f



USB 2.0 device assigned as USB 1.1

I am using RH7.3 (sort of a need so upgrading may be an issue)
I have a USB 2.0 PCI card which gets recognized properly.  When I plug
in a USB 2.0 scanner, the scanner falls back to a USB 1.1 on the card.
 I cant seem to find anything regarding how to resolve this.  I found
a similar post (below) - but it was inconclusive.  Any suggestions?
(other than upgrade)

Thanks
cgmckeever

cat /proc/bus/usb/devices

########### here is the 2.0 entry ##################
T:  Bus=03 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#=  1 Spd=480 MxCh= 5
B:  Alloc=  0/900 us ( 0%), #Int=  0, #Iso=  0
D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=01 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=0000 ProdID=0000 Rev= 2.40
S:  Manufacturer=Linux 2.4.18-3 ehci-hcd
S:  Product=PCI device 1033:00e0 (NEC Corporation)
S:  SerialNumber=02:00.2
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr=  0mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl= 12ms
T:  Bus=02 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#=  1 Spd=12  MxCh= 2
B:  Alloc=  0/900 us ( 0%), #Int=  0, #Iso=  0
D:  Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=0000 ProdID=0000 Rev= 0.00
S:  Product=USB OHCI Root Hub
S:  SerialNumber=d08ca000
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr=  0mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl=255ms
T:  Bus=02 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#=  2 Spd=12  MxCh= 0
D:  Ver= 1.10 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=ff MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=04a9 ProdID=220d Rev= 1.00

###############  Here is where the SCANNER is recognized
##################
S:  Manufacturer=Canon
S:  Product=CanoScan
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=a0 MxPwr=500mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=ff Driver=(none)
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   1 Ivl= 16ms
E:  Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=  0ms
E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=  0ms
T:  Bus=01 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#=  1 Spd=12  MxCh= 3
B:  Alloc=  0/900 us ( 0%), #Int=  0, #Iso=  0
D:  Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=0000 ProdID=0000 Rev= 0.00
S:  Product=USB OHCI Root Hub
S:  SerialNumber=d08c8000
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr=  0mA
I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl=255ms






From: Mark Bratcher (_mbratche_@rochester.rr.com)
Subject: Need help with external USB drive on Linux
 
View this article only
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware
Date: 2003-02-13 16:34:39 PST

I have a V-link drive box that houses a hard disk.
The interface is up to USB 2.0 compatible.
I purchased this from CompGeeks. :-)

A friend of mine got this working on Mandrake Linux without any
additional
drivers. When I try to use it on RedHat 7.3 (kernel 2.4.18), the USB
driver
sees it get plugged in as well as when it's unplugged. But the message
in
the /var/log/messages reads:

Feb 13 19:19:23 blueboy kernel: hub.c: USB new device connect on
bus1/1, assigned device number 3
Feb 13 19:19:23 blueboy kernel: usb.c: USB device 3 (vend/prod
0x67b/0x2307) is not claimed by any active driver.
Feb 13 19:19:27 blueboy /etc/hotplug/usb.agent: ... no modules for USB
product 67b/2307/100

I have usb-storage, ide-scsi, and usb-uhci all loaded as modules.

Everything I've read on the internet that I can search for in google
tells me
this should just simply work and give me the drive as /dev/sda (I have
no other
SCSI devices), but it isn't happening.

Has anyone made one of these work?

Thanks.
Mark
0
9/26/2004 3:34:27 PM
comp.os.linux.hardware 9621 articles. 0 followers. Post Follow

2 Replies
546 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 13

Chris McKeever wrote:
> I am using RH7.3 (sort of a need so upgrading may be an issue)
> I have a USB 2.0 PCI card which gets recognized properly.  When I plug
> in a USB 2.0 scanner, the scanner falls back to a USB 1.1 on the card.
>  I cant seem to find anything regarding how to resolve this.  I found
> a similar post (below) - but it was inconclusive.  Any suggestions?
> (other than upgrade)

You need to have either the OHCI or UHCI module loaded for USB 1.1 
support (which you obviously do).  _In addition_ you need the EHCI 
module (ehci-hcd) to support USB 2.0 speeds.  Check with 'lsmod'.  If 
it's not listed, try (as root) 'modprobe echi-hcd'.  If you see no 
output, the module loaded successfully;  try plugging in the scanner 
now.  If there is output from modprobe, report the errors here if you 
need further help resolving the problem.
0
jpstewart (2598)
9/26/2004 8:57:50 PM
Also check that your scanner is a true USB 2.0 Hi-speed device not a 
re-badged USB 1.1 Full-speed device.

The rebading by the USB peoples means:
USB 2.0 Low-speed = USB 1.1 <12mbits
USB 2.0 Full-Speed = USB 1.1 12mbits
USB 2.0 Hi-Speed = USB 2 480Mbits

Chris McKeever wrote:
> I am using RH7.3 (sort of a need so upgrading may be an issue)
> I have a USB 2.0 PCI card which gets recognized properly.  When I plug
> in a USB 2.0 scanner, the scanner falls back to a USB 1.1 on the card.
>  I cant seem to find anything regarding how to resolve this.  I found
> a similar post (below) - but it was inconclusive.  Any suggestions?
> (other than upgrade)
> 
> Thanks
> cgmckeever
> 
> cat /proc/bus/usb/devices
> 
> ########### here is the 2.0 entry ##################
> T:  Bus=03 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#=  1 Spd=480 MxCh= 5
> B:  Alloc=  0/900 us ( 0%), #Int=  0, #Iso=  0
> D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=01 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
> P:  Vendor=0000 ProdID=0000 Rev= 2.40
> S:  Manufacturer=Linux 2.4.18-3 ehci-hcd
> S:  Product=PCI device 1033:00e0 (NEC Corporation)
> S:  SerialNumber=02:00.2
> C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr=  0mA
> I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
> E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl= 12ms
> T:  Bus=02 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#=  1 Spd=12  MxCh= 2
> B:  Alloc=  0/900 us ( 0%), #Int=  0, #Iso=  0
> D:  Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
> P:  Vendor=0000 ProdID=0000 Rev= 0.00
> S:  Product=USB OHCI Root Hub
> S:  SerialNumber=d08ca000
> C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr=  0mA
> I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
> E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl=255ms
> T:  Bus=02 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#=  2 Spd=12  MxCh= 0
> D:  Ver= 1.10 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=ff MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
> P:  Vendor=04a9 ProdID=220d Rev= 1.00
> 
> ###############  Here is where the SCANNER is recognized
> ##################
> S:  Manufacturer=Canon
> S:  Product=CanoScan
> C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=a0 MxPwr=500mA
> I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=ff Driver=(none)
> E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   1 Ivl= 16ms
> E:  Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=  0ms
> E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=  0ms
> T:  Bus=01 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#=  1 Spd=12  MxCh= 3
> B:  Alloc=  0/900 us ( 0%), #Int=  0, #Iso=  0
> D:  Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs=  1
> P:  Vendor=0000 ProdID=0000 Rev= 0.00
> S:  Product=USB OHCI Root Hub
> S:  SerialNumber=d08c8000
> C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr=  0mA
> I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
> E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl=255ms
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Mark Bratcher (_mbratche_@rochester.rr.com)
> Subject: Need help with external USB drive on Linux
>  
> View this article only
> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware
> Date: 2003-02-13 16:34:39 PST
> 
> I have a V-link drive box that houses a hard disk.
> The interface is up to USB 2.0 compatible.
> I purchased this from CompGeeks. :-)
> 
> A friend of mine got this working on Mandrake Linux without any
> additional
> drivers. When I try to use it on RedHat 7.3 (kernel 2.4.18), the USB
> driver
> sees it get plugged in as well as when it's unplugged. But the message
> in
> the /var/log/messages reads:
> 
> Feb 13 19:19:23 blueboy kernel: hub.c: USB new device connect on
> bus1/1, assigned device number 3
> Feb 13 19:19:23 blueboy kernel: usb.c: USB device 3 (vend/prod
> 0x67b/0x2307) is not claimed by any active driver.
> Feb 13 19:19:27 blueboy /etc/hotplug/usb.agent: ... no modules for USB
> product 67b/2307/100
> 
> I have usb-storage, ide-scsi, and usb-uhci all loaded as modules.
> 
> Everything I've read on the internet that I can search for in google
> tells me
> this should just simply work and give me the drive as /dev/sda (I have
> no other
> SCSI devices), but it isn't happening.
> 
> Has anyone made one of these work?
> 
> Thanks.
> Mark
0
11/1/2004 7:59:25 AM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

How to force kernel to use a USB 2.0-compatible device (ehci_hcd) as a USB 1.1 device (uhci_hcd)
Hi. I've been using Linux for a long time now (very actively for almost 10 years now), and now I'm stuck with a configuration problem that hopefully should be possible to work around. I have a Linksys WUSB54GP wireless network adapter. It works well under Windows, and even under Linux on my desktop PC (even using it as a USB 2.0 device). But on my laptop it's a different story. To cut a long story short (see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6374), I'm getting unexpected "USB disconnect" after a few hours (independently of how much the device was used) when using this device with the ehci-hcd module. Using the same device as a USB 1.1 device (uhci-hcd module) yields no problems, so now I'm trying to move on and use this device as a USB 1.1 one until hopefully some day everything starts working under ehci-hcd. I've made this device work by removing (rmmod) the ehci-hcd module. I've been doing all of this with gentoo's suspend2-sources-2.6.16-r4, gentoo-sources-2.6.14-r2; and also with vanilla kernels 2.6.16.16, 2.6.17_rc3 and 2.6.17_rc4. This is an excerpt from /proc/bus/usb/devices: T: Bus=01 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=12 MxCh= 2 B: Alloc= 0/900 us ( 0%), #Int= 0, #Iso= 0 D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=0000 ProdID=0000 Rev= 2.06 S: Manufacturer=Linux 2.6.16-suspend2-r4 uhci_hcd S: Product=UHCI Host Controller S: SerialNumber=0000:00:10.0 C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= ...

Multiple USB 1.1 devices in USB 2 Hub speed ?
Hi, If I have a number of USB 1.1 devices plugged into a USB 2 Hub, can I get the full 12MB/s of each USB 1.1 device via the USB 2 link to a host ? Or does the USB 2 link fall back to a 1.1 compatible mode ? I am also looking for a Mini USB IP67 bulkhead connector. So far I have found something from Samtec, Bulgin and the mil circular D38999 series, but all these options are very bulky. If I can get a similar sized connector that can take through 2 or 3 USB links, then it will not be so bad. Regards Anton Erasmus On Jul 16, 12:07 pm, Anton Erasmus <nob...@spam.prevent.net> wrote: > Hi, > > If I have a number of USB 1.1 devices plugged into a USB 2 Hub, can I > get the full 12MB/s of each USB 1.1 device via the USB 2 link to a > host ? Or does the USB 2 link fall back to a 1.1 compatible mode ? > Not sure what's your question, it is a bit confusing. The two statements around the OR are equivalent. Briefly: High speed = 480 Mbps (USB 2.0) Full Speed = 12Mbps (USB 1.1) Low Speed = 1.5Mbps (USB 1.1) USB 2.0 is backward compatible, so is the hub. It should support a mix of devices. So, yes, you get the 12Mbps full speed AND yes, the USB 2 link falls back to 1.1. "Adrian" <adrianbica@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c11ebd15-e7d7-4b6c-9a72-fac71de01b70@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 16, 12:07 pm, Anton Erasmus <nob...@spam.prevent.net> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If I have a number of USB 1.1 de...

Generic USB 2.0 hub showing up as USB 1.1
I have two generic 4-port USB hubs that are supposed to be USB 2.0 compliant. The older one is fine, works as advertised. Meanwhile the newer one sometimes shows up under the USB 2.0 root hub (i.e. "Standard Enhanced PCI to USB Host Controller"), or usually it shows up under the slower "Standard OpenHCD USB Host Controller" (USB 1.1). My motherboard (Asus M2NPV-VM) USB ports are all USB 2.0 compliant, and they individually auto-detect whether they need to switch down to USB 1.1 speeds. I'm using a Microsoft tool called UVCView under Windows XP to display the details of the USB devices, including the hubs and roothubs. According to UVCView, the older hub and newer hub seem to have the same chipset vendor (idVendor = "Genesys Logic, Inc."), although externally they look quite different and have different brand names. So I'm not sure why one would be consistently USB 2.0 compliant, while the other one is not. Now another interesting thing I noticed is that the inconsistent hub will only show up as USB 2.0-compliant after I boot into Windows after having previously rebooted from Ubuntu 7.10 Linux (dual-boot system). So maybe Linux does something to the device that puts it right. But when I list the devices while in Linux I see that it is listed under USB 1.1 just like when in Windows. I have no idea why Linux leaves the hub fixed for Windows, but doesn't fix it for itself?! Any idea what's going on with this hub?...

laptop usb 1.1 + scanner usb 2.0 + modem ADSL = ?????!!!!!*****
I have a laptop with a single USB 1.1 port. My new scanner (Epson 3170 usb 2.0) works fine with it and so does my ADSL modem but both can't work together. I have tried to make them "cooperate" with a Sitecom Usb pocket hub which needs an external power adapter and of course it doesn't work without it; do you think it would work if I had one? Or is there any other possibility (Pcmcia/usb card for example)? Thank you for your future wise advice. Good chance powered hub will work, but not guaranteed. Is your modem USB only? If ethernet also, as one more option, y...

Compatibilit� USB 2.0 et USB 1.1 avec W2K ?
Bonjour Je rencontre un PB avec l'une de mes cl�s USB qui est USB 2.0 et qui bug lorsque je la connacte sur un hub USB 1.1 : je la "vois" sur le PC mais je ne peux y transf�rer quoique ce soit, malgr� l'installation des drivers sp�cifiques. Ayant constat� qu'avec XP, chaque fois que l'on connecte un p�riph�rique USB 2.0 sur un port 1.1 XP signale qu'il peux y avoir des porbl�mes, je vous drais savoir si cela existe aussi avec W2K. Merci d'avance Sorry Pegasus Mail is NOT USB 1.x or 2.0 compliant. Dave ;-) <John.Viel@caramail.rem...

move ZFS mountpoint from USB 1.1 to USB 2.0 port
I created a mountpoint called /tdusb1 on a USB 1.1 port conncted to a 1TB LaCie hard drive. I discoverd that our system has a USB 2.0 port and want to move the logical mountpoint to a new physical USB port. How do I do it? Actually, I will need to do the same sort of thing from one Solaris 10 system to another in the future. I don't care about plug-and-play and hot swappable as long as I can read the same drive from different Sun systems. I assume that there are ZFS related commands for doing this but don't want to experiment too much as the USB hard drive already has valuable stuff ...

problem related to backward compatibility of usb 2.0 -> usb 1.1?
Hi, I've recently bought an external harddrive (Q - tec). It's great stuff. The hdd combines lot's of storage space and small dimensions with adequate speed because it runs on usb 2.0. Just plug it in and do whatever you feel like doing. Needless to say, I've grown attached to it. Then bad things started to happen. One night, my PC got fragged (cooked MCU on motherboard). As a result, I was forced to use my dad's computer in order to finish my work for school. It didn't have any usb 2.0 slots, so I had to make due with usb 1.1. I plugged it in, started Wi...

Toshiba Satellite 2410-S185 / PS241U-851457 is NOT USB 2.0 as advertised. It is only USB 1.1
I purchased a Toshiba laptop 2410-S185 from CDW almost a year ago The system specs claimed to support USB 2.0. This didn�t seem to be the case when I tried to get it working. I eventually looked up the Intel Chipset at Intel�s website and found it DOES NOT support 2.0 (Intel Chipset 82801CA) I spent 4 hours on the phone with Toshiba before I was upgraded to a lvel two tech and convinced them of the problem. They told me �Thank you for letting us know the error in our documentation, I�ll have someone fix that for you� Of course there is NO WAY they�re going to get off the hook that easy....

Toshiba Satellite 2410-S185 / PS241U-851457 is NOT USB 2.0 as advertised. It is only USB 1.1
I purchased a Toshiba laptop 2410-S185 from CDW almost a year ago The system specs claimed to support USB 2.0. This didn�t seem to be the case when I tried to get it working. I eventually looked up the Intel Chipset at Intel�s website and found it DOES NOT support 2.0 (Intel Chipset 82801CA) I spent 4 hours on the phone with Toshiba before I was upgraded to a lvel two tech and convinced them of the problem. They told me �Thank you for letting us know the error in our documentation, I�ll have someone fix that for you� Of course there is NO WAY they�re going to get off the hook that easy. I can�t imagine how many of these they sold with such a major mistake. I have a feeling they�re just going to send me a usb2.0 pccard adapter. They BETTER do at least that much. I'd say it qualifies for a class action law suit. Not that I myself have the energy or motivation to take it that far. usenet@net-express.com.remove On Mon, 03 May 2004 21:15:19 -0500, Bastian <usenet@net-express.com> wrote: >I purchased a Toshiba laptop 2410-S185 from CDW almost a year ago > >The system specs claimed to support USB 2.0. >This didn�t seem to be the case when I tried to get it working. > >I eventually looked up the Intel Chipset at Intel�s website and found >it DOES NOT support 2.0 (Intel Chipset 82801CA) > >I spent 4 hours on the phone with Toshiba before I was upgraded to a >lvel two tech and convinced them of the problem. > >They told me �...

New Printer with USB 2.0 - Old PC with USB 1.1 Ports
I am FINALLY getting around to getting a new printer - but I have a 4 year old laptop that has two USB 1.1 ports. Will a new printer with a USB 2.0 connection work with my laptop? I heard it will - but will be slower than designed to be. I am planning on getting another HP OfficeJet (my old one lasted 7 years!!!!). Also, can I use a regular USB 1.1 cable? Is there a difference between USB cables (2.0 different than 1.1?). Thanks! Paula On 31 Jul 2006 17:25:13 -0700, pokee@shaw.ca wrote: >I am FINALLY getting around to getting a new printer - but I have a 4 >year o...

Linux: Oracle9i DB 9.2, Oracle9i DS 9.0.2, Oracle9i AS 1.0.2.2.1(Forms, Reports) on Fedora Core 1
I have installed with Philippe ALEXANDRE on a laptop Oracle9i DB 9.2, Oracle9i DS 9.0.2, Oracle9i AS 1.0.2.2.1(Forms6i, Reports6i) on Fedora Core 1 the 8th November 2003. All is running OK. Denis ALEXANDRE Assistant Manager, Banque Saradar France http://www.alexnet.fr/ P.S. I am using Oracle and Unix to create an Integrated Banking System since 1987. This banking system is installed in more than 25 other banks. ...

LaTex equation numbering like 2.1, 2.2, also 2.0.1, 2.0,2, 2.1.1, etc
David Roach wrote: > Is there a simple command to have latex number > the equations by the section numbers automatically. > > David From the LaTeX Companion (what a wonderful book!) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % number equations within sections % In preamble \makeatletter \@addtoreset{equation}{section} \makeatother \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Numbers within sections...I use this all the time in articles. Even works with ******************* ******************* Brilliant. And then I got numbering within subsections by repeating and editing (not replacing), so I now have:- (Just after the documentClass command) \makeatletter \@addtoreset{equation}{section} \makeatother \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}} \makeatletter \@addtoreset{equation}{subsection} \makeatother \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesubsection.\arabic{equation}} Bob Bob Marlow schrieb: > David Roach wrote: > >> Is there a simple command to have latex number >> the equations by the section numbers automatically. >> >> David > > From the LaTeX Companion (what a wonderful book!) > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > > % number equations within sections > % In preamble > > \makeatletter > \@addtoreset{equation}{section} > \makeatother > \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}} > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% [more code] > Hi! I th...

how can you tell if you have usb 1.1 or usb 2
How can you tell from windows 2000 if you have a usb1.1 or usb2.0 connector? "Laura" <handl@mts.net> wrote in message news:e0ddcf8.0407291201.1dc73116@posting.google.com... > > How can you tell from windows 2000 if you have a > usb1.1 or usb2.0 connector? Control Panel -> System -> Hardware -> Device Manager. Then right click on the USB hub(s) and click Properties. Another way is to plug in a known USB 2.0 device into the port. The system will pop a warning if the port is USB 1.1. dk "Laura" > How can you tell from windows 2000 if you have a usb1.1 or usb2.0 connector? plug something into it that runs on USB 2.0. You'll get an error message. Pat Laura wrote: > How can you tell from windows 2000 if you have a usb1.1 or usb2.0 > connector? Connectors for USB are the same for USB 1.1 or 2. Win2K does not support USB2 unless an MS patch is applied http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;319973 The link will answer your question. Even with the patch, it is up to the vendor to supply a Win2K compatible driver for USB2. Check that the USB device is in fact compatible. Q ...

HP PSC1210 USB 1.1 or USB 2?
Hi all, is this printer USB 1.1 or USB 2?? Everywhere I go to find this out, it only tells me its USB Which doesnt tell me a hell of a lot lol. Any info appreciated Cheers From the truly sketchy information on the HP web site, I would have to guess that the PSC1210 supports USB 1.1 and takes advantage of the higher throughput of USB 2.0. HP supports the product (drivers, etc) running with Windows 98, which, for all intents and purposes, knows nothing about USB 2.0... Ben Myers On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:19:08 +1300, "Paul" <goneouttolunch@home.com> wrote: >Hi all, is this printer USB 1.1 or USB 2?? > >Everywhere I go to find this out, it only tells me its USB > >Which doesnt tell me a hell of a lot lol. > >Any info appreciated > >Cheers > > Ta Ben. I finally got a tech online to chat with. And yup he said its definitely 1.1 and USB2. So, it'll make use of USB2 if u have USB 2 ports and a USB2 cable. <ben_myers_spam_me_not @ charter.net (Ben Myers)> wrote in message news:41efbc8a.5083615@nntp.charter.net... > From the truly sketchy information on the HP web site, I would have to > guess > that the PSC1210 supports USB 1.1 and takes advantage of the higher > throughput > of USB 2.0. HP supports the product (drivers, etc) running with Windows > 98, > which, for all intents and purposes, knows nothing about USB 2.0... Ben > Myers > > On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:19:08 +1300, "P...

USB 1.1/2.0 Implementation
Hi All Has anyone successfully implemented USB 2.0 or USB 1.1 protocol in Altera Device. If yes, can you pls start me off. I'm not able to make any progress in this. I have found couple of sites in ths area, but always end towards a brick wall. Help Pls Cheerio "SneakerNet" <nospam@nospam.org> wrote in message news:<fIObb.156268$JA5.3828849@news.xtra.co.nz>... > Hi All > > Has anyone successfully implemented USB 2.0 or USB 1.1 protocol in Altera > Device. If yes, can you pls start me off. I'm not able to make any progress > in this. I have fo...

usb 1.1 to 2.0 card?
I have a 3-4 year old Intel El Paso motherboard w/82845 chipset. It has 2 front mounted USB 1.1 ports. I traced the cable to the connector on the motherboard and it's easily accessible. My question: Is there a USB 2.0 PCI card out there that has an internal connector compatible with the motherboard connector? The idea being that I could just unplug the cable from the motherboard and plug it into my shiny new 2.0 card and have front accessible USB 2.0 ports. ? TIA </joel> On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 02:11:37 GMT, "Joel" <joelycat@hotmail.com> wrote: >I have a ...

[ANN] gettext-2.0.1, gettext_activerecord-2.0.1, gettext_rails-2.0.1
Hi, Ruby-GetText-Package-2.0.1 and the families (gettext-2.0.1, gettext_activerecord-2.0.1 and gettext_rails-2.0.1) are now available. Ruby-GetText-Package is the library/tools for message localization. * gettext - Message localization libraries and tools for all kind of apps/libs. * gettext_activerecord - ActiveRecord Localization * gettext_rails - Rails support with gettext. Changes ------- * gettext-2.0.1 * Fixed bugs * doesn't work with ruby-1.8.5. [Reported by Dan Coutu] * GetText.locale= can't keep the locale. [Reported by Adam Ilan] * Break backward c...

Oracle server 9.2.0.1.0, Client 9.2.0.4.0, Red Hat Linux enterprise advanced server 2.1
Hi Everybody, My Database server is running on Red Hat Linux enterprise advanced server 2.1, And my Oracle version is 9.2.0.1.0. My Client mechine also Red Hat Linux enterprise advanced server 2.1 , Oracle client version is 9.2.0.4.0. I am running a web application. Our application is in Magic edeveloper. I connect to Oracle using oracle gateway to my application. My Problem is my application is is becoming slow. I am not able to trace where the problem is. Before our application was running fine. recently i upgraded Oracle client version to 9.2.0.4.0. My Oracle client & server versions are different. I am getting error on my client mechine, it showing all memory address on the screen and the part of error is, arg register addr=83498cc .... Dump of memory from 0x83988c to 0x83499cc .... -- End of Call stack trace -- I am not able to trace where the problem is.Any insight please... Thanks, Ssreddy. ...

usb error on external disc ?? hub 1-0:1.0:Cannot enable port 2
Hi, I want connext an external drive STOREX FHD-353 on my Linux 2.6.9-34 WhiteBox I have following error message "hub 1-0:1.0:Cannot enable port 2. Maybe the USB cable is bad. " Do you have an idea ? Regards Philippe My computer is an K7AMD, with motherboard Micro star 6167 . I think computer could onlly work un USB1.0 not USB 2.0. External Hard drive is running before with another PC that use XP .. ...

USB 1.1 vs. 2.0 and USBTMC
Hi group- I'm hoping some USB knowledgeable persons can help with this USBTMC (Test & Measurement Class) question... USBTMC prescribes two descriptors that are supported under 2.0 but not 1.1. They are the device qualifier and other-speed configuration descriptors. Neither have anything to do with USBTMC. Instead they seem to exist for 2.0 high-speed support. Does anyone know if it's a violation of the the USBTMC standard to implement USBTMC under the 1.1 standard thus forgoing the two extra 2.0 descriptors? JJS <johnspeth@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1124998933.396820.236390@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Hi group- > > I'm hoping some USB knowledgeable persons can help with this USBTMC > (Test & Measurement Class) question... > > USBTMC prescribes two descriptors that are supported under 2.0 but not > 1.1. They are the device qualifier and other-speed configuration > descriptors. Neither have anything to do with USBTMC. Instead they > seem to exist for 2.0 high-speed support. This is a very wide-spread misunderstanding, but complying to USB 2.0 does not imply high-speed. I have made many USB 2.0 compliant full-speed devices, implemented using existing chips originally designed for USB 1.1. Set bcdUSB to 0x200, and stall when the host ask for the device qualifier. Thats all. Remember to test your implementation with usbcv. Leo Havm�ller. ...

USB 1.1 and 2.0 controllers in same PC?
I have a 3-month-old HP Pavilion a450n desktop computer running Windows XP SP1. I am curious about the USB controllers reported in Device Manager. I see 5 controllers, which appear like this: Intel(R) 82801EB USB Universal Host Controller - 24D2 Intel(R) 82801EB USB Universal Host Controller - 24D4 Intel(R) 82801EB USB Universal Host Controller - 24D7 Intel(R) 82801EB USB Universal Host Controller - 24DE Intel(R) 82801EB USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 24DD Can this be right? Do I really have 4 USB 1.1 controllers and only one USB 2.0 controller? If, as I suspect, this doesn't make sense, is my computer somehow misconfigured? (Also, what do the hex numbers shown in the above list refer to?) Thanks, - Bob ...

USB cables: Difference between 1.1 and 2.0 ???
Curious.... I used an *old USB cable* to connect my laptop's USB 2 port to a USB 2 device. I got a WinXP message (seemingly a little wrong) which claimed that I was using a low speed USB port and that moving the cable to a high speed port would result in higher rates. Bunch of questions, given that I cannot find cable wiring differences online. 1. Is there a difference between cables. 2. Did Windows XP get confused and respond to the slow cable as if it were instead a slow port. This seems like a silly error message. 3. Possibly unrelated: There is a lumpy th...

USB 1.1 cable on 2.0 printer?
Hello. Just ordered a Canon i560 printer; the specs say it has a USB 2.0 interface. I have some USB 1.1 cables floating around; can I use them on the 2.0 interface? Any signal integrity issues? Thanks! If you see a 'X' in my address, please remove it before e-mailing me. Do not add me to any MicroSoft address book; I do not want your viruses. I track and report spam; do not send me junk mail. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The FAQ files v1.21 for the Tropez, and v1.01 for the TBS-2001 sound boards can be obtained from: http://www.landfield.com/faqs/PCsoundcards/ http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~mccreary/tbeach/faq.html http://www.pasteur.fr/infosci/FAQ/PCsoundcards/ http://faqs.org/faqs/by-newsgroup/comp/comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard.misc.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No physical difference between what's termed a 1.1 cable and a 2.0 cable. Cari www.coribright.com <TowXWang@umich.edu> wrote in message news:HkDgb.3315$H91.75519@news.itd.umich.edu... > Hello. > > Just ordered a Canon i560 printer; the specs say it has a USB 2.0 > interface. I have some USB 1.1 cables floating around; can I use them on > the 2.0 interface? Any signal integrity issues? > > Thanks! > > > > If you see a 'X' in my address, please remove it before e-mailing me. > Do not add me to any MicroSoft ad...

USB 2.0/1.1 to IDE adapter
I bought a USB 2.0/1.1 to IDE adapter recently and tried with a hard disk and CD writer successfully. However, I tried the Rocoh MP5125A DVD+RW/+R writer without success. The pc showed yellow question mark in hardware list. Is there any thing I can do to fix it? Is there any such adapter to make a bootable CD-ROM drive? Thanks, Ray ...

Web resources about - USB 2.0 device assigned as USB 1.1 - comp.os.linux.hardware

Internet Assigned Numbers Authority - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority ( IANA ) is the entity that oversees global IP address allocation, autonomous system number allocation, ...

Coalition ministers assigned bodyguards
Four senior ministers in the Abbott government have been assigned secret-service style protection amid an angry backlash over the federal budget, ...

Security concerns: 3500 more troops assigned to Olympics
Security concerns: 3500 more troops assigned to Olympics

Coalition ministers assigned bodyguards
Four senior ministers in the Abbott government have been assigned secret-service style protection amid an angry backlash over the federal budget, ...

Thai crown prince Maha Vajiralongkorn revokes wife's royally-assigned family name
Thailand's crown prince revokes the royally-assigned family name of his wife, amid cases of corruption.

New area code assigned to Quebec
The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) said Wednesday that it will introduce a new area code for the 819 region ...

New Hampshire man arrested after protesting Jodi Picoult book assigned to teen daughter - CTV News
A New Hampshire dad was arrested at a school board meeting after protesting a book assigned to his teen daughter that contained what he said ...

One tln debt swap quota assigned to regional gov't
One tln debt swap quota assigned to regional gov't

Apple’s next-generation Apple TV moves closer to reality, assigned J33 codename
iOS release history tells us that as a product in development moves even closer to release, it is assigned a proper codename. Not only an identifier ...

Verizon Assigned Sir Mix-A-Lot’s Old Phone Number To This Lawyer… Hijinks Ensue
Two things should strike you about this story: first, Verizon can do absolutely nothing right, and second, the famed 'Baby Got Back' singer's ...

Resources last updated: 3/26/2016 3:37:00 AM