[ Followup set to comp.periphs.scanners ]
I'm finally going to buy a scanner, and would like some opinions on what
might work. My requirements are modest; 600 DPI, 8-bit color, and <=
$200 would be just fine.
The real problem is that I *don't* want to buy a scanner that isn't
supported by Free software. According to the lists at
http://www.sane-project.org/ , the current low-end offerings from Epson
and Canon are not supported by SANE yet. I can probably run USBSnoopy
on 'Doze, figure out part of the protocol on a LiDE 35 or Perfection
3490, and write a partial backend--but that's too much like work and it
takes a long time. So: Does anyone have any horror stories about the
Plustek OpticPro UT24 ? That one's marked as "complete" in SANE's
lists, and Googling for problems didn't turn up much. If anyone has
other suggestions, please post them to the newsfroup. TIA,
--
Matt G|There is no Darkness in eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Frustration is annoying, but the *real* disasters in life begin when you
get exactly what you want.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
danSPANceswitTRAPhcrows (1928)
|
11/19/2005 3:06:04 PM |
|
On 11/19/05 16:06, Dances With Crows wrote:
> [ Followup set to comp.periphs.scanners ]
>
> I'm finally going to buy a scanner, and would like some opinions on what
> might work. My requirements are modest; 600 DPI, 8-bit color, and <=
> $200 would be just fine.
>
> The real problem is that I *don't* want to buy a scanner that isn't
> supported by Free software. According to the lists at
> http://www.sane-project.org/ , the current low-end offerings from Epson
> and Canon are not supported by SANE yet. I can probably run USBSnoopy
> on 'Doze, figure out part of the protocol on a LiDE 35 or Perfection
> 3490, and write a partial backend--but that's too much like work and it
> takes a long time. So: Does anyone have any horror stories about the
> Plustek OpticPro UT24 ? That one's marked as "complete" in SANE's
> lists, and Googling for problems didn't turn up much. If anyone has
> other suggestions, please post them to the newsfroup. TIA,
>
Canonscan LiDE 20 from canon works perfectly on Linux. And I paid for
it less than 60 euro 6 months ago.
I just plugged it (USB1.1), started xsane and it was working.
My distribution didn't have an OCR program so I downloaded gocr,
compiled, installed and also OCR was available.
Ciao
Giovanni
--
A computer is like an air conditioner,
it stops working when you open Windows.
Registered Linux user #337974 <http://counter.li.org/>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
lsodgf0 (405)
|
11/19/2005 4:09:46 PM
|
|
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.periphs.scanners.]
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:09:46 +0100, Giovanni staggered into the Black
Sun and said:
> On 11/19/05 16:06, Dances With Crows wrote:
>> I'm finally going to buy a scanner, and would like some opinions on
>> what might work. My requirements are modest; 600 DPI, 8-bit color,
>> and <= $200 would be just fine.
>>
>> The real problem is that I *don't* want to buy a scanner that isn't
>> supported by Free software. According to the lists at
>> http://www.sane-project.org/ , the current low-end offerings from
>> Epson and Canon are not supported by SANE yet.
> Canonscan LiDE 20 from canon works perfectly on Linux.
....and it's been discontinued, is not listed on pricewatch/newegg, and
of the first 5 webstores I found/checked via Google, 4 list it as "out
of stock". The one that didn't list it as out of stock was in Malaysia.
Not very encouraging to my mind. That's sort of why I mentioned the
Plustek UT24, because it's in-stock at a USA company and listed as
"complete" in SANE.
> My distribution didn't have an OCR program so I downloaded gocr,
> compiled, installed and also OCR was available.
The "gtk-ocr" frontend for it is pitiful. Fortunately, kooka can use
gocr as well. gocr worked better than OCRad on a very clean test image,
but it's still inferior to what a 4-year-old Omnipage and Typereader
came up with. OCR is one area where Free stuff is seriously lagging.
Fortunately, I won't be doing much if any OCR on the things I'm
scanning.
--
Matt G|There is no Darkness in eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
The early bird who catches the worm works for someone who comes in late
and owns the worm farm. --Travis McGee
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
danSPANceswitTRAPhcrows (1928)
|
11/19/2005 4:51:49 PM
|
|
|
2 Replies
42 Views
(page loaded in 0.04 seconds)
Similiar Articles:7/15/2012 6:42:46 PM
|