Re: Little Alpha I learned on is up... #2

  • Follow


----=_vm_0011_W4604425209_28549_1190646092
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> be considered a correctly configured machine

Gee - that's a tough one.  How about 

>> BECAUSE IT WORKS? <<


----=_vm_0011_W4604425209_28549_1190646092
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: attachment

From: "FrankS" <sapienza@noesys.com>
To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com
Message-ID: <1190636093.232794.120720@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:14:00 +0000
Received: (qmail 20428 invoked by uid 78); 24 Sep 2007 12:26:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ns-mr9.netsolmail.com) (10.49.16.168) by 0 with 
          SMTP; 24 Sep 2007 12:26:06 -0000
Received: from MVB.SAIC.COM (mvb.saic.com [198.151.12.104]) by 
          ns-mr9.netsolmail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l8OCQ5KZ000517 
          for <paul@raulersons.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:26:06 -0400
X-Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 13
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1190636093 31989 127.0.0.1 (24 Sep 2007 12:14:53 
         GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:14:53 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1190635825.827798.305580@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 
                  1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.190.201.57; 
                posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
X-Gateway-Source-Info: USENET
Subject: Re: Little Alpha I learned on is up...
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Raulerson
>
> EVEN THOUGH THE 4mm TAPE IS NOT
> SUPPORTED ON THE CORRECTLY CONFIGURED MACHINE THAT EVERYTHING ELSE
> WORKS ON.

This last comment (above) that Paul makes in his e-mail to me is, umm,
interesting.

How can a machine running OpenVMS, which was never qualified to run
OpenVMS, be considered a "CORRECTLY CONFIGURED MACHINE"?




----=_vm_0011_W4604425209_28549_1190646092--

0
Reply paul298 (265) 9/24/2007 3:01:32 PM


0 Replies
29 Views

(page loaded in 0.024 seconds)


Reply: