f



Re: Number of CPUs detected by Bind 9.4.2 on 4 CPU system runningRedHat es 4.

> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 05:57:01PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > Adam Tkac writes:
> > [...] 
> > > After quick look into bind and glibc code /proc has to be mounted.
> > > named calls sysconf(3) function and internal glibc implementation
> > > looks like this:
> > [...]
> > 
> >  Not that I have looked at the code, but maybe bind should grab this info
> >  before dropping privileges and going to jail ...
> > 
> 
> Yes, this will be the best long term solution. I'm going to prepare
> simple patch to fix this problem.
> 
> Adam
> 
> -- 
> Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.

	/proc is also needed for IPv6 interface scanning.

	This is a design fault in Linux.
	The correct fix is to correct the design fault in the OS.

	Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org

0
Mark
4/1/2008 10:24:06 PM
comp.protocols.dns.bind 16245 articles. 1 followers. Post Follow

0 Replies
633 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 2

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS #2
Mokwena Motseto <MotsetM@sapo.co.za> wrote: >> Do you know of any problems I might encounter if I migrate to Microsoft >> DNS I don't what version it is, or if it has versions at all phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu replied: > You won't get support from this forum :-) Sorry to disappoint Peter, but there have been discussions of the interaction between MS W2k (or W2k+3) DNS Server and BIND in the on this list (and on its now-defunct sister list bind9-users@isc.org). Check the list archives. Discussions of BIND interoperability with other DNS software is n...

RE: Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS
Hi Sorry for the misunderstanding I was not looking for support, I was just asking from people, who have been in the same situation that I am in now What influenced their decision to choose what ever they chose to go with -----Original Message----- From: bind-users-bounce@isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce@isc.org] On Behalf Of phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu Sent: 11 October 2004 21:21 To: comp-protocols-dns-bind@isc.org Subject: Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS Mokwena Motseto <MotsetM@sapo.co.za> wrote: > Hi > We are currently running BIND 4...

Re: Can I have a HPUX bind 4.9.7 slaved to a Solaris bind 9.2.2 master ?
>>>>> "Terry" == Terry Pike <terry.j.pike@gsk.com> writes: Terry> I have a HPUX bind 4.9.7 master server that I want to Terry> convert to a slave server. I want to create a new master Terry> on Solaris bind 9.2.2. Terry> Question: will the V4.9.7 server accept zone transfers from Terry> V9.2.2 ?? Of course. Why shouldn't it? The zone transfer protocol hasn't changed. However BIND9 by default tries a more efficient data transfer scheme that long-dead stuff like BIND4 doesn't understand. This behaviour ...

RE: Bind is hanging on CentOS 4.4 #4
Good suggestion. I just tried that and re-ran the ./configure --disable-threads Then I killed the named pid and started named: ps -Leo user,pid,ppid,lstart,lwp,nlwp,psr,args |egrep "LWP|named" USER PID PPID STARTED LWP NLWP PSR COMMAND named 14671 1 Fri May 29 13:56:41 2009 14671 5 0 /usr/sbin/named -u named -t /var/named/chroot named 14671 1 Fri May 29 13:56:41 2009 14672 5 0 /usr/sbin/named -u named -t /var/named/chroot named 14671 1 Fri May 29 13:56:41 2009 14673 5 0 /usr/sbin/named -u named -t /var/name...

Re: BIND 9.4.2-P2-W1 stops responding #4
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Mark Andrews wrote: > > >> Yeah aint that a nice kickinthepants... Sorry no new bind for yous if > >> you arent made of moneybags and running the latest windoze! Guess we > >> will start looking at djbdns, it didnt have the bugs in the first > >> place. Or switch back to windozedns.. oh no.. did I say that?? > > > >> disgruntled_used_to_be_bind_user > > > > Firstly I don't call XP or W2K3 the lastest versions by any > > measure. There were some fixes that we would have liked ...

Bind 9.2.4 slaving problem [bind 9.2.1 and bind 8.3.3]
Greetings. I have a master name server running BIND 9.2.1 [Debian Woody - server not available on the Internet] and a slave server running bind 9.2.4 [Debian Sarge - not currently available on the Internet] and two others running bind 8.3.3 [Debian Woody - on the Internet]. The 9.2.1 is a master for all the others to slave from. I have an entry in a zone defined on the master as the following: > $ORIGIN example.com. > spamhaus-datafeed IN NS local-rbl-a > spamhaus-datafeed IN NS local-rbl-b When I issue the following command: #> host -t nx spam...

Transition from BIND 9.2.4 to 9.4.1P1
Hi Folks, I am running Solaris 10 and have successfully installed a newer version of BIND (9.4.1P1) from sunfreeware.com into /usr/local/sbin. I'm able to start it by typing: /usr/local/sbin/named -u root -c /etc/named.conf However, the default startup command svcadm enable dns/server starts up the "old" BIND in /usr/sbin/ How can I make this transition to the new version final? I'd like to also remove the old version, too, but I can't determine which package it was, in order to use pkgrm. I'd like the new version of BIND to load upon startup as well. Thanks for...

TRSDOS II, version 4.2.0, 4.2.2, 4.2.4, 4.2.6 (or 4.3.x or 4.4)
Hi, Group I require a copy of the above DOS, but I need it _on disk_ as I do not have an emulator for the Model II that must be tested. Is there any possible sources of the OS on disk, or can you advise if the original 8" drive can be hooked to another device so that I can transfer an electronic copy to the disk to boot the machine? What other options do I have? Thanks L replying to my own post :-) I found an article here (http://www.tim-mann.org/trs80resources.html) where Tim describes a trick to rescue a disk's contents. This should be a workable solution...

4:2:2 to 4:4:4 conversion
Hi, I have subsampled 4:4:4 image using 15-tap filter into 4:2:2 image. Now, in order to view 4:2:2 image, I need to convert it back into 4:4:4 image. I have repeated the chroma samples to create chroma values for alternate luma samples erstwhile without chroma. However, I am doubtful of the method. Do I need to interpolate to create the missing chroma samples? What is generally done in such a scenario?? Regards, Ajay "Ajay" <mishraka@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1113558255.605980.208160@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > Hi, > > I have subsampled 4:4:4 image ...

Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS
bind-users-bounce@isc.org wrote on 10/11/2004 11:27:26 AM: [clip...] > > Do you know of any problems I might encounter if I migrate to BIND ver 9 > (latest) You should not have any problems. However, you should read all the docs that come with BIND 9. If you start with the "README" file you will find this statement: "If you are upgrading from BIND 8, please read the migration notes in doc/misc/migration. If you are upgrading from BIND 4, read doc/misc/migration-4to9." I highly recommend going through all of the docs before m...

Does 4/2/2= (4/2)/2 =1 OR = 4/(2/2)=4
I don't have matlab and I am trying to translate some simple matlab code. Does 4/2/2 = (4/2)/2 = 1 or 4/2/2 = 4/(2/2) = 4 On 9/11/2012 9:43 AM, sarah.englander@gmail.com wrote: > I don't have matlab and I am trying to translate some simple matlab code. > > Does 4/2/2 = (4/2)/2 = 1 yes. At a given precedence level (and obviously two of the same operators are the same level) evaluation proceeds from LtoR. ....snip... <http://www.mathworks.com/help/techdoc/matlab_prog/f0-40063.html#f0-38155> -- dpb <none@non.net> wrote in message <...

Re: Performance of Bind 9.2.3 vs BIND 4.8.3 #2
>>>>> "nishant" == nishant <nishant80@gmail.com> writes: nishant> But still i need to show that 'performance' wise BIND 9 nishant> is better than BIND 4. My previous posting did that. nishant> Can u please help me in deciding what kind of tests nishant> should i really be doing to show that BIND 9 'performs' nishant> better (or much better, as you say) than BIND 4? Look, stop wasting your time on this pointless make-work exercise. BIND4 is DEAD. Nobody should be running it. Consult the list arch...

Re: Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS #3
"Mokwena Motseto" <MotsetM@sapo.co.za> wrote: >Hi > >Sorry for the misunderstanding > >I was not looking for support, I was just asking from people, who have >been in the same situation that I am in now > >What influenced their decision to choose what ever they chose to go >with My feeling from reading postings on this list for a number of years is that most people who are currently using BIND will stick with BIND. In general, there is a mistrust of MS code. There were interoperability problems with BIND and MS W2k DNS a few years ag...

bind 9.4 and bind 9.5 works in BSD/OS 4.3.X
Found the answer and any early OS should adapt the following: Check to see if you have an /etc/login.conf file If so check for any parameter that has openfiles-cur Set to 1024 or higher and that should get bind 9.4 + working . -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising! http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630 Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010 ...

Re: BSD/OS 4.2 and Bind 8.4.1 #2
> > > > Hi, > > > > Hadn't this been fixed in 8.3.2? > > It is fixed in 8.4.2 (out shortly). > > Index: bind8/src/port/bsdos/include/port_after.h > diff -u bind8/src/port/bsdos/include/port_after.h:1.38 bind8/src/port/bsdos/include/port_after.h:1.40 > --- bind8/src/port/bsdos/include/port_after.h:1.38 Mon Apr 28 21:58:56 2003 > +++ bind8/src/port/bsdos/include/port_after.h Thu Sep 4 13:51:22 2003 > Thank you. Seems to compile fine. Looks like the most current Bind9 compiles fine. Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc. ...

RE: Bind is hanging on CentOS 4.4 #2
Here is the output from ps -eLf ps -eLf | grep named named 32231 1 32231 0 7 May26 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/named -u named -t /var/named/chroot named 32231 1 32232 0 7 May26 ? 00:15:04 /usr/sbin/named -u named -t /var/named/chroot named 32231 1 32236 0 7 May26 ? 00:15:04 /usr/sbin/named -u named -t /var/named/chroot named 32231 1 32237 0 7 May26 ? 00:14:58 /usr/sbin/named -u named -t /var/named/chroot named 32231 1 32238 0 7 May26 ? 00:15:06 /usr/sbin/named -u named -t /var/named/chroot named ...

[bind-users]Up-gradation of Bind 8.2.2 to Bind 9 on AIX 4.3.3
Hello, I have installed Bind 8.2.2 on AIX 4.3.3. Now we want to up-grade it to Bind9. Pl. Anyone know , how to up-grade Bind 8.2.2 to Bind 9 on AIX 4.3.3. ?? regards, Network Admin GNFC Ltd. India Ph: 91 79 26854515 postmaster@gnvfc.net wrote: > Hello, > I have installed Bind 8.2.2 on AIX 4.3.3. Now we want to up-grade it to Bind9. Pl. Anyone know , how to up-grade Bind 8.2.2 to Bind 9 on AIX 4.3.3. ?? > regards, > Network Admin > GNFC Ltd. > India > Ph: 91 79 26854515 Get the source from isc.org, unpack, read the documentation and go ahead. ...

Migration from BIND 4.9 to 9.2 or Microsoft DNS #2
Hi We are currently running BIND 4.9 and we are under pressure to migrate at least to version 8 or 9 But there is a possibility of moving to a microsoft DNS on windows 2003 Our ISP's who host secondary zones for our domains are running BIND ver 9 What I want you guys to help me out with is the following Do you know of any problems I might encounter if I migrate to BIND ver 9 (latest) Do you know of any problems I might encounter if I migrate to Microsoft DNS I don't what version it is, or if it has versions at all Mokwena Motseto ...

Number of CPU detected by Bind 9.4.0
Hello, I have just installed the new version of bind 9.4.0 on my HP-DL360G4which have 2 CPU working with multithreading enabled but it seems bind does not detect correctly the number of CPU. I compiled it with the --enable-threads flag and launched it with the -n 4 flag and actually here is what appears in the log: Mar 6 15:10:35 xxxx named[325]: found 1 CPU, using 4 worker threads so i decided to have a look in the source code to see how is detected this number of CPU and i found in lib/isc/unix/os.c that bind is using the following function to get it 34: sysconf((_SC_NPROCE...

Can I have a HPUX bind 4.9.7 slaved to a Solaris bind 9.2.2 master ?
I have a HPUX bind 4.9.7 master server that I want to convert to a slave server. I want to create a new master on Solaris bind 9.2.2. Question: will the V4.9.7 server accept zone transfers from V9.2.2 ?? Terry Pike <terry.j.pike@gsk.com> wrote: > I have a HPUX bind 4.9.7 master server that I want to convert to a > slave server. I want to create a new master on Solaris bind 9.2.2. > Question: will the V4.9.7 server accept zone transfers from V9.2.2 ?? A better question : why don't you upgrade to bind 9.2.3 ? -- Peter H�kanson IPSec...

Re: Are underscores no longer supported in Bind 9.4? #4
> On 3/4/07, Danny Mayer <mayer@ntp.isc.org> wrote: > > CNAME's point to hostnames and therefore must follow the same rules. Are > > you asking about the label of the CNAME record? It should be the same as > > it acts as a hostname for all purposes. If it doesn't complain then it's > > probably a bug. I didn't see anything in any of the RFC's that makes > > that explicit but it would make sense. > > Yeah, this appears to be a bug then. Both parts of the CNAME can have > an underscore and named-checkzone and named-c...

Re: Performance of Bind 9.2.3 vs BIND 4.8.3
>>>>> "nishant" == nishant <nishant80@gmail.com> writes: nishant> Hello All, I want to upgrade from BIND 4.8.3 to BIND 9.2.3. Don't even think about it, just do it! BIND4 is *dead*. nishant> I am using the above piece of code to send queries to: 1) nishant> A BIND 9.2.3 nameserver and, 2) A BIND 4.8.3 nameserver You'd be better off using queryperf in the BIND9 distribution for this sort of benchmarking. nishant> I took about 50 readings for both nameservers. The nishant> readings of this test reflect ...

Re: BIND 9.4.x vs 9.6.x
Looking at the publically available parts of SunSolve there are at least bug reports about it. Requires Support Contract tmp_mkdir()/xmemfs_mkdir() inconsistent with other xxxfs_mkdir() functions. | Open in a new window bug 6253984 http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6253984-1 - Sep 10, 2007 Requires Support Contract tmp_mkdir()/xmemfs_mkdir() inconsistent with other xxxfs_mkdir() functions. | Open in a new window bug 2152581 http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-2152581-1 - Sep 10, 2007 I don't have a copy of the POSIX standard tha...

Re: Too many open files Re: Patch 9.4.2->9.4.2-P1 breaking tcp-responder?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 05:26:24PM -0500, jbratton@rackspace.com wrote: > Quoting Thomas Jacob <jacob@internet24.de>: > >> That didn't seem to do it for us, the bind instance in question ran >> for about 38 hours and then it refused to accept tcp connections again. > > Did it actually start building up a lot of TCP connections in SYN_RECV > state again, or did it just crash? It didn't crash (it never did that for us yet), so it probably was the SYN_RECV situation, but I wasn't around myself for this particular incident... > You can fix that with ulimit. Check out ulimit -n to see how many open > files you currently allow, and try increasing it. I keep it set to 16384 > on my busier caches without any issues. Note that setting the limit with > ulimit won't be persistent, you will want to change Already did that. I simply put it into the startup scripts. And it looks like the upcoming fixes list seems to have several entries that could be related to this problem: http://www.isc.org/sw/bind/view/?release=9.4.2-P1#FIXES Question: Your initial response regarding not having any problems with a TCP queue size set to 1000, did you already have the increase in the open file limit in place when you tried this. Or rather, did you need to increase both the tcp queue size and the open file limit to get to stable situation? ...

Web resources about - Re: Number of CPUs detected by Bind 9.4.2 on 4 CPU system runningRedHat es 4. - comp.protocols.dns.bind

Resources last updated: 2/17/2016 10:39:32 PM