bind 9.4 and bind 9.5 works in BSD/OS 4.3.X
Found the answer and any early OS should adapt the following:
Check to see if you have an /etc/login.conf file
If so check for any parameter that has openfiles-cur
Set to 1024 or higher and that should get bind 9.4 + working .
Member - Liberal International This is firstname.lastname@example.org Ici email@example.com
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010
...Re: nsupdate strangeness v 9.2.3 vs. 9.3.x / 9.4.x
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> The setting behind:
> My DNS server runs server software isc-bind with version 9.4.x (the most
> recent version).
> My dial up host runs bind v 9.2.3 and the nsupdate program coming with it.
> When trying to use the 9.4.x (or 9.3.x) distribution and the nsupdate
> program coming with it, I am experiencing the following problem for quite a
> while now. When I try to update my zone entry
> nsupdate -d -k $KEY
> >server $SERVER
> >zone $ZON...Re: Where is the log file of BIND 9.x.x located on Solaris10?
> Where is the log file of BIND 9.x.x located on Solaris10?
The default logging is done to syslog.
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
...Re: BIND 9.4.x and check-names
IDkuNy4zLCBmb3IgZXhhbXBsZS4NCkkgYW0gZGVhbGluZyB3aXRoIG...RE: Can I use bind 8.x conf files with bind 9.2.3?
Hi Bill Larson,
Many thanks for your response. Actually I didn't find any step by step
guide for the installation and configuration of BIND 9. I have managed
to install and configure Bind 9 with basic configuration but still a lot
more to do. If you can help me in this I shall be very thank full to
you. I use to get the following error for a zone file which is running
fine with bind 8. Also I have included the zone file and named.conf, so
that you can have a look not only on this error but also suggest me how
is my named.conf. Sorry for the long email.
--------------- Error wh...nsupdate strangeness v 9.2.3 vs. 9.3.x / 9.4.x
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
The setting behind:
My DNS server runs server software isc-bind with version 9.4.x (the most
My dial up host runs bind v 9.2.3 and the nsupdate program coming with it.
When trying to use the 9.4.x (or 9.3.x) distribution and the nsupdate
program coming with it, I am experiencing the following problem for quite a
while now. When I try to update my zone entry
nsupdate -d -k $KEY
>update add @ $TTL2 A $IPADDR
I allways get the error message
client x...Re: Can I use bind 8.x conf files with bind 9.2.3? #2
> Hi Bill Larson,
> Many thanks for your response. Actually I didn't find any step by step
> guide for the installation and configuration of BIND 9. I have managed
> to install and configure Bind 9 with basic configuration but still a lot
> more to do. If you can help me in this I shall be very thank full to
> you. I use to get the following error for a zone file which is running
> fine with bind 8. Also I have included the zone file and named.conf, so
> that you can have a look not only on this error but also suggest me how
> is my named.conf. S...RE: Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS
Sorry for the misunderstanding
I was not looking for support, I was just asking from people, who have
been in the same situation that I am in now
What influenced their decision to choose what ever they chose to go with
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On
Behalf Of firstname.lastname@example.org
Sent: 11 October 2004 21:21
Subject: Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS
Mokwena Motseto <MotsetM@sapo.co.za> wrote:
> We are currently running BIND 4...New Versions of BIND are available (9.9.4, 9.8.6, and 9.6-ESV-R10)
New versions of BIND are now available from http://www.isc.org/downloads
See the messages in bind-announce announcing BIND 9.9.4, 9.8.6,
and 9.6-ESV-R10 or read the release notes in the ISC Knowledge Base
for more info on the features, changes, and bug fixes included in the
...Re: bind 9.6.0-P1's nsupdate dumps core on NetBSD/i386 4.x
In message <email@example.com>, Ray Phillips writes:
> I've built bind 9.6.0-P1 on NetBSD/i386 machines (versions 3.1, 4.0,
> 4.0.1 and 5.0_RC2) and discovered that nsupdate dumps core on the 4.x
> The build process was just:
> % sh -c './configure --disable-threads > configure.log 2>&1'
> % sh -c 'make > make.log 2>&1'
> % su
> # sh -c 'make install > make-install.log 2>&1'
> I've also tried without --disable-thr...Re: bind 9.6.0-P1's nsupdate dumps core on NetBSD/i386 4.x #2
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Ray Phillips writes:
> > You need to call gdb correctly.
> > gdb /usr/local/bin/nsupdate nsupdate.core
> Thanks Mark.
> Sorry, I (obviously) don't have much of a clue about using gdb.
Looks like you have hit this bug.
2547. [bug] openssl_link.c:mem_realloc() could reference an
out-of-range area of the source buffer. New public
function isc_mem_reallocate() was introduced to address
this bug...No djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.bz2 file for GCC 4.9.3 / 5.1.0?
There is no djcross-gcc-x.x.x.tar.gz2 file for GCC 4.9.3 and 5.1.0 . In
There are only .rpm files. I have to use rpm2cpio to extract
But in directories for other versions :
http://www.delor...Where is the log file of BIND 9.x.x located on Solaris10?
Where is the log file of BIND 9.x.x located on Solaris10?
Steve Bby wrote:
> Where is the log file of BIND 9.x.x located on Solaris10?
...BIND 9.7.2-P3, 9.6.2-P3, 9.6-ESV-R3 and 9.4-ESV-R4 are now available
We've published four releases that contain various security and bug fixes.
The detailed Security Advisories are located at:
Guidance as to recommended upgrades are available at:
BIND 9.7.2-P3 Release Note
BIND 9.6.2-P3 Release Note
BIND 9.6-ESV-R3 Release Note
http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.6-ESV-R3/RELEASE-NOTES-BIND-9.6-...BIND 9.4.x and check-names
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I recently implemented a change in our DNS environment with the intention o=
f suppressing the log events related to AD-integrated zones, and their Non-=
RFC compliant nature.
In the global configuration I added the following statements:
check-names slave ignore;
check-names master ignore;
Flushed & reloaded.
However, I still see these entries appear in the logs. Could someone please=