I'm seeking advice.

APE does not include EWOULDBLOCK in its <errno.h>.  I have a feeling
that no syscall will return EWOULDBLOCK as an error code, so I fail to
see any reason not to include it.  Am I missing something?

++L

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:48 AM,  <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:

>  APE does not include EWOULDBLOCK in its <errno.h>.  I have a feeling
>  that no syscall will return EWOULDBLOCK as an error code, so I fail to
>  see any reason not to include it.  Am I missing something?

If it's not there, and someone uses EWOULDBLOCK, they'll get an
error.Probably a good idea.

I.E.

You Have Been Warned.

:-)

ron

>  APE does not include EWOULDBLOCK in its <errno.h>.  I have a feeling
>  that no syscall will return EWOULDBLOCK as an error code, so I fail to
>  see any reason not to include it.  Am I missing something?

I think it's common on UNIX systems for EWOULDBLOCK to be a synonym for EAGAIN.