f



RE: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27 #4

<snipped to be more concise>
listen-on-v6 port 53 { any; };
didn't work for a couple of people, myself included.
</snipped>

Mark Andrews says:

> > 	The contents of /proc/net/if_inet6=20
>=20
> 	.... in the chroot area.
> =20

That did, naturally, fix the problem.
My question is this:

If additional ipv6 interfaces are added,=20
the new contents of this file must be copied
to the chroot area and named restarted, correct?

Thank you
--
jack

0
Jack
10/20/2004 6:14:25 PM
comp.protocols.dns.bind 16245 articles. 1 followers. Post Follow

0 Replies
577 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 28

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

Re: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27 #3
> On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 17:42, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote: > > >>>>> On 19 Oct 2004 15:38:14 -0400, > > >>>>> R Dicaire <rdicaire@comcast.net> said: > > > > > Hi, I've compiled 9.3.0 on a slackware 9.1 box running 2.4.27 kernel. > > > My configure line is: > > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var > > > --with-openssl=/usr/local/ssl --enable-threads --enable-ipv6 > > > --enable-getifaddrs > > > > What if you do not specify --enable-getifaddrs? > > Same thing. > > The contents of /proc/net/if_inet6 -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org ...

Re: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27 #2
> > > On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 17:42, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote: > > > >>>>> On 19 Oct 2004 15:38:14 -0400, > > > >>>>> R Dicaire <rdicaire@comcast.net> said: > > > > > > > Hi, I've compiled 9.3.0 on a slackware 9.1 box running 2.4.27 kernel. > > > > My configure line is: > > > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var > > > > --with-openssl=/usr/local/ssl --enable-threads --enable-ipv6 > > > > --enable-getifaddrs > > > > > > What if you do not specify --enable-getifaddrs? > > > > Same thing. > > > > > The contents of /proc/net/if_inet6 .... in the chroot area. > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org ...

RE: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27
>=20 > options { > directory "/etc/named"; > listen-on { 68.47.208.78; 192.168.1.1; }; > pid-file "/etc/named/named.pid"; > allow-recursion { 192.168.1.0/24; ! 0.0.0.0; }; > listen-on-v6 { 3ffe:401d:202b::1000; }; > }; >=20 I have a similar config and I notice the same thing 9.3.0 on RH 9.0 options { listen-on port 53 { any; }; listen-on-v6 port 53 { any; }; -- jack ...

RE: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27 #6
=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: R Dicaire [mailto:rdicaire@comcast.net]=20 > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:44 AM > To: Jack Tavares > Cc: bind-users@isc.org > Subject: RE: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27 >=20 > On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 18:42, Jack Tavares wrote: > > but mounting /proc in the chroot jail defeats some of the > > benefits of using a chroot jail, yes?=20 >=20 > I just tried this: >=20 > mkdir -p $CHROOT/proc/net > cat /proc/net/if_inet6 > $CHROOT/proc/net/if_inet6 > restart bind, voila. >=20 > No need to mount proc again. >=20 >=20 Yes, that works great if you don't add/del ipv6 interfaces on your box. If you do AND you want bind to listen on all of them, you have to remember to copy the contents of the file and restart bind. Not optimal for my purposes. I was hoping for a=20 method involving less manual intervention. ...

Re: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27 #7
> =20 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: R Dicaire [mailto:rdicaire@comcast.net]=20 > > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:44 AM > > To: Jack Tavares > > Cc: bind-users@isc.org > > Subject: RE: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27 > >=20 > > On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 18:42, Jack Tavares wrote: > > > but mounting /proc in the chroot jail defeats some of the > > > benefits of using a chroot jail, yes?=20 > >=20 > > I just tried this: > >=20 > > mkdir -p $CHROOT/proc/net > > cat /proc/net/if_inet6 > $CHROOT/proc/net/if_inet6 > > restart bind, voila. > >=20 > > No need to mount proc again. > >=20 > >=20 > Yes, that works great if you don't add/del ipv6 interfaces > on your box. > > If you do AND you want bind to listen on all of them, > you have to remember to copy the contents of the file > and restart bind. > > Not optimal for my purposes. I was hoping for a=20 > method involving less manual intervention. Complain to the Linux IPv6 stack developers. Every other OS extended their sysctl()/ioctl() methods of interface scanning. Linux is the only platform where the developers felt the need to do this through the file system. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org *...

RE: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27 #5
but mounting /proc in the chroot jail defeats some of the benefits of using a chroot jail, yes?=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: bind-users-bounce@isc.org=20 > [mailto:bind-users-bounce@isc.org] On Behalf Of R Dicaire > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:12 PM > To: netmgr@csc.fi > Cc: comp-protocols-dns-bind@isc.org > Subject: Re: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27 >=20 > On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 05:37, netmgr@csc.fi wrote: >=20 > > I had problems running chrooted bind9.3 with ipv6 on Redhat9.=20 > > I had to add --disable-getifaddrs for ipv6 to work. My=20 > named.conf has > > 'listen-on-v6 {v6:addres;};'. I also had to 'mount proc=20 > $CHROOTDIR/proc" > > so that bind could read /proc/net/if_inet6 and also needed to have > > 'mknod $CHROOT/dev/random c 1 8' to have random for named inside the > > chroot. >=20 > Mounting proc in the CHROOT did it, bind now listens on ipv6=20 > interface. > Thank you very much! >=20 >=20 >=20 ...

Re: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27 #8
> * Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>: > > Complain to the Linux IPv6 stack developers. Every other OS > > extended their sysctl()/ioctl() methods of interface scanning. > > Linux is the only platform where the developers felt the need > > to do this through the file system. > > Where's the problem with using getaddrinfo(3) to get the IP list? I think you meant getifaddrs(3). getifaddrs(3) is a wrapper around socket(2), sysctl(2), ioctl(2), close(2) and now open(2) and read(2). It was designed to hide the OS specific details from application developers. named uses getifaddrs(3) if it is available and it supports IPv6. Otherwise we do it the hard way. getifaddrs(3) won't save you if the IPv6 stack developers havn't provided a non file system method to get the interface addresses. AFAIK the only way to get the list of interface addresses under Linux is to use the file system either directly or via getifaddrs(3). Mark > Best regards, > Daniel > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org * Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>: > >> * Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>: >> > Complain to the Linux IPv6 stack developers. Every other OS >> > extended their sysctl()/ioctl() methods of interface scanning. >> >...

Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] -new !
Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] -new ! If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up with anything ...., and for 14,000 more reasons, please send e-mail, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr, tel2003@pathfinder.gr, astra35@pathfinder.gr, ...

Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs]
Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] - new ! If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up with anything ...., and for 14,000 more reasons, please send e-mail, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr, tel2003@pathfinder.gr, astra35@pathfinder.gr, TEL <tel4@ath.forthnet.gr> wrote: > Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat > Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] - > new ! > If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up ...

Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs]
Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] - new ! If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up with anything ...., and for 14,000 more reasons, please send e-mail, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr, tel2003@pathfinder.gr, astra35@pathfinder.gr, ...

Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs]
Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] - new ! If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up with anything ...., and for 14,000 more reasons, please send e-mail, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr, tel2003@pathfinder.gr, astra35@pathfinder.gr, On 29 Nov 2003 04:26:12 -0800, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr (TEL) wrote: > Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot .... what??? is 'Red Hot' [sic] a new distro? .. -- /// Michael J. Tobler: motorcyclist, surfer, skydiver, \\\ \\\ and author: "...

Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs]
Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] - new ! If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up with anything ...., and for 14,000 more reasons, please send e-mail, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr, tel2003@pathfinder.gr, astra35@pathfinder.gr, ...

Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs]
Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] - new ! If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up with anything ...., and for 14,000 more reasons, please send e-mail, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr, tel2003@pathfinder.gr, astra35@pathfinder.gr, ...

Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs]
Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] - new ! If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up with anything ...., and for 14,000 more reasons, please send e-mail, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr, tel2003@pathfinder.gr, astra35@pathfinder.gr, ########################################################################## # Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: cola@stump.algebra.com # # PLEASE remember a short description of the software and the LOCATION. # # This group is archive...

Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] -new !
Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] -new ! If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up with anything ...., and for 14,000 more reasons, please send e-mail, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr, tel2003@pathfinder.gr, astra35@pathfinder.gr, ...

Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] -new !
Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] -new ! If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up with anything ...., and for 14,000 more reasons, please send e-mail, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr, tel2003@pathfinder.gr, astra35@pathfinder.gr, ...

Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] -new !
Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] -new ! If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up with anything ...., and for 14,000 more reasons, please send e-mail, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr, tel2003@pathfinder.gr, astra35@pathfinder.gr, ...

Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] -new !
Red Hot Linux v9.0 [2 DVDs]. Red Hot Linux v9.0 [3 CDs]. Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v3.0 REPACK [4 CDs]. Mandrake Linux 9.2 [3 CDs] -new ! If you have Googled your butt off, and haven't come up with anything ...., and for 14,000 more reasons, please send e-mail, tel4@ath.forthnet.gr, tel2003@pathfinder.gr, astra35@pathfinder.gr, ...

9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27
Hi, I've compiled 9.3.0 on a slackware 9.1 box running 2.4.27 kernel. My configure line is: ../configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --with-openssl=/usr/local/ssl --enable-threads --enable-ipv6 --enable-getifaddrs Bind compiles fine, but when I start it, it doesn't listen on the specified ipv6 address set in named.conf listen-on-v6 directive. 9.3.0beta4 seemed to work fine, and would bind to the specific ipv6 interface, but the final release of this version that I compiled seems to just ignore listen-on-v6 altogether, no errors, nothing. options { directory "/etc/named"; listen-on { 68.47.208.78; 192.168.1.1; }; pid-file "/etc/named/named.pid"; allow-recursion { 192.168.1.0/24; ! 0.0.0.0; }; listen-on-v6 { 3ffe:401d:202b::1000; }; }; Oct 19 15:35:41 rdb named[8528]: starting BIND 9.3.0 -u daemon -t /var/named Oct 19 15:35:41 rdb named[8528]: found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread Oct 19 15:35:41 rdb named[8533]: loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf' Oct 19 15:35:41 rdb named[8533]: listening on IPv4 interface eth0, 68.47.208.78#53 Oct 19 15:35:41 rdb named[8533]: listening on IPv4 interface eth1, 192.168.1.1#53 Oct 19 15:35:41 rdb named[8533]: command channel listening on 192.168.1.1#953 Did I miss something, or is this a legitimate bug? > Hi, I've compiled 9.3.0 on a slackware 9.1 box running 2.4.27 kernel. > My ...

TRSDOS II, version 4.2.0, 4.2.2, 4.2.4, 4.2.6 (or 4.3.x or 4.4)
Hi, Group I require a copy of the above DOS, but I need it _on disk_ as I do not have an emulator for the Model II that must be tested. Is there any possible sources of the OS on disk, or can you advise if the original 8" drive can be hooked to another device so that I can transfer an electronic copy to the disk to boot the machine? What other options do I have? Thanks L replying to my own post :-) I found an article here (http://www.tim-mann.org/trs80resources.html) where Tim describes a trick to rescue a disk's contents. This should be a workable solution...

RE: [wx 2.4.2, WinXP SP 1, Dev-Cpp 4.9.8.10 bundle, gcc 3.2, MySQ L 4.0.20a-nt ] wxDbTable::Update()-ing PK field ?
> I have a table with single smallint PRIMARY KEY field, but it > is not AUTO_INCREMENT. wxDbTable::Update() works if any other > field has been changed. If PRIMARY KEY field has been > changed, nothing happens. The samples\db app has always allowed the primary key (a string field) to be modified. Do you maybe have a foreign key setup referencing this column also? Could you capture the SQL statement that the class is creating, and then what the native error text is that is being returned, and post that in a reply? Maybe the statement itself is being crea...

Re: Performance of Bind 9.2.3 vs BIND 4.8.3 #2
>>>>> "nishant" == nishant <nishant80@gmail.com> writes: nishant> But still i need to show that 'performance' wise BIND 9 nishant> is better than BIND 4. My previous posting did that. nishant> Can u please help me in deciding what kind of tests nishant> should i really be doing to show that BIND 9 'performs' nishant> better (or much better, as you say) than BIND 4? Look, stop wasting your time on this pointless make-work exercise. BIND4 is DEAD. Nobody should be running it. Consult the list archives about this, probably from around 2000. There have been plenty of statements about the expiration of BIND4. Tell your users and management that BIND4 is well beyond end-of-life and has to be replaced with BIND9. If they insist on continuing to run dead code, get them to put that in writing and agree that they, not you, will be held responsible for all the consequences of that action: security holes, no support, no understanding of new DNS protocol features, increased maintenance & administraton costs, etc, etc. In terms of raw throughput BIND9 will always be slower than BIND4, all other things being equal. That's because BIND9 uses more complex data structures and is paranoid about error checking. However that performance penalty is not noticeable in normal operations. I doubt if anyone at your organisation would be able to tell the difference between the re...

100% cpu on linux bind 9.3.0 AND 9.2.4
I am running a bind server on a new linux server. It is a EMT P4 box from Dell running Redhat Enterprise 3.0 64bit. I complied with -O3 and -O2, with and without threads(but it didn't seem to matter) and both current bind9 trees. I was running on a Ultra10 with solaris 8, and even though it was 1/6th the machine it was around 60% cpu. On the linux box I get 100% usage and I can't figure it out. I don't have signed zones/queries but I do have some dynamic zones and 2 views. There isn't much in the logs other than the usual denied updates from clients. Tcpdump doesn't show much in the way of traffic either. rndc status doesn't indicate any large number of recursive queries or anything and I am stumped. Any ideas? -- Robert Weber, UnixOps/ITS UCB "It was like the Manifest Destiny all over again, except, instead of taking and consuming everything in their paths for God, they did so with the same fervor and sense of entitlement for their new god... themselves. Buy, take, break, throw it away." --FIF "American Kryptonite" ...

Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS #3
"Mokwena Motseto" <MotsetM@sapo.co.za> wrote: >Hi > >Sorry for the misunderstanding > >I was not looking for support, I was just asking from people, who have >been in the same situation that I am in now > >What influenced their decision to choose what ever they chose to go >with My feeling from reading postings on this list for a number of years is that most people who are currently using BIND will stick with BIND. In general, there is a mistrust of MS code. There were interoperability problems with BIND and MS W2k DNS a few years ago, but I have experienced no major problems since August 2002, when MS resolved my last major problem. I use MS W2k+3 DNS mainly for the AD-related zones, where I want the AD-integrated security of the DDNS. I do have one forward zone and its five reverse zones on the MS DNS Server, all under the control of a MS DHCP Server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Barry S. Finkel Computing and Instrumentation Solutions Division Argonne National Laboratory Phone: +1 (630) 252-7277 9700 South Cass Avenue Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-4601 Building 222, Room D209 Internet: BSFinkel@anl.gov Argonne, IL 60439-4828 IBMMAIL: I1004994 ...

Web resources about - RE: 9.3.0 and ipv6 on linux 2.4.27 #4 - comp.protocols.dns.bind

Linux - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the operating system. For the kernel, see Linux kernel . For other uses, see Linux (disambiguation) . and video game consoles ...

Linux - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the operating system. For the kernel, see Linux kernel . For other uses, see Linux (disambiguation) . The development of ...

Linux - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the operating system. For the kernel, see Linux kernel . For other uses, see Linux (disambiguation) . and video game consoles ...

Linux - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the operating system. For the kernel, see Linux kernel . For GNU package based on Linux kernel, see GNU Linux-libre . For ...

Linux Mint hit by malware infection on its website, forum after hack attack
(credit: Wired UK/Shuttershock) Linux Mint forum users, and anyone who downloaded and installed a copy of the 17.3 Cinnamon edition on Saturday ...

TED 2016: Linux founder not a 'people person'
Linus Torvalds, head of Linux, gives a rare and open interview at the TED conference in Vancouver.

Warning! Linux Mint hacked and ISO image compromised
Linux Mint is one of the best distos around, but if you’ve installed it recently you might have done so using a compromised ISO image. The Linux ...

IDG Contributor Network: 9 Really Odd Linux Commands
You can probably make your Unix systems hum deliver great performance, withstand threats to file system integrity, resist hacker attacks, report ...

Linux Mint hacked: Compromised data up for sale, ISO downloads backdoored
On Saturday, Linux Mint disclosed that someone had compromised their website and made changes to links in order to direct users to malicious ...

Hackers compromised Linux Mint's install files
Some Linux fans just got a hard lesson about the importance of double-checking install files. The Linux Mint team is warning users that hackers ...

Resources last updated: 2/24/2016 12:19:39 AM