f



Re: BIND 9.4.x vs 9.6.x - pid-file check and creation #4

Looking at the publically available parts of SunSolve there are at least
bug reports about it.

Requires Support Contract tmp_mkdir()/xmemfs_mkdir() inconsistent with other xxxfs_mkdir() functions.  |  Open in a new window
bug 6253984
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6253984-1 - Sep 10, 2007
 
Requires Support Contract tmp_mkdir()/xmemfs_mkdir() inconsistent with other xxxfs_mkdir() functions.  |  Open in a new window
bug 2152581
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-2152581-1 - Sep 10, 2007 
I don't have a copy of the POSIX standard that covers mkdir(2) to
see what it has to say about it.  Historically however EACCES on
search failure,  EEXIST if the file/directory exists, then EACCES on
parent directory write permissions was the error determination order.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
0
Mark
1/27/2009 2:35:21 PM
comp.protocols.dns.bind 16245 articles. 1 followers. Post Follow

0 Replies
677 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 26

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

bind 9.4 and bind 9.5 works in BSD/OS 4.3.X
Found the answer and any early OS should adapt the following: Check to see if you have an /etc/login.conf file If so check for any parameter that has openfiles-cur Set to 1024 or higher and that should get bind 9.4 + working . -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising! http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630 Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010 ...

Re: nsupdate strangeness v 9.2.3 vs. 9.3.x / 9.4.x
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Greetings, > > The setting behind: > > My DNS server runs server software isc-bind with version 9.4.x (the most > recent version). > > My dial up host runs bind v 9.2.3 and the nsupdate program coming with it. > When trying to use the 9.4.x (or 9.3.x) distribution and the nsupdate > program coming with it, I am experiencing the following problem for quite a > while now. When I try to update my zone entry > > nsupdate -d -k $KEY > >server $SERVER > >zone $ZON...

Re: BIND 9.4.x and check-names
Pklzbid0IGl0IHRpbWUgdG8gdXBncmFkZT8NCg0KWWVzLCBpdCBpcy4gSW4gZmFjdCwgYWRkaW5n IHRoZXNlIHN0YXRlbWVudHMgdG8gdGhlIG9wdGlvbnMgY2xhdXNlIGlzIGluIHByZXBhcmF0aW9u IGZvciBvdXIgbWlncmF0aW9uIHRvIGEgbGF0ZXIgdmVyc2lvbi4gDQpJdCBzZWVtcyBmcm9tIG15 IHRlc3RpbmcgdGhhdCB3aGlsZSBCSU5EIDkuNCB3YXMgdmVyeSBwYXNzaXZlIGFib3V0IHRoZXNl IHR5cGUgb2YgcmVjb3JkcywgYW5kIHdvdWxkIGxvYWQgYSB6b25lIGRlc3BpdGUgImlsbGVnYWwg Y2hhcnMiLCBsYXRlciB2ZXJzaW9ucyBvZiBCSU5EIHdvdWxkIGFjdHVhbGx5IGZhaWwgdG8gc3Rh cnQuIFRoaXMgaXMgYSBmdW5kYW1lbnRhbCBkaWZmZXJlbmNlIGJldHdlZW4gQklORCA5LjQgYW5k IDkuNy4zLCBmb3IgZXhhbXBsZS4NCkkgYW0gZGVhbGluZyB3aXRoIG...

nsupdate strangeness v 9.2.3 vs. 9.3.x / 9.4.x
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, The setting behind: My DNS server runs server software isc-bind with version 9.4.x (the most recent version). My dial up host runs bind v 9.2.3 and the nsupdate program coming with it. When trying to use the 9.4.x (or 9.3.x) distribution and the nsupdate program coming with it, I am experiencing the following problem for quite a while now. When I try to update my zone entry nsupdate -d -k $KEY >server $SERVER >zone $ZONE >update add @ $TTL2 A $IPADDR >send I allways get the error message client x...

RE: Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS
Hi Sorry for the misunderstanding I was not looking for support, I was just asking from people, who have been in the same situation that I am in now What influenced their decision to choose what ever they chose to go with -----Original Message----- From: bind-users-bounce@isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce@isc.org] On Behalf Of phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu Sent: 11 October 2004 21:21 To: comp-protocols-dns-bind@isc.org Subject: Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS Mokwena Motseto <MotsetM@sapo.co.za> wrote: > Hi > We are currently running BIND 4...

New Versions of BIND are available (9.9.4, 9.8.6, and 9.6-ESV-R10)
New versions of BIND are now available from http://www.isc.org/downloads See the messages in bind-announce announcing BIND 9.9.4, 9.8.6, and 9.6-ESV-R10 or read the release notes in the ISC Knowledge Base ( https://kb.isc.org/category/81/0/10/Software-Products/BIND9/Release-Notes/ ) for more info on the features, changes, and bug fixes included in the new releases. ...

Re: bind 9.6.0-P1's nsupdate dumps core on NetBSD/i386 4.x
In message <p05200f70c5d52b51dba3@[130.102.20.138]>, Ray Phillips writes: > I've built bind 9.6.0-P1 on NetBSD/i386 machines (versions 3.1, 4.0, > 4.0.1 and 5.0_RC2) and discovered that nsupdate dumps core on the 4.x > ones. > > The build process was just: > > % sh -c './configure --disable-threads > configure.log 2>&1' > % sh -c 'make > make.log 2>&1' > % su > Password: > # sh -c 'make install > make-install.log 2>&1' > # > > I've also tried without --disable-thr...

Re: bind 9.6.0-P1's nsupdate dumps core on NetBSD/i386 4.x #2
In message <p05200f72c5d61071b990@[130.102.20.138]>, Ray Phillips writes: > > You need to call gdb correctly. > > > > gdb /usr/local/bin/nsupdate nsupdate.core > > Thanks Mark. > > Sorry, I (obviously) don't have much of a clue about using gdb. Looks like you have hit this bug. 2547. [bug] openssl_link.c:mem_realloc() could reference an out-of-range area of the source buffer. New public function isc_mem_reallocate() was introduced to address this bug...

BIND 9.4.x and check-names
--_000_9496BCDD18FE8B49BB984508D9C40CBE0457BC37D9EXCNYSM95BABP_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good Morning, I recently implemented a change in our DNS environment with the intention o= f suppressing the log events related to AD-integrated zones, and their Non-= RFC compliant nature. In the global configuration I added the following statements: check-names slave ignore; check-names master ignore; Flushed & reloaded. However, I still see these entries appear in the logs. Could someone please= chime ...

Re: Bug... 4.x, 8.x ,9.x
At 12:52 AM 10/14/2004, Techie wrote: >As it says in the readme1st.txt file in the zip distro of Bind 9.3, drop >the bug rep's in here. > >Well here it goes. > > >1) The installer provides an option to Start service after finishing >install. Why? There are no config files done since they have to be built by >hand so hy even provide the option. It seems redundant. INstead there >should be a list on what files are required and what you need to add as >basic values. Then it would be more Windows friendly. When you are upgrading the version of BIN...

BIND 9.7.2-P3, 9.6.2-P3, 9.6-ESV-R3 and 9.4-ESV-R4 are now available
We've published four releases that contain various security and bug fixes. The detailed Security Advisories are located at: http://www.isc.org/advisories Guidance as to recommended upgrades are available at: http://www.isc.org/announcement/guidance-regarding-dec-1st-2010-security-advisories BIND 9.7.2-P3 Release Note http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.2-P3/RELEASE-NOTES-BIND-9.7.2-P3.txt BIND 9.6.2-P3 Release Note http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.6.2-P3/RELEASE-NOTES-BIND-9.6.2-P3.txt BIND 9.6-ESV-R3 Release Note http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.6-ESV-R3/RELEASE-NOTES-BIND-9.6-...

Re: Where is the log file of BIND 9.x.x located on Solaris10?
> Where is the log file of BIND 9.x.x located on Solaris10? The default logging is done to syslog. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org ...

Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS
bind-users-bounce@isc.org wrote on 10/11/2004 11:27:26 AM: [clip...] > > Do you know of any problems I might encounter if I migrate to BIND ver 9 > (latest) You should not have any problems. However, you should read all the docs that come with BIND 9. If you start with the "README" file you will find this statement: "If you are upgrading from BIND 8, please read the migration notes in doc/misc/migration. If you are upgrading from BIND 4, read doc/misc/migration-4to9." I highly recommend going through all of the docs before m...

Re: BIND 9.4.x empty zones
> I have been looking at the new "built-in empty zone" stuff in 9.4.x > (specific experiments with 9.4.2rc1), partly with a view to getting > our production 9.3.x setup in line so that the transition is not too > traumatic. Comparing them with the "server information" (class CHAOS) > "version.bind" zone and friends is also instructive. You may want to look at the draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones drafts and discussions in the dnsop working group. > Here is a summary of what I have found so far, with some questions > arising....

Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS #2
Mokwena Motseto <MotsetM@sapo.co.za> wrote: >> Do you know of any problems I might encounter if I migrate to Microsoft >> DNS I don't what version it is, or if it has versions at all phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu replied: > You won't get support from this forum :-) Sorry to disappoint Peter, but there have been discussions of the interaction between MS W2k (or W2k+3) DNS Server and BIND in the on this list (and on its now-defunct sister list bind9-users@isc.org). Check the list archives. Discussions of BIND interoperability with other DNS software is n...

Web resources about - Re: BIND 9.4.x vs 9.6.x - pid-file check and creation #4 - comp.protocols.dns.bind

Resources last updated: 2/13/2016 7:15:32 AM