M$ problem.

  • Follow


This is most likely a dumb question but here goes.  I'm trying to sync
my window XP workstation and Windows 2000/2003 with my ntp server that
I have setup on a RedHat AS3 server.  I can sync my Netware server
with it no problem.  I can't get anything M$ to sync with it.  Ideas? 
I've kept the /etc/ntp.conf file simple with no restrict statements
(until I have things working) and I've commented out the 'restrict
default ignore' statement.  I tried a packet capture and I get the
following...
 
15:25:07.709086 blah.edu.ntp > blah2.edu.ntp: [udp sum ok]  v3
sym_act strat 0 poll 4 prec -6 dist 0.093719 disp 16.000000 ref
(unspec)@3295264256.578125000 orig 0.000000000 rec -0.000000000 xmt
-999684189.859375000 (ttl 128, id 50417, len 76)
15:25:07.709299 blah2.edu.ntp > blah.edu.ntp: [udp sum ok]  v3
sym_pas strat 2 poll 4 prec -17 dist 0.101898 disp 0.074523 ref
NAVOBS1.MIT.EDU@3295283001.341322988 orig 3295283106.140625000 rec
+1.568633019 xmt +1.568656027 (DF) [tos 0x10]  (ttl 64, id 298, len
76)
 
 
Is there anything else that I could include that would help people
give me some ideas?  Like I said, my NW and other RedHat servers sync
just fine with it.   Thanks in advace!
 

 
0
Reply Chad 6/3/2004 8:31:43 PM

Chad Miller wrote:

> This is most likely a dumb question but here goes.  I'm trying to sync
> my window XP workstation and Windows 2000/2003 with my ntp server that
> I have setup on a RedHat AS3 server.  I can sync my Netware server
> with it no problem.  I can't get anything M$ to sync with it.  Ideas?
> I've kept the /etc/ntp.conf file simple with no restrict statements
> (until I have things working) and I've commented out the 'restrict
> default ignore' statement.  I tried a packet capture and I get the
> following...

Please have a look at my posting in thread "w32time service" of May, 27.

Martin
-- 
Martin Burnicki

Meinberg Funkuhren
Bad Pyrmont
Germany
0
Reply Martin 6/4/2004 12:55:44 PM


1 Replies
125 Views

(page loaded in 0.039 seconds)

Similiar Articles:













7/17/2012 7:12:21 AM


Reply: