a moderate income from something I actually enjoy
doing, as opposed to the years I endured doing something I didn't,
because like everyone else I followed the herd into the sheep pen, and
only discovered the truth with the experience of age.

That's not exactly uncommon, so I must assume DFS also understands the
ugly truth, but just happens to like it, because he's an irredeemably
evil bastard. Of course it's not much of a stretch to make that
assumption, one look at the belligerent bile he spews into COLA tells us
everything we need to know about him. He'd sell his own mother if he
thought he could get away with it, for even just the smallest personal
advantage. Meanwhile I gave up nearly everything I had to pursue
something more virtuous and satisfying, and would gladly sacrifice the
rest of it to see thugs like DFS go to prison, where he belongs.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 37 days  | about GNU/Linux."

"Homer" <usenet@slated.org> wrote in message 
news:plgj18-mon.ln1@sky.matrix...

> evil bastard. Of course it's not much of a stretch to make that
> assumption, one look at the belligerent bile he spews into COLA tells us
> everything we need to know about him.

enough already about the vile piece of shit "advocate" named chrisv.  read 
one or two of shit's posts will tell you all that you will ever need to know 
about the retarded scumbag piece of shit called "chrisv."



> He'd sell his own mother if he thought he could get away with it,

chrisv's mother is ugly anal whore who shat him out into a toilet.

DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
> On 1/31/2011 4:54 AM, owl wrote:
> > DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>  wrote:
> >> On 1/30/2011 9:22 PM, Homer wrote:
> >>> Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>   wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> Buh bye for now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Don't let your guard down in real life.  No telling what that stalking
> >>>> freak DFS might do.
> >>>
> >>> There's already more than enough there to justify going to the Feds,
> >>> IMO.
> >>
> >>
> >> Please do, [H]ypocrite.  Please waste as much of your time and money as
> >> possible.
> >>
> >> "going to the Feds" about me will be just as good an investment as you
> >> trying to sell Linux crapware along with coffee and donuts.
> >>
> >
> > It really doesn't matter if you're found guilty or not.  An arrest
> > alone will ensure that your personal info gets linked online to those
> > you stalk.  That alone would be hilarious and worth the effort of filing
> > a complaint.


> Please go ahead and "file a complaint", luser.

Oh, believe me.  If I were one of your stalking victims, I would nail your
ass to the wall.

http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/TelecommunicationsInformationTechnology/CyberstalkingLaws/tabid/13495/Default.aspx

owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> writes:

> DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
>> On 1/31/2011 4:54 AM, owl wrote:
>> > DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>  wrote:
>> >> On 1/30/2011 9:22 PM, Homer wrote:
>> >>> Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
>> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>   wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>> Buh bye for now.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Don't let your guard down in real life.  No telling what that stalking
>> >>>> freak DFS might do.
>> >>>
>> >>> There's already more than enough there to justify going to the Feds,
>> >>> IMO.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Please do, [H]ypocrite.  Please waste as much of your time and money as
>> >> possible.
>> >>
>> >> "going to the Feds" about me will be just as good an investment as you
>> >> trying to sell Linux crapware along with coffee and donuts.
>> >>
>> >
>> > It really doesn't matter if you're found guilty or not.  An arrest
>> > alone will ensure that your personal info gets linked online to those
>> > you stalk.  That alone would be hilarious and worth the effort of filing
>> > a complaint.
>
>> Please go ahead and "file a complaint", luser.
>
> Oh, believe me.  If I were one of your stalking victims, I would nail your
> ass to the wall.
>
> http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/TelecommunicationsInformationTechnology/CyberstalkingLaws/tabid/13495/Default.aspx

What cyber stalking?

Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?

owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> writes:

> DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
>> On 1/31/2011 4:54 AM, owl wrote:
>> > DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>  wrote:
>> >> On 1/30/2011 9:22 PM, Homer wrote:
>> >>> Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
>> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>   wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>> Buh bye for now.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Don't let your guard down in real life.  No telling what that stalking
>> >>>> freak DFS might do.
>> >>>
>> >>> There's already more than enough there to justify going to the Feds,
>> >>> IMO.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Please do, [H]ypocrite.  Please waste as much of your time and money as
>> >> possible.
>> >>
>> >> "going to the Feds" about me will be just as good an investment as you
>> >> trying to sell Linux crapware along with coffee and donuts.
>> >>
>> >
>> > It really doesn't matter if you're found guilty or not.  An arrest
>> > alone will ensure that your personal info gets linked online to those
>> > you stalk.  That alone would be hilarious and worth the effort of filing
>> > a complaint.
>
>> Please go ahead and "file a complaint", luser.
>
> Oh, believe me.  If I were one of your stalking victims, I would nail your
> ass to the wall.
>
> http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/TelecommunicationsInformationTechnology/CyberstalkingLaws/tabid/13495/Default.aspx

Interestingly, having read that, its YOU who would be guilty since its
YOU making threats. Where has dfs threatened anyone? He has only, not
that I agree, reposted publicly accessible information. Chris took the
decision to openly post with his own name. I think thats a little silly
myself. He also thinks people who dont are wimps. Which is funny since
he sucks up to posters called "chrisv" "7" and "homer". Hypocrite? You
decide.

Hadron stated in post ii7koi$pro$1@news.eternal-september.org on 1/31/11
5:39 PM:

> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> writes:
> 
>> DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/31/2011 4:54 AM, owl wrote:
>>>> DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>  wrote:
>>>>> On 1/30/2011 9:22 PM, Homer wrote:
>>>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
>>>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com>   wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Buh bye for now.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Don't let your guard down in real life.  No telling what that stalking
>>>>>>> freak DFS might do.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There's already more than enough there to justify going to the Feds,
>>>>>> IMO.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please do, [H]ypocrite.  Please waste as much of your time and money as
>>>>> possible.
>>>>> 
>>>>> "going to the Feds" about me will be just as good an investment as you
>>>>> trying to sell Linux crapware along with coffee and donuts.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> It really doesn't matter if you're found guilty or not.  An arrest
>>>> alone will ensure that your personal info gets linked online to those
>>>> you stalk.  That alone would be hilarious and worth the effort of filing
>>>> a complaint.
>> 
>>> Please go ahead and "file a complaint", luser.
>> 
>> Oh, believe me.  If I were one of your stalking victims, I would nail your
>> ass to the wall.
>> 
>> http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/TelecommunicationsInformationTechnology/Cy
>> berstalkingLaws/tabid/13495/Default.aspx
> 
> What cyber stalking?
> 
> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?

Exactly - they accept it is bad... when done to an "advocate".  I do not
believe I have heard a single "advocate" state that what those folks did,
and Carroll et. al., was wrong.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Some dumb fucknut wrote:

> Tattoo Vampire / Don Zeigler: "A little experimentation in college does not 
> make one gay"

Cute, but the post you cite has this:

X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512

Nope, I've never used Outlook Express to post to newsgroups.

It also has my real email address in the From line - don't use it on the
Usenet, either. But, hey, cure forgery there, Snotwad. :-P

-- 
Best regards,
[tv]
Owner, Trollus Amongus LLC


The right to swing my fist ends where the other man�s nose begins.

Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:

> What cyber stalking?

> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?

I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.

On 1/31/2011 7:30 PM, owl wrote:


>> Please go ahead and "file a complaint", luser.
>
> Oh, believe me.  If I were one of your stalking victims, I would nail your
> ass to the wall.
>
> http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/TelecommunicationsInformationTechnology/CyberstalkingLaws/tabid/13495/Default.aspx



OK, pissant.  I'll call your little boy bluff.

Just give me some tidbit of info about you I can use to get my 
"stalking" started.

Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> writes:

> >
> > Oh, believe me.  If I were one of your stalking victims, I would nail your
> > ass to the wall.
> >
> > http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/TelecommunicationsInformationTechnology/CyberstalkingLaws/tabid/13495/Default.aspx

> Interestingly, having read that, its YOU who would be guilty since its
> YOU making threats.

A warning of retaliation against an attack is not a threat. 

> Where has dfs threatened anyone?

The laws cover harassment, not just threats.

> He has only, not
> that I agree, reposted publicly accessible information. Chris took the
> decision to openly post with his own name. I think thats a little silly
> myself. He also thinks people who dont are wimps. Which is funny since
> he sucks up to posters called "chrisv" "7" and "homer". Hypocrite? You
> decide.

I agree that posting with your real name is reckless, but regardless
of whether someone makes it easy to find their personal information, it
should not be dragged into this newsgroup, especially when it involves
the person's family.  But I guess it's true that you just can't buy
class.

DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:

> Just give me some tidbit of info about you I can use to get my 
> "stalking" started.

Stalking freak dufus!
I will not help you with your crimes.

owl stated in post 9f0asdf.hoa8eppr@rooftop.invalid on 1/31/11 6:09 PM:

> Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> What cyber stalking?
> 
>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
> 
> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
> 
Fair enough.  You were not posting at the time - but I have had folks track
me down to my place of employment, threaten to contact my employer and have
me fired for impersonating the person they say I am, had my house address
tracked down, had the names of my neighbors tracked down with threats of
contacting them, have had my wife emailed and sent lies, have had folks
impersonate my wife, threaten to call the police and make accusaetc.

Such stuff is just insane... though, to be clear, I am *not* saying HPT and
the others have done all of that... but they have engaged in some of it
*and* have shown support for those who go even further.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

On 1/31/2011 8:37 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>  wrote:
>
>> Just give me some tidbit of info about you I can use to get my
>> "stalking" started.
>
> Stalking freak dufus!
> I will not help you with your crimes.



Figures you'd chicken out, pissant.

Whenever you grow a pair:

Here's the actual GA law on cyberstalking:
http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/georgia.shtml

These are the "Feds" closest to me:
http://atlanta.fbi.gov/

Maybe you can twist your little "stalking victim" fantasy to make it 
interesting to them:
http://atlanta.fbi.gov/priorities.htm

Make sure you and Linosuck and Old Friend and that loser [H]omer get 
your stories^^^^^^^ whine/lies straight; you wouldn't want to be 
severely penalized for wasting their time.

owl wrote:
> Hadron wrote:
>
>> What cyber stalking?
>
>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>
> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.

Oh, he means this:

147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies. Snit has been 
trolling COLA and CSMA, along with other newsgroups for over 7 years. 
Someone in CSMA started collecting quotes from various posters about 
their disappointments toward Snit's trolling, since 2003. Over time, it 
has grown to 148 quotes. Here is the list of 147:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/201a1a914e63f0f7

And here is 148:

148- Owl (COLA):
Homer (COLA): "He first needs to acknowledge the definition of 'router',
before you'll ever get him to accept its purpose."
Snit: "By all means, please do name the Best Buy router that does 'only'
what you say."
Owl (COLA): "You only made the pathetic attempt to restrict the 
discussion to Best Buy toy routers after having your ass kicked 
repeatedly over your obvious cluelessness when it comes to networking 
protocols."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fe99701d0e986157

They have substantial links to nearly all. One can follow the thread and 
realise that Snit is nothing more than the traditional ad hominem troll. 
At first he seems reasonable, but then it degrades into personal attacks 
against the one replying, to which Snit then turns the conversation into 
insults and attacks, without ever coming to a mutual understanding and 
resolution of the issue. He resorts to strawman arguments, quote 
mangles, referring to forged evidences on his website, lies, etc.

Most have him kill binned as a result.

-- 
HPT

High Plains Thumper stated in post 4d476e52$0$4318$6e1ede2f@read.cnntp.org
on 1/31/11 7:22 PM:

> owl wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>> 
>>> What cyber stalking?
>> 
>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>> 
>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
> 
> Oh, he means this:
> 
> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies. Snit has been
> trolling COLA and CSMA, along with other newsgroups for over 7 years.
> Someone in CSMA started collecting quotes from various posters about
> their disappointments toward Snit's trolling, since 2003. Over time, it
> has grown to 148 quotes. Here is the list of 147:
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/201a1a914e63f0f7
> 
> And here is 148:
> 
> 148- Owl (COLA):
> Homer (COLA): "He first needs to acknowledge the definition of 'router',
> before you'll ever get him to accept its purpose."
> Snit: "By all means, please do name the Best Buy router that does 'only'
> what you say."
> Owl (COLA): "You only made the pathetic attempt to restrict the
> discussion to Best Buy toy routers after having your ass kicked
> repeatedly over your obvious cluelessness when it comes to networking
> protocols."
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fe99701d0e986157
> 
> They have substantial links to nearly all. One can follow the thread and
> realise that Snit is nothing more than the traditional ad hominem troll.
> At first he seems reasonable, but then it degrades into personal attacks
> against the one replying, to which Snit then turns the conversation into
> insults and attacks, without ever coming to a mutual understanding and
> resolution of the issue. He resorts to strawman arguments, quote
> mangles, referring to forged evidences on his website, lies, etc.
> 
> Most have him kill binned as a result.

One: that is not at all what I was in reference to.

Two: if I *really* did as you accuse, you would quote me doing so.  There is
a reason HPT *never* does this... he cannot.

Three: I challenge HPT to show where I have done as he accuses:

- start making personal attacks and insults
- making stawmen
- mangling quotes
- forging evidence

HPT *will* run from this challenge.  This is 100% certain.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
> owl wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> What cyber stalking?
>>
>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>
>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>
> Oh, he means this:
>
> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.

No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
then intimidating someone.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 38 days  | about GNU/Linux."

Homer stated in post gk8k18-had.ln1@sky.matrix on 1/31/11 7:44 PM:

> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>> owl wrote:
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>> 
>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>> 
>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>> 
>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>> 
>> Oh, he means this:
>> 
>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
> 
> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
> own Website. 

I never posted a link to my business website.  But, no, that is not what I
am in reference to.  Here is an example of what I mean, though not by HPT:

<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5ce16bd71bad1e12>

That is right: Steve Carroll tracked me down to my place of employment (or
at least what he thinks is my employer) and threatened to contact my
employer, tell them lies (including how he thinks I am impersonating the
person he claims I am... huh?  He is, literally, insane) and will get me
fired, even if he has to do some "arm twisting".  This, he said, was not a
threat but a promise.

Read his post.  You can feel his hatred and anger oozing out of him.  He, of
course, denies it... but he does not hide it.   Poor Steve, he cannot
imagine how an instructor would "act this way", meaning publicly pointing
out his lies.  Poor Steve... such a victim.

> That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
> then intimidating someone.

Tracking someone down to their place of employment and threatening to try to
have them fired is researching and trying to intimidate.  And Peter K at one
point was encouraging people to contact my wife.  Sandman took him up on
that and used the email Peter found... and made up a whole slew of lies
about me.  Carroll has also written to my wife and to myself on many
occasions.  Carroll's ex (or non-ex, he never can decide) threatened to call
the police and falsely accuse me of raping her (we have never been within
100 miles of each other as far as I know).

On and on... and not one "advocate" has stood up to call another on this
(not that Carroll and Sandman are COLA advocates... they are CSMA
advocates).

-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
> On 1/31/2011 8:37 PM, owl wrote:
> > DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>  wrote:
> >
> >> Just give me some tidbit of info about you I can use to get my
> >> "stalking" started.
> >
> > Stalking freak dufus!
> > I will not help you with your crimes.



> Figures you'd chicken out, pissant.

> Whenever you grow a pair:

> Here's the actual GA law on cyberstalking:
> http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/georgia.shtml

> These are the "Feds" closest to me:
> http://atlanta.fbi.gov/

> Maybe you can twist your little "stalking victim" fantasy to make it 
> interesting to them:
> http://atlanta.fbi.gov/priorities.htm

> Make sure you and Linosuck and Old Friend and that loser [H]omer get 
> your stories^^^^^^^ whine/lies straight; you wouldn't want to be 
> severely penalized for wasting their time.

I notice you're still hiding from the law behind the "DFS" nym, stalker
freak dufus.  Whenever you grow a pair... etc. 
 

On 01/31/2011 07:44 PM, Homer wrote:
> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>> owl wrote:
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>
>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>
>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>
>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>
>> Oh, he means this:
>>
>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
>
> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
> own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
> then intimidating someone.

Oh, that one. Yes, the trolls keep whining about stuff that is not 
personal information violation, particularly when one publicly posts 
their information and someone else quotes it. However, the trolls have 
nymshifted before nicking an advocates nym or name, then returning to 
claim the advocate posted it. That is impersonation and illegal.

Since the topic herein is cyber stalking, let's examine if this is 
stalking. This one involved Snit and his stalking Elizabot. The 
discussion is rather disturbing:

Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 10:32:00 -0600
From: Elizabot <toolittletool...@poo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Steve admits he is Sigmond....
Message-ID: <40a64600$0$209$75868355@news.frii.net>

Snit: "Good to see... just wish you would keep it good, clean, honest 
fun.... as I do."

Elizabot: "So stalking people on the internet is "good, clean, honest 
fun" in your book. I am not surprised."

Snit: "No... and when you did that I did contact the police."

Elizabot: "And since I didn't do it they did nothing."

Snit: "Of course not... I called your bluff and you wisely backed down. 
Hmmmm, just like Steve."

Elizabot: "What bluff?"

Snit: "Do you not remember?  Do you suffer from the same ailments as 
Steve when he asks when he has lied... when he pretends he does not 
remember?"

Elizabot: "Of course I remember."

Snit: "Keep in mind the topic is your threat... good to see you do 
remember making it..."

Elizabot: "Actually, the topic is your having "good, clean, honest fun." 
Do try and keep up.

....

Elizabot: "I wrote "You are very near to crossing the line. I will not 
hesitate to contact the Prescott Police Department if you do. And that's 
a promise."

Snit: "Right... a clear threat to contact the police with made up 
accusations, being that there was no line I was near."

Elizabot: "I wouldn't bring "made up" accusations to the police, Snit. I 
would bring hard and verifiable evidence to them."

Snit: "In case you decided to make good on that threat, I brought it to 
the attention of the police, and they assured me that you would actually 
have to provide evidence. My rights and options were explained to me, 
and I followed the suggestions they offered."

Elizabot: "Bullshit. They told you to leave me alone."

Snit: "As far as I know, you never did carry out your threat, though 
your obsession of posting about me 2/3 of the time or so has stayed.

....

Elizabot: "I said if you crossed the line, I'd contact the police."

Snit: "You made a very clear threat.  Of that there is no doubt.  I 
wisely took it seriously, and reacted appropriately."

Elizabot: "I wrote "You are very near to crossing the line. I will not 
hesitate to contact the Prescott Police Department if you do. And that's 
a promise." That's no bluff, and it still stands."

Snit: "What line is this you are in reference to?"

Elizabot: "If I told you, there is no doubt in my mind that you'd do it 
to see if I would follow up. Either that, or you'd claim I was daring 
you. You are that childish, Snit. You are always pushing and stretching 
and testing limits.  Perhaps you should actually follow the advice given 
to you by the police and leave me alone."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/49f4d41d5173e3db

This is the type of person Snit is that Hadron is attempting to defend. 
Birds of a feather ....

-- 
HPT

High Plains Thumper stated in post 4d477f4d$0$4318$6e1ede2f@read.cnntp.org
on 1/31/11 8:34 PM:

> On 01/31/2011 07:44 PM, Homer wrote:
>> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>>> owl wrote:
>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>> 
>>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>> 
>>> Oh, he means this:
>>> 
>>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
>> 
>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
>> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
>> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
>> own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
>> then intimidating someone.
> 
> Oh, that one.
> 
Nope.  Not what I mean at all.

> Yes, the trolls keep whining about stuff that is not personal information
> violation, particularly when one publicly posts their information and someone
> else quotes it.
> 
Except I did not post my info and then have it quoted, I had trolls hunt it
down and then post it.

> However, the trolls have nymshifted before nicking an advocates nym or name,
> then returning to claim the advocate posted it. That is impersonation and
> illegal.

I have bad both my wife and myself impersonated... including someone forging
my IP address in some posts (I have no idea how they do that).

> Since the topic herein is cyber stalking, let's examine if this is
> stalking. This one involved Snit and his stalking Elizabot. The
> discussion is rather disturbing:
> 
> Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 10:32:00 -0600
> From: Elizabot <toolittletool...@poo.com>
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
> Subject: Re: Steve admits he is Sigmond....
> Message-ID: <40a64600$0$209$75868355@news.frii.net>
> 
> Snit: "Good to see... just wish you would keep it good, clean, honest
> fun.... as I do."
> 
> Elizabot: "So stalking people on the internet is "good, clean, honest
> fun" in your book. I am not surprised."
> 
> Snit: "No... and when you did that I did contact the police."

Yes: she threatened to call the police and make false accusations.  And I
showed the posts to the police.  Yup.  *Nothing* wrong with my doing so...
yet you try to make it seem like there is.

> Elizabot: "And since I didn't do it they did nothing."
> 
> Snit: "Of course not... I called your bluff and you wisely backed down.
> Hmmmm, just like Steve."
> 
> Elizabot: "What bluff?"
> 
> Snit: "Do you not remember?  Do you suffer from the same ailments as
> Steve when he asks when he has lied... when he pretends he does not
> remember?"
> 
> Elizabot: "Of course I remember."
> 
> Snit: "Keep in mind the topic is your threat... good to see you do
> remember making it..."
> 
> Elizabot: "Actually, the topic is your having "good, clean, honest fun."
> Do try and keep up.
> 
> ...
> 
> 
> Elizabot: "I wrote "You are very near to crossing the line. I will not
> hesitate to contact the Prescott Police Department if you do. And that's
> a promise."
> 
> Snit: "Right... a clear threat to contact the police with made up
> accusations, being that there was no line I was near."

Yup: she had already made public accusations that I had raped her - what
other line was there for her to make up that I had "crossed"?

> Elizabot: "I wouldn't bring "made up" accusations to the police, Snit. I
> would bring hard and verifiable evidence to them."
> 
> Snit: "In case you decided to make good on that threat, I brought it to
> the attention of the police, and they assured me that you would actually
> have to provide evidence. My rights and options were explained to me,
> and I followed the suggestions they offered."
> 
> Elizabot: "Bullshit. They told you to leave me alone."
> 
> Snit: "As far as I know, you never did carry out your threat, though
> your obsession of posting about me 2/3 of the time or so has stayed.

And please note, shortly after that she stopped posting.  The police
contacted her and let her know she *had* crossed a line.

> ...
> 
> 
> Elizabot: "I said if you crossed the line, I'd contact the police."
> 
> Snit: "You made a very clear threat.  Of that there is no doubt.  I
> wisely took it seriously, and reacted appropriately."
> 
> Elizabot: "I wrote "You are very near to crossing the line. I will not
> hesitate to contact the Prescott Police Department if you do. And that's
> a promise." That's no bluff, and it still stands."
> 
> Snit: "What line is this you are in reference to?"
> 
> Elizabot: "If I told you, there is no doubt in my mind that you'd do it
> to see if I would follow up. Either that, or you'd claim I was daring
> you. You are that childish, Snit. You are always pushing and stretching
> and testing limits.  Perhaps you should actually follow the advice given
> to you by the police and leave me alone."
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/49f4d41d5173e3db
> 
> This is the type of person Snit is that Hadron is attempting to defend.
> Birds of a feather ....

Gee: she stalked me, tracked down my name, my address, my place of
employment, the names of my neighbors, etc.  She accused me of raping her
and then talked about calling the police.  I reported her and then she
stopped posting.

Yeah, I am evil.  

Seriously, what do you think I did wrong?

-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
> DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
>> On 1/31/2011 8:37 PM, owl wrote:
>>> DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just give me some tidbit of info about you I can use to get my
>>>> "stalking" started.
>>>
>>> Stalking freak dufus!
>>> I will not help you with your crimes.
>> 
>> Figures you'd chicken out, pissant.

You seriously expect someone to deliberately reveal their personal
details to a known stalker and thug like you? That's what started this
whole thing in the first place - or rather, you did.

>> Whenever you grow a pair:
>
>> Here's the actual GA law on cyberstalking:
>> http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/georgia.shtml

Here's a more complete reference, including laws pertaining to
Cyberstalking, Cyberharassment and Cyberbullying (their terms):

http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13495

>> Make sure you and Linosuck and Old Friend and that loser [H]omer get 
>> your stories^^^^^^^ whine/lies straight

You mean the bit where you posted "An Old Friend's" personal details in
order to intimidate him, in violation of your Usenet provider's TOS and
the law?  Or do you mean the bit where you supported another attacker
calling Chris' wife a "whore"?

>> you wouldn't want to be severely penalized for wasting their time.

If it were me, I'd take my chances. Not that chance has much to do with
it, given the palpable evidence. Like they say, the truth is always
the best defence.

> I notice you're still hiding from the law behind the "DFS" nym,
> stalker freak dufus.  Whenever you grow a pair... etc. 

Sooner or later he's going to seriously cross the line, if he hasn't
already, and then neither pseudonyms nor God will help him.

-- 
K.                           | Ancient Chinese Proverb:
http://slated.org            | "The road to Hell is paved with
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on sky   | ignorant twits who know nothing
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 38 days  | about GNU/Linux."

On 1/31/2011 10:49 PM, Homer wrote:
> Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
>> DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>  wrote:
>>> On 1/31/2011 8:37 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Just give me some tidbit of info about you I can use to get my
>>>>> "stalking" started.
>>>>
>>>> Stalking freak dufus!
>>>> I will not help you with your crimes.
>>>
>>> Figures you'd chicken out, pissant.
>
> You seriously expect someone to deliberately reveal their personal
> details to a known stalker and thug like you? That's what started this
> whole thing in the first place - or rather, you did.

What personal details?  When you post it to Usenet or to a website, it 
becomes public info.  Why don't you know that?



>>> Whenever you grow a pair:
>>
>>> Here's the actual GA law on cyberstalking:
>>> http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/georgia.shtml
>
> Here's a more complete reference, including laws pertaining to
> Cyberstalking, Cyberharassment and Cyberbullying (their terms):
>
> http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13495

The GA law is what's important here... or would be if any violation of 
it had taken place.



>>> Make sure you and Linosuck and Old Friend and that loser [H]omer get
>>> your stories^^^^^^^ whine/lies straight
>
> You mean the bit where you posted "An Old Friend's" personal details in
> order to intimidate him,

His own public information intimidates him?

Wonder what he's hiding...




> in violation of your Usenet provider's TOS and
> the law?

Neither was violated.





> Or do you mean the bit where you supported another attacker
> calling Chris' wife a "whore"?

Not just any old whore; an anal whore.

Does it really bother you wackos that an anonymous nym posts a mindless, 
incongruous flame-insult?  Plus, if you knew Linosuck's personality, you 
know he would never marry an anal whore.  I see him as more of a 
child-bride kind of man.




>>> you wouldn't want to be severely penalized for wasting their time.
>
> If it were me, I'd take my chances. Not that chance has much to do with
> it, given the palpable evidence. Like they say, the truth is always
> the best defence.


So do it, bozo.  Take your chances.

You are (or were) in Killin, Scotland 
(http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0065007/usercomments), so the FBI won't 
pick you up for wasting their time.


By the way:
Where do you live now?
Where do you work?
What's your phone number?
What kind of car do you drive?
What's your license plate #?




>> I notice you're still hiding from the law behind the "DFS" nym,
>> stalker freak dufus.  Whenever you grow a pair... etc.
>
> Sooner or later he's going to seriously cross the line, if he hasn't
> already, and then neither pseudonyms nor God will help him.

I don't post under a pseudonym; those are my initials.

And there is no God.

On 1/31/2011 7:39 PM, Hadron wrote:

> What cyber stalking?
>
> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?


Funny, I don't remember a single one of the smarmy, hypocrite 
"advocates" whining about Snit being "cyberstalked".

On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 02:44:00 +0000, Homer wrote:

> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>> owl wrote:
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>
>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>
>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>
>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>
>> Oh, he means this:
>>
>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
> 
> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
> own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
> then intimidating someone.

Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for those 
WinTrolls.

-- 
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581 
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0

RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 02:44:00 +0000, Homer wrote:
>
>> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>>> owl wrote:
>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>>
>>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>>
>>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>>
>>> Oh, he means this:
>>>
>>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
>> 
>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
>> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
>> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
>> own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
>> then intimidating someone.
>
> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for those 
> WinTrolls.

Did you even understand what was being discussed?

Hadron wrote:

> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 02:44:00 +0000, Homer wrote:
>>
>>> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>>>> owl wrote:
>>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, he means this:
>>>>
>>>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
>>> 
>>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
>>> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
>>> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
>>> own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
>>> then intimidating someone.
>>
>> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for those
>> WinTrolls.
> 
> Did you even understand what was being discussed?

I guess he did. Snit Michael Glasser has for *years* posted his trolling 
websites "gallopping insanity" address. And he had setup that site so 
incredibly stupid that you could simply call its IP address and get the 
"Prescott Computer Guy" instead. *HE* is the one who posted his complete data 
for several years, because that ignorant stupid "computer expert" was way too 
incompetent to set up his website correctly. And he was too cheap to have two 
different sites, and instead simply addressed one and the same under two 
different names.

You mean those inconveniant facts, Hadron Larry?

The fact that it was Snit Michael Glasser himself, and no one else, who posted 
his complete name, address and "business" (as he never has run any business 
except trolling usenet).

Too bad that you can't fabricate your "facts" so easily in this case, Hadron 
Larry Snot Quark
-- 
Windows was created to keep stupid people away from UNIX."
  -- Tom Christiansen

It is rumoured that Homer wrote:

> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>> owl wrote:
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>
>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>
>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>
>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>
>> Oh, he means this:
>>
>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
>
> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
> own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
> then intimidating someone.

Exactly. And IIRC he has also posted info to his website in this group too.

And according to google,  Michael Snit Glasser still posts with
"gallopinginsanity.com":

From:          Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Message-ID:    <C96CD087.8C9E8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Now it doesn't take a genius (unless you're Hadron, that is) to run a "whois"
to find out details which 'Snit' *himself* has posted elsewhere, & which are
ALL in the public domain.

Domain address: gallopinginsanity.com

Registrant:
   Prescott Computer Guy
   Arizona 
   United States

   Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
   Domain Name: GALLOPINGINSANITY.COM
      Created on: 08-May-06
      Expires on: 01-Sep-13
      Last Updated on: 01-Jun-10

   Administrative Contact:
      Glasser, Michael  domain_info@prescottcomputerguy.org
      Prescott Computer Guy
      xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      Prescott, Arizona 
      United States
     
   Technical Contact:
      Glasser, Michael  domain_info@prescottcomputerguy.org
      Prescott Computer Guy
      Prescott, Arizona 
      United States
     
<I've omitted some parts of his address>

-- 
Computer not found: A)bort, R)etry, K)ill troll.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash,
or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire
built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods."
-- former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

It is rumoured that High Plains Thumper wrote:

> On 01/31/2011 07:44 PM, Homer wrote:
>> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>>> owl wrote:
>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>>
>>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>>
>>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>>
>>> Oh, he means this:
>>>
>>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
>>
>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
>> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
>> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
>> own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
>> then intimidating someone.
>
> Oh, that one. Yes, the trolls keep whining about stuff that is not 
> personal information violation, particularly when one publicly posts 
> their information and someone else quotes it. However, the trolls have 
> nymshifted before nicking an advocates nym or name, then returning to 
> claim the advocate posted it. That is impersonation and illegal.
>
> Since the topic herein is cyber stalking, let's examine if this is 
> stalking. This one involved Snit and his stalking Elizabot. The 
> discussion is rather disturbing:
>
> Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 10:32:00 -0600
> From: Elizabot <toolittletool...@poo.com>
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
> Subject: Re: Steve admits he is Sigmond....
> Message-ID: <40a64600$0$209$75868355@news.frii.net>
>
> Snit: "Good to see... just wish you would keep it good, clean, honest 
> fun.... as I do."
>
> Elizabot: "So stalking people on the internet is "good, clean, honest 
> fun" in your book. I am not surprised."
>
> Snit: "No... and when you did that I did contact the police."
>
> Elizabot: "And since I didn't do it they did nothing."
>
> Snit: "Of course not... I called your bluff and you wisely backed down. 
> Hmmmm, just like Steve."
>
> Elizabot: "What bluff?"
>
> Snit: "Do you not remember?  Do you suffer from the same ailments as 
> Steve when he asks when he has lied... when he pretends he does not 
> remember?"
>
> Elizabot: "Of course I remember."
>
> Snit: "Keep in mind the topic is your threat... good to see you do 
> remember making it..."
>
> Elizabot: "Actually, the topic is your having "good, clean, honest fun." 
> Do try and keep up.
>
> ...
>
> Elizabot: "I wrote "You are very near to crossing the line. I will not 
> hesitate to contact the Prescott Police Department if you do. And that's 
> a promise."
>
> Snit: "Right... a clear threat to contact the police with made up 
> accusations, being that there was no line I was near."
>
> Elizabot: "I wouldn't bring "made up" accusations to the police, Snit. I 
> would bring hard and verifiable evidence to them."
>
> Snit: "In case you decided to make good on that threat, I brought it to 
> the attention of the police, and they assured me that you would actually 
> have to provide evidence. My rights and options were explained to me, 
> and I followed the suggestions they offered."
>
> Elizabot: "Bullshit. They told you to leave me alone."
>
> Snit: "As far as I know, you never did carry out your threat, though 
> your obsession of posting about me 2/3 of the time or so has stayed.
>
> ...
>
> Elizabot: "I said if you crossed the line, I'd contact the police."
>
> Snit: "You made a very clear threat.  Of that there is no doubt.  I 
> wisely took it seriously, and reacted appropriately."
>
> Elizabot: "I wrote "You are very near to crossing the line. I will not 
> hesitate to contact the Prescott Police Department if you do. And that's 
> a promise." That's no bluff, and it still stands."
>
> Snit: "What line is this you are in reference to?"
>
> Elizabot: "If I told you, there is no doubt in my mind that you'd do it 
> to see if I would follow up. Either that, or you'd claim I was daring 
> you. You are that childish, Snit. You are always pushing and stretching 
> and testing limits.  Perhaps you should actually follow the advice given 
> to you by the police and leave me alone."
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/49f4d41d5173e3db
>
> This is the type of person Snit is that Hadron is attempting to defend. 
> Birds of a feather ....

Well naturally, the Hadron M$ zealot has to defend his fellow trolls no matter
how obnoxious & odious they are.

-- 
Computer air conditioner in use! Please close Windows.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash,
or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire
built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods."
-- former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

It is rumoured that Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> Some dumb fucknut wrote:
>
>> Tattoo Vampire / Don Zeigler: "A little experimentation in college does not 
>> make one gay"
>
> Cute, but the post you cite has this:
>
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
>
> Nope, I've never used Outlook Express to post to newsgroups.
>
> It also has my real email address in the From line - don't use it on the
> Usenet, either. But, hey, cure forgery there, Snotwad. :-P

References:  smtp.cobalt.loc

That troll again...

-- 
Homo sum; humani nihil a me alienum puto
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash,
or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire
built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods."
-- former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> He has only, not
>> that I agree, reposted publicly accessible information. Chris took the
>> decision to openly post with his own name. I think thats a little silly
>> myself. He also thinks people who dont are wimps. Which is funny since
>> he sucks up to posters called "chrisv" "7" and "homer". Hypocrite? You
>> decide.
>
> I agree that posting with your real name is reckless, but regardless
> of whether someone makes it easy to find their personal information, it
> should not be dragged into this newsgroup, especially when it involves
> the person's family.  But I guess it's true that you just can't buy
> class.

Indeed.  That's why "Hadron" must always stick in a lie/insult in just about
every post.

-- 
Debian Linux is a solid, comprehensive product, and a genuine pleasure to
use.  It is also great to become involved with the Debian collective,
whose friendliness and spirit recalls the early days of the Internet and
its sense of openness and global cooperation.

owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
>
>> Just give me some tidbit of info about you I can use to get my 
>> "stalking" started.
>
> Stalking freak dufus!
> I will not help you with your crimes.

See?  DFS will try any ploy to find your soft spot and burrow his way into
your skin.

-- 
The most exquisite peak in culinary art is conquered when you do right by a
ham, for a ham, in the very nature of the process it has undergone since last
it walked on its own feet, combines in its flavor the tang of smoky autumnal
woods, the maternal softness of earthy fields delivered of their crop children,
the wineyness of a late sun, the intimate kiss of fertilizing rain, and the
bite of fire.  You must slice it thin, almost as thin as this page you hold
in your hands.  The making of a ham dinner, like the making of a gentleman,
starts a long, long time before the event.
		-- W. B. Courtney, "Reflections of Maryland Country Ham",
		   from "Congress Eate It Up"

It is rumoured that Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Just give me some tidbit of info about you I can use to get my 
>>> "stalking" started.
>>
>> Stalking freak dufus!
>> I will not help you with your crimes.
>
> See?  DFS will try any ploy to find your soft spot and burrow his way into
> your skin.

Like a botfly, or cattle grub.

-- 
Computer games are turning children into brainless walking zombies.
Proof - see Hadron.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash,
or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire
built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods."
-- former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> It is rumoured that Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just give me some tidbit of info about you I can use to get my 
>>>> "stalking" started.
>>>
>>> Stalking freak dufus!
>>> I will not help you with your crimes.
>>
>> See?  DFS will try any ploy to find your soft spot and burrow his way into
>> your skin.
>
> Like a botfly, or cattle grub.

LOL.

Ewwwwwww.  Creepy!

-- 
Every time I think I know where it's at, they move it.

William Poaster wrote:

> Like a botfly, or cattle grub.

I was thinking of a chigger. :-)
-- 
Best regards,
[tv]
Owner, Trollus Amongus LLC


Men have become the tools of their tools.

It is rumoured that Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> William Poaster wrote:
>
>> Like a botfly, or cattle grub.
>
> I was thinking of a chigger. :-)

Oh, yes! :-)   There are plenty of those in western Kansas. 

-- 
Linux = Your Brain - Windows = Your brain on drugs.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash,
or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire
built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods."
-- former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

Peter K�hlmann wrote:
> Hadron wrote:
>> RonB<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>  writes:
>>> Homer wrote:
>>>
>>>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael
>>>> Glasser, and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer
>>>> Guy". AFAICR this was revealed by Snit himself years ago on
>>>> CSMA, when he posted a link to his own Website. That's rather
>>>> different to someone researching, exposing, then intimidating
>>>> someone.
>>>
>>> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for
>>> those WinTrolls.
>>
>> Did you even understand what was being discussed?
>
> I guess he did. Snit Michael Glasser has for *years* posted his
> trolling websites "gallopping insanity" address. And he had setup
> that site so incredibly stupid that you could simply call its IP
> address and get the "Prescott Computer Guy" instead. *HE* is the one
> who posted his complete data for several years, because that ignorant
> stupid "computer expert" was way too incompetent to set up his
> website correctly. And he was too cheap to have two different sites,
> and instead simply addressed one and the same under two different
> names.
>
> You mean those inconvenient facts, Hadron Larry?
>
> The fact that it was Snit Michael Glasser himself, and no one else,
> who posted his complete name, address and "business" (as he never has
> run any business except trolling usenet).
>
> Too bad that you can't fabricate your "facts" so easily in this case,
> Hadron Larry Snot Quark

Typical of Snit, this very same conversation occurred over 2 years ago:

Snit: "No doubt... here are some examples I have documented:
   <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Office2003.html>
   <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/logoff.html>
   <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Project.html>
   <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/dialogs/>
   <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/New_Folder/>"

Tattoo Vampire: "All your links resolve to the index page at
prescottcomputer.com."

Moshe Goldfarb (flatfish): "Stop lying... His links work fine..."

Snit: "Of course they do - he is just being a bonehead.  Again.  Oh, and
if you look he screwed up... my site is not prescottcomputer.com."

Peter K�hlmann: "No. It is prescottcomputerguy.org, which resolves to
the exact same IP address as gallopinginsanity.com. So you *again* blast
your info all over usenet. And then wonder that people
find out that Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser are the very same
idiotic, dishonest twits trolling usenet 24/7 and pretending to actually
'run a business'"

25 Aug 2008

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/bb3ae104ac249356

-- 
HPT

It is rumoured that High Plains Thumper wrote:

> Peter K�hlmann wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>> RonB<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>  writes:
>>>> Homer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael
>>>>> Glasser, and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer
>>>>> Guy". AFAICR this was revealed by Snit himself years ago on
>>>>> CSMA, when he posted a link to his own Website. That's rather
>>>>> different to someone researching, exposing, then intimidating
>>>>> someone.
>>>>
>>>> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for
>>>> those WinTrolls.
>>>
>>> Did you even understand what was being discussed?
>>
>> I guess he did. Snit Michael Glasser has for *years* posted his
>> trolling websites "gallopping insanity" address. And he had setup
>> that site so incredibly stupid that you could simply call its IP
>> address and get the "Prescott Computer Guy" instead. *HE* is the one
>> who posted his complete data for several years, because that ignorant
>> stupid "computer expert" was way too incompetent to set up his
>> website correctly. And he was too cheap to have two different sites,
>> and instead simply addressed one and the same under two different
>> names.
>>
>> You mean those inconvenient facts, Hadron Larry?
>>
>> The fact that it was Snit Michael Glasser himself, and no one else,
>> who posted his complete name, address and "business" (as he never has
>> run any business except trolling usenet).
>>
>> Too bad that you can't fabricate your "facts" so easily in this case,
>> Hadron Larry Snot Quark
>
> Typical of Snit, this very same conversation occurred over 2 years ago:
>
> Snit: "No doubt... here are some examples I have documented:
>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Office2003.html>
>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/logoff.html>
>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Project.html>
>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/dialogs/>
>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/New_Folder/>"
>
> Tattoo Vampire: "All your links resolve to the index page at
> prescottcomputer.com."
>
> Moshe Goldfarb (flatfish): "Stop lying... His links work fine..."
>
> Snit: "Of course they do - he is just being a bonehead.  Again.  Oh, and
> if you look he screwed up... my site is not prescottcomputer.com."
>
> Peter K�hlmann: "No. It is prescottcomputerguy.org, which resolves to
> the exact same IP address as gallopinginsanity.com. So you *again* blast
> your info all over usenet. And then wonder that people
> find out that Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser are the very same
> idiotic, dishonest twits trolling usenet 24/7 and pretending to actually
> 'run a business'"
>
> 25 Aug 2008
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/bb3ae104ac249356

Q.E.D

-- 
Linux = Your Brain - Windows = Your brain on drugs.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash,
or liquid assets reserves. Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire
built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods."
-- former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

William Poaster wrote:

> It is rumoured that High Plains Thumper wrote:
> 
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>> RonB<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>  writes:
>>>>> Homer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael
>>>>>> Glasser, and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer
>>>>>> Guy". AFAICR this was revealed by Snit himself years ago on
>>>>>> CSMA, when he posted a link to his own Website. That's rather
>>>>>> different to someone researching, exposing, then intimidating
>>>>>> someone.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for
>>>>> those WinTrolls.
>>>>
>>>> Did you even understand what was being discussed?
>>>
>>> I guess he did. Snit Michael Glasser has for *years* posted his
>>> trolling websites "gallopping insanity" address. And he had setup
>>> that site so incredibly stupid that you could simply call its IP
>>> address and get the "Prescott Computer Guy" instead. *HE* is the one
>>> who posted his complete data for several years, because that ignorant
>>> stupid "computer expert" was way too incompetent to set up his
>>> website correctly. And he was too cheap to have two different sites,
>>> and instead simply addressed one and the same under two different
>>> names.
>>>
>>> You mean those inconvenient facts, Hadron Larry?
>>>
>>> The fact that it was Snit Michael Glasser himself, and no one else,
>>> who posted his complete name, address and "business" (as he never has
>>> run any business except trolling usenet).
>>>
>>> Too bad that you can't fabricate your "facts" so easily in this case,
>>> Hadron Larry Snot Quark
>>
>> Typical of Snit, this very same conversation occurred over 2 years ago:
>>
>> Snit: "No doubt... here are some examples I have documented:
>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Office2003.html>
>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/logoff.html>
>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Project.html>
>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/dialogs/>
>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/New_Folder/>"
>>
>> Tattoo Vampire: "All your links resolve to the index page at
>> prescottcomputer.com."
>>
>> Moshe Goldfarb (flatfish): "Stop lying... His links work fine..."
>>
>> Snit: "Of course they do - he is just being a bonehead.  Again.  Oh, and
>> if you look he screwed up... my site is not prescottcomputer.com."
>>
>> Peter Köhlmann: "No. It is prescottcomputerguy.org, which resolves to
>> the exact same IP address as gallopinginsanity.com. So you *again* blast
>> your info all over usenet. And then wonder that people
>> find out that Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser are the very same
>> idiotic, dishonest twits trolling usenet 24/7 and pretending to actually
>> 'run a business'"
>>
>> 25 Aug 2008
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/bb3ae104ac249356
> 
> Q.E.D
> 

and if you do *this* now

~> host prescottcomputerguy.org
prescottcomputerguy.org has address 97.74.215.83
prescottcomputerguy.org mail is handled by 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net.
prescottcomputerguy.org mail is handled by 0 smtp.secureserver.net.

~> host gallopinginsanity.com
gallopinginsanity.com has address 97.74.215.83
gallopinginsanity.com mail is handled by 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net.
gallopinginsanity.com mail is handled by 0 smtp.secureserver.net.


What a surprise. Snit is Michael Glasser. Still blasting all his private and 
phony "business" info all over usenet

And that lying filthy POS has the gall to accuse others of wrongdoing

And, the mind boggles, Hadron Larry Snot Quark actually is stupid enough to 
fall himself for Snit Michael Glassers lies. And is attacking people because 
of it. How much deeper can that twit actually sink?

-- 
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I can not change,
the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to hide the
bodies of those I had to kill because they pissed me off.

On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:03:33 +0100, Peter 
K�hlmann<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> William Poaster wrote:

#1 You are butt kissing Willie Butt Kiss Boaster.
#2 You are looking insane.
#3  You need to be locked-up.

-- 
posted with a Droid

DFS stated in post ii82jg$8mc$3@news.eternal-september.org on 1/31/11 9:35
PM:

> On 1/31/2011 7:39 PM, Hadron wrote:
> 
>> What cyber stalking?
>> 
>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
> 
> 
> Funny, I don't remember a single one of the smarmy, hypocrite
> "advocates" whining about Snit being "cyberstalked".
> 
And look at the defense: it was not hard to track me down, so it was just
fine to:

1) post my information
2) lie about me and my family
3) seed Google with lies tied to my business name
4) encourage people to email my wife

And, as seen in Carroll and others

5) track me down to my place of employment
6) threaten to contact my employer for the purpose of having
   me get fired 
7) make public accusations of sexual harassment and even rape

All of this is "defended" based on the fact that one can track someone down
using information on the Internet.

It is insane.  


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

High Plains Thumper stated in post 4d480e23$0$4322$6e1ede2f@read.cnntp.org
on 2/1/11 6:44 AM:

> Peter K�hlmann wrote:
>> Hadron wrote:
>>> RonB<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>  writes:
>>>> Homer wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael
>>>>> Glasser, and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer
>>>>> Guy". AFAICR this was revealed by Snit himself years ago on
>>>>> CSMA, when he posted a link to his own Website. That's rather
>>>>> different to someone researching, exposing, then intimidating
>>>>> someone.
>>>> 
>>>> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for
>>>> those WinTrolls.
>>> 
>>> Did you even understand what was being discussed?
>> 
>> I guess he did. Snit Michael Glasser has for *years* posted his
>> trolling websites "gallopping insanity" address. And he had setup
>> that site so incredibly stupid that you could simply call its IP
>> address and get the "Prescott Computer Guy" instead. *HE* is the one
>> who posted his complete data for several years, because that ignorant
>> stupid "computer expert" was way too incompetent to set up his
>> website correctly. And he was too cheap to have two different sites,
>> and instead simply addressed one and the same under two different
>> names.
>> 
>> You mean those inconvenient facts, Hadron Larry?
>> 
>> The fact that it was Snit Michael Glasser himself, and no one else,
>> who posted his complete name, address and "business" (as he never has
>> run any business except trolling usenet).
>> 
>> Too bad that you can't fabricate your "facts" so easily in this case,
>> Hadron Larry Snot Quark
> 
> Typical of Snit, this very same conversation occurred over 2 years ago:
> 
> Snit: "No doubt... here are some examples I have documented:
>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Office2003.html>
>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/logoff.html>
>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Project.html>
>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/dialogs/>
>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/New_Folder/>"
> 
> Tattoo Vampire: "All your links resolve to the index page at
> prescottcomputer.com."

Which they never did. Ever.

> Moshe Goldfarb (flatfish): "Stop lying... His links work fine..."
> 
> Snit: "Of course they do - he is just being a bonehead.  Again.  Oh, and
> if you look he screwed up... my site is not prescottcomputer.com."
> 
> Peter K�hlmann: "No. It is prescottcomputerguy.org, which resolves to
> the exact same IP address as gallopinginsanity.com. So you *again* blast
> your info all over usenet. And then wonder that people
> find out that Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser are the very same
> idiotic, dishonest twits trolling usenet 24/7 and pretending to actually
> 'run a business'"
> 
> 25 Aug 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/bb3ae104ac249356

And look at the defense: it was not hard to track me down, so it was just
fine to:

1) post my information
2) lie about me and my family
3) seed Google with lies tied to my business name
4) encourage people to email my wife

And, as seen in Carroll and others

5) track me down to my place of employment
6) threaten to contact my employer for the purpose of having
   me get fired 
7) make public accusations of sexual harassment and even rape

All of this is "defended" based on the fact that one can track someone down
using information on the Internet.

It is insane.  

-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

RonB stated in post ii8b2u$qtd$3@news.eternal-september.org on 2/1/11 12:00
AM:

> On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 02:44:00 +0000, Homer wrote:
> 
>> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>>> owl wrote:
>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>> 
>>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>> 
>>> Oh, he means this:
>>> 
>>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
>> 
>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
>> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
>> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
>> own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
>> then intimidating someone.
> 
> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for those
> WinTrolls.

And look at the defense: it was not hard to track me down, so it was just
fine to:

1) post my information
2) lie about me and my family
3) seed Google with lies tied to my business name
4) encourage people to email my wife

And, as seen in Carroll and others

5) track me down to my place of employment
6) threaten to contact my employer for the purpose of having
   me get fired 
7) make public accusations of sexual harassment and even rape

All of this is "defended" based on the fact that one can track someone down
using information on the Internet.

It is insane.  


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

William Poaster stated in post 7gfl18-sov.ln1@beta.mylinuxnet.org on 2/1/11
6:47 AM:

> It is rumoured that High Plains Thumper wrote:
> 
>> Peter K�hlmann wrote:
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>> RonB<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>  writes:
>>>>> Homer wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael
>>>>>> Glasser, and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer
>>>>>> Guy". AFAICR this was revealed by Snit himself years ago on
>>>>>> CSMA, when he posted a link to his own Website. That's rather
>>>>>> different to someone researching, exposing, then intimidating
>>>>>> someone.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for
>>>>> those WinTrolls.
>>>> 
>>>> Did you even understand what was being discussed?
>>> 
>>> I guess he did. Snit Michael Glasser has for *years* posted his
>>> trolling websites "gallopping insanity" address. And he had setup
>>> that site so incredibly stupid that you could simply call its IP
>>> address and get the "Prescott Computer Guy" instead. *HE* is the one
>>> who posted his complete data for several years, because that ignorant
>>> stupid "computer expert" was way too incompetent to set up his
>>> website correctly. And he was too cheap to have two different sites,
>>> and instead simply addressed one and the same under two different
>>> names.
>>> 
>>> You mean those inconvenient facts, Hadron Larry?
>>> 
>>> The fact that it was Snit Michael Glasser himself, and no one else,
>>> who posted his complete name, address and "business" (as he never has
>>> run any business except trolling usenet).
>>> 
>>> Too bad that you can't fabricate your "facts" so easily in this case,
>>> Hadron Larry Snot Quark
>> 
>> Typical of Snit, this very same conversation occurred over 2 years ago:
>> 
>> Snit: "No doubt... here are some examples I have documented:
>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Office2003.html>
>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/logoff.html>
>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Project.html>
>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/dialogs/>
>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/New_Folder/>"
>> 
>> Tattoo Vampire: "All your links resolve to the index page at
>> prescottcomputer.com."
>> 
>> Moshe Goldfarb (flatfish): "Stop lying... His links work fine..."
>> 
>> Snit: "Of course they do - he is just being a bonehead.  Again.  Oh, and
>> if you look he screwed up... my site is not prescottcomputer.com."
>> 
>> Peter K�hlmann: "No. It is prescottcomputerguy.org, which resolves to
>> the exact same IP address as gallopinginsanity.com. So you *again* blast
>> your info all over usenet. And then wonder that people
>> find out that Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser are the very same
>> idiotic, dishonest twits trolling usenet 24/7 and pretending to actually
>> 'run a business'"
>> 
>> 25 Aug 2008
>> 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/bb3ae104ac249356
> 
> Q.E.D

And look at the defense: it was not hard to track me down, so it was just
fine to:

1) post my information
2) lie about me and my family
3) seed Google with lies tied to my business name
4) encourage people to email my wife

And, as seen in Carroll and others

5) track me down to my place of employment
6) threaten to contact my employer for the purpose of having
   me get fired 
7) make public accusations of sexual harassment and even rape

All of this is "defended" based on the fact that one can track someone down
using information on the Internet.

It is insane.  


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

William Poaster stated in post ns4l18-6n5.ln1@beta.mylinuxnet.org on 2/1/11
3:46 AM:

> It is rumoured that Homer wrote:
> 
>> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>>> owl wrote:
>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>> 
>>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>> 
>>> Oh, he means this:
>>> 
>>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
>> 
>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
>> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
>> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
>> own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
>> then intimidating someone.
> 
> Exactly. And IIRC he has also posted info to his website in this group too.
> 
> And according to google,  Michael Snit Glasser still posts with
> "gallopinginsanity.com":
> 
> From:          Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
> Message-ID:    <C96CD087.8C9E8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
> 
> Now it doesn't take a genius (unless you're Hadron, that is) to run a "whois"
> to find out details which 'Snit' *himself* has posted elsewhere, & which are
> ALL in the public domain.
> 
> Domain address: gallopinginsanity.com
> 
> Registrant:
>    Prescott Computer Guy
>    Arizona 
>    United States
> 
>    Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
>    Domain Name: GALLOPINGINSANITY.COM
>       Created on: 08-May-06
>       Expires on: 01-Sep-13
>       Last Updated on: 01-Jun-10
> 
>    Administrative Contact:
>       Glasser, Michael  domain_info@prescottcomputerguy.org
>       Prescott Computer Guy
>       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>       Prescott, Arizona
>       United States
>      
>    Technical Contact:
>       Glasser, Michael  domain_info@prescottcomputerguy.org
>       Prescott Computer Guy
>       Prescott, Arizona
>       United States
>      
> <I've omitted some parts of his address>

And look at the defense: it was not hard to track me down, so it was just
fine to:

1) post my information
2) lie about me and my family
3) seed Google with lies tied to my business name
4) encourage people to email my wife

And, as seen in Carroll and others

5) track me down to my place of employment
6) threaten to contact my employer for the purpose of having
   me get fired 
7) make public accusations of sexual harassment and even rape

All of this is "defended" based on the fact that one can track someone down
using information on the Internet.

It is insane.  


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Peter K�hlmann stated in post ii93rm$e8j$02$1@news.t-online.com on 2/1/11
7:03 AM:

> William Poaster wrote:
> 
>> It is rumoured that High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> 
>>> Peter K�hlmann wrote:
>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>> RonB<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>  writes:
>>>>>> Homer wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael
>>>>>>> Glasser, and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer
>>>>>>> Guy". AFAICR this was revealed by Snit himself years ago on
>>>>>>> CSMA, when he posted a link to his own Website. That's rather
>>>>>>> different to someone researching, exposing, then intimidating
>>>>>>> someone.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for
>>>>>> those WinTrolls.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Did you even understand what was being discussed?
>>>> 
>>>> I guess he did. Snit Michael Glasser has for *years* posted his
>>>> trolling websites "gallopping insanity" address. And he had setup
>>>> that site so incredibly stupid that you could simply call its IP
>>>> address and get the "Prescott Computer Guy" instead. *HE* is the one
>>>> who posted his complete data for several years, because that ignorant
>>>> stupid "computer expert" was way too incompetent to set up his
>>>> website correctly. And he was too cheap to have two different sites,
>>>> and instead simply addressed one and the same under two different
>>>> names.
>>>> 
>>>> You mean those inconvenient facts, Hadron Larry?
>>>> 
>>>> The fact that it was Snit Michael Glasser himself, and no one else,
>>>> who posted his complete name, address and "business" (as he never has
>>>> run any business except trolling usenet).
>>>> 
>>>> Too bad that you can't fabricate your "facts" so easily in this case,
>>>> Hadron Larry Snot Quark
>>> 
>>> Typical of Snit, this very same conversation occurred over 2 years ago:
>>> 
>>> Snit: "No doubt... here are some examples I have documented:
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Office2003.html>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/logoff.html>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Project.html>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/dialogs/>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/New_Folder/>"
>>> 
>>> Tattoo Vampire: "All your links resolve to the index page at
>>> prescottcomputer.com."
>>> 
>>> Moshe Goldfarb (flatfish): "Stop lying... His links work fine..."
>>> 
>>> Snit: "Of course they do - he is just being a bonehead.  Again.  Oh, and
>>> if you look he screwed up... my site is not prescottcomputer.com."
>>> 
>>> Peter K�hlmann: "No. It is prescottcomputerguy.org, which resolves to
>>> the exact same IP address as gallopinginsanity.com. So you *again* blast
>>> your info all over usenet. And then wonder that people
>>> find out that Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser are the very same
>>> idiotic, dishonest twits trolling usenet 24/7 and pretending to actually
>>> 'run a business'"
>>> 
>>> 25 Aug 2008
>>> 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/bb3ae104ac249356
>> 
>> Q.E.D
>> 
> 
> and if you do *this* now
> 
> ~> host prescottcomputerguy.org
> prescottcomputerguy.org has address 97.74.215.83
> prescottcomputerguy.org mail is handled by 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net.
> prescottcomputerguy.org mail is handled by 0 smtp.secureserver.net.
> 
> ~> host gallopinginsanity.com
> gallopinginsanity.com has address 97.74.215.83
> gallopinginsanity.com mail is handled by 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net.
> gallopinginsanity.com mail is handled by 0 smtp.secureserver.net.
> 
> 
> What a surprise. Snit is Michael Glasser. Still blasting all his private and
> phony "business" info all over usenet
> 
> And that lying filthy POS has the gall to accuse others of wrongdoing
> 
> And, the mind boggles, Hadron Larry Snot Quark actually is stupid enough to
> fall himself for Snit Michael Glassers lies. And is attacking people because
> of it. How much deeper can that twit actually sink?

And look at the defense: it was not hard to track me down, so it was just
fine to:

1) post my information
2) lie about me and my family
3) seed Google with lies tied to my business name
4) encourage people to email my wife

And, as seen in Carroll and others

5) track me down to my place of employment
6) threaten to contact my employer for the purpose of having
   me get fired 
7) make public accusations of sexual harassment and even rape

All of this is "defended" based on the fact that one can track someone down
using information on the Internet.

It is insane.  


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Peter K�hlmann stated in post ii8h7k$urq$02$1@news.t-online.com on 2/1/11
1:45 AM:

> Hadron wrote:
> 
>> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 02:44:00 +0000, Homer wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>>>>> owl wrote:
>>>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Oh, he means this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
>>>> 
>>>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
>>>> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
>>>> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
>>>> own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
>>>> then intimidating someone.
>>> 
>>> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for those
>>> WinTrolls.
>> 
>> Did you even understand what was being discussed?
> 
> I guess he did. Snit Michael Glasser has for *years* posted his trolling
> websites "gallopping insanity" address. And he had setup that site so
> incredibly stupid that you could simply call its IP address and get the
> "Prescott Computer Guy" instead. *HE* is the one who posted his complete data
> for several years, because that ignorant stupid "computer expert" was way too
> incompetent to set up his website correctly. And he was too cheap to have two
> different sites, and instead simply addressed one and the same under two
> different names.
> 
> You mean those inconveniant facts, Hadron Larry?
> 
> The fact that it was Snit Michael Glasser himself, and no one else, who posted
> his complete name, address and "business" (as he never has run any business
> except trolling usenet).
> 
> Too bad that you can't fabricate your "facts" so easily in this case, Hadron
> Larry Snot Quark

And look at the defense: it was not hard to track me down, so it was just
fine to:

1) post my information
2) lie about me and my family
3) seed Google with lies tied to my business name
4) encourage people to email my wife

And, as seen in Carroll and others

5) track me down to my place of employment
6) threaten to contact my employer for the purpose of having
   me get fired 
7) make public accusations of sexual harassment and even rape

All of this is "defended" based on the fact that one can track someone down
using information on the Internet.

It is insane.  


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, Peter K�hlmann
on 1/2/2011 14:03 shattered the silence with:

> William Poaster wrote:
>
>> It is rumoured that High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> 
>>> Peter K�hlmann wrote:
>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>> RonB<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>  writes:
>>>>>> Homer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael
>>>>>>> Glasser, and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer
>>>>>>> Guy". AFAICR this was revealed by Snit himself years ago on
>>>>>>> CSMA, when he posted a link to his own Website. That's rather
>>>>>>> different to someone researching, exposing, then intimidating
>>>>>>> someone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for
>>>>>> those WinTrolls.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you even understand what was being discussed?
>>>>
>>>> I guess he did. Snit Michael Glasser has for *years* posted his
>>>> trolling websites "gallopping insanity" address. And he had setup
>>>> that site so incredibly stupid that you could simply call its IP
>>>> address and get the "Prescott Computer Guy" instead. *HE* is the one
>>>> who posted his complete data for several years, because that ignorant
>>>> stupid "computer expert" was way too incompetent to set up his
>>>> website correctly. And he was too cheap to have two different sites,
>>>> and instead simply addressed one and the same under two different
>>>> names.
>>>>
>>>> You mean those inconvenient facts, Hadron Larry?
>>>>
>>>> The fact that it was Snit Michael Glasser himself, and no one else,
>>>> who posted his complete name, address and "business" (as he never has
>>>> run any business except trolling usenet).
>>>>
>>>> Too bad that you can't fabricate your "facts" so easily in this case,
>>>> Hadron Larry Snot Quark
>>>
>>> Typical of Snit, this very same conversation occurred over 2 years ago:
>>>
>>> Snit: "No doubt... here are some examples I have documented:
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Office2003.html>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/logoff.html>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Project.html>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/dialogs/>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/New_Folder/>"
>>>
>>> Tattoo Vampire: "All your links resolve to the index page at
>>> prescottcomputer.com."
>>>
>>> Moshe Goldfarb (flatfish): "Stop lying... His links work fine..."
>>>
>>> Snit: "Of course they do - he is just being a bonehead.  Again.  Oh, and
>>> if you look he screwed up... my site is not prescottcomputer.com."
>>>
>>> Peter K�hlmann: "No. It is prescottcomputerguy.org, which resolves to
>>> the exact same IP address as gallopinginsanity.com. So you *again* blast
>>> your info all over usenet. And then wonder that people
>>> find out that Snot/Snit/Rekruled/Michael Glasser are the very same
>>> idiotic, dishonest twits trolling usenet 24/7 and pretending to actually
>>> 'run a business'"
>>>
>>> 25 Aug 2008
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/bb3ae104ac249356
>> 
>> Q.E.D
>> 
>
> and if you do *this* now
>
> ~> host prescottcomputerguy.org
> prescottcomputerguy.org has address 97.74.215.83
> prescottcomputerguy.org mail is handled by 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net.
> prescottcomputerguy.org mail is handled by 0 smtp.secureserver.net.
>
> ~> host gallopinginsanity.com
> gallopinginsanity.com has address 97.74.215.83
> gallopinginsanity.com mail is handled by 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net.
> gallopinginsanity.com mail is handled by 0 smtp.secureserver.net.
>
>
> What a surprise. Snit is Michael Glasser. Still blasting all his private and 
> phony "business" info all over usenet
>
> And that lying filthy POS has the gall to accuse others of wrongdoing
>
> And, the mind boggles, Hadron Larry Snot Quark actually is stupid enough to 
> fall himself for Snit Michael Glassers lies. And is attacking people because 
> of it. How much deeper can that twit actually sink?

Well just as you think the M$ zealot has sunk to the bottom, he pulls
something else out of his ass to show that he hasn't. 

-- 
Hi! I'm a PC & I'm NOT running M$ Windoze!
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

Hadron stated in post ii8b8j$2tl$1@news.eternal-september.org on 2/1/11
12:03 AM:

> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 02:44:00 +0000, Homer wrote:
>> 
>>> Verily I say unto thee, that High Plains Thumper spake thusly:
>>>> owl wrote:
>>>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>>> 
>>>> Oh, he means this:
>>>> 
>>>> 147 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
>>> 
>>> No, he means the revelation that Snit's real name is Michael Glasser,
>>> and runs a business called "The Prescott Computer Guy". AFAICR this was
>>> revealed by Snit himself years ago on CSMA, when he posted a link to his
>>> own Website. That's rather different to someone researching, exposing,
>>> then intimidating someone.
>> 
>> Ah,those darned inconvenient facts keep getting in the way for those
>> WinTrolls.
> 
> Did you even understand what was being discussed?

The story, please note, has gone from my revealing my personal info to my
not hiding it.  A very, very different story.  And then the fact I did not
hide my information, somehow, makes it just fine to:

1) post my information
2) lie about me and my family
3) seed Google with lies tied to my business name
4) encourage people to email my wife

And, as seen in Carroll and others

5) track me down to my place of employment
6) threaten to contact my employer for the purpose of having
   me get fired 
7) make public accusations of sexual harassment and even rape

All of this is "defended" based on the fact that one can track someone down
using information on the Internet.

It is insane.  


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

"owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> schreef in bericht 
news:9f0asdf.hoa8eppr@rooftop.invalid...
> Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What cyber stalking?
>
>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>
> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>

Well, you "missed" a lot of posts to Hadron, DFS, Zeke, Snit then, how 
"convenient", you hypocrite:
(p)Rick: "Fuck you, you lying bitch."
(p)Rick: "Eat shit and die, bitch."
(p)Rick: "Bigot bitch"
(p)Rick: "You are such a dishonest, bigoted bitch"
(p)Rick: "I see you're still a one note bitch. "
(p)Rick: "The only bitch around here is you"
(p)Rick: "You must be a disgusting, lying, bitch."
(p)Rick: "You show your dishonesty bitch fish"

[H]ypocrite [H]omer: "Shut your fat mouth you stupid fucking American inbred 
Redneck"

chrisv (in one post): "Fsck you...snotty POS....asshole...worthless waste of
skin...you suck shit...God-damned...fsckwit...Wintroll fsckwits."

Greg Shearman: "fuckwit lying cunt"  (among dozens of other uses of fuck and
fucking, ass, asshole)
Greg Shearman: "You must be the biggest fucking loser of all time."

Tattoo Vampire: "His asshole is so reamed out he has room for an oxygen 
tank, too."
Tattoo Vampire: "Snotwad, you suck major hemorrhoid-infested bungholes."
Tattoo Vampire:"Trolling Usenet isn't a living, you headfucked idiot."
Tattoo Vampire:"You pitiful freak. Die, quickly. :-P "
Tattoo Vampire:"Do us a favor and shoot yourself in the head. No, wait, you 
have no vital organs in there... n/m"
Tattoo Vampire:"Lick the sweat off my balls after a 3-mile run, flatty."
Tattoo Vampire:"And why do you even fucking care, you worthless turd?"
Tattoo Vampire:"That you're a fucking idiot who should have been aborted 
long before birth?"
Tattoo Vampire:"Wow - you're a useless idiot. Que surprise!"
Tattoo Vampire:"And the asshole Wintrolls hijack yet another thread.Why 
don't all you idiots just drop dead?"
Tattoo Vampire:"Too bad you're not. Filth like you deserves to drop dead."
Tattoo Vampire:"Go fuck yourself, twat."
Tattoo Vampire: "Get the fuck out, then, bitch."

AZ Nonad: "I've seen the microsoft cocksucker's other posts.  I'm surprised
he can type with that enormous penis in his face."

Doug Mentohl: "Fuck off, get aids, get cancer, die a slow painfull death, in 
fact let your whole genetic line become  extinct ... "
Doug Mentohl: "When are you going to get cancer and die. Hopfully before 
your jizz infects any unfortunate female you rohypnoled on one of your 
'dates' ..  "
Doug Mentohl: "Fuck off, get cancer and die a long and painfull death."
Doug Mentohl: "fuck Tim Smith the Usenet, Digg and Slashdot stalker .."
Doug Mentohl: "What the fuck are you on about you ignorant CUNT"

Kier: "go fuck yourself"

Philip Callan: "You ignorant fuck ..." 

Clogwog stated in post 201102011627.p11GRaR21578@smtp.cobalt.loc on 2/1/11
9:27 AM:

> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> schreef in bericht
> news:9f0asdf.hoa8eppr@rooftop.invalid...
>> Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> What cyber stalking?
>> 
>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>> 
>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>> 
> 
> Well, you "missed" a lot of posts to Hadron, DFS, Zeke, Snit then, how
> "convenient", you hypocrite:
> (p)Rick: "Fuck you, you lying bitch."
> (p)Rick: "Eat shit and die, bitch."
> (p)Rick: "Bigot bitch"
> (p)Rick: "You are such a dishonest, bigoted bitch"
> (p)Rick: "I see you're still a one note bitch. "
> (p)Rick: "The only bitch around here is you"
> (p)Rick: "You must be a disgusting, lying, bitch."
> (p)Rick: "You show your dishonesty bitch fish"
> 
> [H]ypocrite [H]omer: "Shut your fat mouth you stupid fucking American inbred
> Redneck"
> 
> chrisv (in one post): "Fsck you...snotty POS....asshole...worthless waste of
> skin...you suck shit...God-damned...fsckwit...Wintroll fsckwits."
> 
> Greg Shearman: "fuckwit lying cunt"  (among dozens of other uses of fuck and
> fucking, ass, asshole)
> Greg Shearman: "You must be the biggest fucking loser of all time."
> 
> Tattoo Vampire: "His asshole is so reamed out he has room for an oxygen
> tank, too."
> Tattoo Vampire: "Snotwad, you suck major hemorrhoid-infested bungholes."
> Tattoo Vampire:"Trolling Usenet isn't a living, you headfucked idiot."
> Tattoo Vampire:"You pitiful freak. Die, quickly. :-P "
> Tattoo Vampire:"Do us a favor and shoot yourself in the head. No, wait, you
> have no vital organs in there... n/m"
> Tattoo Vampire:"Lick the sweat off my balls after a 3-mile run, flatty."
> Tattoo Vampire:"And why do you even fucking care, you worthless turd?"
> Tattoo Vampire:"That you're a fucking idiot who should have been aborted
> long before birth?"
> Tattoo Vampire:"Wow - you're a useless idiot. Que surprise!"
> Tattoo Vampire:"And the asshole Wintrolls hijack yet another thread.Why
> don't all you idiots just drop dead?"
> Tattoo Vampire:"Too bad you're not. Filth like you deserves to drop dead."
> Tattoo Vampire:"Go fuck yourself, twat."
> Tattoo Vampire: "Get the fuck out, then, bitch."
> 
> AZ Nonad: "I've seen the microsoft cocksucker's other posts.  I'm surprised
> he can type with that enormous penis in his face."
> 
> Doug Mentohl: "Fuck off, get aids, get cancer, die a slow painfull death, in
> fact let your whole genetic line become  extinct ... "
> Doug Mentohl: "When are you going to get cancer and die. Hopfully before
> your jizz infects any unfortunate female you rohypnoled on one of your
> 'dates' ..  "
> Doug Mentohl: "Fuck off, get cancer and die a long and painfull death."
> Doug Mentohl: "fuck Tim Smith the Usenet, Digg and Slashdot stalker .."
> Doug Mentohl: "What the fuck are you on about you ignorant CUNT"
> 
> Kier: "go fuck yourself"
> 
> Philip Callan: "You ignorant fuck ..."
> 
Just did a quick look to see which folks in COLA and CSMA have gone out of
their way to tie their own lies to my business name: William Poaster, Petet
K�hlmann, HPT, Phil Da Lick!, Sinister Midget III, Don Zeigler, Tim Adams,
Wally, Tattoo Vampire.

And this from Peter K.
    -----
    I'll take a wild guess and say his wife's Email address is:
    [redacted]
    For the sake of his family's safety, I think she aught to know.
    -----

And, as far as I know, not a single "advocate" has been willing to stand up
and say such behavior is wrong.  It is, of course, completely wrong -
seeding Google with such lies about a person's business simply because you
lose a Usenet debate.  It is absurd.

-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

"DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> schreef in bericht 
news:ii82jc$8mc$2@news.eternal-september.org...
> On 1/31/2011 10:49 PM, Homer wrote:
>> Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
>>> DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>  wrote:
>>>> On 1/31/2011 8:37 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>> DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>   wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Just give me some tidbit of info about you I can use to get my
>>>>>> "stalking" started.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stalking freak dufus!
>>>>> I will not help you with your crimes.
>>>>
>>>> Figures you'd chicken out, pissant.
>>
>> You seriously expect someone to deliberately reveal their personal
>> details to a known stalker and thug like you? That's what started this
>> whole thing in the first place - or rather, you did.
>
> What personal details?  When you post it to Usenet or to a website, it 
> becomes public info.  Why don't you know that?
>
>
>
>>>> Whenever you grow a pair:
>>>
>>>> Here's the actual GA law on cyberstalking:
>>>> http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/georgia.shtml
>>
>> Here's a more complete reference, including laws pertaining to
>> Cyberstalking, Cyberharassment and Cyberbullying (their terms):
>>
>> http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13495
>
> The GA law is what's important here... or would be if any violation of it 
> had taken place.
>
>
>
>>>> Make sure you and Linosuck and Old Friend and that loser [H]omer get
>>>> your stories^^^^^^^ whine/lies straight
>>
>> You mean the bit where you posted "An Old Friend's" personal details in
>> order to intimidate him,
>
> His own public information intimidates him?
>
> Wonder what he's hiding...
>
>
>
>
>> in violation of your Usenet provider's TOS and
>> the law?
>
> Neither was violated.
>
>
>
>
>
>> Or do you mean the bit where you supported another attacker
>> calling Chris' wife a "whore"?
>
> Not just any old whore; an anal whore.
>
> Does it really bother you wackos that an anonymous nym posts a mindless, 
> incongruous flame-insult?  Plus, if you knew Linosuck's personality, you 
> know he would never marry an anal whore.  I see him as more of a 
> child-bride kind of man.
>
>
>
>
>>>> you wouldn't want to be severely penalized for wasting their time.
>>
>> If it were me, I'd take my chances. Not that chance has much to do with
>> it, given the palpable evidence. Like they say, the truth is always
>> the best defence.
>
>
> So do it, bozo.  Take your chances.
>
> You are (or were) in Killin, Scotland 
> (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0065007/usercomments), so the FBI won't pick 
> you up for wasting their time.
>
>
> By the way:
> Where do you live now?
> Where do you work?
> What's your phone number?
> What kind of car do you drive?
> What's your license plate #?

More *public* info about Keith G. Robertson-Turner, who uses the nickname 
"Homer"

Keith G. Robertson-Turner, Sunny Cruden Bay - Scotland.
http://bit.ly/9JX8nL

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Ban Fireworks. More 
details
Submitted by Keith G. Robertson-Turner of slated.org
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Ban-Fireworks/
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/fireworksban/
--------------------------------------------------------------
^
|
| - > lol  the silly control freak "Homer" lost the case (as always)

I hope that somebody puts a big banger up his arse! ;-)

On 1/31/2011 2:55 PM, Homer wrote:
> Verily I say unto thee, that owl spake thusly:
>> DFS<nospam@dfs_.com>  wrote:
>
>>> Please do, [H]ypocrite.  Please waste as much of your time and money
>>> as possible.
>>>
>>> "going to the Feds" about me will be just as good an investment as
>>> you trying to sell Linux crapware along with coffee and donuts.
>>
>> It really doesn't matter if you're found guilty or not.  An arrest
>> alone will ensure that your personal info gets linked online to those
>> you stalk.  That alone would be hilarious and worth the effort of
>> filing a complaint.
>
> And note yet again how DFS only cares about the financial attribute of
> something far more important than money: justice, just like he does with
> freedom, and no doubt everything else in his worthless life.
>
> Meanwhile, I make a moderate income from something I actually enjoy
> doing, as opposed to the years I endured doing something I didn't,

No kidding?  I was never money-grubbing enough to spend years enduring 
something I didn't like.

Well, as it turns out you were right to grub for that cash:
http://lifeinc.todayshow.com/_news/2011/02/01/5961656-does-money-make-you-happy-absolutely-




> because like everyone else I followed the herd into the sheep pen, and
> only discovered the truth with the experience of age.

ah yes... now you're older and wiser and suddenly you've become a 
"masked, caped, freedom fighting, software rights activist".

You're fighting the wrong fight, [H]ypocrite.  Software "freedom" is a 
stupid and meaningless concept.




> That's not exactly uncommon, so I must assume DFS also understands the
> ugly truth, but just happens to like it, because he's an irredeemably
> evil bastard.

What "truth" did you discover?




> Of course it's not much of a stretch to make that
> assumption, one look at the belligerent bile he spews into COLA tells us
> everything we need to know about him.

When in Rome...




> He'd sell his own mother if he
> thought he could get away with it, for even just the smallest personal
> advantage.

Leave my anal whore mother out of it...




> Meanwhile I gave up nearly everything I had to pursue
> something more virtuous and satisfying, and would gladly sacrifice the
> rest of it to see thugs like DFS go to prison, where he belongs.

You're so dramatic, [H]ypocrite!

What exactly is it you "gave up"?  Let's have some specifics and details.

Snit wrote:

> And look at the defense: it was not hard to track me down, so it was just
> fine to:
> 
> 1) post my information
> 2) lie about me and my family
> 3) seed Google with lies tied to my business name
> 4) encourage people to email my wife
> 
> And, as seen in Carroll and others
> 
> 5) track me down to my place of employment
> 6) threaten to contact my employer for the purpose of having
>    me get fired 
> 7) make public accusations of sexual harassment and even rape
> 
> All of this is "defended" based on the fact that one can track someone down
> using information on the Internet.
> 
> It is insane.


Well..... I have ragged on you in the past and made some snide comments
about your home life, your job and your spouse, and for that I apologize.

-- 
Best regards,
[tv]
Owner, Trollus Amongus LLC

Its great to be great, but its greater to be human.

Snit wrote:

> Which they never did. Ever.

Yeah, they did. You sneaky fellow, you had my IP address and set up a
redirect. :-P


-- 
Best regards,
[tv]
Owner, Trollus Amongus LLC

Tattoo Vampire stated in post sgcak6y5mwmd.dlg@sitting.at.this.computer on
2/1/11 5:21 PM:

> Snit wrote:
> 
>> And look at the defense: it was not hard to track me down, so it was just
>> fine to:
>> 
>> 1) post my information
>> 2) lie about me and my family
>> 3) seed Google with lies tied to my business name
>> 4) encourage people to email my wife
>> 
>> And, as seen in Carroll and others
>> 
>> 5) track me down to my place of employment
>> 6) threaten to contact my employer for the purpose of having
>>    me get fired 
>> 7) make public accusations of sexual harassment and even rape
>> 
>> All of this is "defended" based on the fact that one can track someone down
>> using information on the Internet.
>> 
>> It is insane.
> 
> 
> Well..... I have ragged on you in the past and made some snide comments
> about your home life, your job and your spouse, and for that I apologize.

Fair enough.  If I recall, you have not gone to the extremes of folks such
as Peter... and he has not gone *nearly* to the extremes of some of the CSMA
folks.  They have gone so far over the top that, frankly, they should be in
jail.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Tattoo Vampire stated in post 1cwjhpzlu0anq$.dlg@sitting.at.this.computer on
2/1/11 5:24 PM:

> Snit wrote:
> 
>>> Snit: "No doubt... here are some examples I have documented:
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Office2003.html>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/logoff.html>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/pages/Project.html>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/dialogs/>
>>>    <http://csma.gallopinginsanity.com/interface/New_Folder/>"
>>> 
>>> Tattoo Vampire: "All your links resolve to the index page at
>>> prescottcomputer.com."
>> 
>> Which they never did. Ever.
> 
> Yeah, they did. You sneaky fellow, you had my IP address and set up a
> redirect. :-P

Hmmm, I may have done that for a day or two just to mess with the folks who
were harassing me.  I know I set it up some pages to redirect to random
sites for a few days.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Snit wrote:

> Fair enough.  If I recall, you have not gone to the extremes of folks such
> as Peter... and he has not gone *nearly* to the extremes of some of the CSMA
> folks.  They have gone so far over the top that, frankly, they should be in
> jail.

It would mean a lot if you would say, "Apology accepted."

-- 
Best regards,
[tv]
Owner, Trollus Amongus LLC


Men have become the tools of their tools.

William Poaster wrote:
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> Elizabot: "I said if you crossed the line, I'd contact the
>> police."
>>
>> Snit: "You made a very clear threat.  Of that there is no doubt.
>> I wisely took it seriously, and reacted appropriately."
>>
>> Elizabot: "I wrote "You are very near to crossing the line. I will
>> not hesitate to contact the Prescott Police Department if you do.
>> And that's a promise." That's no bluff, and it still stands."
>>
>> Snit: "What line is this you are in reference to?"
>>
>> Elizabot: "If I told you, there is no doubt in my mind that you'd
>> do it to see if I would follow up. Either that, or you'd claim I
>> was daring you. You are that childish, Snit. You are always pushing
>> and stretching and testing limits.  Perhaps you should actually
>> follow the advice given to you by the police and leave me alone."
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/49f4d41d5173e3db
>>
>> This is the type of person Snit is that Hadron is attempting to
>>defend. Birds of a feather ....
>
> Well naturally, the Hadron M$ zealot has to defend his fellow trolls
> no matter how obnoxious & odious they are.

True, here is something from the not so distant past regarding how nasty 
Snit really is, and how he supports the worst COLA trolls:

Moshe Goldfarb: "If it were me, I wouldn't want some self confessed 
flaming homosexual tacking my every move. Especially one riding a 
motorcycle. If I were you, I would start ignoring High Plains Thumper, 
like most of the group does. He is obviously unstable."

HPT: "Flatfish at its best, libellous, hateful, lying worthless drivel.
I am not homosexual."

Snit: "For now I am having fun shoving his incompetence and dishonesty 
in his face and watching him run... but, face it, that is still 
attention - and that is all he really wants. Yeah, maybe I should stop 
giving him the attention he is begging for."

HPT: "Michael Glasser at his best - a lying, little, insulting worthless 
worm of a man.  You keep regurgitating your worthless diatribe, because 
you have an incessant need to win at all costs. You are a fraud, I 
seriously doubt you are an instructor at Yavapai Community College, but 
an imposter.  I seriously doubt someone as a teacher would be capable of 
the type of insulting, libellous worthless drivel that you express."

11 Jul 2009

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a243f963f27a526b

-- 
HPT

Tattoo Vampire stated in post jk1kqnf2xuv1.dlg@sitting.at.this.computer on
2/1/11 6:01 PM:

> Snit wrote:
> 
>> Fair enough.  If I recall, you have not gone to the extremes of folks such
>> as Peter... and he has not gone *nearly* to the extremes of some of the CSMA
>> folks.  They have gone so far over the top that, frankly, they should be in
>> jail.
> 
> It would mean a lot if you would say, "Apology accepted."

Sorry about that... apology accepted.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

High Plains Thumper stated in post 4d48ada9$0$4319$6e1ede2f@read.cnntp.org
on 2/1/11 6:04 PM:

> William Poaster wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> 
>>> Elizabot: "I said if you crossed the line, I'd contact the
>>> police."
>>> 
>>> Snit: "You made a very clear threat.  Of that there is no doubt.
>>> I wisely took it seriously, and reacted appropriately."
>>> 
>>> Elizabot: "I wrote "You are very near to crossing the line. I will
>>> not hesitate to contact the Prescott Police Department if you do.
>>> And that's a promise." That's no bluff, and it still stands."
>>> 
>>> Snit: "What line is this you are in reference to?"
>>> 
>>> Elizabot: "If I told you, there is no doubt in my mind that you'd
>>> do it to see if I would follow up. Either that, or you'd claim I
>>> was daring you. You are that childish, Snit. You are always pushing
>>> and stretching and testing limits.  Perhaps you should actually
>>> follow the advice given to you by the police and leave me alone."
>>> 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/49f4d41d5173e3db
>>> 
>>> This is the type of person Snit is that Hadron is attempting to
>>> defend. Birds of a feather ....
>> 
>> Well naturally, the Hadron M$ zealot has to defend his fellow trolls
>> no matter how obnoxious & odious they are.
> 
> True, here is something from the not so distant past regarding how nasty
> Snit really is, and how he supports the worst COLA trolls:
> 
> Moshe Goldfarb: "If it were me, I wouldn't want some self confessed
> flaming homosexual tacking my every move. Especially one riding a
> motorcycle. If I were you, I would start ignoring High Plains Thumper,
> like most of the group does. He is obviously unstable."

Your implication is I support the above.  I do not.

> HPT: "Flatfish at its best, libellous, hateful, lying worthless drivel.
> I am not homosexual."
> 
> Snit: "For now I am having fun shoving his incompetence and dishonesty
> in his face and watching him run... but, face it, that is still
> attention - and that is all he really wants. Yeah, maybe I should stop
> giving him the attention he is begging for."
> 
> HPT: "Michael Glasser at his best - a lying, little, insulting worthless
> worm of a man.  You keep regurgitating your worthless diatribe, because
> you have an incessant need to win at all costs. You are a fraud, I
> seriously doubt you are an instructor at Yavapai Community College, but
> an imposter.  I seriously doubt someone as a teacher would be capable of
> the type of insulting, libellous worthless drivel that you express."

Notice how you, again, reference a college Carroll and others claim I work.

And you use the phrase "worm of a man".  It fits you perfectly.

> 11 Jul 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a243f963f27a526b



-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

On 2/1/2011 8:01 PM, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> Fair enough.  If I recall, you have not gone to the extremes of folks such
>> as Peter... and he has not gone *nearly* to the extremes of some of the CSMA
>> folks.  They have gone so far over the top that, frankly, they should be in
>> jail.
>
> It would mean a lot if you would say, "Apology accepted."


Don't do it, Snit.

This Tattoo Vampire piece of crap doesn't suddenly reverse years of 
filthy abuse to you in one little fake apology post.

=========================================================================
"Snit is a lying, cross-posting troll who uses multiple aliases."

"Snit talks like a sissy"

"You know his long-suffering spouse is getting fed up with his lazy ass."

"you're a trolling, lying moron"

"Why does Snit want to swing from Rick's nuts?"

"Hypocrite Snit"

"snotty twerp"

"Shut the fuck up, twat."

"To Zeke: Please make a New Years' resolution to commit suicide. Better 
yet, murder/suicide and take your fellow trolls with you. Tip: don't 
shoot Glasser in the head; you won't hit a vital organ."
=========================================================================

DFS stated in post iiad9p$s9g$1@news.eternal-september.org on 2/1/11 6:50
PM:

> On 2/1/2011 8:01 PM, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>> 
>>> Fair enough.  If I recall, you have not gone to the extremes of folks such
>>> as Peter... and he has not gone *nearly* to the extremes of some of the CSMA
>>> folks.  They have gone so far over the top that, frankly, they should be in
>>> jail.
>> 
>> It would mean a lot if you would say, "Apology accepted."
> 
> 
> Don't do it, Snit.

Already done.  And while he and I might not agree on things, and he might
troll me, he has not sank to the level being talked about in a long time
(and even then not to the extremes being talked about) - not seeded Google
with my business name, etc.  I need not agree with his position to accept he
is sincere in not wanting to do such actions.

> This Tattoo Vampire piece of crap doesn't suddenly reverse years of
> filthy abuse to you in one little fake apology post.
> 
> =========================================================================
> "Snit is a lying, cross-posting troll who uses multiple aliases."
> 
> "Snit talks like a sissy"
> 
> "You know his long-suffering spouse is getting fed up with his lazy ass."
> 
> "you're a trolling, lying moron"
> 
> "Why does Snit want to swing from Rick's nuts?"
> 
> "Hypocrite Snit"
> 
> "snotty twerp"
> 
> "Shut the fuck up, twat."
> 
> "To Zeke: Please make a New Years' resolution to commit suicide. Better
> yet, murder/suicide and take your fellow trolls with you. Tip: don't
> shoot Glasser in the head; you won't hit a vital organ."
> =========================================================================

With the last one he uses my real name, which I have asked folks not to (not
that doing so is that big of a deal).  Other than that, sure, it is trolling
and absurd, but it is not *dangerous* or just taking anything out of COLA.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Snit wrote:

> Sorry about that... apology accepted.

Thanks. :-)
-- 
Best regards,
[tv]
Owner, Trollus Amongus LLC

Random "Deep Thought by Jack Handey": Sometimes I think you have to march
right in and demand your rights,even if you don't know what your rights are,
or who the person is you're talking to. Then on the way out, slam the door.

Snit wrote, quoting a useless scumbag:

>> This Tattoo Vampire piece of crap doesn't suddenly reverse years of
>> filthy abuse to you in one little fake apology post.

For d00f:

Eat hot death, freak.

-- 
Best regards,
[tv]
Owner, Trollus Amongus LLC

People dont change under governments. Governments change. People remain the
same.

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:

> Clogwog stated in post 201102011627.p11GRaR21578@smtp.cobalt.loc on 2/1/11
> 9:27 AM:
>
>> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> schreef in bericht
>> news:9f0asdf.hoa8eppr@rooftop.invalid...
>>> Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>> 
>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>> 
>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>> 
>> 
>> Well, you "missed" a lot of posts to Hadron, DFS, Zeke, Snit then, how
>> "convenient", you hypocrite:
>> (p)Rick: "Fuck you, you lying bitch."
>> (p)Rick: "Eat shit and die, bitch."
>> (p)Rick: "Bigot bitch"
>> (p)Rick: "You are such a dishonest, bigoted bitch"
>> (p)Rick: "I see you're still a one note bitch. "
>> (p)Rick: "The only bitch around here is you"
>> (p)Rick: "You must be a disgusting, lying, bitch."
>> (p)Rick: "You show your dishonesty bitch fish"
>> 
>> [H]ypocrite [H]omer: "Shut your fat mouth you stupid fucking American inbred
>> Redneck"
>> 
>> chrisv (in one post): "Fsck you...snotty POS....asshole...worthless waste of
>> skin...you suck shit...God-damned...fsckwit...Wintroll fsckwits."
>> 
>> Greg Shearman: "fuckwit lying cunt"  (among dozens of other uses of fuck and
>> fucking, ass, asshole)
>> Greg Shearman: "You must be the biggest fucking loser of all time."
>> 
>> Tattoo Vampire: "His asshole is so reamed out he has room for an oxygen
>> tank, too."
>> Tattoo Vampire: "Snotwad, you suck major hemorrhoid-infested bungholes."
>> Tattoo Vampire:"Trolling Usenet isn't a living, you headfucked idiot."
>> Tattoo Vampire:"You pitiful freak. Die, quickly. :-P "
>> Tattoo Vampire:"Do us a favor and shoot yourself in the head. No, wait, you
>> have no vital organs in there... n/m"
>> Tattoo Vampire:"Lick the sweat off my balls after a 3-mile run, flatty."
>> Tattoo Vampire:"And why do you even fucking care, you worthless turd?"
>> Tattoo Vampire:"That you're a fucking idiot who should have been aborted
>> long before birth?"
>> Tattoo Vampire:"Wow - you're a useless idiot. Que surprise!"
>> Tattoo Vampire:"And the asshole Wintrolls hijack yet another thread.Why
>> don't all you idiots just drop dead?"
>> Tattoo Vampire:"Too bad you're not. Filth like you deserves to drop dead."
>> Tattoo Vampire:"Go fuck yourself, twat."
>> Tattoo Vampire: "Get the fuck out, then, bitch."
>> 
>> AZ Nonad: "I've seen the microsoft cocksucker's other posts.  I'm surprised
>> he can type with that enormous penis in his face."
>> 
>> Doug Mentohl: "Fuck off, get aids, get cancer, die a slow painfull death, in
>> fact let your whole genetic line become  extinct ... "
>> Doug Mentohl: "When are you going to get cancer and die. Hopfully before
>> your jizz infects any unfortunate female you rohypnoled on one of your
>> 'dates' ..  "
>> Doug Mentohl: "Fuck off, get cancer and die a long and painfull death."
>> Doug Mentohl: "fuck Tim Smith the Usenet, Digg and Slashdot stalker .."
>> Doug Mentohl: "What the fuck are you on about you ignorant CUNT"
>> 
>> Kier: "go fuck yourself"
>> 
>> Philip Callan: "You ignorant fuck ..."
>> 
> Just did a quick look to see which folks in COLA and CSMA have gone out of
> their way to tie their own lies to my business name: William Poaster, Petet
> Köhlmann, HPT, Phil Da Lick!, Sinister Midget III, Don Zeigler, Tim Adams,
> Wally, Tattoo Vampire.
>
> And this from Peter K.
>     -----
>     I'll take a wild guess and say his wife's Email address is:
>     [redacted]
>     For the sake of his family's safety, I think she aught to know.
>     -----
>
> And, as far as I know, not a single "advocate" has been willing to stand up
> and say such behavior is wrong.  It is, of course, completely wrong -
> seeding Google with such lies about a person's business simply because you
> lose a Usenet debate.  It is absurd.

I seem to recall that Chris Ahlstrom told Peter to stop. Chris is quite
adamant about it being wrong to target other peoples families and
private life.

And fair play to him for that.
 

Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> writes:

> Snit wrote:
>
>> Sorry about that... apology accepted.
>
> Thanks. :-)


*round of applause*

Hadron stated in post iiap57$vjv$4@news.eternal-september.org on 2/1/11
10:13 PM:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
> 
>> Clogwog stated in post 201102011627.p11GRaR21578@smtp.cobalt.loc on 2/1/11
>> 9:27 AM:
>> 
>>> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> schreef in bericht
>>> news:9f0asdf.hoa8eppr@rooftop.invalid...
>>>> Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>> 
>>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Well, you "missed" a lot of posts to Hadron, DFS, Zeke, Snit then, how
>>> "convenient", you hypocrite:
>>> (p)Rick: "Fuck you, you lying bitch."
>>> (p)Rick: "Eat shit and die, bitch."
>>> (p)Rick: "Bigot bitch"
>>> (p)Rick: "You are such a dishonest, bigoted bitch"
>>> (p)Rick: "I see you're still a one note bitch. "
>>> (p)Rick: "The only bitch around here is you"
>>> (p)Rick: "You must be a disgusting, lying, bitch."
>>> (p)Rick: "You show your dishonesty bitch fish"
>>> 
>>> [H]ypocrite [H]omer: "Shut your fat mouth you stupid fucking American inbred
>>> Redneck"
>>> 
>>> chrisv (in one post): "Fsck you...snotty POS....asshole...worthless waste of
>>> skin...you suck shit...God-damned...fsckwit...Wintroll fsckwits."
>>> 
>>> Greg Shearman: "fuckwit lying cunt"  (among dozens of other uses of fuck and
>>> fucking, ass, asshole)
>>> Greg Shearman: "You must be the biggest fucking loser of all time."
>>> 
>>> Tattoo Vampire: "His asshole is so reamed out he has room for an oxygen
>>> tank, too."
>>> Tattoo Vampire: "Snotwad, you suck major hemorrhoid-infested bungholes."
>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Trolling Usenet isn't a living, you headfucked idiot."
>>> Tattoo Vampire:"You pitiful freak. Die, quickly. :-P "
>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Do us a favor and shoot yourself in the head. No, wait, you
>>> have no vital organs in there... n/m"
>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Lick the sweat off my balls after a 3-mile run, flatty."
>>> Tattoo Vampire:"And why do you even fucking care, you worthless turd?"
>>> Tattoo Vampire:"That you're a fucking idiot who should have been aborted
>>> long before birth?"
>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Wow - you're a useless idiot. Que surprise!"
>>> Tattoo Vampire:"And the asshole Wintrolls hijack yet another thread.Why
>>> don't all you idiots just drop dead?"
>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Too bad you're not. Filth like you deserves to drop dead."
>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Go fuck yourself, twat."
>>> Tattoo Vampire: "Get the fuck out, then, bitch."
>>> 
>>> AZ Nonad: "I've seen the microsoft cocksucker's other posts.  I'm surprised
>>> he can type with that enormous penis in his face."
>>> 
>>> Doug Mentohl: "Fuck off, get aids, get cancer, die a slow painfull death, in
>>> fact let your whole genetic line become  extinct ... "
>>> Doug Mentohl: "When are you going to get cancer and die. Hopfully before
>>> your jizz infects any unfortunate female you rohypnoled on one of your
>>> 'dates' ..  "
>>> Doug Mentohl: "Fuck off, get cancer and die a long and painfull death."
>>> Doug Mentohl: "fuck Tim Smith the Usenet, Digg and Slashdot stalker .."
>>> Doug Mentohl: "What the fuck are you on about you ignorant CUNT"
>>> 
>>> Kier: "go fuck yourself"
>>> 
>>> Philip Callan: "You ignorant fuck ..."
>>> 
>> Just did a quick look to see which folks in COLA and CSMA have gone out of
>> their way to tie their own lies to my business name: William Poaster, Petet
>> K�hlmann, HPT, Phil Da Lick!, Sinister Midget III, Don Zeigler, Tim Adams,
>> Wally, Tattoo Vampire.
>> 
>> And this from Peter K.
>>     -----
>>     I'll take a wild guess and say his wife's Email address is:
>>     [redacted]
>>     For the sake of his family's safety, I think she aught to know.
>>     -----
>> 
>> And, as far as I know, not a single "advocate" has been willing to stand up
>> and say such behavior is wrong.  It is, of course, completely wrong -
>> seeding Google with such lies about a person's business simply because you
>> lose a Usenet debate.  It is absurd.
> 
> I seem to recall that Chris Ahlstrom told Peter to stop. Chris is quite
> adamant about it being wrong to target other peoples families and
> private life.
> 
> And fair play to him for that.
>  

I do not recall that, but if so, kudos to him.  Seriously, it would be
impressive to see him having done so.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

Once upon a midnight dreary, as I laboured lone & weary, High Plains
Thumper on 2/2/2011 01:04 shattered the silence with:

> William Poaster wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>
>>> Elizabot: "I said if you crossed the line, I'd contact the
>>> police."
>>>
>>> Snit: "You made a very clear threat.  Of that there is no doubt.
>>> I wisely took it seriously, and reacted appropriately."
>>>
>>> Elizabot: "I wrote "You are very near to crossing the line. I will
>>> not hesitate to contact the Prescott Police Department if you do.
>>> And that's a promise." That's no bluff, and it still stands."
>>>
>>> Snit: "What line is this you are in reference to?"
>>>
>>> Elizabot: "If I told you, there is no doubt in my mind that you'd
>>> do it to see if I would follow up. Either that, or you'd claim I
>>> was daring you. You are that childish, Snit. You are always pushing
>>> and stretching and testing limits.  Perhaps you should actually
>>> follow the advice given to you by the police and leave me alone."
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/49f4d41d5173e3db
>>>
>>> This is the type of person Snit is that Hadron is attempting to
>>>defend. Birds of a feather ....
>>
>> Well naturally, the Hadron M$ zealot has to defend his fellow trolls
>> no matter how obnoxious & odious they are.
>
> True, here is something from the not so distant past regarding how nasty 
> Snit really is, and how he supports the worst COLA trolls:
>
> Moshe Goldfarb: "If it were me, I wouldn't want some self confessed 
> flaming homosexual tacking my every move. Especially one riding a 
> motorcycle. If I were you, I would start ignoring High Plains Thumper, 
> like most of the group does. He is obviously unstable."
>
> HPT: "Flatfish at its best, libellous, hateful, lying worthless drivel.
> I am not homosexual."
>
> Snit: "For now I am having fun shoving his incompetence and dishonesty 
> in his face and watching him run... but, face it, that is still 
> attention - and that is all he really wants. Yeah, maybe I should stop 
> giving him the attention he is begging for."
>
> HPT: "Michael Glasser at his best - a lying, little, insulting worthless 
> worm of a man.  You keep regurgitating your worthless diatribe, because 
> you have an incessant need to win at all costs. You are a fraud, I 
> seriously doubt you are an instructor at Yavapai Community College, but 
> an imposter.  I seriously doubt someone as a teacher would be capable of 
> the type of insulting, libellous worthless drivel that you express."
>
> 11 Jul 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a243f963f27a526b

As I've said before, all their threats, libel, etc is all documented in
Googlegroups. *Anyone* can see their posts, & they don't seem to realize 
that could backfire on them.

-- 
VIII. Any non-trivial program contains at least one bug.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:

> Hadron stated in post iiap57$vjv$4@news.eternal-september.org on 2/1/11
> 10:13 PM:
>
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Clogwog stated in post 201102011627.p11GRaR21578@smtp.cobalt.loc on 2/1/11
>>> 9:27 AM:
>>> 
>>>> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> schreef in bericht
>>>> news:9f0asdf.hoa8eppr@rooftop.invalid...
>>>>> Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> What cyber stalking?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Like Willy Poaster, HPT and Peter Koehlmann did with Snit?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm not familiar with that.  But if it was similar, then yes.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Well, you "missed" a lot of posts to Hadron, DFS, Zeke, Snit then, how
>>>> "convenient", you hypocrite:
>>>> (p)Rick: "Fuck you, you lying bitch."
>>>> (p)Rick: "Eat shit and die, bitch."
>>>> (p)Rick: "Bigot bitch"
>>>> (p)Rick: "You are such a dishonest, bigoted bitch"
>>>> (p)Rick: "I see you're still a one note bitch. "
>>>> (p)Rick: "The only bitch around here is you"
>>>> (p)Rick: "You must be a disgusting, lying, bitch."
>>>> (p)Rick: "You show your dishonesty bitch fish"
>>>> 
>>>> [H]ypocrite [H]omer: "Shut your fat mouth you stupid fucking American inbred
>>>> Redneck"
>>>> 
>>>> chrisv (in one post): "Fsck you...snotty POS....asshole...worthless waste of
>>>> skin...you suck shit...God-damned...fsckwit...Wintroll fsckwits."
>>>> 
>>>> Greg Shearman: "fuckwit lying cunt"  (among dozens of other uses of fuck and
>>>> fucking, ass, asshole)
>>>> Greg Shearman: "You must be the biggest fucking loser of all time."
>>>> 
>>>> Tattoo Vampire: "His asshole is so reamed out he has room for an oxygen
>>>> tank, too."
>>>> Tattoo Vampire: "Snotwad, you suck major hemorrhoid-infested bungholes."
>>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Trolling Usenet isn't a living, you headfucked idiot."
>>>> Tattoo Vampire:"You pitiful freak. Die, quickly. :-P "
>>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Do us a favor and shoot yourself in the head. No, wait, you
>>>> have no vital organs in there... n/m"
>>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Lick the sweat off my balls after a 3-mile run, flatty."
>>>> Tattoo Vampire:"And why do you even fucking care, you worthless turd?"
>>>> Tattoo Vampire:"That you're a fucking idiot who should have been aborted
>>>> long before birth?"
>>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Wow - you're a useless idiot. Que surprise!"
>>>> Tattoo Vampire:"And the asshole Wintrolls hijack yet another thread.Why
>>>> don't all you idiots just drop dead?"
>>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Too bad you're not. Filth like you deserves to drop dead."
>>>> Tattoo Vampire:"Go fuck yourself, twat."
>>>> Tattoo Vampire: "Get the fuck out, then, bitch."
>>>> 
>>>> AZ Nonad: "I've seen the microsoft cocksucker's other posts.  I'm surprised
>>>> he can type with that enormous penis in his face."
>>>> 
>>>> Doug Mentohl: "Fuck off, get aids, get cancer, die a slow painfull death, in
>>>> fact let your whole genetic line become  extinct ... "
>>>> Doug Mentohl: "When are you going to get cancer and die. Hopfully before
>>>> your jizz infects any unfortunate female you rohypnoled on one of your
>>>> 'dates' ..  "
>>>> Doug Mentohl: "Fuck off, get cancer and die a long and painfull death."
>>>> Doug Mentohl: "fuck Tim Smith the Usenet, Digg and Slashdot stalker .."
>>>> Doug Mentohl: "What the fuck are you on about you ignorant CUNT"
>>>> 
>>>> Kier: "go fuck yourself"
>>>> 
>>>> Philip Callan: "You ignorant fuck ..."
>>>> 
>>> Just did a quick look to see which folks in COLA and CSMA have gone out of
>>> their way to tie their own lies to my business name: William Poaster, Petet
>>> Köhlmann, HPT, Phil Da Lick!, Sinister Midget III, Don Zeigler, Tim Adams,
>>> Wally, Tattoo Vampire.
>>> 
>>> And this from Peter K.
>>>     -----
>>>     I'll take a wild guess and say his wife's Email address is:
>>>     [redacted]
>>>     For the sake of his family's safety, I think she aught to know.
>>>     -----
>>> 
>>> And, as far as I know, not a single "advocate" has been willing to stand up
>>> and say such behavior is wrong.  It is, of course, completely wrong -
>>> seeding Google with such lies about a person's business simply because you
>>> lose a Usenet debate.  It is absurd.
>> 
>> I seem to recall that Chris Ahlstrom told Peter to stop. Chris is quite
>> adamant about it being wrong to target other peoples families and
>> private life.
>> 
>> And fair play to him for that.
>>  
>
> I do not recall that, but if so, kudos to him.  Seriously, it would be
> impressive to see him having done so.

Hmmm. It seems I "recalled" wrong. Strangely he did nothing of the sort.

Which is strange considering all he does lately i bleat about that
subject.

Possibly it doesnt apply when its to "wintrolls".

And verily, didst Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> hastily babble thusly:
>> How does equating someone spending millions to TRASH a rival with someone
>> DONATING resources to rivals work again?
> 
> Excellent question.  How is Bill Gate's work that benefits Windows / MS the
> same as trashing Linux?

"Linux is a cancer", remember that?
There must be reams of similar anti-linux crap over the past decade right up
to the present day. Oh, the pretend they're changing their tune and
accepting linux once in a while... But that's just fluff and I very much
doubt it reflects the company's real views.
-- 
|   spike1@freenet.co.uk   |                                                 |
|   Andrew Halliwell BSc   | "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't |
|            in            |  suck is probably the day they start making     |
|     Computer science     |  vacuum cleaners" - Ernst Jan Plugge            |

William Poaster wrote:

> As I've said before, all their threats, libel, etc is all documented
> in Googlegroups. *Anyone* can see their posts,&  they don't seem to
> realize that could backfire on them.

They know they have but a short season and they could care less.

Look what happened to Novell? They win the lawsuit against SCO, now they 
are owned by a Microsoft consortium.

The only way to bring this company to justice is to place its officers 
in jail.

-- 
HPT

spike1 wrote:
> Snit babble thusly:
>
>>> How does equating someone spending millions to TRASH a rival with
>>> someone DONATING resources to rivals work again?
>>
>> Excellent question.  How is Bill Gate's work that benefits Windows
>> / MS the same as trashing Linux?
>
> "Linux is a cancer", remember that? There must be reams of similar
> anti-linux crap over the past decade right up to the present day. Oh,
> the pretend they're changing their tune and accepting linux once in a
> while... But that's just fluff and I very much doubt it reflects the
> company's real views.

It follows along the Evangelistic goals of the party line:

[quote]
In the Mopping Up phase, Evangelism's goal is to put the final nail into
the competing technology's coffin, and bury it in the burning depths of
the earth.  Ideally, use of the competing technology becomes associated
with mental deficiency, as in, "he believes in Santa Claus, the Easter
Bunny, and OS/2."

Just keep rubbing it in, via the press, analysts, newsgroups, whatever.
make the complete failure of the competition's technology part of the
mythology of the computer industry.

We want to place selection pressure on the companies and individuals
that show a genetic weakness for competitor's technologies, to make the
industry increasingly resistant to such unhealthy strains, over time.
[/quote]

PDF page 55
Microsoft Evangelism
Comes vs. Microsoft court case

http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/Comes-3096.pdf

-- 
HPT

spike1@freenet.co.uk stated in post 5e8q18-90a.ln1@librarian.sky.com on
2/3/11 2:17 AM:

> And verily, didst Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> hastily babble thusly:
>>> How does equating someone spending millions to TRASH a rival with someone
>>> DONATING resources to rivals work again?
>> 
>> Excellent question.  How is Bill Gate's work that benefits Windows / MS the
>> same as trashing Linux?
> 
> "Linux is a cancer", remember that?

Not only do I not remember seeing that in the article, it is not there.

    <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/>

I am not saying your comment has never been said - but it is not even a part
of the conversation!  In fact, the only thing that it is noted that Gates is
actually doing in regards to OSs is:
    -----
    $421 million of Microsoft's money goes, over a mere three years,
    to support MS-friendly development and 'educational' initiatives.
    -----

So MS is supporting MS-friendly development.  How is this a shocking thing?
How is this bad?  Don't people in the OSS community support Linux-friendly
development?  Is that considered a bad thing now?

> There must be reams of similar anti-linux crap over the past decade right up
> to the present day. Oh, the pretend they're changing their tune and
> accepting linux once in a while... But that's just fluff and I very much
> doubt it reflects the company's real views.

I was talking about what was actually shown in the article... not a single
word supporting the accusation of fighting Linux or OSS development in any
way.

-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]