From: jordan@ccs4vms.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.vms/msg/e03d20ee60be5173
I remember seeing this when it was fresh. It seemed kind of clumsy
then, and since the addition of "Symbiont-Checks-Deliverability", I've
been fairly satisfied. Until I found out that it doesn't work properly.
(Some of us just don't get bothered about the state of the dikes until
the storm-surge arrives.)
I've also lodged a whiny complaint in the ITRC forum, in case that
one has a higher-class readership than this one. (It certainly stays
on-topic better.) No one's offered a fresh .EXE yet, but hope endures.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven M. Schweda (+1) 651-699-9818
382 South Warwick Street sms@antinode-org
Saint Paul MN 55105-2547
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
sms (1039)
|
10/11/2005 10:07:38 PM |
|
I talked to an HP call screener but thats it so far; the call went in
pretty late though so I wasn't expecting the callback today. Maybe
tomorrow.
Believe me, the mta included with TCPIP services is chock full of
limitations and problems. We're absolutely going to lose a couple of
customer email server spots to peecee based solutions that can handle
things like being the backup (store and forward) mail server for a
customer domain, and not have a problem separating identical usernames
coming in for two different domains without silly forwarding tricks.
Rich
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
jordan (1203)
|
10/11/2005 10:45:03 PM
|
|
OBTW, my planned implementation of the TEC procedure involved using a
EXECSYMB queue instead of the separate repeating batch job; as each job
landed in the queue, it would get searched, mangled, etc... I thought
it might even be able to handle the backup mail server role by
redirecting appropriate mail to the primary mail server directly
instead of via MX records.
I never got to the point of finding out if the receiver would deliver
mail to a queue running a different symbiont, but I think using the
generic queue it would work.
And yes its more work than having the symbiont check functionality
working 100% but then I've got other problems to work around at some
point so the effort may be worth it. At least till a truly capable
mailer becomes part of the TCPIP package (heh!) or budget for PMDF
falls out of the sky.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
jordan (1203)
|
10/11/2005 10:50:51 PM
|
|