|
|
GPS mask angle
Hi,
The GPS receiver I'm using (an Oncore M12+) has a mask angle setting, by
default 10 degrees.
The antenna is at an altitude of about 600ft with a clear view of the
pacific ocean, is there any advantage or disadvantage for timing purposes
to lowering the mask angle to 0?
thanks,
dave c
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
David
|
1/25/2004 3:32:25 AM |
|
David Cornejo <dave@dogwood.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> The GPS receiver I'm using (an Oncore M12+) has a mask angle setting, by
> default 10 degrees.
> The antenna is at an altitude of about 600ft with a clear view of the
> pacific ocean, is there any advantage or disadvantage for timing purposes
> to lowering the mask angle to 0?
All you can add doing this is bad measurements due
to the huge uncertainty on ionospheric delays.
Stick to 10, or even go up to 15.
-- francois meyer
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
fm
|
1/25/2004 10:51:54 AM
|
|
David Cornejo <dave@dogwood.com> wrote in message news:<mailman.55.1075002467.1757.questions@ntp.org>...
> Hi,
>
> The GPS receiver I'm using (an Oncore M12+) has a mask angle setting, by
> default 10 degrees.
>
> The antenna is at an altitude of about 600ft with a clear view of the
> pacific ocean, is there any advantage or disadvantage for timing purposes
> to lowering the mask angle to 0?
>
> thanks,
> dave c
David,
The signals from low-elevation satellites will traverse more metres of
atmosphere, so the ionosphere and troposphere propagation corrections
may be less accurate.
Paul
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Paul
|
1/26/2004 11:06:48 AM
|
|
|
2 Replies
600 Views
(page loaded in 0.043 seconds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|