> that sounds familiar.  the ide interface had a bogus check for a bit
> that's not valid in atapi.

Is that now fixed in the release distribution?  Or only in 9atom?

++L

On Wed Mar 28 01:11:09 EDT 2012, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> > that sounds familiar.  the ide interface had a bogus check for a bit
> > that's not valid in atapi.
> 
> Is that now fixed in the release distribution?  Or only in 9atom?

sadly, no it has not been fixed in the distribution.  in 9pload sdata.c/^atapktio\(
after the first ata ready, comment out the || (as&Chk).  that's bogus.

- erik