f



usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71

 Hi,
~
 I am using knoppix 5.1.1 based on the Linux 2.6.19 kernel
~
sh-3.1# uname -r
2.6.19
~
 I started Linux/knoppix with the cheatcode
~
 knoppix init 2
~
 then, after plugging in an external minidrive (before even starting X/KDE),
I got:
~
Synchronizing SCSI cache for disk sda:
FAILED
status = 0, message = 00, vhost = 1, driver = 00
<7> APIC error on CPU00: 01(01)
usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
.. . .
~
 I read from the error message and from some postings out there that it is
related to the combination of USB + APIC (+ low speed devices + bad
drivers?), that it also happens with printers, pen drives and wireless
cards connected via USB, so I started Linux/knoppix with:
~
 knoppix apic=off noapic init 2
~
 then I didn't get the first error stanzas, but only the
~
usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
.. . .
~
 ones repeatedly
~
 Why are these problems happening?
~
 How can I fix them?
~
 Thanks
 lbrtchx

0
lbrtchx (180)
5/3/2007 10:02:23 AM
comp.os.linux.hardware 9621 articles. 0 followers. Post Follow

14 Replies
1908 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 4

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage lbrtchx <lbrtchx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>  Hi,
> ~
>  I am using knoppix 5.1.1 based on the Linux 2.6.19 kernel
> ~
> sh-3.1# uname -r
> 2.6.19
> ~
>  I started Linux/knoppix with the cheatcode
> ~
>  knoppix init 2
> ~
>  then, after plugging in an external minidrive (before even starting X/KDE),
> I got:
> ~
> Synchronizing SCSI cache for disk sda:
> FAILED
> status = 0, message = 00, vhost = 1, driver = 00
> <7> APIC error on CPU00: 01(01)
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> . . .
> ~
>  I read from the error message and from some postings out there that it is
> related to the combination of USB + APIC (+ low speed devices + bad
> drivers?), that it also happens with printers, pen drives and wireless
> cards connected via USB, so I started Linux/knoppix with:
> ~
>  knoppix apic=off noapic init 2
> ~
>  then I didn't get the first error stanzas, but only the
> ~
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> . . .
> ~
>  ones repeatedly
> ~
>  Why are these problems happening?
> ~
>  How can I fix them?
> ~
>  Thanks
>  lbrtchx

What is this ''external minidrive'' exactly? Typically all
USB storage needs only the USB storage drive under Linux,
so this seems to be either a hardware problem or a kernel bug.

Bug 7932 might be what is the issue, see 
   http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7932

It seems to have been introduced some time after kernel 2.6.18.6
and is currently unresolved. The only advice I can give you
at this time is to try with an older kernel, e.g. any
2.6.18-variant.

Arno
0
Arno
5/3/2007 5:23:51 PM
> What is this ''external minidrive'' exactly?
 a Toshiba 40.00 Gb HDD2171 MK40196GAX
~
 I started Linux/knoppix with the cheatcode
~
 acpi=off noacpi testcd init 2
~
 I ran dmesg:
~
....
usb 1-1: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2
usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
scsi0 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
usb-storage: device found at 2
usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access     Generic  USB Disk         9.02 PQ: 0
ANSI: 2
SCSI device sda: 78140160 512-byte hdwr sectors (40008 MB)
sda: Write Protect is off
sda: Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
sda: assuming drive cache: write through
SCSI device sda: 78140160 512-byte hdwr sectors (40008 MB)
sda: Write Protect is off
sda: Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
sda: assuming drive cache: write through
 sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 < sda5 >
sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda
usb-storage: device scan complete
~
 then fdisk and got
~
Disk /dev/sda: 40.0 GB, 40007761920 bytes
256 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4845 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16128 * 512 = 8257536 bytes

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1               1         255     2056288+  83  Linux
/dev/sda2             256        1024     6201216   83  Linux
/dev/sda3            1025        1892     6999552    c  W95 FAT32
(LBA)
/dev/sda4            1893        4845    23812992    5  Extended
/dev/sda5            1893        4845    23812960+  83  Linux
~
 I am able to fdisk, mount and access this USB-based (it is also
powered through the USB cable) external minidrive without any problems
now, which makes me wonder how safe my perception is.
~
 Is there any way I could test the drive by other means? Even in a low
level way to see what is really going on with it and try to tell apart
hardware from software problems and if they are software ones, of
which kind? Or do you think the drive si just fine (I will regularly
backup my data anyway ;-))
~
 lbrtchx

0
lbrtchx
5/4/2007 10:43:00 AM
 Notice I am still getting the pesky
~
 "device descriptor read/64, error -71"
~
 error message
~
 lbrtchx

0
lbrtchx
5/4/2007 10:44:58 AM
Previously lbrtchx@hotmail.com wrote:
>> What is this ''external minidrive'' exactly?
>  a Toshiba 40.00 Gb HDD2171 MK40196GAX
> ~
>  I started Linux/knoppix with the cheatcode
> ~
>  acpi=off noacpi testcd init 2
> ~
>  I ran dmesg:
> ~
> ...
> usb 1-1: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2
> usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> scsi0 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
> usb-storage: device found at 2
> usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
> scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access     Generic  USB Disk         9.02 PQ: 0
> ANSI: 2
> SCSI device sda: 78140160 512-byte hdwr sectors (40008 MB)
> sda: Write Protect is off
> sda: Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
> sda: assuming drive cache: write through
> SCSI device sda: 78140160 512-byte hdwr sectors (40008 MB)
> sda: Write Protect is off
> sda: Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
> sda: assuming drive cache: write through
>  sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 < sda5 >
> sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda
> usb-storage: device scan complete
> ~
>  then fdisk and got
> ~
> Disk /dev/sda: 40.0 GB, 40007761920 bytes
> 256 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4845 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16128 * 512 = 8257536 bytes

>    Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
> /dev/sda1               1         255     2056288+  83  Linux
> /dev/sda2             256        1024     6201216   83  Linux
> /dev/sda3            1025        1892     6999552    c  W95 FAT32
> (LBA)
> /dev/sda4            1893        4845    23812992    5  Extended
> /dev/sda5            1893        4845    23812960+  83  Linux
> ~
>  I am able to fdisk, mount and access this USB-based (it is also
> powered through the USB cable) external minidrive without any problems
> now, which makes me wonder how safe my perception is.
> ~
>  Is there any way I could test the drive by other means? Even in a low
> level way to see what is really going on with it and try to tell apart
> hardware from software problems and if they are software ones, of
> which kind? Or do you think the drive si just fine (I will regularly
> backup my data anyway ;-))
> ~
>  lbrtchx

Well, I don't think you need to worry too much. If it reads and
writes fine, thebn it should be ok. However if something breaks, 
it will likely be the USB interface. In that case you can still 
connect the disk directly via IDE and get the data.

Arno
0
Arno
5/4/2007 3:42:54 PM
Previously lbrtchx@hotmail.com wrote:
>  Notice I am still getting the pesky
> ~
>  "device descriptor read/64, error -71"
> ~
>  error message
> ~
>  lbrtchx

Yes. But is does not seem to impact drive functionality.

Arno
0
Arno
5/4/2007 3:43:39 PM
 well, I think you are right. It might be most probably kernel related
~
 I tried using knoppix 4.0.2 which uses kernel
~
2.6.12
~
 and even though I still got "device descriptor read/64, error -71"
the full dump read
~
usb 4-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
usb 4-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71
scsi1 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
usb-storage: device found at 2
usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
  Vendor: Generic   Model: USB Disk          Rev: 9.02
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 02
SCSI device sdb: 78140160 512-byte hdwr sectors (40008 MB)
sdb: assuming drive cache: write through
SCSI device sdb: 78140160 512-byte hdwr sectors (40008 MB)
sdb: assuming drive cache: write through
 sdb: sdb1 sdb2 sdb3 sdb4 < sdb5 >
Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
usb-storage: device scan complete
~
 and I was able to use the disk without any problems
~
 However it might also be hardware/BIOS related. When I try knoppix
5.1.1 CD at work with:
~
 acpi=off noacpi init 2
~
 using my box at work, I am getting
~
usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: Unlink after no-IRQ?  Controller is probably
using the wrong IRQ.
usb 1-4: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-4: device not accepting address 3, error -110
usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4
usb 1-4: device not accepting address 4, error -110
usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 5
usb 1-4: device not accepting address 5, error -110
usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 6
usb 1-4: device not accepting address 6, error -110
~
usb 2-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2
ehci_hcd 0000:0a:0a.2: Unlink after no-IRQ?  Controller is probably
using the wrong IRQ.
usb 2-4: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 2-4: device not accepting address 2, error -110
usb 2-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3
usb 2-4: device descriptor read/64, error -110
usb 2-4: device not accepting address 3, error -110
usb 2-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4
usb 2-4: device not accepting address 4, error -110
usb 2-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 5
usb 2-4: device not accepting address 5, error -110
usb 1-5: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 7
usb 1-5: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-5: device not accepting address 7, error -110
usb 1-5: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 8
usb 1-5: device descriptor read/64, error -110
usb 1-5: device not accepting address 8, error -110
usb 1-5: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 9
usb 1-5: device not accepting address 9, error -110
usb 1-5: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 10
usb 1-5: device not accepting address 10, error -110

~
usb 1-6: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: Unlink after no-IRQ?  Controller is probably
using the wrong IRQ.
usb 1-6: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-6: device not accepting address 3, error -110
usb 1-6: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4
usb 1-6: device not accepting address 4, error -110
usb 1-6: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 5
usb 1-6: device not accepting address 5, error -110
usb 1-6: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 6
usb 1-6: device not accepting address 6, error -110
~
 lbrtchx

0
lbrtchx
5/4/2007 6:56:07 PM
In article <1178275380.390203.168910@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
lbrtchx@hotmail.com writes

> acpi=off noacpi testcd init 2

Shouldn't that be "acpi=off noapic" ?

-- 
(\__/)   Bunny says NO to Windows Vista!
(='.'=)  http://www.badvista.org/
(")_(")  http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38926
         http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0702.html#8
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39051
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39087
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37091
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36653

0
Mike
5/5/2007 7:09:00 PM
Previously Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> wrote:
> In article <1178275380.390203.168910@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> lbrtchx@hotmail.com writes

>> acpi=off noacpi testcd init 2

> Shouldn't that be "acpi=off noapic" ?

I think it should. 

Arno
0
Arno
5/5/2007 8:19:12 PM
 Hmm! Actually there is both:
~
 noapic and noacpi
~
 http://www.knoppix.net/wiki/Cheat_Codes
~
 http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/wiki/index.php/Cheat_Codes
~
 http://hamshack-hack.sourceforge.net/knx-cheat.html
~
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Configuration_and_Power_Interface
~
 http://support.novell.com/techcenter/sdb/en/2002/10/81_acpi.html
~
 lbrtchx

0
lbrtchx
5/6/2007 1:18:19 AM
In article <1178414299.780752.33660@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
lbrtchx@hotmail.com writes
> Hmm! Actually there is both:

You're missing the point.  According to your posts, you're booting with
the kernel parameters "acpi=off noacpi" which do the same thing, so one
parameter is redundant.  It sounds to me as if you don't realise that
ACPI and APIC are two different things.

When diagnosing possible hardware problems such as the one you're
having, it's useful to disable the ACPI BIOS with "acpi=off" and disable
the advanced programmable interrupt controller with "noacpi".

The APIC is relevant, as you mention getting this output:

"usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3
ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: Unlink after no-IRQ?  Controller is probably 
using the wrong IRQ."

This suggests an APIC routing problem, possibly due to a buggy BIOS, so
it's worth trying again with APIC turned off.

-- 
(\__/)   Bunny says NO to Windows Vista!
(='.'=)  http://www.badvista.org/
(")_(")  http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38926
         http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0702.html#8
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39051
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39087
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37091
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36653

0
Mike
5/6/2007 3:46:04 AM
In article <8SKcwpA89UPGFw8C@jasper.org.uk>, Mike Tomlinson
<mike@jasper.org.uk> writes

>When diagnosing possible hardware problems such as the one you're
>having, it's useful to disable the ACPI BIOS with "acpi=off" and disable
>the advanced programmable interrupt controller with "noacpi".
                                                      ^^^^^^
That should read noapic, dammit. :)

-- 
(\__/)   Bunny says NO to Windows Vista!
(='.'=)  http://www.badvista.org/
(")_(")  http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38926
         http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0702.html#8
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39051
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39087
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37091
         http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36653

0
Mike
5/6/2007 11:04:14 AM
Previously Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> wrote:
> In article <8SKcwpA89UPGFw8C@jasper.org.uk>, Mike Tomlinson
> <mike@jasper.org.uk> writes

>>When diagnosing possible hardware problems such as the one you're
>>having, it's useful to disable the ACPI BIOS with "acpi=off" and disable
>>the advanced programmable interrupt controller with "noacpi".
>                                                       ^^^^^^
> That should read noapic, dammit. :)

Well, I have been mixing these up since the option exixts ;-)

Arno
0
Arno
5/6/2007 9:44:47 PM
On 3 Mai, 12:02, lbrtchx <lbrt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>  Hi,
> ~
>  I am using knoppix 5.1.1 based on the Linux 2.6.19 kernel
> ~
> sh-3.1# uname -r
> 2.6.19
> ~
>  I started Linux/knoppix with the cheatcode
> ~
>  knoppix init 2
> ~
>  then, after plugging in an external minidrive (before even starting X/KDE),
> I got:
> ~
> Synchronizing SCSI cache for disk sda:
> FAILED
> status = 0, message = 00, vhost = 1, driver = 00
> <7> APIC error on CPU00: 01(01)
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> . . .
> ~
>  I read from the error message and from some postings out there that it is
> related to the combination of USB + APIC (+ low speed devices + bad
> drivers?), that it also happens with printers, pen drives and wireless
> cards connected via USB, so I started Linux/knoppix with:
> ~
>  knoppix apic=off noapic init 2
> ~
>  then I didn't get the first error stanzas, but only the
> ~
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71
> . . .
> ~
>  ones repeatedly
> ~
>  Why are these problems happening?
> ~
>  How can I fix them?
> ~
>  Thanks
>  lbrtchx

I had a bad (low quality) cable. Replacing it with an USB 2.0 spec
cable fixed it.
You should exclude other hard ware problems as well.

0
hanspetersorge
6/11/2007 9:52:42 PM
> I had a bad (low quality) cable. Replacing it with an USB 2.0 spec
> cable fixed it.
> You should exclude other hard ware problems as well.
~
 Well, yeah, I guess!
~
 Any specifics about what you just mentioned? Any way to test USB
cables to spec? What would be other the hardware problems?
~
 lbrtchx



0
lbrtchx
6/11/2007 11:44:58 PM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

[News] 4 Linux Releases: Foresight Linux 1.1, Ubuntu CE 2.2, Kwort 2.2, Mandriva 2007.1 RC1
Foresight Linux 1.1 is out ! http://foresightlinux.com/downloads/ Kwort [Slackware derivative] 2.2 final released! ,----[ Quote ] | I'm proud to announce that Kwort 2.2 final version has been released | after a very long time (more than a year). The system is very stable | and very usable. `---- http://kwort.org/?page=NewsViewer&ID=45&PHPSESSID=1d286ac69fabebf18b4db27ded0b277d Mandriva Linux 2007 Spring RC1 (aka "Xianyang") ,----[ Quote ] | New since Mandriva Linux 2007: | | * Major desktop components | o KDE 3.5.6 | o GNOME 2.18 (RC: final release will include GNOME 2.18) | o OpenOffice.org 2.1 | o Mozilla Firefox 2.0 `---- http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Releases/Mandriva/2007.1/Development/RC1 ...

Multiple USB 1.1 devices in USB 2 Hub speed ?
Hi, If I have a number of USB 1.1 devices plugged into a USB 2 Hub, can I get the full 12MB/s of each USB 1.1 device via the USB 2 link to a host ? Or does the USB 2 link fall back to a 1.1 compatible mode ? I am also looking for a Mini USB IP67 bulkhead connector. So far I have found something from Samtec, Bulgin and the mil circular D38999 series, but all these options are very bulky. If I can get a similar sized connector that can take through 2 or 3 USB links, then it will not be so bad. Regards Anton Erasmus On Jul 16, 12:07 pm, Anton Erasmus <nob...@spam.prevent.net> wrote: > Hi, > > If I have a number of USB 1.1 devices plugged into a USB 2 Hub, can I > get the full 12MB/s of each USB 1.1 device via the USB 2 link to a > host ? Or does the USB 2 link fall back to a 1.1 compatible mode ? > Not sure what's your question, it is a bit confusing. The two statements around the OR are equivalent. Briefly: High speed = 480 Mbps (USB 2.0) Full Speed = 12Mbps (USB 1.1) Low Speed = 1.5Mbps (USB 1.1) USB 2.0 is backward compatible, so is the hub. It should support a mix of devices. So, yes, you get the 12Mbps full speed AND yes, the USB 2 link falls back to 1.1. "Adrian" <adrianbica@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c11ebd15-e7d7-4b6c-9a72-fac71de01b70@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 16, 12:07 pm, Anton Erasmus <nob...@spam.prevent.net> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If I have a number of USB 1.1 de...

Scanning USB devices and reading USB descriptors
Hi, I'm wondering how I can scan the system for USB devices and read off the USB descriptors such as VID/PID/serial number in C? I have an external USB HDD that I wish to access, and I'm currently able to do so with DeviceIoControl by addressing it as PhysicalDriveX, which will return me information about the device, except it only does it for the attached fixed disk, rather than the USB device. Thanks! galapogos wrote: > Hi, Hi, > > I'm wondering how I can scan the system for USB devices and read off > the USB descriptors such as VID/PID/serial number in C? I hav...

#1 #n+1 #2n+1 #2 #n+2 #2n+2 #3 #n+3 #2n+3 #n #2n #3n #1 #2 #3 #n #n+1 #n+2 #n+3 #2n #2n+1 100 Gbps aggregate stream of 64/66b words virtual lane markers virtual lane 1 virtual lane 2 virtual lan
#1 #n+1 #2n+1 #2 #n+2 #2n+2 #3 #n+3 #2n+3 #n #2n #3n #1 #2 #3 #n #n+1 #n+2 #n+3 #2n #2n+1 100 Gbps aggregate stream of 64/66b words virtual lane markers virtual lane 1 virtual lane 2 virtual lane 3 virtual lane n Simple 66-bit word level round robin distribution Transmit PM Transmit PM Receive PM Receive PM Transmit PC Receive PC 1 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.0 1.0 0.1 1.1 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 0.0 0.1 8.0 16.0 5.0 13.0 2.0 10.0 18.0 7.0 15.0 2.1 4.0 12.0 1.0 9.0 17.0 4.1 6.0 14.0 3.0 11.0 19.0 6.1 8.0 5.0 16.0 VL0 VL1 VL2 0.0 1.0 0.1 1.1 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 8.0 5.0 16.0 VL19 identified and reported. 2:1 0 10 2:1 1 11 2:1 2 12 2:1 3 13 2:1 4 14 2:1 5 15 2:1 6 16 2:1 7 17 2:1 8 18 2:1 9 19 1:2 1:2 1:2 1:2 1:2 1:2 1:2 1:2 1:2 1:2 Transmit P Receive P PMAtor PMAtor PMDoor PMDoor Virtual_Lanes Electrical_Lanes Optical_Lanes Electrical_Lanes begin transit transmit... .... transmitting... ...

X error on silent install of Oracle 11g (11.2.0.1) on Linux x86-64
I am trying a silent install of Oracle 11g (11.2.0.1) for a single instance= database (software only) on a 64bit Linux server. For some reason, I get = a "X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. X connection to localhost:11.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown)." = error. I don't understand why X would be needed for silent install. I hav= e previously done this with 11.1 without any problems. Also netca and dbca = in 11.2 run without any issues when doing silent install. pradeep wrote: > I am trying a silent install of Oracle 11g (11.2.0.1) for a single instance database (software only) on a 64bit Linux server. For some reason, I get a "X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. > X connection to localhost:11.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown)." error. I don't understand why X would be needed for silent install. I have previously done this with 11.1 without any problems. Also netca and dbca in 11.2 run without any issues when doing silent install. Just a very wild guess but easy to check: you wouldn't have a DISPLAY variable set? pradeep: # I am trying a silent install of Oracle 11g (11.2.0.1) for a single instance database (software only) on a 64bit Linux server. .... The 11.2.0.1 stuff has been obsoleted by 11.2.0.2 ... if you look for patch 10098815 on oracle support you can download the 11.2.0.2 ( full installs ) stuff. Of course you still need to then patch it up to 11.2.0.2...

Re: Boot from USB PRM (Partitioned Removable Media ) failed after loading OS2LVM.DMD error: "OS/2 is unable to operate OS/2 is unable to operate your hard disk or diskette drive"
For the knowledge base: add to the thread 3 month old Done a test with an T41 ( with USB 2.0 port ) and USB 2.0 Cardreader! Result: Error "OS/2 is unable ......" Next step in test: 1. Downgrade the drive to the level Mike Luther works with!! Do a test boot form CF Card 2. recreate the test results ( Mike Luther) with boot form usb diskette. kind regards Rainer Rainer Stroebel schrieb: > > For the knowledge base: add to the thread 3 month old cross post of the info from comp.os.so2.apps Thread : How to boot OS/2 4.52 (to a ...

Linux: Oracle9i DB 9.2, Oracle9i DS 9.0.2, Oracle9i AS 1.0.2.2.1(Forms, Reports) on Fedora Core 1
I have installed with Philippe ALEXANDRE on a laptop Oracle9i DB 9.2, Oracle9i DS 9.0.2, Oracle9i AS 1.0.2.2.1(Forms6i, Reports6i) on Fedora Core 1 the 8th November 2003. All is running OK. Denis ALEXANDRE Assistant Manager, Banque Saradar France http://www.alexnet.fr/ P.S. I am using Oracle and Unix to create an Integrated Banking System since 1987. This banking system is installed in more than 25 other banks. ...

Migration of OS/2 1.30 to OS/2 2.0 or newer
Hi all, what is the chance to upgrade an OS/2 1.30-system with LAN manager (ethernet with plain NetBIOS), a C-written frontend and a Sybase-SQL-server 1.1 to a newer OS/2-version? The system is installed on a FAT-drive, print-jobs are created by the C-frontend for LaserJet-printers and send directly to the LPT-port or a shared LPT-port on a print-server and several OS/2 1.3-clients access the database also via the C-frontend. I would perfer using WarpServer 4 based on Warp 3, or even just Warp 3 Connect/Warp 4 (without LVM, JFS etc., so WSeB, ACP, MCP or eCS are not an option) the whole infrastructure may not be needed anymore because only one person still works with the system! What could be show-stoppers to care about? Thanks a lot for any answer! -- To Answer please replace "invalid" with "de" ! Zum Antworten bitte "invalid" durch "de" ersetzen ! Chau y hasta luego, Thorolf Thorolf Godawa wrote: > Hi all, > > what is the chance to upgrade an OS/2 1.30-system with LAN manager > (ethernet with plain NetBIOS), a C-written frontend and a > Sybase-SQL-server 1.1 to a newer OS/2-version? > > The system is installed on a FAT-drive, print-jobs are created by the > C-frontend for LaserJet-printers and send directly to the LPT-port or a > shared LPT-port on a print-server and several OS/2 1.3-clients access > the database also via the C-frontend. > > I would perfer using WarpServer ...

Error: a=nominal([1 2 1 2]), b=getlevels(a), b(2)
According to documentation for "categorical", getlevels returns a uniquified version of its input, but is of the same type. I am baffled by the differences in what I see in the input & output: a=nominal([1 2 1 2]) b=getlevels(a) a(2) b(2) % Error: Index exceeds matrix dimensions b(1) % This scalar index returns all 2 elements numel(b) % Shows 2 unique elements I tried a vertical "a", but "b" is still horizontal: a=nominal([1;2;1;2]) b=getlevels(a) % 1x2 row array of unique numbers b(2) % Error: Index exceeds matrix dimensions b(1) % This scalar index returns all 2 elements in 1 row numel(b) % Shows 2 unique element's The help pages for categorical data indicate that the following should be OK, but it generates errors: >> a(find(a==2)) Error using nominalcheck (line 53) Invalid types for comparison. Error in nominal/eq (line 20) [acodes,bcodes] = nominalcheck(a,b); In fact, even find(a==2) generates the same error, and I tacked it down to a==2. This means that the following is erroneous as well: >> a(a==2) Error using nominalcheck (line 53) Invalid types for comparison. Error in nominal/eq (line 20) [acodes,bcodes] = nominalcheck(a,b); I need to access elements in "a" based on a specified unique value. I need to process the elements of "a" differently depending on the value used to select the elemen...

Drivers: USB 1.1 Extended Control Driver for OS/2
++ From the VOICE OS/2-eCS News Service http://www.os2voice.org ++ From: warpcafeDESPAM@DESPAMyahoo.de Wim Brul has released his USB 1.1 Extended Control Driver for OS/2 for free use. From the website: "This driver enables you to directly control usb devices. It provides an application programming interface that conforms to the standard DosRead and DosWrite functions and as such may be easily used from rexx procedures using the charin and charout functions. It has been designed to ease the development and test of simple usb devices that do not belong to any usb device class an...

1 USB device gets attached to 2 different devices and mouted twice!
When I plug in my USB Lexar powershot storage device, fedora automatically recognizes it, mounts it, and creates an icon on the desktop for it. The only problem is that it does everything twice! It attaches the device to both sda AND sdb. It creates two mount points for each /media/POWERSHOT and /media/POWERSHOT1 It creates two icons POWERSHOT and POWERSHOT1. I am running Fedora Core 3 (2.6.11-1.14_FC3smp) on a Shuttle box (ST61G4B XPC 800fsb). Oddly this works fine on another box running the same exact version of Fedora. Below are the relevent sections of /var/log/messages and output of ...

OS/2 Lan Server V3.0 for sale with OS/2 2.1
http://cm.ebay.com/cm/ck/1065-29296-2357-0?uid=4289490&site=0&ver=LCA080805&item=120067699646&lk=URL ...

ruby version 1.9.2 dev with memcached-0.1.18 native compilation error/syntax errors #2
Hi there Hopefully these errors somehow relate to REE, if not, highly appreciate any feedback and a direction! Installed latest (from git master) enterprise server and attempting to build memcached-0.18.0 with ruby compiler version 1.9.2 dev , encountered 2 exceptions (one during native compilation of memcached gem and second during ruby compilation of memcached rails.rb (syntax error on the usage of alias) Symptom 1: errors during gem execution of memcache gem Symptom 2: errors during ruby compilation of memcached .rb file Using environment: A) Ruby Server deployment using ruby enterp...

do I have usb 1 or 2 / Linux ?
+ I have 2 USB ports on an older Linux box (I didn't build it, thus this question). How can I determine if these are USB 1.1 or USB 2 ports ? I'm presently assuming they are USB 1.1 after seeing relatively slow performance with a rated 55x CD burner. I've found a few USB utilities, but none which specifically tell me 1.1 /or/ 2 Thanks stuseven@hotmail.com wrote: > + > I have 2 USB ports on an older Linux box > (I didn't build it, thus this question). > > How can I determine if these are USB 1.1 or > USB 2 ports ? >...

how can you tell if you have usb 1.1 or usb 2
How can you tell from windows 2000 if you have a usb1.1 or usb2.0 connector? "Laura" <handl@mts.net> wrote in message news:e0ddcf8.0407291201.1dc73116@posting.google.com... > > How can you tell from windows 2000 if you have a > usb1.1 or usb2.0 connector? Control Panel -> System -> Hardware -> Device Manager. Then right click on the USB hub(s) and click Properties. Another way is to plug in a known USB 2.0 device into the port. The system will pop a warning if the port is USB 1.1. dk "Laura" > How can you tell from windows 2000 if you have a usb1.1 or usb2.0 connector? plug something into it that runs on USB 2.0. You'll get an error message. Pat Laura wrote: > How can you tell from windows 2000 if you have a usb1.1 or usb2.0 > connector? Connectors for USB are the same for USB 1.1 or 2. Win2K does not support USB2 unless an MS patch is applied http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;319973 The link will answer your question. Even with the patch, it is up to the vendor to supply a Win2K compatible driver for USB2. Check that the USB device is in fact compatible. Q ...

HP PSC1210 USB 1.1 or USB 2?
Hi all, is this printer USB 1.1 or USB 2?? Everywhere I go to find this out, it only tells me its USB Which doesnt tell me a hell of a lot lol. Any info appreciated Cheers From the truly sketchy information on the HP web site, I would have to guess that the PSC1210 supports USB 1.1 and takes advantage of the higher throughput of USB 2.0. HP supports the product (drivers, etc) running with Windows 98, which, for all intents and purposes, knows nothing about USB 2.0... Ben Myers On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:19:08 +1300, "Paul" <goneouttolunch@home.com> wrote: >Hi all, is this printer USB 1.1 or USB 2?? > >Everywhere I go to find this out, it only tells me its USB > >Which doesnt tell me a hell of a lot lol. > >Any info appreciated > >Cheers > > Ta Ben. I finally got a tech online to chat with. And yup he said its definitely 1.1 and USB2. So, it'll make use of USB2 if u have USB 2 ports and a USB2 cable. <ben_myers_spam_me_not @ charter.net (Ben Myers)> wrote in message news:41efbc8a.5083615@nntp.charter.net... > From the truly sketchy information on the HP web site, I would have to > guess > that the PSC1210 supports USB 1.1 and takes advantage of the higher > throughput > of USB 2.0. HP supports the product (drivers, etc) running with Windows > 98, > which, for all intents and purposes, knows nothing about USB 2.0... Ben > Myers > > On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:19:08 +1300, "P...

usb error on external disc ?? hub 1-0:1.0:Cannot enable port 2
Hi, I want connext an external drive STOREX FHD-353 on my Linux 2.6.9-34 WhiteBox I have following error message "hub 1-0:1.0:Cannot enable port 2. Maybe the USB cable is bad. " Do you have an idea ? Regards Philippe My computer is an K7AMD, with motherboard Micro star 6167 . I think computer could onlly work un USB1.0 not USB 2.0. External Hard drive is running before with another PC that use XP .. ...

LaTex equation numbering like 2.1, 2.2, also 2.0.1, 2.0,2, 2.1.1, etc
David Roach wrote: > Is there a simple command to have latex number > the equations by the section numbers automatically. > > David From the LaTeX Companion (what a wonderful book!) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % number equations within sections % In preamble \makeatletter \@addtoreset{equation}{section} \makeatother \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Numbers within sections...I use this all the time in articles. Even works with ******************* ******************* Brilliant. And then I got numbering within subsections by repeating and editing (not replacing), so I now have:- (Just after the documentClass command) \makeatletter \@addtoreset{equation}{section} \makeatother \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}} \makeatletter \@addtoreset{equation}{subsection} \makeatother \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesubsection.\arabic{equation}} Bob Bob Marlow schrieb: > David Roach wrote: > >> Is there a simple command to have latex number >> the equations by the section numbers automatically. >> >> David > > From the LaTeX Companion (what a wonderful book!) > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > > % number equations within sections > % In preamble > > \makeatletter > \@addtoreset{equation}{section} > \makeatother > \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}} > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% [more code] > Hi! I th...

WANTED: 60 MEG HD and OS/2 1.2/1.3 for PS/2 50
I'm interested in installed OS/2 1.2 or 1.3 on my PS/2 Model 50. In order to do this, I will need to install a larger HD. IBM offered the 8550-021 and the 8550-061, the 61 coming with a 60 MEG ESDI Hard drive. As far as I know, the HD was available seperately. If anyone has either OS/2 or a Model 50 compatible HD floating around somewhere, please let me know. Thanks. Hi! Regarding the hard disk for your Model 50. The 20MB and 60MB disks were different types that used different controllers and or riser cards. The 60MB disk is not by itself compatible with your Model 50, unless it is a Model 50Z. Read this link for more information on this: http://www.walshcomptech.com/ohlandl/8550/8550_Tinkering.html http://www.walshcomptech.com/ohlandl/8550/8550_Controllers.html As far as OS/2 goes, if someone here in the group does not have it, it does show up on eBay from time to time. William ...

[News] Linux Mint 2.2 KDE Edition Review; Foresight Linux 1.2 Released
Review: Linux Mint 2.2 Beta 020 "Bianca KDE Edition" ,----[ Quote ] | While it is always nice to have another Linux distribution, because | choice is good, I didn't see any compelling reason to use Linux Mint | over the Ubuntu which it is based off of. The look is slightly | different, with some different configuration options here and there. | I can't really say it offers anything special over Ubuntu, but you never | know, there are no doubt future improvements that the Linux Mint team | will make. Hopefully they fix the video driver issue so I can try it | out on my deskto...

Newbie: ORa 9.2.0.1 on Linux SUSE 8.2 Install causes Errors
Hi all, while Installing ORACLE 9.2.0.1 EE on a SUSE Linux 8.2 Env I had some strange errors: Can anyone give me hints working this around ? -error while make on ctx-cartridge install I'm using Glibc 2.3.2 should i apply some patches ? a part of the make.log **************************************************************************** **************** mv -f /opt/oracle/bin/ctxsrv /opt/oracle/bin/ctxsrvO mv ctxsrv /opt/oracle/bin/ctxsrv chmod 751 /opt/oracle/bin/ctxsrv gcc -o ctxhx -L/opt/oracle/ctx/lib/ -L/opt/oracle/lib/ -L/opt/oracle/lib/stubs/ /opt/oracle/ctx/lib/ctxhx.o -L/opt/oracle/ctx/lib/ -lm -lsc_ca -lsc_fa -lsc_ ex -lsc_da -lsc_ut -lsc_ch -lsc_fi -lctxhx -lc -Wl,-rpath,/opt/oracle/ctx/li b -lnls9 -lcore9 -lnls9 -lcore9 -lnls9 -lxml9 -lcore9 -lunls9 -lnls9 /lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to `__ctype_b_loc@GLIBC_2.3' /lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to `_dl_addr@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to `_dl_open@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to `_dl_close@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to `_dl_sym@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib/libdl.so.2: undefined reference to `_dl_vsym@GLIBC_PRIVATE' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [ctxhx] **************************************************************************** ***************** -Error while calling database configuration assistent: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation stackbase=0x45447000, stackpointer=0x45446d5c Full thread...

FLAC 1.1.1 on OS/2
Did anybody succeed in building a correctly working FLAC on OS/2? The distribution page claims that OS/2 build is supported, but actually it is not even close to be supported... Fixing "obvious flaws", I can make the test scripts run, but they show subtle (?) corruption of the sound. Typical errors are like simple iterator on writable file creating APPLICATION block creating PADDING block is writable = 1 [S]VP try to write over STREAMINFO block... FLAC__metadata_simple_iterator_set_block() returned false like it should [S]VP next...

"usb 7-1: reset low speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2"
Hello. usb 7-1: reset low speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 Is this something to worry about in my KNOPPIX v6.4.4? Thank you in advance. :) -- Quote of the Week: "The foreign policy aim of ants can be summed up as follows: restless aggression, territorial conquest, and genocidal annihilation of neighboring colonies whenever possible. If ants had nuclear weapons, they would probably end the world in a week." --Journey to the Ants, page 59. Bert Holldobler & Edward O. Wilson /\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ / Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail. If crediting, ( ) then please kindly use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. Ant wrote: > usb 7-1: reset low speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 > > Is this something to worry about in my KNOPPIX v6.4.4? Some code decided that that USB port needed a reset. This might be done in an attempt to revive a device that has stopped responding, but it's not possible to determine whether there is a problem in this particular case without the surrounding messages from the system log. Regards, Clemens Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de> wrote: > Ant wrote: > > usb 7-1: reset low speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 > > > > Is this something to worry about in my KNOPPIX v6.4.4? > Some code dec...

[News] New GNU/Linux Distros: blackPanther OS 10.1 and Zorin OS 2.0 Released
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 blackPanther OS 10.1 http://www.blackpanther.hu/ Zorin OS 2.0 video released ,----[ Quote ] | If you're interested in Zorin OS 2.0 then | you'll be interested to see the first video | of it. Head over to the Videos page on this | site view it. | | Also as a quick reminder, Zorin OS 2.0 will | be availible on the 1st of January, that's | less than a week! `---- http://zorin-os.webs.com/apps/blog/entries/show/2434137-zorin-os-2-0-video-released Recent: Torvalds rejects one-size-fits-all Linux ,----[ Quote ] | Linus Torvalds has rejected the argument that Linux developers should pool | their resources behind a single distribution. `---- http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/246534/torvalds-rejects-onesizefitsall-linux.html Fragmentation good for the user, says Nokia ,----[ Quote ] | Fragmentation within mobile platforms helps handset manufacturers | and software developers to properly address customers' needs, a | senior Nokia executive has said. `---- http://community.zdnet.co.uk/blog/0,1000000567,10013788o-2000331761b,00.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAks/9eAACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6dIgCgl+fAFmr/M9S8qIOxFSk7vowV Mb0An1J70hjkZdYkhXltDLxoN+kiRLOq =fL86 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ...

[News] New Reviews of Tiny Core Linux 2.1, CDLinux 0.9.2, Live Linux Gaming 0.9.5, PCLinuxOS Minime 09.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tiny Core Linux 2.1 ,----[ Quote ] | They say that good things come in small packages and so it is with Tiny Core | Linux, a diminutive but powerful distribution. TCL weighs in at an incredibly | petite 11MB when you download it. Yes, it really is that tiny. Tiny Core | Linux is based on Busybox, the Linux 2.6 kernel, JWM, Fltk and Tiny X. `---- http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/07/01/tiny-core-linux-2-1/ CDLinux 0.9.2 Community Edition Review ,----[ Quote ] | Five weeks ago when I wrote an overview of Debris Linux I received a number | of requests to review other mini distributions from DistroWatch Weekly | readers. CDLinux is a minimalist distro from China which takes a different | approach to small. Rather than cram as many application as possible onto a | mini (3"/8cm) CD, the CDLinux Community Edition aims for excellent support of | half a dozen languages (Chinese, English, French, German, Japanese and | Russian), support for a wide variety of filesystems and excellent hardware | support, including CUPS and XSane for printers and scanners, all of which are | included in the 204MB iso. They also offer a "standard" edition, just 64MB in | size, which includes a basic Xfce desktop and almost no applications at all. | CDLinux "standard" does include popular rescue and admin tools, making it an | excellent choice for a recovery CD. Finally, the 25MB "mini" edition is | co...