> -----Original Message-----
> From: JF Mezei [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]=20
> Sent: October 11, 2004 11:45 PM
> To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com
> Subject: Re: Obsucure Inquier article about Intel mentions=20
> VMS (and not any other OS') other OS') other OS') other OS')=20
> other OS') other OS') other OS') other OS') other OS') other=20
> OS') other OS') other OS') other OS') other OS') other OS') other=20
> "Main, Kerry" wrote:
> > Course, there are many ways to offer different opinions=20
> within a large
> > company, but keep in mind that every OS or platform within a company
> > will always try and say it needs more $'s to promote/enhance itself.
> If you go back through the archives of cov, you will find=20
> many Digits arguing
> AGAINST advertising of VMS, giving all sorts of reasons.
Perhaps my mind is failing me, but I sure do not remember ever reading
and Digital/Compaq/HP employee arguing *against* advertising OpenVMS.
HP Services Canada
(remove the DOT's and AT)=20
"OpenVMS has always had integrity ..
Now, Integrity has OpenVMS .."