f



No djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.bz2 file for GCC 4.9.3 / 5.1.0?

Hello,

There is no djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.gz2 file for GCC 4.9.3 and 5.1.0 . In

  http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.9.3/
  http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-5.1.0/

There are only .rpm files. I have to use rpm2cpio to extract
djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.bz2.

But in directories for other versions :

  http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.7.3/
  http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.8.4/
  http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.8.5/
  http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.9.2/
  http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-5.2.0/

There are djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.bz2 files in the directories.

Is it right?
0
Andrew
8/13/2015 4:17:50 AM
comp.os.msdos.djgpp 3308 articles. 2 followers. tigrepotrazosalvaje (34) is leader. Post Follow

2 Replies
742 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 29

On 08/13/2015 07:17 AM, Andrew Wu (andrewwu.tw@gmail.com) [via djgpp@delorie.com] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is no djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.gz2 file for GCC 4.9.3 and 5.1.0 . In
>
>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.9.3/
>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-5.1.0/
>
> There are only .rpm files. I have to use rpm2cpio to extract
> djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.bz2.
>
> But in directories for other versions :
>
>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.7.3/
>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.8.4/
>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.8.5/
>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.9.2/
>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-5.2.0/
>
> There are djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.bz2 files in the directories.
>
> Is it right?
>
They are present inside SRPM so it is not critical problem. It is however nice to be able to get 
them without downloading large SRPM file.

Uploaded them now. Note that files have original timestamps (when they were actually created 
instead of todays ones)

Andris

0
Andris
8/30/2015 6:35:37 AM
Ok, thank you. :)

2015-08-30 14:35 GMT+08:00 Andris Pavenis (andris.pavenis@iki.fi) [via
djgpp@delorie.com] <djgpp@delorie.com>:
> On 08/13/2015 07:17 AM, Andrew Wu (andrewwu.tw@gmail.com) [via
> djgpp@delorie.com] wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> There is no djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.gz2 file for GCC 4.9.3 and 5.1.0 . In
>>
>>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.9.3/
>>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-5.1.0/
>>
>> There are only .rpm files. I have to use rpm2cpio to extract
>> djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.bz2.
>>
>> But in directories for other versions :
>>
>>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.7.3/
>>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.8.4/
>>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.8.5/
>>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-4.9.2/
>>    http://www.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/rpms/djcross-gcc-5.2.0/
>>
>> There are djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.bz2 files in the directories.
>>
>> Is it right?
>>
> They are present inside SRPM so it is not critical problem. It is however
> nice to be able to get them without downloading large SRPM file.
>
> Uploaded them now. Note that files have original timestamps (when they were
> actually created instead of todays ones)
>
> Andris
>
0
Andrew
8/31/2015 5:09:53 AM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

ANNOUNCE: Release of DJGPP ports of GCC-5.2.0, GCC-4.9.3, GCC-4.8.5,, GCC-4.7.4 and GCC-3.4.6 for DJGPP v2.05
This is announcement of GCC-5.2.0, GCC-4.9.3, GCC-4.8.5, GCC-4.7.4 and GCC-3.4.6 for DJGPP v2.05 GCC used to stand for the GNU C Compiler, but since the compiler supports several other languages aside from C, it now stands for the GNU Compiler Collection. All these GCC versions are built using DJGPP v2.05 under Windows Vista Business SP3. Requirements for using binary packages: - DJGPP v2.05 (packages are NOT intended to be used with DJGPP v2.03) - binutils-2.22 or above (binutils-2.24 or above recommended) Currently all packages are still located at: ftp://ftp.de...

Gcc 3.4.X to Gcc 4.1.X upgrading
Hi Guys, I know that upgrade from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 is not seamless as the C++ ABI changed between these two versions. There is an issue with the libstdc+ + library which must be taken care of, as well. However is there a issue in upgrading from gcc 3.4.X to Gcc 4.1. X? Say incompatibilities with source code (tempates, defaults include files etc) and ABI Also, is there a issue if I have libraries compiled with gcc 4.1.2 version and gcc-3.4.2? Can we get conflicting symbols? Thanks AS kas wrote: > Hi Guys, > I know that upgrade from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 is [..] Your questio...

os/2 - samba 3.0.x, 3.1.x and 4.x
I realized during the last weeks, that the os2 community "is still up and running". My own os2 related story began in Dec. 1987 with os2 version 1.0 (16 Bit, textmode only) - IIRC? It was a heavy weight SDK from Microsoft (~28 kilograms, ~10.000,-- german marks (about 5.000,-- US$). At that time IBM and Microsoft slept in the same bed. Now we face 2004 - and there are still os2 users around - which try to connect their machines to a central server - maybe a samba server. I'm working as a freelancer in Berlin / Germany - and due to my own problems I had to get samba and os2 wor...

how to "(1-3*x^2)/(1-3*x+x^2+2*x^3) => 1/(1-2*x) + x/(1-x-x^2)"?
hi normal(1/(1-2*x) + x/ (1-x-x^2),expanded); 1/(1-2*x) + x/(1-x-x^2) => (1-3*x^2)/(1-3*x+x^2+2*x^3) how to do the reverse? dillogimp@gmail.com writes: > normal(1/(1-2*x) + x/ (1-x-x^2),expanded); > 1/(1-2*x) + x/(1-x-x^2) => (1-3*x^2)/(1-3*x+x^2+2*x^3) > how to do the reverse? convert(%,parfrac,x); -- Joe Riel ...

x = 0; x += ++x + x++; x == 4?
Hi, is this result defined by the standard? I'm just in a small "fight" with some workmates on this topic. So an answer from more involved people could help. Regards, Christian Christian Johannes Charbula wrote: > is this result defined by the standard? No. The second statement contains the expression in which the rules are broken. See the Standard, [expr]/4. > I'm just in a small "fight" with some workmates on this topic. So an > answer from more involved people could help. Never fight your workmates. It's detrimental to your career. V -- ...

GCC 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.3.9 (PPC)
Hi, I'll ask here if it is anyhow possible to get a more actual GCC compiler than the Nov'04 update Release on ADC ? ( gcc-3.3 (GCC) 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 1671) ) I have trouble with a library that generates missing vtable entries, known to work with GCC 4.0.1 (build 5247) on a MacBook Pro. The code also works on a Windows Box. Could I propably get it from CVS on ADC and build it ? Thanks, Lothar "Lothar Behrens" <lothar.behrens@lollisoft.de> a �crit dans le message de news: 1193477548.089307.28220@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com.....

wxWidgets 2.6.3 on Intel Mac with OS X 10.0.4 (Tiger), gcc 4.0.1
Hello, I have recently started porting our application to Mac OS X. Application was developed for Microsoft Windows using wxWidgets. I have installed wxWidgets 2.6.3 on my Mac using darwinports system. Compilation completed successfully and without any warnings/errors. I am able to compile same programs included in library archive, but started application does not receive ANY user input - I am even unable to move application window. Program is stripped to bare bones: #include "wx/wx.h" #include <iostream> class MyApp : public wxApp { public: virtual boo...

[wx 2.4.2/2.5.5, MacOS X 10.3.9, gcc 3.1] build failed: wcslen undeclared
Hello, I've been trying to build wxWidgets under MaxOS X 10.3.9 using Apple's developer tools (gcc etc.). I have tried both the 2.4.2 version and the 2.5.5, but the build fails during make with the same problem (I believe). For 2.4.2 I get: c++ -c -I./lib/wx/include/mac-2.4 -I./include -I./src/png -I./src/jpeg -I./src/tiff -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -no-cpp-precomp -fpascal-strings -I./src/mac/morefile -I/Developer/Headers/FlatCarbon -D__WXMAC__ -O2 -MMD -Wall -o accel.o ./src/mac/accel.cpp In file included from include/wx/string.h:62, ...

Slove 0 = a(1) + a(2)*x + a(3)*x^2 + a(4)*x^3 +...?
Hi all, My problem is very easy. But I don't know quite MatLab to know if there is a function to solve that: 0 = a(1) + a(2)*x + a(3)*x^2 + a(4)*x^3 +...? "a" is vector known. Thank you for your help Fabien. Look at the "roots" function. "Fabien Blarel" <eezfb@gwmail.nottingham.ac.uk> wrote in message news:eec6364.-1@WebX.raydaftYaTP... > Hi all, > > > My problem is very easy. But I don't know quite MatLab to know if > there is a function to solve that: > > > 0 = a(1) + a(2)*x + a(3)*x^2 + a(4)*x^3...

3*x''+(10^-3)*x'+123*x=2*cos(3*t); x=x(t);initial conditions x(0)=0 and x'(0)=0
Hi everybody, I need to solve the Cauchy problem written in the title box ( I paste it here again ): 3*x''+(10^-3)*x'+123*x=2*cos(3*t); x=x(t);initial conditions x(0)=0 and x'(0)=0. I tried with Runge-Kutta method and it seems to work as the solution x(t) is the same that I can get solving the equation by myself. I need to know if it would be better another method (eventually multistep one) and why it would be better (please don't just tell me 'cause it's faster or so...I need to know the why too). As last thing I need to estimate the error committed with Runge...

Prblm with Tomcat 4.1.x & 5.x (but 4.0.x works)
Dear subscribers I've tried to get Tomcat 4.1.x or 5.x to work on my FreeBSD 5.3 server, unfortunately without success so far. The problem seems to be with the Tomcat's bootstrap code. Whenever I start Tomcat, using the startup.sh script, I get the following error, pasted below, in the Catalina.out log. Note that it seems like the 4.0.x version works fine although I haven't done any extensive testing, i.e. just tried the default page at localhost:8080. This exception is thrown when starting Tomcat: java.util.zip.ZipException: No such file or directory...

x^(3/2)+x^(5/2) = (x+x^2)*x^(1/2)
Is there a simple way to get Maple to convert x^(3/2) + x^(5/2) to (x+x^2)*x^(1/2). I am willing to assume(x>0). Maple does recognize these as being equal: > p:=x^(3/2)+x^(5/2): > q:=(x+x^2)*sqrt(x): > simplify(p-q); 0 Here's a clumsy way to do it: > p:=x^(3/2)+x^(5/2): > assume(t>0): > subs(x=t^2,p); > simplify(%,{t^2=x}); > collect(%,t); Is there something simpler? (This has undoubtedly come up before, but I cannot find it anywhere.) --Edwin If you do not insist upon your incomplete factoriz...

x - 1 = x
What languages might use a scheme similar to this? Could I build my own? x = x - (x+1) + x + 2: Numbers: 101 (TM) Code. -100=-101+1==-99-1===-100 -099=-101+2==-98-1===-99 -098=-101+3==-97-1===-98 -097=-101+4==-96-1===-97 -096=-101+5==-95-1===-96 -095=-101+6==-94-1===-95 -094=-101+7==-93-1===-94 -093=-101+8==-92-1===-93 -092=-101+9==-91-1===-92 -091=-101+10==-90-1===-91 -090=-101+11==-89-1===-90 -089=-101+12==-88-1===-89 -088=-101+13==-87-1===-88 -087=-101+14==-86-1===-87 -086=-101+15==-85-1===-86 -085=-101+16==-84-1===-85 -084=-101+17==-83-1===-84 -083=-101+18==-82-1===-83 -082=-101+19==-81-1...

how to solve Sturm liouville problem(F''(x)+3/8*(1-x*x)*lam^2*F(x)=0, b.c=F'(0)=0,F(1)=0
undefined "Sankha Banerjee" <jume_sankha@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ef1283b.-1@webx.raydaftYaTP... > undefined > do you mean to write F''(x)+3/8*(1-x^2)*lam^2*F(x)=0 or F''(x)+3/8*(1-x)*x*lam^2*F(x)=0 Nasser yes the first one:F''(x)+3/8*(1-x^2)*lam^2*F(x)=0 > and to find the eigen value lam and the eigen function subject to a orthogonal condition. Nasser Abbasi wrote: > > > > > "Sankha Banerjee" <jume_sankha@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:ef1283b.-1@webx.raydaftYaTP...

Web resources about - No djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.bz2 file for GCC 4.9.3 / 5.1.0? - comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Resources last updated: 1/25/2016 8:45:07 AM